« first day (1833 days earlier)      last day (3089 days later) » 

4:00 AM
and they do
 
@ACuriousMind Oh, sorry about that.
Although I'm not Canadian.
 
@HDE226868 Better
 
too late...you ruined it
@HDE226868 I accept this now
carry on
 
On that note, good night/day/morning/whatever, all.
 
I'll take one good whatever, thanks
 
4:00 AM
OTOH, ACM says eh a lot
@ACuriousMind lel
5AM treating you well?
 
@0celo7 an example is the repeated calling me 'satan' based on your incorrect interpretation of the avatar I used to have (which I explained) - especially after I expressed my annoyance at being called that
 
So no one will tell me how I troll. Great.
 
Another true work story: I've been there for about 2 months now and have yet to actually meet my boss
 
@KyleKanos Where do you work?
Are you allowed to say?
 
@0celo7 I've said "eh" 27 times in this chat. You've said it 48 times. Checkmate.
 
4:02 AM
@0celo7 just gave you an example
 
@0celo7 At a major US bank
 
@ACuriousMind ...*gulp*
My sister in law is a snow man
 
@Ghost I think he might have you on ignore.
 
But I am not
 
@ACuriousMind oh well, no great loss
 
4:03 AM
@ACuriousMind Oh, I do.
"Goodbye"
 
he can give the trolling, but not take it - he is immature
 
I'm a German-Czech-American
 
@KyleKanos Well...is that good or bad?
 
What if his boss is a killer :o
 
@ACuriousMind I find it funny
 
4:05 AM
sounds bad for morale
 
I talk to him on MS Lync most every day
Anyways....it's late so I'm going to bed now
 
how do you know he's not a brain in a jar
 
Good seeing you all, see you in ~2 weeks when Turkey Day comes
(and I have an off day)
 
@KyleKanos See ya, don't work too hard!
 
@KyleKanos bye ;_;
 
4:07 AM
Which of the unlabeled days in my calendar is Turkey Day for you 'Muricans?
 
@ACuriousMind Last Thursday of the 11th Monat
 
Well, @ACuriousMind have a great day and even wish that immature troll friend of yours (0celo7) a good day
 
@ACuriousMind Can we ever have a serious conversation about trolling?
Is it possible
 
@Ghost Likewise. (Although I think I'm gonna head to bed soon)
 
user54412
@0celo7 4th Thursday, actually
 
4:10 AM
@ChrisWhite Is it not the last this year?
Are they not equal this year?
 
user54412
this year it is
 
Ok, thanks for that vindication.
You can delete those posts now.
Baseless attack...
But in general, it is the vierte ...Thurstag, @ACuriousMind.
Whatever Thursday is :)
Dönertag?
Durstag
not Dienstag
 
@0celo7 What exactly do you mean?
It's Donnerstag
 
@ACuriousMind Dönertag was p. close
 
Both English and German variant derive from Thor, the god of thunder.
 
4:13 AM
@ACuriousMind I know
I could not think of the right word
Now I know what thunder is, too
Or rather I remember
Losing my Deutsch Kred hier
 
user54412
Donner and Blitzen sound like far more awesome reindeer once you realize what their names mean.
 
@NeuroFuzzy You know, the integral is supposedly an S. Maybe people got tired of writing $\int L\mathrm{d}t$ and just kept the integral.
 
@ChrisWhite ...and yet we get the story about the one with the red nose, not them. So sad.
 
@ACuriousMind I don't see why I'm a troll
@ACuriousMind Are there any good German rappers anymore? I recall Bushido and Sido back in the say...
But they were mostly to shock our parents.
 
@0celo7 I am so not into rap that I can't answer that.
 
4:18 AM
@ACuriousMind Unkultiertes Schweinchen!
That probably makes 0 sense
I don't even care anymore
 
It...is an odd choice for an insult.
Also, it should be unkultiviert
 
@ACuriousMind That dawned on me
but this way it has better flow :)
My memory is pretty good.
Sido := Super Intelligent Drug Victim
 
Do German rappers rap in English :P
Joke^
 
No, I don't think so.
Not the stuff I used to listen to as a confused German-American teenager.
Didn't want my dad understanding it and getting upset.
(probably)
 
Shouldn't that be Americian-German teen?
 
4:24 AM
@0celo7 I don't think you're a troll. But you have a tendency to make ill-timed jokes, and you tend to not let things go, like, at all. That puts some people off. However, I think most of the times you were called troll it was in jest.
 
@skullpetrol I considered myself to be German.
Seriously.
 
