« first day (1603 days earlier)      last day (3412 days later) » 

12:03 AM
I was expecting question quality to rise over the holidays, but it's actually gone WAY down...
 
@teadawg1337 You answered 8 questions all time, the most recent of your answers being "ways to write 50".
 
@Behaviour Your point being? I enjoy a little bit of recreational mathematics every now and then
 
It's too hard
 
@Behaviour I sincerely apologize for not meeting your standards for MSE, I'll be sure to be 100% super serious about everything from now on.
The things I put up with...
 
12:18 AM
really I swear some of these problems are meant for PhDs
wow and when I come back to chat everyone is gone
 
@DonLarynx Well, PhDs cannot do IMO questions, doesn't matter, lol.
@DonLarynx Now someone is gonna come and flag that, lol.
 
lol
 
@Behaviour You know, the only two times you've interacted with me in chat involved giving me crap about something I did. How about you just take a chill pill? I want no quarrel with thee
 
@teadawg1337 Is a fight going to start?
 
@Jasper No, I'm resisting temptation.
 
12:29 AM
@teadawg1337 I am also trying to figure out Behaviour. I don't know him well enough now to figure out anything.
 
@Jasper My main point above is that implying someone screwed up by posting an answer to a question they found interesting is completely uncalled for
I'm probably gonna get flagged and temporarily banned from this chatroom, lol. W/e
 
@teadawg1337 It's interesting how you use thee instead of you.
 
Maybe he's just envious @teadawg1337
 
@teadawg1337 Well, I doubt it.
 
@JasperLoy Imo, "thee" fits better in that sentence than "you" :P
 
12:35 AM
@teadawg1337 I am thinking that maybe you are into reading the bible. Because you use thee and temptation, lol.
 
@Jasper I'm the opposite of religious
I just have an expansive vocabulary, that's all
 
There was once I said I hated animals, and someone said he wished I would die a terrible death. He got flagged.
I think he was being serious, so I did not disagree with the flag.
He should know that saying I hate animals doesn't mean I like to torture animals. There is a big difference.
It's a bit like saying I hate ice cream.
 
@teadawg1337 I have a very small vocab. I don't read anything at all.
 
@Jasper I don't read anything either, except math textbooks xD
I absorb information through osmosis, that's why I have such a good vocabulary
(and yes, I realize I used that word incorrectly)
(it's part of the joke)
 
12:41 AM
@teadawg1337 Why is it used incorrectly?
 
@Jasper Oh, I guess I did use it correctly... I confuse osmosis and diffusion a lot when I'm really tired
 
@teadawg1337 Now that you mention both osmosis and diffusion, I am confused too, lol.
 
12:58 AM
What is special physically or geometrically about a topology?
IS NOONEQbre
Is no one here?
 
@beginner Nothing.
 
Then why do we care for them?
Why do they get their own field?
Why do we want to have something that holds all of its finite unions and intersections/ what is so special about that?
 
Your question is very vague, to begin with.
 
Do you dislike me Jasper??
 
To understand the motivation for a topological space, you may first want to understand what a metric space is.
 
1:05 AM
It is a space based on distances between all points
But I don't know the math for it
 
People generalise things, from Euclidean space to normed space to metric space and then to topological space.
 
What does Euclidean normed and metric fail to describe that topology succeeds?
 
Because structures naturally arise that are no longer in the smaller domain of spaces.
 
@beginner...why is math useful? why is eating useful? why is talking useful? why, for god sakes, are abelian finite napkin dimorphisms useful?
 
I don't want useful for real life, I essentially want to know the chain of reason, like with natural numbers, to negatives, to rationals, real numbers, complex numbers
But with topology being built because x,y,z failed
 
1:08 AM
You may read Wikipedia first. It's very good for math.
 
the study of geometric properties and spatial relations unaffected by the continuous change of shape or size of figures.
how do you feel about that statement @beginner?
see, that's one more reason why I studied math instead of English. Wikipedia aint got nothing on English.
 
@DonLarynx Napkin?
 
So it is about maintaining the object? Like the video I watched about inverting the sphere, we are looking at certain changes that don't stop us from mathematically seein the sphere?
 
@beginner No, I don't. I just think your parents are too strict for grounding you, lol.
 
I was just blowing into and out of a plastic bottle, now my head feels like its oscillating.
 
