« first day (1602 days earlier)      last day (3414 days later) » 

10:00 PM
@KajHansen I wanted to answer it but I was too lazy.
 
@DonLarynx OK
 
wow, I was asked to review a flagged comment on cha
t
that had never happenned to me before
 
@Chris'ssis Prove that every number greater than 5 can be written as the sum of two primes It was given in a high school contest.
 
@JorgeFernández Was it my comment? You just got 10k SE wide.
 
@Huy are you banned?
That he is.
 
10:01 PM
@MikeMiller Yes.
 
no, I was the comment I was asked to review was actually Huys
 
What did Huy say?
 
Sorry, Huy.
He called Don a troll.
 
but I said it wasn't innapropriate
 
Why was he banned for that?
 
10:01 PM
I don't think he was
 
He is banned, for sure.
 
He was. For about half an hour, I think is how it works.
 
Unless I got confused and klicked on the wrong button
 
I didn't think it was inappropriate.
 
Huy
I was banned and now after 3 minutes I magically got unbanned.
 
10:02 PM
I just got asked like 30 seconds ago.
 
@Jorge All it takes is five users to think it is inappropriate; others disagreed, for some reason.
 
Huy
Not sure what happened.
 
I guess many others thought he should not say it and clicked valid. Or he said something else.
@Huy A mod unbanned you.
 
Welcome back, @Huy
 
@DonLarynx huh?
 
10:02 PM
@Ted OK, Lawson has a section right after this trying to convince me that all this representation theory is useful.
 
@N3b this is similar to Goldbach's conjecture
 
Huy
That's nice of whoever mod unbanned me.
 
You see, at this time of the day, there are many people who are easily offended, so they click valid.
 
@Kaj: I'm happy to downvote you whenever you want. Oh wait, it costs me, too :P
 
I have been banned from chat 5 times.
 
@Ted, no no. I have a nice $0 \pmod {10}$ rep right now!
 
I won't repeat the things I said which got me banned.
 
Gee, all this mod election stuff has made everyone hyper ...
 
@N3b: I know, which is why I deleted my comment. I am sort of retarded.
 
10:03 PM
But they were mostly related to using sex words.
 
Huy
@JasperLoy: To me, "are you a troll?" is a cheerful version of saying "are you kidding me?", but I guess there are people who disagree.
 
Once I got flagged for saying 'I am on bananas'.
@Huy I think that comment is very harmless.
 
Bananas are extremely illegal, @Jasper
 
Surprise surprise. The people I voted for won.
 
Huy
I think your comment about bananas was much more offending than my previous one.
 
10:04 PM
I agree.
 
I know, I know, you're not an English major :D
 
I have to play organ tomorrow
 
@TedShifrin Won is wrong?
 
The people with the most rep gets repped, the rest get's rekt. That is the standard
 
The onus of being multitalented, @Alizter.
I voted for the people I thought would be best, @N3B. Rep was not the issue.
 
10:05 PM
Hardly. They are christmas carols
 
@Alizter I could have said something innapropiate. But I do not want to get banned.
 
@KajHansen Your hat fits nicely.
I remember @N3buchadnezzar got banned several times, lol.
 
No, @Jasper, but "one" was wrong :D
 
@JasperLoy, indeed. I'm a fan.
 
I saw a lot of people running for mod who hadn't been around or even flagged that much
 
10:06 PM
@JasperLoy Twice i think.
 
I was an administrator in my department for 8 years. I don't ever want to be mod.
 
You know, I think I have been really nasty talking about my enemy in this chat. So I think I should stop talking about my enemy anymore.
 
@N3buchadnezzar Hehe. My music teacher had a mug that said "Kiss my organ". With a picture of an organ. Too bad I have a halo and I still don't get it ;)
 
@TedShifrin Yeah, that is the correct way to vote. However I do not think everyone thinks ythe way you do. To me it seems people just gloss over the candidates and think "oh he has such points, he must be so great".
 
I think ultimately, my enemy did not do anything to seriously hurt me, so I should forgive and forget.
 
10:08 PM
You've been around for 7 months and you have flagged 5 things. Nope.
 
@Alizter Playing in a Catholic church will get rid of that halo pretty quickly. I hear they play loads of organs there
 
I don't spend my life flagging ...
 
