« first day (1363 days earlier)      last day (3558 days later) » 

11:00 AM
interesting
 
killed mysqld, the memory hog. trying again
may have to exit some instances of vim, too
 
no loss there /emacs
 
emacs uses way more memory than vim
 
@JSBձոգչ But you get so much more for your memory blocks with emacs.
 
@JSBձոգչ :D I'm just stirring.
 
11:15 AM
cudgels brain for joke about Microsoft Wizard School, gives up
 
Vim doesn't even have syntax highlighting. Emacs has Tetris.
 
Vim has so much syntax hilighting i don't even know what you're talking about
 
Precisely my point.
But I will gladly reword: Vim doesn't even have non-rubbish syntax highlighting, so that everyone and his dog is forced to write a package of their own.
I know I did.
It has OVER 9000 highlighting and it ALL SUCKS. Emacs, meanwhile, has just one Tetris, and it is ALL AWESUM.
QED.
 
Tetris is awesum
 
QED!!!
 
11:21 AM
when i tell Magic Online to show me cards I don't own, the first thing it does is remind me that i don't own ANY foil Black Lotuses
screw you, Magic Online
 
It is indeed so awesum that not once in the entire game do you have to type wq!
@JSBձոգչ I am missing something. So it does precisely what you instructed it to do?
 
@RegDwigнt it rubs my face in the fact that i don't own any $400 cards
 
@JSBձոգչ Sounds like the mere application of $400 will solve that problem.
 
@JSBձոգչ well it has to start with a card. So it might as well sort by price descending.
@Robusto yeah that's how Magic works. You throw $400 at it and they never make another card again.
 
Worth their weight in card stock.
 
11:25 AM
Perhaps noseless? — tobyink 4 hours ago
Teehee.
 
Animetic?
Why are we answering such questions?
> Why are you not kicking the shit out of Private Pyle?
 
I think going by the answers we can just close it.
Pout, wide-eyed, intense.
Car, billiards, sputnik.
 
theorem, elephants, microencephalic
 
@RegDwigнt yes
 
Clearly the word is ( \ / ).
 
11:29 AM
Why is the punchbowl of ELU always filled with such turds?
 
Because you keep your gold and diamonds to yourself.
You could totally share. But you're all greedy.
 
Oh, this is my fault.
 
Cf. Axiom 1.
 
Which stage is "punishment of the innocent"? I forget.
 
All stages.
Easy to forget, I know.
 
11:31 AM
The six phases of a big project is a cynical take on the outcome of large projects, with an unspoken assumption about their seemingly inherent tendency towards chaos. The list is reprinted in slightly different variations in any number of project management books as a cautionary tale. One such example gives the phases as: Enthusiasm, Disillusionment, Panic and hysteria, Hunt for the guilty, Punishment of the innocent, and Reward for the uninvolved. == References... ==
Stage 5.
 
That's why I never get involved with anything.
Sweet, sweet rewards.
 
But you are involved. You ran for mod, and won. Now it's your fault if there are fuck-ups.
 
Nah, you forgot that the SE policy is "a good mod does nothing at all".
 
Doesn't matter if you do anything. You are a mod, you bear responsibility.
 
Nope, bearing is a do-word.
 
11:38 AM
Tell that to a woman in childbirth. See how long you remain standing.
 
I'm still standing better than I ever did. Looking like a true survivor.
But you go tell a woman in childbirth that love love is a verb love is a doing word feather on my breath.
 
Isn't it a bit early to be imbibing, even in Deutschland?
 
It is never too early in Deutschland.
 
Or Russland.
 
^ note the position of Romania on this list. And Germany.
 
11:46 AM
Note how much waste is produced by third world countries
 
How has Ireland managed to deal with more than 100%? Do they import waste from elsewhere?
 
@skullpatrol Those are percentages, not absolute quantities.
 
Putting up with the UK's garbage.
 
It may well be that Germany's landfills are more gianter than Romania's, because more stuff.
 
Belgium has less than 100%. Perhaps they import it from there.
 