1:11 AM
I yelled at my mum, if it were my dad it would have been fine
My mum wasn't upset but my dad was
 
@beginner: it can be really useful when you consider functions. for example, does one function preserve the one-to-one and onto properties if it is applied to another space?
 
So we are passing bijectivity to other spaces?
Do we worry about homomorphisms or isomorphisms still?
 
Let me give you a simpler example
 
Ok I didn't see that omen gnough
one though
Ted are you a algebraic geometer?
 
a differential geometric sort, yeah, @beginner, although I'm not much of anything any more :P
 
1:18 AM
Did you already retire??
 
no, 5 more months
 
You will always be our professor here(hopefully in our opinion)
 
Are you learning what all the fields of math are, @beginner?
 
Yeah I am trying to understand the reason for topology
 
what do you mean by "the reason for"? and what do you mean by "topology"?
 
1:21 AM
like with rational numbers we had a problem, so we made the reals and then we had problems so we made the complex numbers
What problems did we have in earlier spaces that made us work on topological spaces
 
well, there's a different viewpoint to your algebra progression ...
Suppose you started with a continuous function on $\Bbb Q$ that was negative at $a$ and positive at $b$ ... must it be $0$ somewhere in between?
 
Oh did I get it wrong
Yes it must
The intermediate value theorem I think
 
Or suppose you have a continuous function ... must it have a max and a min? Well, no, not necessarily. So you discover that you need properties on your domain in order to get these results.
 
@beginner that only applies for $\Bbb{R}$
 
The intermediate value theorem won't work on $\Bbb Q$. Consider $f(x)=x^2-2$.
 
1:24 AM
Oh woops
 
So my first question leads you to define connectedness and my second question leads you to define compactness and soon you're trying to deal with more complicated spaces and wonder if they have these properties ... and it goes from there ...
 
Hey @TedShifrin :)
 
hi @evinda
 
But that means we had limitations that we circumvented, what did we not like with the metric space and the Euclidon space?
 
"no, 5 more months," he replied begrudgingly. @Ted :)
 
1:26 AM
I don't think "begrudgingly" is a word, @Kaj. And what did you mean?
 
@TedShifrin Could you take a look at this?
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1078697/the-points-are-mathbbz-linearly-dependent
Is the substitution the only method to show what I am supposed to?
 
@KajHansen I am now wearing the same stupid hat as you.
 
I thought it meant that you did it sadly without motivation
 
Hmmm, now I'll have to think of a synonym for what I meant...
 
Sadly without motivation @kaj??
 
1:28 AM
Well, we're naturally led to far more interesting spaces, @beginner. Infinite dimensions, curves spaces, etc. What if I identify points $(x,y)$, $(x',y')$ in $\Bbb R^2$ to one another if $xy=x'y'$. What is the collection of identified points looking like?
Sadly without motivation?
 
I thought that is what begrudgingly meant
 
@evinda: That isn't for me, sorry.
I don't begrudge you success, @beginner :)
 
:)
 
But I think as a modifier of me, it needs to be "grudging(ly)" :P
 
Ugh, English is hard
 
1:30 AM
This is why Azoff only got a C in it, @Kaj :P But I did better :D
 
:P
 
This reminds me of something I've been meaning to ask you for some time @Ted
 
@@TedShifrin A ok... :) Do you maybe have an idea about the following?
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1078757/how-could-we-show-that-the-abelian-group-has-text-rank-0
 
@evinda: I don't do characteristic $p$ geometry ...
You need to start asking your own teacher stuff.
 
@TedShifrin A ok.. :)
 
1:31 AM
I have to go, my parents are taking me somewhere in 5 min :(. I will copy what you said to a notepad and think about it thanks ted!!
 
Be well, @beginner, and don't fight with your parents ;)
 
In learning French, I'm rather confused about when it's appropriate to use "on" vs. "nous". Is there any convention in that regard? From context clues, it seems like one would be more likely to use "on" in the royal sense, as in the royal "we" in English.
 
r9m
@DanielFischer I think I was wrong !! my latest question was well recieved :) I got 2 fantastic answers ! :D
 
Right, or just "one" in English.
 
Ok, so I do have the correct interpretation?
 
1:32 AM
The royal we often sounds condescending in English, @Kaj. Using "on" in French is not nearly so.
You should ask @Hippa sometime. He's an actual Frenchman, although he tries to pretend he isn't :P
 
Interesting. I'll have to talk to him next time he's on :D
 
Well, he's an actual French kid :D
 
Important distinction! haha
 
Did you pass French, @Kaj?
 