@N3buchadnezzar I think it is protestant
you know being England and all
 
@TedShifrin does that mean I don't ever have to be an administrator?
 
I have 104 helpful flags, lol.
 
10:08 PM
I don't really know
 
OMG There is $\Huge 37$ people in here :O
 
I guess it's time to go watch a movie and then learn the Hodge theorem, @Ted
 
I am just helping the community so I can continue to use the pipe organ
 
@skullpatrol 37 is a special number to me.
 
It's rare that one has to be, @Alex ... Usually the ones who want to be are power-hungry and therefore terrible.
 
10:09 PM
prime?
 
I finally watched Frozen the other day
 
@Mike: This may be of interest to you, although you'll tell me it's trivial :P
 
Let it go
Let it go
 
@skullpatrol It's the number of strokes in my Chinese name, which I shall keep a secret.
 
Way to go, @Alizter :)
 
10:10 PM
@TedShifrin What if I'm power-hungrily pursuing the ability to be non-terrible? Like Batman?
 
@Kaj: I gave Mark and Dan my favorite physics problem ...
 
That was on my qual @Ted
 
The Dean the University Needs, not the one it Wants
 
I also watched the Mockingjay
 
Oh, very cool, @Mike :)
 
10:10 PM
no idea
what that was about
 
@AlexanderGruber then you become a mod!
 
I first learned it reading one of my favorite math papers ever.
 
@AlexanderGruber Deanied
 
@quid ahhhh you got me
 
Interstellar made the most sense
 
10:10 PM
I smite you, @Alex :P
 
Which means it's super trivial @Ted
 
Hi @snailboat
 
@N3buchadnezzar Your diploma has been placed in Timed Suspension.
 
What, my learning it in Griffiths's paper, or your having it on a qual, @Mike?
 
Huy
@Alizter: Did you watch the other two parts of the Hunger Games too?
 
10:11 PM
@TedShifrin, which one is that? Object falling off the side of a sphere, or the ladder sliding down a wall, or figuring out which direction the bicycle is travelling, or why one of the axes of rotation of a rectangular prism is unstable?
 
@TedShifrin When my photoshop skills improve can I make you shoot lightning from your hands?
 
@AlexanderGruber ? :p
 
@Huy I missed catching fire
 
Anything on my quals must have been trivial, @Ted, or else I wouldn't have passed
 
oops
 
10:11 PM
How can one change the size of hats?
 
The first two, coupled, @Kaj :P Are you poking fun at me? GRR.
Shaddup @Mike
 
Huy
@Alizter: Why would you watch Mockingjay then?
 
I haven't watched any of the hunger games. Will I enjoy the last one?
 
ohhh mod joke that may have been a bit esoteric
 
Huy
@MikeMiller: The first two ones are enjoyable.
 
10:12 PM
Nope! I just know there are lots of problems you enjoy @Ted
 
@Huy Because cinema -> Social activity
 
Dec 15 at 11:25, by Khallil Benyattou
user image
 
@ali How is your cold now?
 
@JasperLoy Much better thanks :)
 
There were some very angry/insulting people in my class, @Kaj, not that I'm surprised.
 
10:12 PM
I feel young again
wait
 
@Huy Yes, but I'm not watching those. I'm being called upon to watch the new one.
 
@Alizter No problem, just pay me 100 dollars, lol.
 
BTW, @Kaj, you never told me how analysis turned out. I take it I shouldn't ask?
 
Huy
@Alizter: I was invited to watch Catching Fire but I hadn't seen the first one yet. So I watched it at home and then could proceed to going to the cinema.
 
Compared to me and Ted, @Alizter, you were never old.
 
Huy
10:13 PM
@MikeMiller: See my previous message.
 
@MikeMiller I feel really old in this room.
 
@Mike, you're barely older than Balarka. Why do you keep aligning yourself with my decrepitude?
 
@Huy Yes, but I only learned I'm going about five minutes ago.
 
glares @Jasper
 
Huy
@MikeMiller: And when? Tonight?
 
10:13 PM
@Ted Because it brings a smile to my face.
 
@Huy My friend explained it to me so now I can't be asked to watch it. I get the general gist. Reminds me of avatar.
 
It wasn't terrible @TedShifrin. Not optimal, but not terrible. And are you referring to your probability students?
 