@0celo7 How was it supposed to shock your parents if they didn't understand it? :P
 
It's hard speaking German most of the day, having only German friends, speaking German with one parent, going to German stores, etc. and still thinking you're American. I did that for 6-7 years.
@ACuriousMind Other people's parents. And my mother.
And you know how kids are.
We watched Happy Tree Friends at 3 in the morning because bloods and guts were cool.
We played GTA because yay killing people.
 
Wow! 7 yrs is a long time.
 
4:26 AM
Although when Eric's dad saw me playing GTA LCS on his PSP...oh boy that was bad.
Those were some good times.
@skullpetrol I think it's closer to six...but yeah.
If you count my birth year I've been in Germany approaching 8 years.
Ask @ACuriousMind, I sound like a German who's lived abroad for a while.
(When speaking German, my English is flawless.)
 
He does
 
Rather, I sound like a Pfälzer who's lived abroad for a while ;)
 
No t there
 
srs
how do you tell
I never could do that
@ACuriousMind how do you tell
 
How do you tell how English words are written?
One just has to learn it
 
4:32 AM
Logic and reason.
 
@0celo7 lol
 
@ACuriousMind Now that I think about it, I would not have written Pfaltz
@ACuriousMind see, now you're laughing
@ACuriousMind "you tend to not let things go, like, at all."
Example?
Satan does not count. He was asking for that one.
 
@0celo7 Telling you to stop it is not "asking for it".
 
@ACuriousMind I see we are going to have to agree to disagree on that one.
Other than that.
 
@0celo7 Well, everytime someone deletes something you keep asking what was deleted, and everytime someone says something you don't understand you keep asking even after being told an equivalent of "Don't worry about it"
The most egregious example is the whole thing with the Duffman, though :P
 
4:41 AM
@ACuriousMind 1) I just really want to know what was deleted 2) if it was worth mentioning it's worth worrying about
@ACuriousMind I disagree, naturally.
He's the one who keeps coming back for more.
 
(and I just realized that allusion is lost on you, the Duffman is a character from the Simpsons)
@0celo7 ...and you keep giving it. It takes two to tango.
 
And why is it so foreign to you that I want to know things that I don't understand?
@ACuriousMind Personally, I enjoy the tango.
@ACuriousMind Never watched that show, never will.
 
@0celo7 It's not. But "Don't worry about it" is polite phrasing for "I can't be bothered to explain this now". Asking once is alright, asking thrice is a bit annoying.
 
@ACuriousMind If you can't be bothered then you shouldn't have mentioned it. Or say "I can't be bothered."
@ACuriousMind Are you speaking from experience here?
I will admit that I don't have a good sense for when I'm annoying people.
Hence why taking to profs is really cool on the one hand but stressful on the other
 
@0celo7 Well, see, that's an allowed attitude to have, but it's kinda hard to calibrate it well because phrased like that it comes across as if you think the other person owes you an explanation.
 
4:53 AM
@ACuriousMind I can see that.
 
@0celo7 I only come back not to be in the presence of you, but to see what physics discussions are happening... YOU are the one that started with the satan crap - every time... even when I explained to you, you kept on going like some troll kid
 
In any case, I'm going to bed now. I really should've taken more courses this semester, this empty schedule isn't good for me...
 
@ACuriousMind Poor Bajoran
 
...then again, all the courses I already had taken or they were boring. So, good night
 
@ACuriousMind PDE CLASSES
AND GR
Time to crank out a paper.
 
 
3 hours later…
7:54 AM
@ACuriousMind Obviously they actually derived from planets, and their related gods...so we latins have the correct thunder god :-P
not that icelandic with a ridicolous hammer
 
Make some progress on Van Kampen's stochastic processes book.
 
 
1 hour later…
9:26 AM
@ACuriousMind :-D but @KyleKanos may not like it...
 
 
2 hours later…
11:13 AM
@DavidZ A NOTE FOR YOU
If you'd inform at least before deleting the answer, that would be great. I dont know why you are doing so, but please stop deleting my answer one after other. After all, OP found it useful, and if you think its giving complete answer, I could rephrase the answer. But you didn't even wait for me to respond and deleted two answers straight away. Please respond ...
 
Welp
Time to do some BIBLIOGRAPHY
First let's pull all the CTC papers from Arxiv!
 
11:44 AM
Hey, a CTC paper by Carroll!
 
12:25 PM
@yuggib Your Jupiter is such a weakling that he had to split the job with Summanus ;)
 
12:38 PM
@ACuriousMind have you read (or are you aware of) the paper by David Deutsch Quantum Theory of Probability and Decisions, in which he claims that the probability axiom of QM can be deduced from the other axioms?
 
