« first day (475 days earlier)      last day (4440 days later) » 

8:00 PM
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Still, it seems this must be a dupe.
 
user19161
Coffee is not nice when cold, unless it's iced coffee.
 
user19161
So nice drinks are usually very hot or very cold but not in between.
 
@JasperLoy I agree
but my brother drinks even when it's not hot
 
@Kit @Rob will you have a bar for sniping? This back and forth is killing me. We used to be 1k ahead, now it's 300 behind again.
 
8:09 PM
@RegDwightѬſ道 I can.
 
Whats bar for sniping?
 
Spoken like a true Obama.
I applaud your Obamaness!
 
user19161
@SonicTheHedgehog They are playing a game somewhere else.
 
@RegDwightѬſ道 I am here to be applauded.
Shall I start now?
 
8:12 PM
I kept losing.
 
user19161
@Cerberus Time to quit!
 
And for some reason my passive score is positive so I'll keep it at that.
@JasperLoy Don't worry, I stopped fighting.
 
@RegDwightѬſ道 I will burn one now. Also, I will assist in the war effort. The two things are not mutually exclusive.
 
No bogarting in this chat!
 
user19161
@Cerberus Is it a shooting game?
 
8:14 PM
@JasperLoy No, it is a turn-based card game.
 
user19161
I am good at shooting. I score full marks with a real rifle in the day time.
 
Seriously?
Wowie.
 
@JasperLoy for some reason, the thought of you using live ammunition scares me a bit.
 
@JasperLoy 30 minutes appears to be within the proper period cooking.stackexchange.com/a/19256/5009
 
user19161
@Cerberus Yes. But I score almost zero at night because of my astigmatism.
 
user19161
8:16 PM
@Theta30 Haha, I did not expect you to do research on this!
 
@Cerberus I just got to the end of the video. kinda scary when I think about how much data is stored about me by my ISP
 
@MattЭллен Ah, you've finished it already! I need to pause and rewind a lot. And run back to the screen while making dinner, when I can't follow something. Yeah, did they give you info about things your ISP could be doing?
 
@Cerberus nono, I know what my ISP have been told to store for 7 years by law. I asked my MP to vote against that law.
 
Luckily I have nothing to hide from my ISP or the government. But I do hate the ease with which privacy is broken.
 
exactly
 
8:19 PM
@MattЭллен Ohh wow, 7 years, seriously?
 
That is very long.
 
user19161
Why is it called seven year itch?
 
user19161
Does it really happen after seven years?
 
what is the 7 year itch?
 
8:22 PM
Depends in which one Jas means?
 
@Reg: Spent, 105 ahead.
 
Scabies, or the theory that relationships often flounder after 7 years?
 
Well, I answered that question question. What’s the verdict?
 
8:23 PM
I see
 
100 behind now. I'm starting.
 
@JonPurdy Link?
 
3
Q: Why some questions are written in this funny way?

doppelfishThere, I did it myself. Instead of asking "Why are some questions written in this funny way?", I produced what strikes me as bad English ever so often: Questions that are formed by starting out with "Why" (or other interrogative words), followed by what seems to be a normal subject-verb-object se...

The one that was most recently talked about in here. :P
 
Yes, but I'm lazy.
 
I’m just not sure what form bother is in in “why bother?”
“Why be…” suggests infinitive/bare.
 
8:30 PM
isn't it just headlineese? "[this is]Why we eat to stay alive"
 
@MattЭллен Not when it has a question mark.
 
oh right.
 
A headlined question tends to be phrased in the usual way, though (pretty much by definition) rhetorically. “Who Wants to Get Rich?”
 
@JonPurdy your answer is what I wanted to write. +1 from me.
 
"Why we eat to stay alive" seems normal to me
 
8:34 PM
@MattЭллен Yes, but it’s not a question.
 
Except the OP said he put in the "missing question marks."
 
@JonPurdy I never said it was. I'm saying it's normal to find headlines like that
 
@MattЭллен Okay, agreed, absolutely.
 
And he got them from StackExchange question titles.
 
@MattЭллен In that case it's a dupe.
 
8:36 PM
@JonPurdy high five for consensus
 
@KitFox I failed to notice that. Cheater!
 
@RegDwightѬſ道 I see. I haven't been paying enough attention to recognise it.
 
@KitFox So? There isn’t really a consistent standard for question titles. Broadly, some are declarative (like titles) and some are interrogative (like questions) and when you tack a question mark onto the former you get what we observe here.
 
user19161
@JonPurdy I omit the question mark when writing the title in this way.
 
user19161
It just becomes a phrase.
 
user19161
8:39 PM
Why did he do this? --> Why he did this
 
@JasperLoy that's what you're supposed to do
 
@JasperLoy That’s correct. But “Why he did this?” is (to my eye) wrong.
 
user19161
@JonPurdy Yet many titles here are like that.
 
But if someone says "Uhoh, Jasper wrote a question! better add a ?" then it becomes wrong.
 
user19161
What is the difference between A and B? --> Difference between A and B
 
8:41 PM
As a descriptivist, of course, my “wrong” means “whatever most relevant people disagree with”.
 
@Jon: I think both you and Irene make valid points. But I think we need more context: I suspect that the OP labelled a few titles as questions that weren't questions but just descriptive titles, of the type chapter 1: on why women do not like to wear underwear.
 
Jasper wrote this weird question "Why he did this?" (I added the missing question mark.)
 
@JonPurdy Isn't that what intelligent people always mean when they say that?
 
@Cerberus I read your “capter” as a chapter about a caper. :)
@Cerberus Hah, no.
 
