In correspondence to donors of a nonprofit, I think use of the words of and that are superfluous. What is your opinion?
He is the boy I saw yesterday vs He is the boy that I saw yesterday.
This statement could replace all the notes we send vs. This statement could replace all of the notes we se...
@JohnLawler The worldwide market is craving Syntactic Rules for Dummies, J.M. Lawler, Wiley 2015. Imagine billions and billions served. — tchrist18 secs ago
Also, it definitely doesn't come from French, and that's not what "il y a" means in French. There is such a construct in many languages. — George Pompidou29 secs ago
@Cerberus I think I remember reading somewhere that the reason Youtube uses DASH is because of the high bandwidth usage caused by videos being buffered completely but not being watched.
So someone would watch the first few seconds and then close the video.
Oval Books is a British publishing company responsible for the publishing the critically acclaimed Bluffer's Guide and Xenophobe's Guide series. The books are written by experts on the subject in an off-beat but informative way, verging on spoof.
== Bluffer's Guide Series ==
The Bluffer's Guide to Accountancy
The Bluffer's Guide to Archaeology
The Bluffer's Guide to Astrology & Fortune Telling
The Bluffer's Guide to Ballet
The Bluffer's Guide to Bond
The Bluffer's Guide to Chess
The Bluffer's Guide to the Classics by Ross Leckie
The Bluffer's Guide to Computers
The Bluffer's Guide to Consultancy...
@Alraxite Probably. But then they should improve their buffering algorisms. And should not throw parts that have already been buffered out of memory. Unless it really takes up a huge load of memory?
Anyway, this algorithm screws the ones who have a bad connection in every which way. On rewinding, it loses the buffered content. And many a times, people with slow connections will leave a video to buffer. Except of course, that doesn't happen anymore!
I'm aware there is probably little connection between these two words, the Greek trauma, and German Traum, but does anyone know of any connection that may have been explored, scholarly, poetically, etc., whether playing off the homnymic nature of the two, or explaining such coincidence?
I know t...
@skullpatrol Tchrist's one-boxing is indeed excessive. But at least it is meant to be new content, to show people things they might want to see or read, not just making a point.
He hand-picked all those links. It's not just typing !!wiki all the time.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 well, as George explained just yesterday, any past remark of his is utter nonsense. And since he is in a time zone that is many hours in the past, I am in the comfortable position of discounting as nonsense everything he will say for hours to come.
Since I am especially interested in EL&U questions that involve the historical development and alteration of word meanings, or the first occurrence of a word or phrase, providing source information is especially crucial to the usefulness of my answers. A bit of advice I received (some time ago) i...
You know, @Andrew, I sometimes wonder how many questions would be rewritten into suitable form if it detected that they were asking if something is grammatically correct and blocked them from doing so with a little popup saying why? :)
This might be a dupe, but I was in a hurry so just answered anyway. Certainly it is general reference, but from what I can tell, people can’t even read a dictionary without handholding and other unmentionably unsanitary acts.
Any: Determiner and Pronoun sg. & pl.
Although its origins lie as an indeterminate derivative of one, which is of course singular by definition, any can be used both in the singular and the plural.
Per the OED, in the singular, any means:
A __ no matter which; a __ whichever, of whatever ...
Not many questions would be rewritten, I suspect. My standard comment might go some way to help (I hope; otherwise it's not helping now).
> Unfortunately proof-reading is explicitly off-topic. Proofreading questions can come in many forms: "Help me fix this", "What's wrong with this", "Are there any mistakes", Which is correct", but they all involve reading a specific text and won't really help anyone else.
> Please identify what you're particularly concerned about, and edit the question to indicate that. It's possible, of course, that there's already a question for it, which searching the site may well find.