@MrShinyandNew安宇 Because I would like to be sure that it is illegal in Canada (because I am almost certain that it is legal here). Are you 100 % sure you didn't just think so because published put that stuff on their products?
@Cerberus Wait, are you trying to frame this in terms of "Mr. S&N was brainwashed by the industry goons at an early age, because he didn't acquire all of his legal knowledge from primary sources"?
@ClarkKent No, it might not be permitted. "Necessity" is only a defense against guilt, it doesn't make things "legal". That is an important distinction.
and making a recording of the radio is easy, and frankly making a casssette recording is so easily done...(all I'm saying is that it's not obvious sometimes)
@MrShinyandNew安宇 As I was saying, I'm trying to remember whether I actually read something definitive on this. I can't. And I bet that 99 % of the people here wouldn't know any of the less well-known laws.
@Mitch agreed, and agreed, and it doesn't matter if it's obvious or not. The fact is I, personally, knew it was both illegal and (at least somewhat) wrong.
@MrShinyandNew安宇 So it is not so strange to ask whether you actually knew knew this, or just thought you knew, as a kid. I don't meam to imply that you were stupid or that you should known, because few people normally know these things. Loads of urban myths. Like the one about removing the label from a mattress?
@Cerberus In fact it's a bit of a joke because just about every consumer electronics device that works with "media" violates the law (when used in the way it is intended to be used)
I am more than prepared to believe you: but I needed you to be as specific as this (because most people think they know what's illegal while in fact they don't, even intelligent people). So now I believe you.
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Mainly because it seemed absurd to me that that should be illegal in 1993, so I had a hard time believing it.
AND media which is sold for the (potential) purposes of storing copied music, i.e. blank CDs, blank tapes, has a levy collected which is handed to copyright groups
@Cerberus yeah, it used to be, but then the gov't fucked it up, and all the new copyright legislation they tried to pass was really bad, and there were protests, but now they have a majority gov't, so who knows what will happen
@Cerberus It really depends on how useful the app is, what people are used to paying for productivity tools, what the competition is, and what people are used to paying for other non-comparable programs.
eg on the Android market, most software is in the $1-$20 range.
@MrShinyandNew安宇 I was going to mention mobile applications. Huge profits are made there, because q seems to go up exponentially (or at least lots) when p goes below € 10 or € 5.
Personally I don't like paying anything at all, so even though, say, $5 is almost no money, I won't even try software that's $5 if I have to pay to try it.
But some apps, like Photoshop, are hundreds of $. and Also, you asked in EUR, which betrays a key point: prices vary on a per-market basis. I couldn't even start to guess how much software costs in Europe.
@Cerberus If I use the free version, I might pay $5 for an upgrade. I would have to get past the mental block of "I'm buying this app, but not forever, because it might not be around later".
@Cerberus not updated, or an update I need isn't free, or the platform on which it runs might stop working, etc. Like, I have Corel Draw 9 but it doesn't work on anything past Windows 98. not 2k, not XP, etc. The fix is to buy a newer Corel Draw. That annoys me a lot.
Games are an exception, because they are fundamentally different in many ways. I can think of it as "pay $5 for X hours of entertainment" and when those hours are up, any more hours of entertainmetn are a bonus.
@Cerberus well, the support costs of maintaining the app, the updates, and the licensing for "life" are constant but the revenue must be declining and will continue to decline for ever no matter their price point. So probably they're not interested in new sales of this antique.
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Yeah OK, that could be the case. This is just an extreme example. But I see lots of other, more popular programs that I think could rake in heaps more money if they lowered their prices.
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Heh, I could do that. But I find their prices so unsympathetic (even back when everybody used XP) that I am disinclined to make the effort.
The kind of people who would install this program are the same kind of people who can google "how to remove things from the explorer context menu", fire up Regedit, and be done with it.
@Cerberus You are A) completely atypical of any desktop user I've ever encountered, and B) capable of following instructions on how to edit the registry, thus achieving your goal for free
@Cerberus bah, deleting random shit in the registry can cause issues. Following carefully written instructions, not so much. Just back up your system or whatever you do.
Having to edit the registry with all the right settings for all the entries that I want to move for all the extensions...would take hours, and I can't know that I'm not messing something up, because I don't know what I'm doing.
@MrShinyandNew安宇 It has a coloured bar that attracts attention every time it changes colour. Makes me less productive. And I think there was something else. Besides, I like paying € 1 for this program, because it's great. Except that I can't.
What I want is two things: 1.) only have the entries I used most in the root context menu; 2.) have the entries organised in some way that makes sense. Oh, and I want a.) to do this easily and quickly, and b.) each change to be easily reversible.
@Cerberus I usually just want to remove the ones that I don't use, because whatever they do I can usually do the "long" way if I ever need to do that, which is doubtful because no program is so important that it dominates my use of Explorer