« first day (1602 days earlier)      last day (3413 days later) » 

6:00 PM
On the other hand, I'll note that (one interpretation of) those courses seem to be at a wide difference of 'level'. I won't note anything about this note, I'll just note it.
 
@MikeMiller "For an average student in their fourth semester" might be better, although still not good.
 
LEL at "I won't note anything about this note, I'll just note it."
 
Depends on what you mean by an average student. The average over all math students I've encountered couldn't handle anything close to that.
 
I think measure theory and manifolds vastly differ from number theory.
 
@Alexander I prefer algebrastuff, but its ok.
 
6:01 PM
So the course is not quite "homogeneous".
 
Nor should a choice of study be homogeneous...
@AlexanderGruber he caught on!
 
I study homogeneously, @MikeM
 
@MikeMiller Blame the illuminati :-X
 
Case in point, @BalarkaSen
 
@MikeMiller By average math student I mean willing to work 50+ hours a week and mostly gets A's or B's.
Maybe there's a difference in workethic between the countries.
 
6:03 PM
That does not sound like the average math student. Anyway, I don't think I will be able to tell you whether or not you could handle it no matter how much detail you gave me - this is a question for somebody who knows you well.
(If you are talking about yourself.)
 
@AlexanderGruber In this case there is also a potential answer (without steps, just a numerical value) in the question. Should anything be done about that?
 
If there were a wide array of courses I wanted to take, but was worried I would not be able to handle all of them, I would sign up for them and then drop one if I decided it added too much work for too little gain.
 
@epimorphic There isn't really anything that can be done. If I delete that, then those who saw it before it was deleted will have an advantage in the contest
All I can do is prevent further answers from being posted
 
r9m
@AndrewThompson wow .. that's not average man ! Thats a good student !! :D
 
@TedShifrin
 
6:05 PM
I see.
 
is someone scratching at the door?
 
scratches
 
@AndrewThompson Honestly in my experience @AndrewThompson the "willing to work" part is contingent upon how much you hate what you're doing. I would never be able to take even 2 of those courses at once.
 
@TedShifrin you still have me on ignore?
 
But give me 4 comparable difficulty courses in the disciplines I like and I'd be doin great
It really depends on you man
 
6:06 PM
You're provisionally off ignore, @Balarka ...
 
OH MAN
 
Maybe we should trade off, @Ted.
 
That was unexpected.
 
@AlexanderGruber It hasn't worked yet.
 
What are your four courses, @AndrewT?
 
6:06 PM
@JorgeFernández what?
 
@MikeMiller maybe not if I successfully compute $\pi_1$ of hopf knot complement?
 
7 mins ago, by Andrew Thompson
Complex functions, measure theory, manifolds and number theory. Is that a manageable courseload for someone in their fourth semester?
 
@AlexanderGruber you know
 
I believe this question now has ben reworded to fit our rules math.stackexchange.com/questions/1079010/… but we need another reopen vote
 
Fourth semester of graduate school or fourth semester of undergraduate?
 
6:07 PM
I would have voted to close that in its curent state, @KristofferRyhl, and indeed I will if it's reopened.
 
Now @Balarka is doing topology I have long since forgotten.
 
@JorgeFernández Hahaha. Oh, yeah. What a shame.
 
I am doing algebraic topology @Ted
 
No, he's doing topology you helped me on before I took my quals.
 
It's great stuff.
 
6:08 PM
So I see, @Balarka ... The complement of the Hopf link I can do, because I see that very concretely in $\Bbb R^3$. Do you?
 
r9m
LOL :P that's a good one ! :D
 
Especially since you know what a knot is now, @BalarkaSen.
 
@TedShifrin I have ideas.
If you're going to listen, I can explain my ideas.
 
@Mike: I remember very little these days. Barely my name. The retirement letter is written.
 
@Ted Unrelatedly, I was at a gay italian birthday party the other night. It was fabulous.
 
6:09 PM
Alzheimer, @Ted.
 
Nice, @Mike. Invite me next year :P
 
Maybe you should move to Palm Springs instead of San Diego... if you can handle the heat.
(Some like it hot, you know.)
 
Ugh, NO.
 
That's where I am right now :)
Winter is a great time to be here.
 
@TedShifrin here are my ideas
 
6:11 PM
Have you read about the Wirtinger presentation for $\pi_1(S^3-K)$, @Balarka?
 
