« first day (1946 days earlier)      last day (2894 days later) » 

12:00 AM
C is a universal joke.
All the aliens are like "wtf are you doing y u no jellyquery"
 
@Agawa001 Uhhh why?
 
@Upgoat following yur latest nick updates, the aboutme of your profile was not linked to that update
@quartata because it generates same numbers in two consecutive runs
 
That's because you're not seeding it first
srand(time(NULL));
 
@quartata That might have less entropy than rand() supports. Use a UUID instead.
 
uh , just use time() modulus something
its golfier
 
12:02 AM
@mınxomaτ Yeah, it's not the best way to seed it
@Agawa001 please no
 
please, why ?
 
@EᴀsᴛᴇʀʟʏIʀᴋ ikr. I apply to ECMA for inclusion of this as a built-in in ES8.
 
@Agawa001 Is this an actual question?
 
: Make safari output No one gives a 💩 about Safari..
 
Sorry, I just feel like the answer is obvious
 
12:04 AM
@mınxomaτ
 
Dammit, just saw someone on Youtube whose username was "You are now breathing manually"
Ha, now you are too.
 
i hate when shortesttime-fitting challenges are attrubuted to code-golf
 
@quartata Your tongue just sits kinda awkwardly in your mouth.
@EᴀsᴛᴇʀʟʏIʀᴋ But then I would give a 💩 :-(
 
Anonymous
When I think the name "Benedict Cumberbatch" it's always to the tune of "Another One Bites The Dust." And now so do you.
 
@EᴀsᴛᴇʀʟʏIʀᴋ ಠ_ಠ
 
12:06 AM
@quartata yes it is
 
safari browser is best browser
 
@Upgoat I keep thinking you're digital trauma
 
@Mego Nah, not really.
 
12:06 AM
@Mego nice try though\
 
I always spell it "Beneficial Cucumber" in my head.
 
@CᴏɴᴏʀO'Bʀɪᴇɴ :| should I go back to downgoat
 
@Upgoat Idc :P
 
i always believed that there isno thing called chance here down
 
i wanna go back to downgoat but then i will get downgoated ;_;
 
12:07 AM
>>> import time
>>> for i in range(1, 100):
...   print(time.time() // 60)
...
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
24406567.0
 
so, rand(), must be technically calculated
 
So random
 
so original
very joke
 
I didn't think he was joking
 
@Agawa001 roll a dice
 
12:08 AM
and anything occurs as what people call it "chance" or "random", is backgrounded on a reason
while we are unaware of that reason
 
Anonymous
Benedict Cumberwubwub
 
Wow that was late.
 
@mınxomaτ done for you.
Check the PRs.
 
how bout randomizing a function according to how random a random thing can be starred at a random tange of time in 19th byte 's board, nothing can be more random than this
 
12:18 AM
@EᴀsᴛᴇʀʟʏIʀᴋ Did you test this in all other browsers? And pls minify.
 
>>> import time as hammer
>>> hammer.time()
12
 
@mınxomaτ working on it
 
when you want a quick coffee, do you just chew instant coffee?
 
instant coffee != coffee.
 
^
 
12:20 AM
@Mego With regards to this I think the system is fair enough for challenge writers as it stands
But people always say I'm the exception :))
(continues to stroke ego in private)
 
>>> import antigravity
 
@HelkaHomba "ego" ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
 
>>> from __future__ import braces as stop_the_bad_import_jokes
SyntaxError: Not a chance
 
Anonymous
@HelkaHomba I disagree. Trivial challenges and clever solutions to challenges get significantly more votes than clever challenges. Answer votes giving more than twice the rep that question votes do only makes it worse. To make things worse, trivial challenges get more answers, which puts them on HNQ, which then attracts more views, votes, and answers.
 
Anonymous
Trivial challenges dominate the highest-voted and most-viewed challenges
 
Anonymous
12:26 AM
Meanwhile, interesting, novel challenges get ignored, likely because "too hard; can't be bothered"
 
Anonymous
Your challenges are the exception, because you have a unique reputation within this community for creating very good challenges. When you post a challenge, we all flock to it, because we know it's going to be good, and it inevitably ends up on HNQ. Challenges by anyone else don't get that same kind of response.
 
@FryAmTheEggman nice...
 
Anonymous
Out of the top 10 users by reputation, you are the only one with more questions than answers posted.
 
@Mego Yeah. It is admittedly difficult to garner interest for clever/in-depth challenges (unlike simple acsii-art stuff I often churn out). But I think it's more an issue of human nature liking quick and easy stuff, not a severe problem with our site.
 