Of course! It was a hard course too; I'm glad it's over. I took that accelerated version that combines two semesters into one.
 
1:35 AM
Well, you had no choice, because you had 2+ years in high school.
You still have one more semester, so don't relax yet.
 
It was probably the hardest non-math course I've taken at UGA. Really felt like we were flying through the material.
True, true
 
Well, at least your math training should make you a better student than 99% of people on campus :P
 
I hope so, haha. By far the hardest part was keeping all the irregular verb conjugations straight in my head.
 
@TedShifrin Sometimes, the more one can think, the more one suffers in this sick world.
 
Well, @Jasper, Mike Spivak sank himself into his book writing so as not to think about how depressed he was. It took years to bounce out of it.
 
1:39 AM
@TedShifrin I didn't know he is a loonie too, lol.
 
@Kaj: I always found I could "hear" conjugations, etc., in my mind ... I don't know if you have an ear for language, but I memorized relatively little.
Not so much in later life, @Jasper, but, yes, very much so in the early days.
In his case, @Jasper, it was largely sexuality-based.
 
@TedShifrin Is he gay too?
 
Yup.
 
Do you know any programming languages Professor @TedShifrin?
 
I know some LaTeX, if it is considered one, lol.
 
1:42 AM
I've had to learn a little Perl to write hundreds of WeBWork problems, @skull. I can program in Mathematica, which apparently is somewhat similar to C(+) ... I studied some FOCAL and Fortran back in the 60's ...
I don't think LaTeX counts as programming ... although plain TeX will do simple programs (like list primes if you teach it to) ...
I hope our new mods are still alive :P
 
I can't remember if I mentioned it already, but point-set has $9$ people next semester. I'm pretty excited about the small class size.
 
Well, I hope a few are registered at the 6000-level or it won't run ...
I don't remember if any of my advisees are in at the 6000-level.
 
I'm just in the 4000 level myself, but I've been tempted to bump up into the 6000 level in either that or complex.
 
well, sorry to discriminate, but only Honors can do that ...
 
That's what I figured, but I'm sure strings can be pulled somewhere or the other :P

At any rate, next semester is high-stakes for me. I'll be trying to solidify a letter from Dr. Graham and maybe also from Dr. Clark.
 
1:49 AM
Good idea ...
 
I guess it's time to apply for REUs?
 
Yup, it is ... I've just been writing/submitting recommendations for literally 11 people for grad school. I don't look forward to the REU stuff soon...
@Kaj: Someone gave me 1's across the board on evals in probability :P
 
Any writing to go along with it? Or just someone with a chip on their shoulder?
 
@TedShifrin I don't see why math programs don't rely more on interviews.
 
Can't tell ... One person wrote a bitter comment. Another said I wouldn't care what he/she wrote because I'm retiring.
 
1:52 AM
It was me, @Ted
 
@Alex: Because we don't link to labs/grant support the way the experimental sciences do.
 
Not the comments, the 1s
 
This reminds me of those silly RateMyProfessors things. I've definitely had pretty good professors with terrible reviews on that site.
 
Wait 'til you see what I said about your bungling Taylor series, @Mike ...
 
@TedShifrin how does that affect interviewing?
 
1:53 AM
Generally, only people who love or who hate bother with RateMyProfessor. I've had pretty positive ones there. The one negative one seems to have disappeared a few years ago.
@Alex: I think bio/physical sciences interview to align people with particular labs/advisers. In math we don't link support or admission to a particular lab or adviser.
 
@KajHansen I encourage my students to slam me on there after evaluations. If people are checking to RMP to see which professor is easiest, they probably ain't gonna like my class.
 
Of course, math programs do have visitation days and the contacts prospective students make may influence decisions for either the university or the student @Alex.
 
That's how I am with professor evals. I know it's a terrible practice, but I'm only ever inspired to write anything in the evaluation when the professor has had a wonderfully positive impact on me.
 
So you wrote a glowing eval on analysis, @Kaj?
 
@TedShifrin I see, so, you're saying it's because math research is more decentralized.
 
1:55 AM
I doubt I've had a "wonderfully positive impact on you," @Kaj. That would be limited to algebra courses :D
Well, not so grant-dependent, @Alex, in general.
 