I dunno what a wirtinger presentation is
i am doing it from scratch.
 
So you weren't listening when I told you about it?
 
What is the $z$ plane, @Balarka?
 
evening
 
heya @DanielRust
 
6:13 PM
The one represented by the ideal $\langle z \rangle$, @Ted, of course
 
smacks @Mike
 
Oh, most of us would call that the $xy$-plane.
 
@TedShifrin The $xy$ plane.
OK, jinx.
Hullo @DanielRust
 
Did someone delete my comment in this question? math.stackexchange.com/questions/1078971/…?
 
@Balarka: My suggestion is to pick the most convenient locations for the two "circles." In particular, let one of them go through the point at $\infty$, so you have just ... um ... the $z$-axis.
BTW, @Mike, was it a gay Italian's birthday, or an Italian party? :D
 
6:14 PM
did you see all of my approach?
 
He's doing the complement in $\Bbb R^3$, which is a little more complicated.
 
It was a gay Italian's birthday, taking the form of an Italian party, populated by gay Italians.
I think I counted once, and the ratios were 20.5:2.5.
 
Very cool, @Mike :) I imagine your Italian improved.
 
@r9m You spend too much effort on making them good questions, that makes you lose all the pity-upvotes.
 
6:15 PM
Ratios?
 
Hello @Ted.
 
Yes, I learned how to say Grazzi.
 
@MikeMiller you can just use Van Kampen to show that $\pi_1(\mathbb{R}^3\setminus L)=\pi_1(S^3\setminus L)$
 
Hi @DanielF
 
That's just a deformation retract, @DanielRust
Oh wait
$S^3$
Confus.
 
6:16 PM
Easier @DanielRust @Balarka: Just let the point that compactifies $\Bbb R^3$ to form $S^3$ be a different point not in the link.
 
Yes, @DanielRust
 
where you view $S^3$ as the one-point compactification of 3-space
 
I've done this problem enough times :P
 
@DanielFischer Enjoying your last hour of freedom?
 
6:17 PM
makes sense @Ted
 
But if he'd like to fully describe the topology of the one fella...
 
I answered this exact question a week ago
 
@Alex: He did not like that when I asked that question last night.
 
he'd better not just ignore that point
 
1
A: How do I prove this using van-Kampen theorem informally ? (2)

Daniel RustAn informal calculation might go as follows. First, let's "push" one of the circles to infinity so that we're instead removing a copy of $S^1$ from $\mathbb{R}^3$ and a copy of $\mathbb{R}$ which 'goes through' the circle and goes off towards infinity along the $z$-coordinate. You should hopefull...

 
6:17 PM
@TedShifrin Hahaha :)
 
actually i was thinking something like thickening up the "hooks" sticking up from the z-plane onto (R+)^3
 
@DanielRust Ted showed me the way to write down the def'n retraction by consider $S^3$ as a subset of $\Bbb C^2$, where it's really quite easy to just write it down.
 
@AlexanderGruber Who knows?
 
Damn, @Balarka's forsaking his algebra and talking about hooks ...
@Mike, Ted did? He didn't show. He just told you to do it.
 
You, at some point, said "consider $S^3 \subset \Bbb C^2$", which was the needed clue...
 
6:19 PM
@TedShifrin I tried comm. alg. after a month of alg topo, but I can't see any of them, so I threw Atiyah-McDonald onto dustbin...
 
Maybe you said more, maybe you said less, but that was the key idea, I'd say.
 
You've been ignoring me for quite a few month @TedShifrin
 
Atiyah-Macdonald does not belong in a dust bin, but give it until you're, say, 18.
 
He's got married since then
 
Atiyah has done enough math for seventeen lifetimes...
 
6:20 PM
@TedShifrin but my prof wants to teach me algebraic geometry. eh.
 
I saw Atiyah speak last year
he's a good speaker
 
@Studentmath No way
I am not going to be captured.
 
He's a fabulous speaker, @DanielRust. But, as was the case with Raoul Bott, every time I heard Atiyah speak, it was so effortlessly presented that I couldn't reconstruct any of it a day later.
Heya @Studentmath
 
Hey Prof. @Ted
 
@Balarka Lest you be like me, you shouldn't decide what you're going to do for the rest of your life until it's turned out you're already doing it.
 
6:21 PM
@BalarkaSen you and i are not so different after all
 
every algebraist are abstractly isomorphic to each other
 
I think I changed twice, or thrice, or twice thrice.
 