Have anyone noticed that we're approaching 30000000?
 
12:30 AM
@LeakyNun ?
 
@Upgoat You just replied to 29958876
 
@Upgoat Message number. I just responded too 29958877
 
oh ok
 
sudoku minimal clues, and O(n) longest palindrome finder are exemplary hard to an impractical extent, i mean that they remain theorical until a satisfying solution pops in.
 
but we still got ~50000 to go
 
12:31 AM
pls no spam
 
Anonymous
On PPCG and Puzzling, it's at least as hard to write a good challenge as it is to come up with a good solution to one. The fact that we don't have a system for rewarding good challenges like we do for rewarding good solutions implies that we value solutions more than challenges. The q/a ratio of our top users by reputation enforces that problem.
 
If we had to do something I think the +10 rep challenge votes would be the simplest thing, but apparently that can't happen :/
 
typedef ctime night; sleep(night->time());
zZ good fight
i mean night
 
@Agawa001 night!
 
Anonymous
When a significant portion of our userbase says "can we please have this?", I'm not satisfied with a "no too hard" answer
 
12:35 AM
solution: get a job at SE?
 
I might actually want to do that
 
@LeakyNun Yeah, I noticed that yesterday.
 
@El'endiaStarman Nice
 
Anonymous
We are fundamentally different than the rest of the network (Puzzling notwithstanding), and the CMs have acknowledged this. The fact that they haven't made any of the changes that we've requested, or commented on them at all (except saying "no too hard" to the challenge rep increase) is very frustrating.
3
 
@LeakyNun I'm replying to this to verify myself
 
12:39 AM
29958964 :o
 
Anonymous
We had to pester the CMs endlessly to graduate. I don't want us to have to do that every time we need something changed.
 
Some tasks take a team—now you can assign issues and pull requests to up to ten users: https://github.com/blog/2178-multiple-assignees-on-issues-and-pull-requests?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=multiple-assignees https://t.co/FwYZaiVzWd
 
Anonymous
I fear the outcome will be "supporting non-Q&A sites is hard, so no". Or worse, "supporting non-Q&A sites is hard, so you and Puzzling are getting shut down".
 
That won't happen. Not right after graduating both.
 
8 hours ago, by mınxomaτ
> Multiple Assignees
ninja'd
 
12:42 AM
@Mego if that were to happen, we'd at least have TNB to organize a secondary site :P
 
@Mego Stack Exchange doesn't shut down healthy communities.
@Mego I honestly don't think pestering had anything to do with it. They keep tabs on the status of the various sites with automatic triggers telling them when sites are ready to graduate.
 
Anonymous
@DrGreenEggsandHamDJ Perhaps I should have said "eventual outcome". I don't expect that we'll be shut down anytime soon. But some point in the future, it could happen, unless something drastically changes, and we get the support we need from the CM team.
 
Anonymous
@AlexA. We had to pester them because those automatic triggers weren't working. meta.stackexchange.com/questions/274340/…
 
@Quill finally
 
Anonymous
@AlexA. We're an exception to several rules already. What's one more?
 
12:45 AM
I still don't think that will happen. Were frustrated with SE, but not the other way around. As far as SE is concerned, we're doing just fine without any site-specific customization's, so why bother?
TBF, we are doing fine. We could be doing even better, but the current system is OK.
 
@Mego That logic doesn't apply here. We are a Stack Exchange site that brings traffic to the network. We don't break any of SE's rules. As a community we function differently, but otherwise we are a typical SE site. And SE has said that they don't shut down healthy sites.
@DrGreenEggsandHamDJ We'd know if they were frustrated with us.
 
Anonymous
@DrGreenEggsandHamDJ I disagree. Our average QPD has been steadily dropping since graduation.
 
That's my point. They aren't.
 
I know, I'm just adding information.
 
@AlexA. unless you're ai.SE
 
12:48 AM
@Mego Really? Do you have a source on that?
 
Anonymous
 
I don't see any evidence of a significant change based on the graph.
 
Yeah, that looks pretty normal. There was a peak right before graduation obviously but it hasn't like flatlined or something
 
If you back it up further to jan of 2015, we're steadily increasing.
 
Anonymous
We're getting a lot less high days and a lot more low days
 
12:50 AM
 
Anonymous
@DrGreenEggsandHamDJ If you back it up to 2015-jan-01, the recent downward trend is even more visible
 
Anonymous
It's OK to post screenshots of the site analytics page in chat, right?
 
Yeah.
 