11:50 AM
I understand that @Robusto but if one were to look at absolute values such as what I mentioned along with oil spills such as the one in the Gulf of Mexico recently, I believe recycling would take on a different meaning in this context.
 
Oil spills are recycling by other means.
 
Are they really?
How so?
 
In the joke universe. Lighten up.
 
I assume because I take the same route to work, I've recycled a lot
 
11:55 AM
You're right, it is a joke.
Have you fully recovered from your cycling "accident" @Matt?
 
yes, thanks. my leg is fine now.
 
Good, good.
 
My chat window is behaving weirdly this morning.
It must need more coffee.
 
pour it through the fuel intake at the front of your machine
 
Hmm. It is near the cup holder?
 
12:02 PM
yes. it's quite small, relative to the size of the cupholder.
 
@JSBձոգչ and I'd like to see further breakdown still because Romania's definition of landfill is not even anywhere the same as that of Germany.
 
about the size of usb A jack
 
Oh. That seems to have fixed it.
 
Fixed it good and proper, I expect :)
 
Landfills in Germany are heavily regulated recycling factories in their own right.
In Eastern Europe, you just dump your plastic in the forest, voila there's your landfill.
 
12:04 PM
excellent. I should be in charge of tech fixing
 
They have plastic in Eastern Europe?
 
Eastern Europe is 99% plastic. And 1% communism.
 
Huh TIL.
 
That's why LEGO is so unpopular there. Nobody understands why they should pay horrendous sums for more plastic. Everyone already has seven metric tons of it.
 
@RegDwigнt They still have forest? Or is that what they are calling the mountains of trash these days?
 
12:07 PM
@Robusto hey now some of the plastic is green.
 
they should buy stuff to reform their platic into lego
 
Or at least looks greenish if you let funghi do their job.
And with some effort and time, it can even bake into a nice black mass so you have a Black Forest of your own.
 
@MattЭллен Like a special waffle iron.
 
Can't they make Lego from something other than plastic @RegD?
 
@RegDwigнt Which reminds me. Did you see the episode of Community where the group has to deal with an outsider as a lab partner, and after they "break" him he starts talking to himself, wondering whatever happened to Lego? "It used to be so simple. Now it's all these complicated kits with pieces you don't understand . . ."
 
12:09 PM
@KitFox yeah!
 
@skullpatrol metal and wood building toys are exceptionally popular, yes. Much more than plastic.
 
Black Forest used to be my favorite kind of cake.
 
@Robusto you misremember. It was the coach who wondered that. A black guy who came fresh from prison where he made his PhD in biology.
 
You misoverestimated me.
 
12:11 PM
Oh, right. Omar from The Wire.
 
He is called a man of color these days.
 
Correct episode, however.
 
Yup.
Which is why I said "misremember" rather than "make shit up".
-1
Q: Using Oxymorons for phyiscal beings

Trey TaylorI had a thought. I was thinking about how I walk to work whilst listening to "The Magnificent Seven" by The Clash, which depicts the stupidity of work. I thought that, in a way, is an oxymoron, listening to music that hates work whilst walking to work. It then spurred a runaway thought train, wha...

 
You calling me a moron?
 
I don't think any kind of being will appreciate being used as a moron of any kind.
 
12:13 PM
Runaway train...which band was that again?
 
@skullpatrol only if you're phyiscal.
@KitFox soul asylum.
 
Ah yes.
 
Np I'm a half-bright twelve year old moron.
 
Are you sure you're twelve? That's a violation of the ToS.
 
Twelve years and twelve months is okay.
 
12:17 PM
I want candy. brb
 
@skullpatrol how many years have you been twelve for?
 
Sour apple flavored green jelly army men. om nom nom
 
Ask tchrist that was his judgement @Matt
 
@KitFox yum!
 
@skullpatrol Hey, that's a pretty good compliment then.
 
12:23 PM
An answer from the horse's mouth!
0
A: What is the name of the "agency" fallacy?