Hi @KhallilBenyattou ^_^
 
I got several messages from one of my students who's not fond of me, @Studentmath: what was the final exam score? what was the average? what was the standard deviation? I also told the student his/her cumulative average. He/she then wanted to know what the C+/B- cutoff was. Turns out there was a 10-point gap between his/her grade and the lowest B. This person still didn't know when to add and when to multiply ... in counting.
@Mike gives, surprisingly, excellent advice. Just keep learning math until you're quite advanced ... then decide.
 
so i shouldn't not Atiyah till 18
 
6:23 PM
@Ted At least he is aware of standard deviation.
 
@Balarka, totally NOT true. Herstein and Michael Artin are very far from isomorphic, to pick two well-known names.
 
Do what you want, @Balarka. You're just a kid.
 
The sigma was huge (around 20%), @Studentmath. A number of extremely high and extremely low scores.
 
Isn't it usually so, in tests?
 
@MikeMiller But I am going to stick to alg topo for a while.
 
6:24 PM
@AlexanderGruber Can you deal with this however it's appropriate to be dealt with?
 
I should go slow on at least something
 
Yes, but it seemed worse in this class. I mean, I had a score of 10% on the final. I should really not have counted it.
Yes, @Balarka, you should.
 
10% :O
 
One of the TAs texted me last night asking if I was still in town, @Ted. And the grades aren't submitted for the students yet. The impression I take from this is that he needs someone else to do his part of the job... I'm not happy.
 
@Ted woha. How did he get the 10%, I am curious
 
6:25 PM
And if you're going to learn some algebraic geometry, let it be concrete stuff like algebraic curves, not schemes. That can wait until you're 19.
 
I always preferred analysis to algebra, but maybe I was just using the wrong books. So I ain't gonna decide which I prefer until I finish my 12 holy books.
 
@TedShifrin I am trying to formalize the connection between galois theory and covering spaces to get free enough to handwave more
@TedShifrin yes, sure.
i am not going for schemes
prof just said he wants me to absorb the first chapter of Hartshone
 
Lots of partial credit points, @Studentmath. This is a guy who didn't want to be in the course and never had time to work on it.
 
@BalarkaSen There is a book called Elementary Algebraic Geometry by Hulek. Maybe you should take a look at it.
 
nah
 
6:26 PM
@TedShifrin Did you count it?
 
Read Fulton or another algebraic curves book, @Balarka. You don't need to worry about arbitrary varieties yet.
 
i'll stick to algebraic topologist. i might become a topologist instead, now that i think about it.
 
@Ted ah, well. I don't think I could ever be a good teacher because I wouldn't remember all the personal stories behind each student
 
A beautiful book you should look at is Miles Reid's "An Undergraduate Course in Algebraic Geometry," or some title like that.
 
Btw Hello Professor :)
 
6:27 PM
or a hyperbolic geometer, seeing how much i find Gromov hyperbolicity interesting.
 
@BalarkaSen What'd I tell you?
 
Well, @Studentmath, I got slammed by several students on this round of evaluations. Not surprised that a few hated me, and less than a third of the students bothered to fill them out. I think they've decided that since I'm retiring I don't care. Very frustrating.
 
@MikeMiller Yes, you did
 
I remind you: at this stage of your life, you do not know what a topologist is. Just enjoy yourself.
 
@TedShifrin Maybe you should try to be nicer. =)
 
6:28 PM
Well, @Balarka, if you're going to hyperbolic geometry, you have a lot of calculus/analysis/geometry to learn.
 
I'm thinking we really should trade off, @Ted...
 
LOL @Mike. You don't get to retire, sorry.
So @Mike, why isn't that TA bugging the professor instead of you?
 
@TedShifrin I mean gromov hyperbolicity and that stuff. that is much closer to algebra.
 
@MikeMiller Even at my stage of life, I do not know what will happen next week.
 
but i guess i should do rudin at some point
 
6:29 PM
@Ted Blech. Well, students are like children - usually ungrateful
 
Gromov is a hell of a differential geometer, @Balarka. Sorry, that won't do.
 
Hell if I know, @Ted. He didn't say more after we both told him we're out of town.
 
Your generation in the US is way more children than earlier in my career, @studentmath.
 
@BalarkaSen personally I'd recommend not Rudin for you
 
@AlexanderGruber <--- true algebraist
 
6:30 PM
@Alex: He'll be ok with Rudin. First, he's already learned some point set. Second, he hates pictures :P
 
I can't cope with y'all.
 