@DrGreenEggsandHamDJ this ain't site analytics, this is SEDE, baby
 
12:51 AM
That isn't site analytics that he posted
 
Yeah, he doesn't have enough rep to see our site analytics
 
I thought that was CR's.
idk why
Well, gbai everyone. I'm going rock climbing.
 
 
Anonymous
 
12:54 AM
@Quill That's a 300 week change
 
@Mego I assume this is weekly view right?
 
Anonymous
The graph I posted is 2015-jan-01 to 2016-may-27, questions, weekly view
 
Anonymous
Yep
 
I personally think that's not a very drastic change but OK
I'm not sure where you're going with this, at any rate
 
Anonymous
What I'm saying is, since graduation, there's been a decline in the number of challenges posted per day
 
12:56 AM
@DrGreenEggsandHamDJ nice! bye!
where?
at a gym or a outdoor place?
 
@Mego OK, sure. And?
 
I don't think it's been long enough since graduation to be able to draw any meaningful conclusions about trends.
 
Anonymous
And that's not good. You'd expect the QPD to stay constant or go up.
 
No, you wouldn't. We actually kind of arbitrarily inflated our QPD during that time period since we heard about the broken triggers and for the first time in years we were actually being examined for graduation
 
when did we graduate? what date?
 
Anonymous
12:58 AM
I believe the key to getting more high-quality challenges is to have more rewards for writing high-quality challenges.
 
Anonymous
@Quill 2016-Feb-23
 
As I recall there was a lot of "POST MORE CHALLENGES" and screenshots of the A51 page
 
@EᴀsᴛᴇʀʟʏIʀᴋ gym.
 
@Mego I agree, but I also don't think that without such rewards we'll ultimately devolve into a festering shitscape.
 
 
Anonymous
12:59 AM
@quartata Exactly. There was an incentive for posting challenges (helping us graduate). Now that we've graduated, that incentive is gone, and our QPD is dropping back to pre-graduation levels.
 
@Quill How did you get that graph?
 
Pre-graduation =/=> unhealthy
 
@Mego I wouldn't say there is very little incentive for posting questions. Questions already get significantly more rep than answers
 
@DrGreenEggsandHamDJ okay cool
 
we can't bounty questions, but you could do a monthly best-of challenge and bounty answers of the winning challengers
 
1:00 AM
I don't think having rewards will change the real probablem which is that people like lower quality trivial challenges and voting is generally skewed towards them. Ultimately even if you have a bounty system votes are still the "primary" reward in most peoples' eyes
 
Anonymous
@AlexA. I definitely did not say that.
 
@LeakyNun data.stackexchange.com
 
oh, thanks
 
@Mego Well, we'd have to devolve as such in order to be shut down
 
I don't think SE would shut down a graduated site no matter how shitty it became
 
Anonymous
1:01 AM
@Upgoat A single question may get significantly more votes than a single answer, but those votes count for less than half, and there are a whole lot more answers than questions being posted every day.
 
considering CommunityBuilding, Lifehacks and a bunch of other sites have been in public beta with numbers like 1.5 a week for many months, SE ain't gonna can PPCG
 
Anonymous
@Upgoat Fair enough. SFF is still running, after all.
 
@Mego Whoa shots fired
@Quill Or Beer SE
 
brb posting in mos eisley
 
don't start a fire @Upgoat
 
Anonymous
1:02 AM
@quartata To be fair, they've had a shitton of drama in the last few months. A mod was asked to step down, their chatroom got frozen, and then that same (former) mod got chat-banned, then site-banned.
 
@Upgoat Please don't
 
@quartata too late
 
Why would you stir up even more drama in there for no reason
3
 
If you're concerned about PPCG's health, don't start getting delusions of closure into your heads.
 
it would really cause drama??
 
1:03 AM
Uh, yes?
 
ok, removed
 
Anonymous
I can't imagine why you would think that was a good idea
2
 
@Upgoat what is mos eisley?
 
A bar
 
1:05 AM
@orlp sci fi chat room:
 
Anonymous
@orlp A wretched hive of scum and villainy.
 
9 mins ago, by Mego
I believe the key to getting more high-quality challenges is to have more rewards for writing high-quality challenges.
@Mego any ideas?
 
Anonymous
21
Q: How should challenge authors be rewarded for creating exemplary challenges?

MegoOver on Puzzling.SE, the community there has been discussing various ways to reward puzzle authors for creating exemplary puzzles. Given that we're like Puzzling.SE in that we're not a Q&A site, and that we've discussed increasing reputation gain/loss for challenge upvotes and downvotes, it seems...