Stuart SorensenThe blog you linked to was my own. I first came across the agency fallacy in a series of audio lectures on evolutionary psychology by Allen MacNeill ('Evolutionary psychology' from 'The Great Courses' audio series available for download on Audible). I'm pretty sure Ben Shermer references it in hi...

 
Except it's not really an answer.
 
It sort of is
 
Sort of.
 
I mean it cites his source for agency fallacy as the answer to the question
 
It should probably be clarified before the community shuts it down.
Hey! Hey! Guess what I am doing today?
 
12:26 PM
At any rate, the hope that helps nonsense had to go.
 
yeah. I can do that, I think
 
Aug 1 at 13:55, by RegDwigнt
If you do not hope it helps, why the hell are you posting?
@KitFox playing with LEGO.
 
@KitFox juggling with fire?
fencing with swordfish!
 
Juggling with burning LEGO.
 
Eating jelly babies.
(That's what we call them, anyway)
 
12:28 PM
Writing requirements.
 
yay! that's what you're paid to do, right?
 
Yep.
 
How did the meeting go?
 
The guy I have constant contention with had this to say to me (which he cc'd my manager on):
> Just wanted to thank you for a great presentation today.
 
12:31 PM
Sent from his iPhone at 10pm last night.
 
congrats!
 
Feels creepy. Hard to explain.
But the meeting was great. I kept 10 people on track for an hour.
 
And we covered everything that needed covering.
 
I can't even keep myself on track for that long
 
12:32 PM
I can't even keep my Lego train on track for that long
 
And everybody left feeling happy and informed and excited about the project.
 
go you!
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 even with a circular track? :D
 
@MattЭллен "circular track".... hm. Interesting. Not sure why I'd want one of those ;p
 
I guess at Christmas I did build a long oval track. Well... more like a rounded rectangle. An iPhone track.
Usually I try to put in lots of twists and turns and branches and unnecessary complexity, because it's fun.
 
12:35 PM
what you need is 3 pieces of tack and a robot that moves the end to the beginning
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 yes!
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 The adjectival form of oval should be Ovaltine — "a long Ovaltine track."
 
@Robusto Hm. But then it'd need to include a secret decoder ring.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Sounds more like a feature than a bug.
 
Anyway it's not, strictly speaking, an oval. And if there's one thing we do here, it's strictly speak.
 
Well, Ovaltine is not, strictly speaking, oval. So the imprecision is warranted.
 
12:40 PM
good point
 
Ain't language grand?
 
I'm writing the OED now to have them add an entry
Ovaltine: adj - not, strictly speaking, an oval
 
Good man.
Make sure @tchrist includes that in his Perl-searchable copy.
 
Good luck.
 
I would think that oval tines are not very effective
 
12:45 PM
@RegDwigнt I read that as "using oxymorons for physical beatings"
at least I fixed the spelling.
@MattЭллен preteens are very effective... at annoying the crap out of everybody.
(it's OK because @skullpatrol is a preteen)
 
if you're pre-tines you're probably using a spoon
 
Ouch. Like putting saltine on a cracker.
 
@Mitch not as effective as teens
@Mitch :-)
 
<pre>teens</pre>
 
1:07 PM
Hello :)
I've been trying to search for a question to legitimately ask on ELU but as I'm browsing Meta, what's being filtered over to ELL, and what's downvoted or duplicate, I sometimes wonder if there are any questions left to ask :) So, changing the subject, what would be a type of question that you'd like to answer?
 
I'm not quite sure why you throw in duplicates into the mix like that.
Or downvotes, for that matter...
Really these are three entirely separate things.
Anyway, why are you specifically searching for a question to ask? If you have a question, then ask it. If you don't, don't. Why invent a question you don't actually have?
 
1:25 PM
duplicates: because they remind me that the question has already been asked. Downvotes because ... never mind. Why am I searching for a question to ask? Because in other realms, I'm usually the one answering questions. Sometimes I'd just like to find out what other people think about things I find curious.
 