@BastianTreichler Nope. What do you mean by "probability axiom", though? The Born rule?
 
@ACuriousMind well I'm just quoting Deutsch, but I think he means the axiom The probability to observe the particle at point x at time t is equal to $||\Psi(x,t)||^2$
at least in my QM course there was such an axiom in wave mechanics
but I'm not sure if he means that, after all, this axiom sounds very Copenhagenish and AFAIK Deutsch is a many-worlds proponent
 
that is the Born rule, yes
It is not tied to any interpretation
It is just what is observed experimentally
Although you could probably nitpick about the word "probability"
But from a frequentist perspective it is a probability
 
oh okay.. but the rule was established by the Copenhagen guys, right? or in the same paper?
 
@ACuriousMind Well Jupiter was immensely powerful, so he let Summanus have a little bit of glory :-D
 
12:48 PM
I think the Born rule is older?
Born rule is 1926
about the same time as Copenhagen
But not by the same guys
 
@Slereah ok never mind Copenhagen interpretation. Born rule then. Deutsch claims to derive it from the other axioms. Lubos Motl thinks that's bullshit: motls.blogspot.ch/2012/04/…
 
@TimKrul the comment I left tells you why I deleted your answers.
 
I'd be interested if any of you guys have studied their arguments
 
I know, but you should let me edit the answers
 
Lubos is an interesting character.
 
12:53 PM
yep :) Deutsch too
 
@TimKrul why?
 
Could you give a link to the question please @TimKrul :-)
 
@Slereah is it correct to say that the Born rule is just a statement about what is observed experimentally, but the Copenhagen interpretation makes it a fundamental rule of physics?
 
@BastianTreichler I am always saddened by the notion of what a "proof" is for a physicist...
 
1:07 PM
What would you say the notion of a "proof" is for a mathematician @yuggib
 
let's say that this Deutsch guy gives a different interpretation of the mathematical theory of quantum mechanics; that however in this particular case yields exactly the same consequences as the interpretation given by others; the only difference being that it is based on the "definition" of the "rational behavior" of the observer
 
Thanks @TimKrul
 
@skullpetrol Oh, that's easy, there are many definitions for that
rigorous definitions
the idea is that a proof is simply a list of true statements
each one being an axiom (so true by definition), or inferred from axioms and previous statements of the proof by means of an allowed inference rule
 
@yuggib well what Deutsch writes in detail is beyond my level of understanding, but the paper seems to be about axiomatic (rigorous) quantum theory. If it's possible to logically derive the Born rule from the other axioms, this would be big news IMHO.
 
1:13 PM
So @TimKrul you don't think the question is at all "homework-like"?
 
@BastianTreichler You haven't seen rigorous axiomatic quantum theory yet.
Just from a cursory look at the paper, I see no discussion of Hilbert spaces, no discussion of domain of operators or what even defines a density operator.
Blatant assumption eigenstates exist with no regard for the difference between continuous and discrete spectrum...
 
@BastianTreichler There is no possible logical proof of an interpretation; and Deutsch is discussing an interpretation. This is because the Born rule itself is an interpretation of a mathematical theory as an application to the real world.
 
I could go on, upshot: That isn't rigorous.
Which is often fine, but not when you try and give foundational derivations of quantum theory :P
 
And I agree with @ACuriousMind, also in my opinion the paper is not rigorous at all
I could say more: if he knew the rigorous aspects of QM better, he would have known that given a quantum theory, intended as a mathematical theory, for any observable there exists a measurement process that satisfies the Born rule (even taking into account the continuous spectrum).
 
@yuggib is the Born rule an interpretation of the mathematical theory? in my QM lecture, it was presented as one of the axioms of QM
 
1:28 PM
In my opinion, it is. Because it says: I have a mathematical theory (to be pedantic, that of non-commutative $C^*$ algebras), that I think should fit well with physical observations of the quantum world. How is it so? Because I interpret the measurements and their outcomes by means of the objects of the mathematical theory (in a way that is explained by the rule).
Then, by means of the mathematical theory I can make new predictions, and test them experimentally, and see if my rule/interpretation, is indeed the correct one.
 
ok thanks
 
1:45 PM
hello
tfw addicted to PB&J
Interesting name.
Finnish?
Why not :(
 
translate: Utveckla och förenkla
(from Swedish) Develop and facilitate
 
close enough
I missed a spot shaving. That's the worst.
 
