Your Mom (non-competing), 331 bytes
Decode the string and decompress it using the Jelly compressor
'IF8KfCgpL1z/AQAAAQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEREREAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQIwMAAwMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQREREVAAAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAwMjAxEDAwEREBERABERABAAEAABEREAAREQAREwMQAREQARETAyMAEVMDYBADABBzABBzAwMDADABEVBgEANhEVA...
What is wrong with this regex?! `(?:(?:"(?:[^"\\]|\\.)*")|(?:[]?\d+(?:\.\d*)?(?:e[-+]?\d+)?)|(?:[a-zA-Z_]\w*)|(?:\+)|(?:\-)|(?:\*)|(?:\/)|(?:%)|(?:\^)|(?:(?<!=)=(?!=))|(?:!=)|(?:==)|(?:\>)|(?:\<)|(?:,)|(?:\|)|(?:\()|(?:\))|(?:\{)|(?:\})|(?:\[)|(?:\])|(?:\n+)|(?:\s+)|(?:\#\#.*)|(?:.))`
corollary to that being if i (the owner) tell you that you can't login to my website even if you have the means to it's still a federal crime. I don't have to lock out your account or anything
Basically, the issue is really more that an employee A was fired by company X, and used the password of employee B (with B's permission) to get access to data that employee A previously owned, before they were fired.
Meme: jQuery
Originator: Unknown (possibly Ólafur Waage)
Cultural Height: TBD
Background: A Stack Overflow-centric meme, jQuery began its career early on as the answer to beat for any question that even remotely referenced JavaScript. Its popularity became so great that eventually jQuery becam...
Your Mom (non-competing), 331 bytes
Decode the string and decompress it using the Jelly compressor
'IF8KfCgpL1z/AQAAAQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEREREAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQIwMAAwMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQREREVAAAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAwMjAxEDAwEREBERABERABAAEAABEREAAREQAREwMQAREQARETAyMAEVMDYBADABBzABBzAwMDADABEVBgEANhEVA...
@Poke No, it's not. If I give you a key to my house (a password), and you give that key to someone else (share it), and they use it to enter my house, that's unauthorized entry and could be punishable as a crime. Same here.
If you look at it the other way, a ruling that the employee can give their password to whomever they want, and those people can access whatever resources they want, and it's all authorized ... that's completely absurd
@Mego Asking people to test your chatbot isn't an unreasonable request, he's not begging or demanding people test it for him. He can't test it himself anyway because it's running on his account. It's also not like he's going off-topic, I and many others have discussed chatbots and requested for help in here, and if one or two messages annoys you so much then feel free to ignore them rather than being impolite to zyabin :/
@Poke So you're arguing that if I give Downgoat a password to access a system that I own, and Downgoat gives that password to you so you can access it, that's legitimate? (not to pick on Downgoat, just choosing a name)
In this case it appears you're completely restricted to the client-side so you don't have very many options. In the case you do own the server, adding this one header will fix it (but avoid using wildcard for security reasons):
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
CORS (cross-origin resource sharing) exists for security reasons preventing a malicious website from submitting a request to, for example your bank account page, and extracting sensitive data from there. [read more here](en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-origin_policy)
Ugh, users who just PrtScn their entire (3-monitor-wide) desktop and submit that in saying "I got this error message" are frustrating ... I mean, yes, I'm glad you submitted a screenshot, props for that, but maybe try not submitting a 10MB BMP file next time.
@CᴏɴᴏʀO'Bʀɪᴇɴ should functionized operators allow whitespace between them? Like ( + ) or should it be in the form of (+)? The latter is faster, less prone to error and all.
@Poke Uh, yeah. That's kinda the definition of trespass. From the Law portion of the Free Dictionary -- entering another person's property without permission of the owner or his/her agent and without lawful authority (like that given to a health inspector) and causing any damage, no matter how slight
No, I did not make Downgoat an agent by allowing him access. He can't enter a business deal, make legal decisions, etc., simply because he has a password. Otherwise, everyone and their dog would be agents of Gmail or Facebook, and that's absurd.
Alice could authorize Bob to do X and Y, but not authorize him to authorize Calvin to do the same. I'm not sure how much of the discussion here is due to this detail.
In this scenario if Alice doesn't want Calvin to have access, it's Bob's fault for giving Calvin access or Alice's fault for not having a better method for determining who has access
@TimmyD I'm not saying you can't talk about it in here, I just figured I'd point out that it's dominating the discussion, which IMO is fine because no one else seems to be talking about anything more relevant at the moment.
let DATA;
if (commander.idkhowtocallit) {
DATA = commander.args[0];
} else {
fs.readFile(commander.args[0], "utf-8", (err, data) => {
if (err) {
console.log("y u do dis ;_; y u given me a unexistant file \u0CA0_\u0CA0");
process.exit(1);
}
DATA = data;
});
}
I think El has it, though (can I abbreviate El'endia to that?). Just because Alice authorized Bob to access the system, doesn't automatically imply that Alice authorized Bob to authorize Calvin.
"White Rabbit" is a song written by Grace Slick, and recorded by the American psychedelic rock band Jefferson Airplane for their 1967 album, Surrealistic Pillow. It was released as a single and became the band's second top ten success, peaking at number eight on the Billboard Hot 100. The song was ranked number 478 on Rolling Stones list of the 500 Greatest Songs of All Time, Number 87 on Rate Your Music's Top Singles of All Time, and appears on The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame's 500 Songs that Shaped Rock and Roll.
== History ==
“White Rabbit” was written and performed by Grace Slick while she was...