Haha oops!
Corrected.
@JonPurdy How do you know?
Noöne with an ounce of education thinks there are objective truths in language use.
 
8:44 PM
@JonPurdy Because they were declarative titles and he tacked a question mark on it and called it a poorly phrased question.
 
@Cerberus By counterexample. I know an intelligent person who is a prescriptivist and insists on objective grammatical correctness.
 
@JonPurdy Are you sure? Have you really investigated his theories?
 
@JonPurdy Isn't that a contradiction in terms? :p
 
@Cerberus I am sure insofar as one can be reasonably sure of anything.
 
I am a strong prescriptivist in that I want language to be a certain way. But I know very well how arbitrary this desire is.
@JonPurdy But then how can he be intelligent?
 
8:46 PM
@Cerberus Intelligence does not necessitate agreeing with you, or me.
 
@Cerberus yeah, like forcing people to understand greek grammar when speaking english. pfft
 
@JonPurdy Doesn't he know how language and our expectations of it change under all kinds of external and internal factors, etc.?
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Yes, like that.
Which is no different from telling people not to use "ain't".
Oops!
slaps himself with prescriptivist paw
 
One of the smartest people I know (a computer science graduate student focused on programming language theory) is a devout Christian. (We used to argue about religion, but we found that programming language design is more contentious.)
 
@Cerberus I no longer tell people not to use "ain't". Instead I tell them not to use it if they care that most people will consider their usage of it to be a sign of lack of intelligence or education.
@JonPurdy uhoh.
 
@JonPurdy Hehe nice.
 
8:48 PM
hides from sound of can of worms being opened
 
I just shoot people who use ain't. it's better for both of us
damnit
 
Okay, I suppose even smart people can have strange lacunae, point granted.
 
shoots self
 
@MattЭллен Obama used it in a public speech once
@MattЭллен wait, you forgot the use/mention distinction!
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 And is that essentially different?
 
8:49 PM
shoots ghost bullets as Obama
 
revives @Matt with Vac-U
 
@MattЭллен How do you feel about in’t? Is it bad like ain’t or is it just reduction of isn’t?
 
@MattЭллен The omission of quotation marks can be fatal!
 
@Cerberus yes. Because I am not saying that they are wrong.
 
Well I can't find the original question. Go figure.
 
8:49 PM
@KitFox revives Thanks!
 
@JonPurdy I believe it's spelt innit, innit?
 
Found something else dupish though.
0
Q: Words order in a question

Andrew DashinWhich is better (and why)? Which feature should I attach this task to? or To which feature should I attach this task?

 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Doesn't what you're saying amount to the same thing, but just using more words?
 
@RegDwightѬſ道 I looked too. Couldn't find.
 
@Cerberus nah, I'm kidding really. I'm not against it
 
8:50 PM
@RegDwightѬſ道 words order? GAH! loads pistol
 
@KitFox No, in’t meaning isn’t, not innit meaning isn’t it (or even things like aren’t they depending on where you ask).
 
I say in't quite often
 
The above is pretty much a dupe of the canonical preposition question, innit.
 
@JonPurdy OH, that.
 
Most people I know are perfectly aware of the fact that there is no objectively "right" language etc. etc., but we all call things right and wrong, which means just that people like us don't like it.
 
8:51 PM
"in't it" is something friends will hear me say
 
@RegDwightѬſ道 Aye, that it do indeed be.
 
Also, aren't the following two the same question?
8
Q: Is it OK to add a question mark to show inflection?

whoabackoffWhen asking a question you generally have to raise your voice at the end of the sentence, is it okay to stuff a question mark in order to show inflection? A couple examples: 'That really happened?' 'I'm going to miss it again?' 'You did that?' etc...

5
Q: Does appending a question mark to a declarative sentence result in a valid sentence?

George EdisonSuppose I have the sentence: "All apples are green." Although it is not a true statement, clearly it is a declarative sentence. Can any declarative sentence like this be made into an interrogative sentence (a question) merely by replacing the period with a question mark? The reason I ask i...

 
@Cerberus no! because it's not a matter of right or wrong. It's a matter of presentation. Like I said, Obama used "ain't" in a speech. It was 100% correct by any logical standard.
I'm not trying to "correct" them.
 
The latter no, because it’s more general.
Oh wait, whether they’re the same as one another.
 
@KitFox I see, this is a Ratchet and Clank thing :)
 
8:52 PM
@RegDwightѬſ道 I think so, yes.
 
@MattЭллен Did you go look it up? :P
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 I'm afraid I can't follow you here.
 
@KitFox yeah - I was curious!
these new fangled techno-ma-bobs
I need to stay relevant
 
Hahaha
You sound like Cronk.
 
@MRS: By the way, have you noticed that we're OK when you are trying to convince me of something, but not the other way around?
 
8:55 PM
Oh noes! Therapy time!
 
Hehe.
 
Just an observation.
 
@KitFox I see!
 
8:56 PM
@Cerberus I'm trying to convince you of something?
 
@MattЭллен I think he uses that very phrase "new fangled tech-ma-bobs"
 
really? :D that's a fantastic coincidence
 
My point is that prescriptivism says that "aint" is wrong, full stop. I say that it's right, but people will look at you funny because of prejudice.
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 You have a point that you're trying to convince me of, no?
 
And if you think this morning's conversation was not "OK", well, I apologize for whatever I did that upset you, I certainly didn't mean to upset you.
 
8:59 PM
if not before then certainly now
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 If that's your definition of prescriptivism, then I don't know any prescriptivists. Then it's just silly ignorance.
 
@Cerberus I don't know if I'm trying to convince you of something, per se. More like explain my perspective.
 

« first day (475 days earlier)      last day (4440 days later) »