@TedShifrin I? Hate pictures? No way.
I love pictures.
 
"y'all" = Southern-speak
 
I love alg topo.
 
@BalarkaSen I have Rudin's 3 textbooks. They have exactly 0 pictures altogether.
 
6:31 PM
@Ted I'd say it's turning the same here, though slower and much less in Math/science. People tend to be more grateful and hard-working when they go for such. But then again, I have seen the opposite too
 
Oh, then Rudin is terrible, @Balarka, unless you draw all your own pictures. He has none ... none. Whereas I put dozens of pictures in my algebra text :D
 
He should draw his own pictures.
That's the best way to use Rudin.
 
@TedShifrin I actually think it's OK not to have pictures in a textbook, because the students should draw their own, lol.
 
The best way to use Rudin is kindling.
 
@TedShifrin I saw your algebra text.
It's great.
 
6:32 PM
@Jasper: In the ideal world, I agree, but many students don't know what pictures to draw.
 
But i have no other recommendation for an analysis text
 
@BalarkaSen Where did you see it? I can't find it anywhere.
 
@alex coincidentally, this is how I intend to use... you!!
 
For example, I draw pictures of modding out rings and groups by ideals/subgroups ... and in class I color-code.
 
@JasperLoy My prof has a copy :P
 
6:33 PM
@MikeMiller Still better than reading Rudin
 
@Alexander would you recommend an analysis text, at all?
 
Thank you, @Balarka, but I honestly didn't think it would fit your taste at all.
 
He wouldn't @Studentmath
 
@Studentmath there is this kind of old one that I like but it is lower level than rudin
I don't have a good alternative at that level
 
@TedShifrin I used to do mathematics keeping eyes closed a few months ago, but now I don't. ;)
 
6:34 PM
The best alternative at that level is to stop believing in infinite sets
 
Apostol has an advanced calculus text, which is a real analysis text. That's the book over which @Pedro and I met. It's quite good. Also, Protter and Morrey is a decent book. So is Wade.
 
Can't possibly as my prof is a hyperbolic geometer.
 
smacks @Alex for heresy
 
@Alexander No need for AC then
 
He draws everything.
 
6:34 PM
@Studentmath Exactly.
 
you people.
 
@AlexanderGruber I hate finite groups.
 
@Mike, you and I should both retire from here.
 
OK. Bye.
 
OK, Mike's out. ...
 
6:35 PM
Don't smack my friend >8(
 
He was quick at it
 
@BalarkaSen Shh shh you don't know what you're saying
@Studentmath like a bandaid
 
You and your pee groups.
 
OK, I'll leave you to the heresy.
 
Wait @Ted
We haven't talked for ages.
:P
 
6:36 PM
You've talked plenty without me, @Balarka!
 
@Ted, do you have any good recommendation for integration-level analysis?
 
Nah.
I just talked with Mike
 
Lebesgue and all of that
 
Mostly about him convincing you to uignore @Balarka @Ted
 
"Measure theory" i believe they call it in faraway lands
 
6:36 PM
Shhh @Studentmath
 
That's not my pedagogical expertise, @Alex. I grew up on Royden, but I'm more fond of integration than of measure theory, so I don't like it that much. Have you looked at Folland?
LOL @Studentmath ...
 
I hope to do Hatcher after Munkres.
 
@Balarka will find that I'm not worth all the trouble.
 
I am doing algebraic topology very thoroughly.
 
@TedShifrin No, I haven't really looked at anything. I have chosen to do analysis deeply out of order, like all other subjects I have taken
 
6:38 PM
Hatcher has supremely hard and interesting exercises, @Balarka. By orders of magnitude better in that regard than any other topology text.
 
@TedShifrin I can't possibly not care for your opinion.
 
next semester is introductory measure theory and lebesgue integrals; this semester was rigorous probability
 
@Ted In the week when I ignored him, he just picked new targets. So surely this would just happen again if they ignored him too... :)
 
@Mike they all started talking analysis the moment you left
 
Great!
 
6:38 PM
I thought you'd left, @Mike.
 
I saw that you didn't, @Ted, and I felt betrayed.
 
Yup, @Alex, totally out of order.
 
LEL
@TedShifrin I look at Hatcher now and then.
It's a good book.
 