@TedShifrin, ok, so there are exceptions...
 
uh huh
 
Also, I wasn't seriously considering a math major prior to your course :)
 
Grades not submitted yet. I'm gonna punch someone.
 
@KajHansen What were you majoring in then?
 
1:57 AM
ducks to hide from @Mike .... oh wait, he's short, too.
 
@MikeMiller Flagged.
@TedShifrin I know Brian Scott is shorter than me.
 
@JasperLoy, I was thinking about physics or chemistry
 
I don't want Jasper to know what I look like, @Ted.
 
I guess the reason it surprises me is because I feel like I could get a much better read off of somebody in a 10 minute interview than I could from a transcript and statement of purpose. I don't know about letters... it's probably easy when they're good, but I imagine it's sort of tough to quantify when they're less than perfect.
 
@Alex: The statement of purpose is very minor. It's the letters of recommendation that carry 95% of the weight ... and the subject GRE.
 
1:58 AM
@MikeMiller Don't worry, I am not gay, lol.
 
I don't see why that would be a reason to worry.
 
The problem @Alex is the generic letters from small colleges that are empty raves. Specifics and letters from well known people are always better.
 
That would have gone well for me, @Ted.
 
You had the Penn State thing going for you, @Mike.
 
I got a letter from Andrews... but I suspect the content of that was my worst letter. Maybe not when the name was attached.
 
2:00 AM
@TedShifrin Yeah it seems a little unfair for students who didn't go to good schools for undergrad. Luckily I had U. Cincinnati near me which is not bad, but I went there to be near family which I'm sure is what motivates a lot of great students who go to lousy schools
 
I was motivated by HOPE. :P
 
@KajHansen Hope is all I have now.
 
Well, but generally more well-known schools have more demanding courses and fellow students. That's not to say that certain individuals can't do great coming out of smaller schools with less advanced coursework.
 
@TedShifrin I think it depends on what you make with what you have.
 
Yes, you can make apple juice with apples and orange juice with oranges.
 
2:03 AM
I'd be a lot more impressed by somebody with published research coming out of an offbeat little college than a 4.0 student at a tier 1 with unambitious coursework
 
well I was unable to solve problem 494. usually I am a guy that needs to finish problems or else I will never get my mind off it.
 
Generally, people coming out of more competitive undergrad programs are better prepared to handle the toughness of grad school, @Alex. There are always exceptions.
 
drinks cabernet sauvignon
 
@MikeMiller Did you finally read my article? =)
 
@Alex yes, which I assume is why students with unambitious coursework don't do well... but that's mg impression.
Nope @Jasper. Sorry.
 
2:08 AM
@MikeMiller Sure, I'm just making the comparison. performed averagely at good school < performed exceptionally at bad school
 
Is Lang the most popular grad text for algebra these days?
 
@JasperLoy Lang or Hungerford
 
Dummit and Foote and Ash (free online) are also used reasonably widely.
 
@AlexanderGruber OK. The biggest difference between them that I know is that rings are defined with and without 1.
 
D&F <3
 
2:13 AM
There's kind of a huge difference in presentation between them...
 
OK, sorry, not the biggest...
 
@JasperLoy I have mixed feelings about Lang. I started off disliking it but I kinda grew into it. It's a pretty good book. I don't know Hungerford well enough to compare.
 
@AlexanderGruber The thing about using Lang is that there are all kinds of things done only in the other books, so you reall have to get them all. That is, for algebra, he has 4 books, lol.
 
far from true, @Jasper
 
I once considered using his Introduction to Linear Algebra, Linear Algebra, Undergraduate Algebra, and Algebra.
 
2:17 AM
But for a graduate algebra course, all one needs is the last. I still prefer Jacobson unless one is quite sophisticated.
 
"Basic" Algebra I
 
we're back to @Kaj's favorite Amazon comments :P
 
Amazon?
 
I don't like Jacobson.
 
2:18 AM
BTW,@Kaj, has Doug messaged you to gloat?
 
He's done a fair amount of gloating....are we talking about his probability scores or his analysis?
 
I like Jacobson's doing modules over a Euclidean domain, where you can see what's going on, as opposed to Lang's abstract proofs for a PID.
 
