@NobodyNada @bwDraco @Henders @angussidney the next time you fail over to your instance, please pull manually (from the terminal) and run pip install -r requirements.txt before restarting. It will break otherwise. (Also run the command !!/migrate_notifications once it starts)
@tripleee @angussidney (@rene) Another time, I'd generally prefer that requests for SD access in SOCVR go through a SOCVR RO. Personally, I use the fact that a user's determined they need to ping an RO to ask for SD access as a minimal indicator that they've actually read SOCVR's FAQ (and might actually follow it). Having done so also indicates that they might read what the SD commands are, so they can interact with SD.
@tripleee It's not a big deal, in this case. EJoshuaS has been around for around 9 months, and has progressively been more interested in SD reports over the last few months. I'm not surprised to see them being willing to take a more active role.
Dang, but this room was active today. I was busy, so wasn't able to follow along, but kept seeing the number of unread message race upward. It's been about 2,000 messages in the last 20, or so, hours. That's a lot to go back though (even with the SD reports hidden).
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, pattern-matching website in body, pattern-matching website in title, +3 more: gomusclebuilding.com/vandexafil-ultra/ by AnnCason on puzzling.SE (@Mithrandir @micsthepick)
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad NS for domain in body, bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body, pattern-matching website in body, repeated URL at end of long post: however the aspect we probably by Moded19 Virk on graphicdesign.SE (@TetsuyaYamamoto)
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, bad keyword in username, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body, +2 more: What is Revolyn Ultra? by Revolyn Ultra on superuser.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, pattern-matching website in body: Eternol Serum Review by haaryray on drupal.SE
Basically in addition to the frameworks you guys are using, the javascript one the root access bot, and Rlemon's caprica6 uses is also affected bu openid being dropped. so... yeah, this is something that's going to be vaguely annoying for a bunch of people.
With the current level of integration to SE, a feed of all the profiles in a convenient list for mods to destroy is vastly better then even if there were no autoflags at all
There are some really quiet sites moderation-wise, @John. These flags might be all that keep some mod-teams from going stir crazy. The Diamond Madness, they call it - one day you stumble on a lonely forgotten cabin in the woods, perhaps to take shelter from the driving snow, and upon opening the door you see the desiccated corpse in the blue hat... bony fingers still clutching that last flag. — Shog9 ♦yesterday
you might save some poor mod from THE DIAMOND MADNESS
@Magisch well, to be fair, my broader concerns are that folks are deciding on things that affect the whole network on the basis that "its worked so far, trust us"
@Magisch Well - most folks, myself included arn't really going to be able to interpret those stats. And there's a certain feeling of "this is what we're going to do" over "maybe we should do this". Once again, Smokey is doing a good job but most of the communication's about numbers and how things will be faster.
not everyone who 'disagrees' with specific implimentation detail's hostile towards what's happening. Just that, well, people have different viewpoints about things.
I'm all about people - so if you guys can go "these are the benefits of more autoflags" and "Its fine - even when we don't have sufficent weight to a post - they get deleted in $worse_time" - I think I would probably be a little happier. That said, I'll not be ragequitting or raving over any smokedetector/charcoal tweaks.
One - If we get to a point where spam becomes unprofitable on SE, then spammers will divest ressources elsewhere (especially when we deny them the SEO juice and clickthough rates)
so - stuff like "we won't be hitting everything with 5 flags, only the worst and most obvious cases. Where something meets a lower criteria, we'll have 3 flags" up front helps
Just a random ramble: no matter the outcome of this meta post, I can say for certain that it's been a good learning experience for everyone. On our side, there's quite a lot of things that I hope we'll change, both internally and externally