There are beautifully powerful theorems in integration theory (like monotone and dominated convergence, both of which are used all over probability).
 
@Mike wants me to do Hatcher.
 
6:39 PM
LOL @Mike
@Alex: You might prefer Royden, as he structures everything very systematically from measures. But take a look at Folland. What book is your course using?
 
@TedShifrin Yeah, I proved those last semester. (in probability)
@TedShifrin We just came to the end of baby Rudin, I'm not sure what he's got planned for next semester.
 
Baby Rudin for a grad course? Weird.
THe measure theory and multivariable analysis in there are both terrible.
 
I'm glad you encouraged me to read Lawson's book, @Ted. Even though it's put me behind on everything else I need to read... :)
 
Well, that's life, @Mike. Lawson is a master.
 
@TedShifrin Yeah, I don't know, they make it mandatory for some reason. I think I would do better just self-studying and taking an exam.
 
6:41 PM
At some point I need to quit and go learn the Hodge theorem.
 
@TedShifrin I've a categorical language for unifying galois theory of fields and covering spaces that I told to @Mike.
 
I loved all the stuff he and Harvey did on currents in complex geometry.
Leave me out of that, @Balarka.
 
And then I need to quit and go learn Thom spectra, and then I need to quit and go learn the theory of connections...
Shut up, @Balarka
 
I want to use it for handwaving.
The more you can handwave, the more you understand.
 
OK, I really am swapping spots with you, @Ted.
 
6:42 PM
As I was explaining yesterday, you understand connections in the abstract setting better after understanding what they're doing for surfaces in $\Bbb R^3$ ... I'm not a fan of top-down math learning.
 
@MikeMiller Well I formally write-down proofs too.
 
There is a sense in which I don't care about surfaces in $\Bbb R^3$, as hypocritical as that makes me.
But yes... I understand.
 
Otherwise you'll be a symbol-pusher like @Balarka, @Mike.
 
Well, it looks like I picked up 20 rep in that weird time when this question moved meta -> main -> meta. — TRiG 1 hour ago
@MikeMiller ^^
 
Saw it, @DanielF. I've got nothin' to do with it.
 
6:44 PM
Move along, move along ...
 
I am not symbol pusher @Ted. You can't compare this Balarka with 6 months younger Balarka.
 
I didn't follow that, @DanielF.
 
Move along, please, @Ted
 
LOL ...
 
@TedShifrin Mike participated in an experiment.
 
6:45 PM
Unwittingly? @DanielF
 
No, wittingly.
 
More like half-wittingly, then.
I bet Alec will come in and chew me out for insulting young'uns again.
 
You have me on ignore for ages, @Ted, and now you're imposing on the improved-me the prat-me habits.
 
OK, @Balarka: I shall watch and see :D
 
I've been looking for a good question to answer on the main, couldn't find anything in probability or coding theory :/
 
6:48 PM
It's a wasteland out there, @Studentmath
 
I hope to study dessins at some point.
 
Yesterday I found a charming diff geo question from an algebraic geometry type faculty member at U Michigan.
 
@Studentmath Ask one
 
@Mike they all get like 40 answers in a second or get closed immediately, the others are above my level usually
 
@Venus did you make some progress on my problem?
 
6:49 PM
David Speyer's question, @Ted? I liked his question and your answer.
 
David Speyer is a great guy.
I've been trying to understand one of his answers in MO for years.
 
@Alexander I should think of one, yes.. I mean, this one math.stackexchange.com/questions/1078743/… is nice, but already got all that's needed in the comments
 
Speyer is a good guy.
 
Dis I am trying to understand.
 
Yeah.
 
6:53 PM
@MikeMiller Hey you.
Out there on your own.
 
What do you want?
 
Never heard of the Bring radical. Odd that Dylan Thurston would have answered, too.
@Pedro !
 
@TedShifrin It's just one of the inverse of $x^5 + x + a = 0$
 
Did you get my email with all the attachments, @Pedro?
 
@TedShifrin I did. I think I answered?
I'm too lazy to do homework, though. =D
 
6:54 PM
:P
 
I don't think you answered. I guess you're allowed a little break time @Pedro
There are some good questions in there, though.
Very cute @Balarka
 
Interesting: if you're pinged shortly after you ignore someone (a five-minute window, perhaps?), you still get pinged on main about it.
 
Hey no way @Mike
why did you ignore me?
 

« first day (1602 days earlier)      last day (3413 days later) »