Anonymous
@skullpatrol Hi :-) Don't mind me, I just joined because of that flag earlier.
 
Yes, @Kaj, and I'm glad it wasn't terrible.
 
Huy
@Alizter: Sorry, I haven't watched Avatar.
 
10:14 PM
@TedShifrin At my age, I already should be an assistant prof. It's sad the way things turned out.
 
No, I'm probably leaving within 15 minutes @Huy
 
@MikeMiller I can't wait for my Lie in two days
 
I concur completely, @Jasper.
 
Lots of emails after grades were posted @Ted ?
 
@snailboat Ok, nice to see you here :-)
 
Huy
10:14 PM
@MikeMiller: I don't understand. Why are you saying "no" if you're leaving within 15 minutes?
 
@KhallilBenyattou thanks! I am not sure why I failed to figure that out myself.
 
One, from a student I told probably shouldn't think about math grad school, applied or not. This person was not pleased and questioned grades. Also trounced me on evals, for sure. Not that I blame that person for getting revenge.
 
@Huy I took tonight to mean "later tonight" instead of "immediately".
 
Oh. I forgot to think about @Ted's problem
 
You always forget about me, @Alizter.
 
10:15 PM
I'll do it on christmas.
 
Huy
@MikeMiller: SPOILER: Dumbledore dies.
 
Grades are still not up for my students. I'm going to start a riot.
That's fine, @Huy. He's entitled to.
 
I'm sure the students already have, @Mike.
 
@MikeMiller Make the test easier :P
 
Not a problem, @quid. It took me ages as well! ^_^
 
10:15 PM
@TedShifrin I think I was too kind on my evaluation of certain instructors in my undergrad days.
 
@TedShifrin, can you ever tell who wrote your evals based on writing style?
 
Enjoy your Christmas, @Alizter, seriously.
 
@Alizter Grades are all in the system, but for some reason not finalized. That's why I'm confused.
 
Huy
@MikeMiller: I think I'd find it rather hard to enjoy the Mockingjay movie not having watched the first two. But maybe you'll like it and then the first two will become even better. Kind of what happened with me watching HIMYM and Friends afterwards.
 
I guess maybe the professor is determining the curve?
 
10:16 PM
Generally, @Jasper, I've found that students are more appreciative of me as time passes, not less.
 
@TedShifrin I will. I am looking forward to new things to learn.
 
Sometimes, @Kaj, but not when it's just straight 1's across the numerics.
 
@Alizter Don't be like me, spend some time with fa-mi-ly.
 
@Mike: Does UCLA not have a deadline for submitting grades? Ours was yesterday at 5 PM.
 
@TedShifrin I have never taken a lecture from you, so I don't know how you teach. But sometimes, you are a little grumpy in this chat. =)
 
10:17 PM
It's the 29th, @Ted. Which is absolutely stupid.
 
@Jasper: Some people in this chat make me grumpy.
 
@JasperLoy I try to leave as much constructive criticism as possible even when I like the prof. (I usually preface doing so with that sentence, too.)
 
And, @Jasper, being here is not my job.
 
@MikeMiller I can play lego star wars with my sister all day then read lies all night
 
I can lie to you during the day too, if you want
 
10:17 PM
@TedShifrin It will be your full time retirement job, lol.
 
Wow @Mike for the 29th. The students are going nuts.
 
I always appreciate hearing how I come off from the students. I never really know if I'm right or they're sucking up until the assessment.
 
For instance: I am actually Ted's alt account.
 
@Alizter How old is your sis?
 
@TedShifrin Sorry =(
 
10:18 PM
@TedShifrin Not to mention the pay here is terrible.
 
No, @Jasper, it will not. I will become a full-time alcoholic. :D
 
@JasperLoy 9
 
@Ted I'm sure they are, but it's worse for me!
 
@AlexanderGruber By the way, did you ask for analysis book recommendation? You can try Folland, Rudin or Royden, the standard three.
 
No, @Mike, in the light of day, it's not worse for you.
 
10:19 PM
Shh.
 
@JasperLoy I heard about folland and royden from Ted, haven't tried yet. Rudin is what I've got and wish I didn't
 
@Alizter It's nice to have a sibling to care for and to care for you, I have none.
 