As you can see, we reliably get more open and upvoted questions every day than most other sites get questions, period.
As to what questions are interesting, it's a) hard to predict and b) yeah many have been long asked by now.
 
Thank you for the search query. That appeals to me on several levels.
 
Actually finding interesting questions is not easy, whether here or elsewhere on SE. Simply browsing the top voted questions doesn't cut it, lots of outliers in there. Picking a top user and browsing through his top answers is a tad better, but still ultimately the same. What seems to work better is picking a bunch of top users and browsing through their top favorited questions.
Basically, as with so many things, the higher the payoff you want, the bigger the effort you need to put in.
 
@user2370114 Good advice^
donut consumption is always the first consideration
 
Energy is too bitter. I prefer to consume donuts.
 
1:37 PM
especially if you're a cop :)
 
Four minutes? Seriously? I ain't got no time like that.
 
@RegDwigнt I am taking your name in vain.
@Mari-LouA Do you truly believe that the “answer” you reference adds value to the site? However nicely formatted it may be, it contains virtually no new material whatsoever. This conflicts with the directive an answer consist principally of the poster’s own words, not just copied-in text. It’s also a veiled appeal to authority, feigning to support its position with a dictionary yet disallowing independent verification. Lastly, it conflicts with these directives. — tchrist 37 secs ago
 
And yeah, so they basically just lucked out.
 
Which is another veiled appeal to authority. :)
 
1:41 PM
Just a couple degrees in either direction would have screwed them up, and you just can't go telling me it was possible to plan this down to a degree.
You'd have to X-ray the tree. Over its entire length, too.
 
@RegDwigнt Do people truly use the favorite thingy much?
 
Yeah, it was strange that they attempted it
 
@JohanLarsson :-O
 
@RegDwigнt Start at 2:55 youtube.com/…
 
@tchrist not much at all, but a) isn't that the whole point of telling wheat from chaff and b) over several people and years, it accumulates alright.
@user2370114 that is exactly where I did. Thank you.
@tchrist well careful there as there's been no reaction from the author and consequently that whole answer is about to get nuked.
 
1:46 PM
@RegDwigнt I was thinking about that. I’d like to preserve your comment. I feel though that you have made it before, and so perhaps there is somewhere else for me to find essentially the same thing.
 
I have made that comment before a zillion times, but per definition it was on a zillion stuffs I went on to delete.
 
But comments on a meta post aren’t the optimal place for discussion either, so I’m not exactly contributing in the right way. But I don’t know what else to do there with Mari-Lou’s response to Andrew, and I do feel like she is a conscientious member who deserves not to be ignored.
Ok, I’ll verbatim copy in your text I guess. With proper attribution. :)
 
If my answer is a good place for that, add it in there.
 
@skullpatrol better now, each day is better, since the 2 massive initial injections
 
@AndrewLeach Ok, I’ve put a band-aid on the issue by copying in @Reg’s comment, so now he can delete that answer without completing orphaning the text I’m linking to. But if you want to use it to flesh out your answer, that would be great, since then we don’t have a long comment chain and we can cut down on my non-constructive stuff.
 
1:53 PM
@kwak I wish you all best :-)
Stay strong.
 
@AndrewLeach Gosh, I’m slow. I misread you.
@JohanLarsson Well, we’ll never know, because the videos where they screwed it up they didn’t put up for public viewing.
 
@tchrist did you figure out the bs : honest work ratio?
 
@tchrist I realize I'm new here, but I'm in the camp that copy/paste dictionary definitions is wrong in general, attribution or not. Especially, formatted as a dictionary definition. That's not an answer, that's a reference copy.
 
@user2370114 I believe I agree with you. I haven’t always clearly understood this myself, I readily confess.
 
@tchrist Not to worry. Done.
 
1:58 PM
@user2370114 Were you born on Wednesday, January 28th, 1970?
@AndrewLeach Thanks.
 
@tchrist No. I suppose I could change that
 
@user2370114 Cool. :)
 

« first day (1363 days earlier)      last day (3558 days later) »