2:09 PM
@0celo7 : look up at the clear night sky. Can you see a worldline? No. It's an abstract thing, it isn't something you can roll up. Or unroll. Slereah is lost in maths and wallowing in abstraction. Now watch my lips: there is no way you can move such that everything else not only moves back to where it was, but never moved at all. Time travel is woo. Let go of it. Move on.
@Slereah : yes, you are peddling woo, and I do understand why. I can explain why, but you have me on ignore, you aren't listening. Instead you carry on regardless, with your fingers in your ears singing tra-la-la.
 
Tra-la-la
@JohnDuffield He has you muted, why do you still @ him?
 
woo woo
 
A Woo Woo is an alcoholic beverage made of vodka, peach schnapps, and cranberry juice. It is typically served as a cocktail in a highball glass or can be served as a shot. It is also sometimes served in a rocks glass. The ingredients are usually shaken together with ice or stirred as preferred. A lime wedge is used as a garnish. == VariationsEdit == The Georgia Peach recipe replaces vodka with light rum. == See alsoEdit == Sex on the Beach == ReferencesEdit == == External linksEdit == Woo Woo Recipe - Retrieved 10 October 2009. Making multiple shots...
 
Bubb Rubb the Raiders Fan.
 
@KyleKanos : who are you talking about?
 
@skillpatrol srs mode, writing a paper now
are you American?
I need your opinion
Are you European or American
 
about?
just ask pal
 
Would you say "Europeans are generally nicer than Americans" is a common belief in America
 
2:26 PM
yup
 
aight
I need to explain why people think the EU has less sanctions than the US but they actually have about 10 more
 
Europeans are considered more liberal with there attitudes.
 
yeah
 
define sanctions
 
@yuggib read my paper when it's done
 
2:28 PM
I'm not sure sanctions are generally seen as an expression of meanness :P
 
@ACuriousMind well you explain it then
if they just didn't know they would have put the same number for both
 
I would bet that gunshot-related crimes in the US are more than 10 times more frequent than in Europe
 
but most people wrote a smaller number for Eurpoe
 
@0celo7 : It's like I said, I'm really not talking to him, What I'm really doing is letting the other guys know that he's in la-la land.
 
@yuggib wtf does that have to do with anything
@JohnDuffield Problem with that is: we like him
And we like his la-la stuff
 
2:30 PM
not paying taxes is mean, using guns is meaner
at least in my opinion
 
Your Einstein and Evidence jig isn't that popular tbh
 
@0celo7 Well, I don't know, perhaps they think America has more quarrels with other nations than the Europeans. (Perhaps you meant that with "nicer", but I'd not put that up to a general niceness/meanness)
 
After all, @Slereah 's upvote/downvote ratio is much higher than yours @JohnDuffield...
@ACuriousMind Ok...
I'm surprised by this though
The only countries that the US has sanctioned that the EU doesn't is Cuba and Venezuela
and I need to figure out what's going on with Cuba
 
how in the world is that related to being nice/mean??
 
@yuggib STOP THINKING LOGICALLY
 
2:33 PM
people are nice, not states
 
yeesh
damn mathematicians
 
I can never stop thinking logically
I'm flawed
3
 
you'll never be a politician
sory
 
agreed
not sure it is a bad thing though
 
what class is this for?
 
2:35 PM
@yuggib Perhaps it is, the world might be better if it were ruled by mathematicians ;)
 
@skillpatrol lingua englanda
@ACuriousMind oh jeez
 
@ACuriousMind in ancient times they proposed philosophers...but mathematicians could definitely do better
 
what's the difference
 
a couple of physicists are (in)famous (european) politicians I think
 
unless you're raising GDP you might as well be a philosopher
 
2:37 PM
on the very opposing sides
 
@yuggib Well, Merkel is technically one, for one.
 
who could name them?
 
@ACuriousMind great
 
yess...and the other is...her european archenemy
 
stop the politics ppl
who brought this up
 
2:38 PM
@yuggib You'll have to be more specific :D
Can't think of another politician I know to be a physicist
 
sigh
Secretary of Energy
or are we talking elected?
Carter was a nuclear engineer
and his policies are hurting the profession to this day
 
it was Varoufakis, but I checked and he started studying physics but then ended graduating in economics and/or mathematical statistics
 
Ah, I see
 
2:58 PM
Let's not forget that Einstein was offered and turned down the first presidency of Israel.
 
@ACuriousMind "The shape of the extra dimensions is not exactly predicted by string theory, but if they were large, we'd have seen them by now."
What?
@skillpatrol Seriously?
 

« first day (1833 days earlier)      last day (3089 days later) »