I don't think Rudin has been a standard ever, @Jasper. I named Folland and Royden. The new standard is Stein/Shakarchi.
 
Apparently back lights on E-readers are damaging to the eyes
 
@AlexanderGruber Have you tried McDonalds?
 
10:19 PM
@N3buchadnezzar No how is it?
 
@AlexanderGruber What's wrong with Rudin?
 
Really, @Ted? They're wordier than even Lee or Hatcher.
 
I prefer Politins books
 
@AlexanderGruber I like it. It is much less terse than rudin. Some say it is a bit wordy, but I reallt liked it.
 
Lee is very wordy. Hatcher is not. You're nuts.
 
10:20 PM
@TedShifrin I see. the Stein books are very exotic. They omit some stuff but has other stuff.
 
I don't recall this room being this active since I registered here...
 
I like how wordy Hatcher is. I have heard many complaints that he doesn't shut the hell up.
 
@JasperLoy I just really dislike what he decides to make theorems and what he chooses to make exercises, and the examples he chooses
 
@teadawg1337 Maybe it's Xmas.
 
@teadawg1337 dances it's christmas
 
10:20 PM
I don't like his dense writing style either
And I don't like his proofs
Or the typeface
 
Well, @Jasper, that's true of most books. I used Stein/Shakarchi for complex analysis the last time and was dismayed that the multivalued nature of log was only emphasized in the last third of the book. So I vowed never to use the book again, but it was a vacuous vow.
 
@AlexanderGruber I see. I will be studying his 3 textbooks.
 
Also I hate analysis that probably has something to do with it
 
@AlexanderGruber McDonald
 
@Alex, I tend to agree with you. It's way too slick, all the time.
 
10:21 PM
@TedShifrin That Lie algebra book you showed me needs somebody to typeface it nicely
 
Lie algebra book, @Alizter? You mean Matrix Groups? It is old style. Done way before LaTeX.
 
@Alizter There's quite a lot of incredible mathematics in books so old that someone had their secretary manually write in their $\mathscr U$'s.
 
@TedShifrin The level of detail he puts in his proofs is really uncomfortable for me.
 
@AlexanderGruber something weird happened
 
You mean lack thereof, @Alex?
 
10:22 PM
@AlexanderGruber Too short?
 
I have a book across the table from me that's so old and so many people have read that it's barely still alive.
 
@AlexanderGruber If you get Royden, make sure it is the latest edition, cowritten with Fitzpatrick.
 
Older than me, @Mike?
 
It's still better than tabbing in word
 
@MikeMiller The bible?
 
10:22 PM
Not quite, @Ted
 
I feel like he should either include much more, i.e. as rigorous as you'd expect of a student's proof, or he should just go full on Serre and include only the main idea in near-Haiku format.
 
LOL
 
@AlexanderGruber Rudin is great as a reference.
 
I did once hold a book older than you. It was a copy of some lecture notes from 1911 - written entirely by hand.
 
Interestingly, @Alex, many students find that my books are too telegraphic, but I think they're far from it. They're just not calculus-book hand-holding style from cover to cover.
 
10:23 PM
@MikeMiller Everybody had neat handwriting in those days right?
 
By a monk, @Mike?
 
I needed it for my number theory project at Penn State and George Andrews let me borrow it. To keep it safe, I carried it around in a shoebox (rather than my backpack).
 
@TedShifrin It just depends on where the detail is omitted
 
Ah, good ol' George Andrews. He once invited me to come give a lecture, and I was busy and turned him down. That was dumb.
 
He's an impossibly pleasant human being.
 
10:24 PM
I support you to whatever extent I can in this vagueness, @Alex.
 
@AlexanderGruber she changed her name to Drew Cyrus
 
No argument, @Mike, although I think I've only met him once.
 
Do you know (of?) John Roe?
 
Do you think it was just a feud to get a quick answer?
 
Noe @Mike
 
10:24 PM
reuse*
 
Ah, shame. He's a noncommutative geometry bloke; taught the topology course there.
 
bloke? So you're both Southern and Brit?
 
It seems like it may be more effective than bounties
 
Learned about fundamental groups, Fredholm Operators, Toeplitz operators, and a baby version of the index theorem.
 
yes, I remember your telling me about the course when you were in it
I know his name, but I've never met him or read his work.
 
