« first day (4108 days earlier)   

19:09
move to meta seems to have erased the spam flags?
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted website in answer, potentially bad ip for hostname in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (97): What are the research problems in English grammar research today?‭ by Md. Sagar Islam Rafi‭ on english.meta.SE
*migration
at least mine
@DanGetz same
19:16
I don't quite get how migrations work. They seem to reset the score but..also not always? I've definitely been able to vote on a question before and after a migration. I think it was upvotes, though. Maybe it wipes downvotes? It might also similarly wipe flags.
it does create a new post
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Linked punctuation in answer, pattern-matching website in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (157): Content Organizer Rules Are Being Created Automatically?‭ by Wiiliam‭ on sharepoint.SE
yes, I also remember years ago I voted twice on a question, both before and after migration
I mean, realistically, it's not "wiping" them. It's creating a new post and locking/removing the old one. So anything related to the old post doesn't transfer. But I have seen the votes transfer.
19:18
maybe the votes transfer depending on some things
Hmm, it's possible it does transfer the flags. But weirdly, so there is a spam flag but not your spam flag after the migration
e.g. not if one is a parent meta since that doesn't have rep..?
Since you have a different main and meta flag pool
@VLAZ (upvotes "transfer", not downvotes, but in some cases aren't attributed to the voter on the destination site, meaning you can vote twice)
@Mithical OK, that probably explains the discrepancy I've seen.
Thanks
19:48
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in body (1): подключение к Bluetooth метке‭ by Vlad Ri‭ on ru.stackoverflow.com
20:05
fp feedback received on [MS] Editing Imported JPG‭
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad phone number in body, potentially bad keyword in title, blacklisted user (177): How do I get American Airlines to respond?‭ by Peter Bell‭ on travel.SE
do we ever preemptively watch numbers? This is somewhere on the spectrum from dumb question to spam attempt, and it includes the number which would be spammed if it turns out to be part of a campaign
@DanGetz I don't see much harm in a watch-number there; go for it!
20:14
!!/normalize-number 8613038384318
@DanGetz Strict normalization: 8613038384318; Normalized numbers used by the number detections: {'8613038384318'}
!!/watch-number 8613038384318(?#NO NorAm)
@DanGetz You don't have blacklist manager privileges, but I've created PR#14109 for you.
PR#14109 ("Dan Getz: Watch 8613038384318(?#NO NorAm)") opened by SmokeDetector
20:18
!!/approve 14109
@SmokeDetector this might be quoting someone else's spam as part of a long story, not attempting to spam themslves?
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in body (1): how to fix memory leak in rust on M3 max Mac ✏️‭ by Michael Ambriel‭ on stackoverflow.com
20:49
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive answer detected, potentially bad keyword in answer, toxic answer detected (160): How can I vent a bathtub trap when the drain is routed under the tub?‭ by Jim‭ on diy.SE
21:11
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in answer (1): ThinkPad No Wi-Fi adapter found‭ by Binyamin Pekar‭ on askubuntu.com
teward/Cerberus: Executing automatic scheduled reboot.
Restart: API quota is 94254.

« first day (4108 days earlier)