 
Anonymous
The increased rep for challenges is one of the better solutions IMO. I'm still stewing on some of the others posted on Puzzling.
 
@Mego wait what
 
Anonymous
1:12 AM
@orlp Were you not keeping up with the SFF drama?
 
@Mego no
 
Anonymous
On an unrelated note: this page is hilarious
 
Anonymous
> Programming Puzzles & Code Golf Stack Exchange works really well for technical support
 
Anonymous
46
Q: Why was a moderator on our Stack asked to step down?

SQBAs we all know by now, Richard is stepping down as a moderator for this Stack. As Richard notes both in his announcement and in chat, he was asked to step down by a community manager. After speaking with the powers-that-be, I have been offered a stark choice; jump ship or get pushed. and ...

 
1:15 AM
@Mego where?
 
I'm only 1 file away from completing cheddar >_>
 
Anonymous
@MarsUltor Look at the link in the immediate previous message
 
3 mins ago, by Mego
On an unrelated note: this page is hilarious
 
Anonymous
TIL we're tech support
 
If anyone wants to play around with that SEDE query I was referencing earllier: data.stackexchange.com/codegolf/query/418726/…
 
Anonymous
1:17 AM
"Help my code doesn't work!" "Have you tried getting rid of whitespace?"
 
Mar 28 at 23:50, by Downgoat
@QPaysTaxes Welcome to Programming Puzzles and Code Golf! This website is tagged so you need to make your code as short as possible, you can start by removing all that horrible whitespace and making all variable named 1-char long.
 
@quartata We bash other sites so much that it would be the most hypocritical thing ever for us to get upset about that.
No worries.
 
Anonymous
Still, trying to stir up more drama is a bad idea, and is not Being Nice
 
Wait, this is the code golf chat?
 
Anonymous
Nope this is Code Review
 
1:24 AM
@Mego ಠ_ಠ
 
I haven't made fun of Code Golf because I don't understand what it is. It seems like the illegitimate love child of Puzzling.SE and Stack Overflow.
 
Anonymous
@WadCheber That's a very apt description
 
We tend to rag on M&TV, Worldbuilding, and Skeptics more than anything else.
 
Anonymous
We write short code that often requires a few lifetimes of the universe to run to completion for large inputs
 
Anonymous
I would never bash on Skeptics. It's too easy. I don't like hitting below the belt.
 
Anonymous
1:26 AM
Instead I'll just continue to pick on every programming language in existence
 

Questions That Need Answering

Oct 16 '15 at 1:45, 37 minutes total – 64 messages, 7 users, 2 stars

Bookmarked Oct 16 '15 at 2:25 by Wad Cheber

Anyway, we're basically a bunch of clowns, so we don't take ourselves too seriously. Upgoat deleted the comments already, but even if he hadn't, I doubt anyone would have gotten upset.
 
Anonymous
@WadCheber Well, you'd actually have to have people active in your chatroom for them to get upset.
 
Anonymous
Heyoooo
 
Anonymous
(I'm joking, of course :P)
 
HOW DARE YOU!
Actually, the drama you mentioned above has had an impact on chat participation. Things got pretty ugly for a while, and then the elections turned into a clusterf$%k. There was a minor exodus from the site as a result.
 
Anonymous
1:32 AM
Yeah, I noticed :P
 
Anonymous
I'm just glad our elections were fairly peaceful
 
Anonymous
Off to the kitchen, to cook something up :)
 
We had the election to replace the ousted mod and bring in another so we had a total of six, but the election itself led to another mod leaving.
Meh.
@Mego Godspeed.
 
WHY DID I HAVE DO REDISCOVER REDDIT?
(So far, it's that many, times 10)
 
It just closed a second before I wanted to post a solution...
4
Q: Illiteral Prime numbers

7H3_H4CK3RYour challenge is to write a program (full program, not a function), that will take an integer and output all prime numbers up to (including) the given integer. Output is any readable list containing all integer primes (array, string, 1 prime per line, whatever you want) and must run to stdout or...

 
1:42 AM
(Wait, no, make that 20 times)
 
@LeakyNun D:
 
@Upgoat Why did you change your name?
 
@LeakyNun idk, people said they would vote for an upright goat
 
@Upgoat Oh no I didn't mess up anything by time travelling, did I?
 
@MarsUltor ?
 
1:56 AM
0/10 not original avatar
-10/10 brackets
 
-1 not Downgoat
 
???
 
@ppcg mod: can my username on PPCG be changed back to Downgoat pls
 

« first day (1946 days earlier)      last day (2894 days later) »