10:25 PM
@TedShifrin I think it's kind of like giving Hints on MSE. If somebody presents only the main idea of the proof, the crucial step, and nothing else, I'm ok with that. It's low detail but it puts the spotlight on the part that matters. I just don't like it when somebody includes a ton of detail on peripheral stuff and then glosses over the central point of the proof
 
I don't think I was 100% happy with it at the time, but post ipso facto I'm very glad took it.
 
which is 90% of what Rudin does... it feels really lazy to me, like he's not omitting detail for pedagogy, but for laziness.
 
Well, @Alex, that's one thing I've tried to teach my students — both undergrad and grad — by grading homeworks. Many have started out belaboring the obvious and leaving out what was hard. I nailed them for it.
 
Can someone here tell me what integral geometry is?
 
Hah. Hilbert's cube is homeomorphic to a subspace of $l_2$?
 
10:26 PM
I don't think that's quite fair to lob at Rudin, though. @Alex ...
 
@TedShifrin Good, that is good practice
 
Yes, @Jasper, that was my thesis. What do you want to know?
 
@TedShifrin No? I don't know, maybe that is just my perception of him.
 
@TedShifrin Well, to summarise what the topic is about in one sentence, because I can't find a good description online?
 
@JorgeFernández You're a victim to the sirens :(
 
10:27 PM
Classically it was called geometric probability. Crofton's formula was the ur-Theorem in the subject. We're basically trying to discern geometric invariants of an object by averaging those of various slices and projections.
 
Sorry, that was 3 sentences.
 
I see. OK.
 
Just make it a run-on.
 
@Jasper: The Gauss-Bonnet Theorem, in some sense, is another prototypical integral geometry theorem. So is Fary-Milnor. I'll be happy to answer further questions.
 
Huy
10:30 PM
@TedShifrin: I started with the first pages of GR today.
I'm very proud of my achievement.
 
GR? @Huy
oh ... duh
I was thinking GT
 
Huy
:D
GT is for high school. I have an exam on GR soon.
 
I told someone about the Foucault pendulum in terms of parallel transport and covariant derivative yesterday @Huy.
 
Huy
Cool. I'll ask you about it soon, maybe
 
Tell me about it, @Ted
 
10:32 PM
@N3buchadnezzar I look at this $$\lim_{x\to0}_{x>0} (\log(\sin(x))+e^{1/x})$$ and know the answer instantly without using Taylor series. How I did it?
 
@Mike: Do you know about the Foucault pendulum?
 
Yes.
 
If I have shown that Hilbert's cube is embeddable in $l_2$, is it suffficient to show that any set of sequences that act like Hilbert's cube in $l_2$ is nowhere dense there, in order to prove that Hilbert's cube is homeomorphic to a nowhere dense subset of $l_2$?
 
@TedShifrin ^^^
 
@HipsterMathematician I am sorry!
 
10:34 PM
So, think about carrying the pendulum around a latitude circle with the earth fixed (rather than rotating). A simple calculation will show that the swing vector field of the pendulum is essentially parallel (i.e., its derivative is almost all normal to the earth at that point). So walking the pendulum once around the latitude circle is parallel transporting a vector along that path (=holonomy).
Whoa, @Studentmath ... You've gone from 0 to 1000 very quickly in topology.
 
Interesting, @Ted
 
@Ted did I? I am doing product spaces now..
 
Did someone flag HipsterMathematician's comment? Because it's funny.
 
I have no idea to what Hipster refers.
 
I guess someone did.
I don't know what they refer to either.
 
Anonymous
10:36 PM
Yes, someone did
 
Well, I'll be sure to punch @Jasper in the face now that HipsterMath can't. :)
 
I did not flag her, of course.
 
I know.
 
@Chris'ssis: I figure that something that is instantaneous for you will take me hours, so I won't try to do it in an instant.
 
Did everybody see this delightful answer which provides a simple-looking integral that happens to equal exactly 22/7 minus pi? math.stackexchange.com/a/1078935/169852
 
Jez
10:37 PM
i thought it was a valid flag, it breaches the "be nice" policy, something i've been banned for a bunch of times
 
@HipsterMathematician I am sorry you got suspended. Of course, I did not flag you.
@Jez No, no, Hipster and I are good friends.
 