It's sad that when Jacobson rewrote his algebra text, the linear algebra got omitted.
 
oh, I only know about probability, @Kaj
 
He was actually more on the disappointed side about probability. Said he needed to do better on some tests and homework.
 
2:20 AM
I was trying to compare Jacobson's Lectures in Abstract Algebra 1,2,3 and his Basic Algebra 1,2.
 
well, he did, but he still got a flavor of A from me on his sixth try ... I thought he'd be happy (relatively)
 
I still think it's kind of funny he's taken $\mathbf{6}$ courses from you.
 
I think it's totally insane.
 
I think that might be a record, @Kaj. I had people who'd done 5 before.
Lots of 4.
 
2:21 AM
I would've done $5$ had you taught algebra the year I came through.
 
I had my last hurrah the year before. :)
 
@KajHansen You are that guy? LOL.
 
One person from probability (who hadn't had me before) has signed up for diff geo. @Kaj
 
Not me. I just took a screenshot @JasperLoy
Is that a good or bad thing @Ted?
 
@KajHansen I know about amazon reviews, lol. I just thought you said something on amazon.
 
2:24 AM
He never came to office hours, blew an A on the final, but smart guy, I think. We'll see how he does in a 35% homework course.
 
Oh no, I never have.
 
I remember how ODE went for me too @Ted
 
ODE, too? @DonL
 
I had a 91 in the class and blew it to an 83 lol @Ted
 
That's how soo many of my classes have gone. I do wonderfully up until the final @DonLarynx
 
2:25 AM
(final exam)
 
oh :(
not like I fail to curve on the finals ...
 
@Kaj: I personally did not open my ODE book.
@Kaj: I should have.
I cannot taste my cabernet sauvignon anymore
 
:O I've been absolutely dependent on my textbook in basically all my courses.
 
@Kaj I was, too, but only in high school.
 
@Kaj slept through most of my lectures :D
 
2:27 AM
Only a few! And, coincidentally, they were the mornings of due homework.
I've gotten myself out of that habit though. I've been finishing them early enough to TeX.
 
good boy
 
I remember impressing my teachers with TeX @Kaj
they still remember me :O
 
I'm just trying to get into good practices for grad school. Plus I find that I'm much more thorough in my arguments when I do. I guess it's a sort of a pride-in-my-work thing.
 
@Ted Who took 6 with you now?
I took 8 with one professor at my school.
 
2:29 AM
Kaj's comrade
 
Doug.
 
8 ... well, you had only epsilon profs :)
 
@Ted: have you ever gone crazy from math
@Ted that is a deep fear of mine
@Ted I was always the weird kid in high school (yet most people were okay around me)
 
@DonLarynx Math will not make you crazy, but people who do math are more likely to become crazy.
 
@Jasper why
 
2:33 AM
@DonLarynx Because people who do math are those who think more.
 
@DonLarynx, I might've been the weird kid too. I think I've grown out of a lot of it though :P
 
@Jasper beats being an extrovert who doesn't think at all lol
 
@DonLarynx Well, I don't think people who think more are introverts. Also, it's not good being crazy.
 
I'm only extroverted when I am drunk i.e. (now)
 
Hey, John von Neumann was a huge extrovert
 
2:36 AM
oh I may also be extroverted when I play sports, but that's pretty much it
 
I have become more extroverted over time.
 
I'm fairly introverted personally. A few hours interacting with a bunch of people and I'm exhausted, mentally and physically.
 
I gain a short boost in extrovertism when I move to an area I previously have not been acquainted with before
 
Oh I'm the opposite. Meeting new people is very difficult for me.
 
Other idiosyncratic elements of Erdős's vocabulary include:[23]
Children were referred to as "epsilons" (because in mathematics, particularly calculus, an arbitrarily small positive quantity is commonly denoted by the Greek letter (ε))
Women were "bosses"
Men were "slaves"
People who stopped doing mathematics had "died"
Alcoholic drinks were "poison"
note the last one, please
it is very true
ironically I am under the influence of it
 
2:42 AM
Amphetamines were candy?
 
@Kaj: Yes.
 
@TedShifrin, is it true that Erdos would visit UGA back in the day? At least a few professors, historically, were Erdos 1's.
 
Do you think Erdos did LSD?
 
Hi guys, can I ask a quick general question on induction?
 
@Vincenzo: Shoot
Paul Erdos denoted "To give an oral exam to a student was "to torture" him/her."
I cannot imagine such a preposterity
my friends have gone through orals
 
2:46 AM
@don Do you know you can edit?
 