Jez
well, this is why the flagging system here is dumb. there's a lack of context.
 
@Studentmath: I don't know what you mean by "any set of sequences that act like Hilbert's cube in $\ell_2$".
 
Can a moderator unban Hipster @snailboat?
 
Jez
people from all rooms get notified when it should just be regulars
 
10:38 PM
@Jez Context matters on such things. If I called Ted a smelly jerk that nobody likes, he would probably smack me, and we would both be on our merry way.
 
Jez
i agree, i've criticized the flagging system a lot
 
I guess flags are a pretty good way to get more people in the room.. I should remember that. When I'm bored next time and no one is there to talk, just flag something that was obviously not meant to be serious :-)
 
You'll recall that Alec accosted me for being rude to Mike or Pedro totally out of context.
 
How're you, @halirutan?
 
LOL @halirutan. Not a way to win friends.
 
10:39 PM
@JasperLoy why?
 
Anonymous
@JasperLoy Sure, okay.
 
Jez
@halirutan yeah that's another thing; false flags dont really get punished
 
@MikeMiller Good. Thanks. Hope you are well too.
 
Doing great!
 
@AlexanderGruber Oh, well, I don't think Hipster was being nasty to me. Just joking around.
 
Anonymous
10:40 PM
I did since it seemed like no one involved was offended
 
I had hoped some real fight is going on here when I was pinged for the flags.
 
@snailboat No problem, I was just wondering. Hadn't been following the conversation
 
@snailboat agreed. I would have done the same thing if you hadn't beaten me to handling it :)
 
OK @HipsterMathematician you have been unbanned.
 
I wasn't joking around @JasperLoy
 
10:41 PM
Oy.
 
Oh, HipsterMath wasn't joking. Let's ban her again, quick!
 
@HipsterMathematician OK. I am sorry. I won't ask you again that question.
 
I appreciate.
When Marília stack exchange is created you can ask that
 
Anyway, the question I asked was 'When are you getting married?' That's all. For those curious.
 
@Ted well, I showed that Hilbert's cube is homeomorphic to $[0,1/n]^N$, which is a subspace of $l_2$. Now the points there are sequences $x_n$ so that $0\le x_n \le 1/n$ for every $n\in N$.
Now I am wondereing, if I show the set of these esequences is nowhere desne in $l_2$, that would suffice to show homeomorphism between Hilbert's cube and a now-where dense subset of $l_2$, right?
 
10:43 PM
@JasperLoy Thank you. I was just searching when you mentioned @HipsterMathematician's name but found nothing.
 
@HipsterMathematician 查雳? :-)
 
@AlexanderGruber Yes.
 
Ahhh, it's a good day.
 
Yeah grubs
 
There are so many users in this chat now.
 
10:46 PM
@JasperLoy it must be for you
 
@Alizter For me? Are they here to hope that I will start studying calculus next Thu? =)
 
Is that the first?
 
Yes, I intend to start studying on the first.
 
@Jasp: Are you a freshman?
 
No where near
 
10:48 PM
@DonLarynx No, I finished undergrad ten years ago. Planning to take GRE hopefully not too far from now.
Mariano is the only mod left from 2011.
 
when do we see the results of the election?
 
@Studentmath: I wasn't ignoring you. I was preparing rice pilaf in the kitchen. Let me read.
 
@JorgeFernández It's out already.
 
@JorgeFernández Meta.
 
10:54 PM
@Ted didn't think you did :P But I kinda figured out what I said is actually true. I think so, at least
 
So, let's see, @Studentmath. To show a set $A\subset X$ is nowhere dense, given any $x\in X-A$, we must find a neighborhood with no element of $A$ in it.
 
Oh, the three I voted for!
 
Yes, tautologically, what you asked is true, @Studentmath.
 
@JorgeFernández Yes, I also voted for them. Too bad Thomas withdrew.
 
I voted for two out of the three @Jorge, but originally voted for all three.
 
10:57 PM
In this case I know the set is closed, so it's enough to show its interior is empty
 
I will come back after my shower.
 
OK, @Studentmath.
 
So for every $\epsilon$, $x\in A$ I take, as $l^2$ is metric space I can just show that $B(x,\epsilon)$ has elment from $A^c$
 

« first day (1602 days earlier)      last day (3414 days later) »