I would actually prefer oral exams. I feel comfortable getting up and explaining things to people at a blackboard. I tend to "blank" on traditional exams.
 
I hate prostate exams, lol.
 
WAT. @Jasper
 
@DonLarynx Well, I had one a long time ago...
 
At 25 correct? 8 years ago?
 
2:47 AM
@DonLarynx Why do you say so?
 
@Don Suppose I want to prove $P(n)$. So I do all the stuff and then, in the inductive step, I find that $P(k+1)$ is implied by $Q(k+1)$. Am I allowed to use induction again, this time on $k+1$?
 
I am a mathematician @Jasper. You stated you graduated 10 years ago.
 
@DonLarynx The general exams I took in grad school were oral
 
@Vincenzo. Assume $P(k)$ is true. Prove $P(k+1)$ is true.
 
@DonLarynx Yes, but that has nothing to do with when a prostate exam would take place, nothing at all.
 
2:48 AM
@Jasper: If I am correct, exams are given at 25 and 50
@robjohn: Boss level
 
@Don Proving the inductive step by induction is not acceptable? Why?
 
@DonLarynx In my case, I had a certain condition and so they had to check it. There's no age they are checked here.
 
Yes, Erdös visited several times a year for many, many years, working with Pomerance, @Kaj.
 
@VincenzoOliva Not sure what you mean by P(k+1) and Q(k+1). Induction step uses P(k) to prove P(k+1)
 
@Vincenzo: What are $P$ and $Q$? I don't understand what you are doing...
 
2:50 AM
That's really cool. I wish I was around back then.
 
Berkeley's quals were orals when I took them. Because I had a lot of teaching experience when I started grad school, I was confident and not intimidated. But it made a lot of grad students fall apart, and they switched to written exams before I left.
 
That's true, @Ted... but there were enough that it was a choice to do so many with one.
The second most influential I took 3 with, and the third most influential I took 0 with.
 
You have to be very advanced to survive oral exams @Ted...
Why does it smell like rice in here?
 
Oral exams are good. I'm for them.
 
2:52 AM
We had some grad students at Berkeley who were literally so nervous that the exam would continuously degrade to something like: What is a matrix? before the guy could dig himself out ...
 
@MikeMiller Aural exams are the best. You just listen.
@TedShifrin Even I can answer that, lol.
 
One of my friends turned into an alcoholic because she couldn't sleep for the months before her quals and needed booze to "relax" to sleep. Not cool.
Yeah, @Jasper, me too.
 
@VincenzoOliva This is always how induction is done:

Assume $P(k)$ is true. Prove $P(k+1)$ is true.
 
I started my algebra qual by giving my two examiners a question I didn't know how to do. After 5 minutes or so of their not knowing, they decided to start the exam :P
 
@Ted: Phenibut (legal), and L-theanine (legal, too) work.
 
2:54 AM
Sure, @Don ...
 
I have a funny story @Ted
 
@Don Yes, I know. My question is: is there something wrong with proving $P(k+1)$ showing by induction that a stronger statement, let's call it $Q(k+1)$, holds?
 
@Vincenzo: What is $P$, and what is $Q$?
 
If it actually depends on $P$ and $Q$, give me some minute to write them down @don @JasperLoy
 
@Mike: On my geometry/topology exam they asked me stuff that wasn't on the syllabus after about half way through. I figured that must have meant I passed. I knew enough to get part way and then they would give a hint, and I'd finish the rest. That's where I learned the Thom-Pontryagin construction :P
That was after they asked why any manifold with a connection on its frame bundle had to be paracompact. Blech. I told them all manifolds are paracompact, but I sketched the argument.
@Don: I'm about to leave, so unless your funny story is quick, I'll ask you to save it :)
 
2:57 AM
@Ted: Good night!
 
See ya soon ...
 
Wow, cabernet sauvignon is way better than vodka
 
That's not saying much @Don
 
@Kaj: I have not finished my bottle yet and I am drunk
@Kaj: If I finish my bottle of vodka, I sleep
 
@PedroTamaroff congratulations on your new moderator position
 
2:59 AM
@Pedro: Yes, congratulations.
 
Everyone I voted for for mod was elected :D
 

« first day (1603 days earlier)      last day (3412 days later) »