But I will gladly reword: Vim doesn't even have non-rubbish syntax highlighting, so that everyone and his dog is forced to write a package of their own.
I know I did.
It has OVER 9000 highlighting and it ALL SUCKS. Emacs, meanwhile, has just one Tetris, and it is ALL AWESUM.
The six phases of a big project is a cynical take on the outcome of large projects, with an unspoken assumption about their seemingly inherent tendency towards chaos. The list is reprinted in slightly different variations in any number of project management books as a cautionary tale.
One such example gives the phases as:
Enthusiasm,
Disillusionment,
Panic and hysteria,
Hunt for the guilty,
Punishment of the innocent, and
Reward for the uninvolved.
== References... ==
I understand that @Robusto but if one were to look at absolute values such as what I mentioned along with oil spills such as the one in the Gulf of Mexico recently, I believe recycling would take on a different meaning in this context.
That's why LEGO is so unpopular there. Nobody understands why they should pay horrendous sums for more plastic. Everyone already has seven metric tons of it.
@RegDwigнt Which reminds me. Did you see the episode of Community where the group has to deal with an outsider as a lab partner, and after they "break" him he starts talking to himself, wondering whatever happened to Lego? "It used to be so simple. Now it's all these complicated kits with pieces you don't understand . . ."
I had a thought. I was thinking about how I walk to work whilst listening to "The Magnificent Seven" by The Clash, which depicts the stupidity of work. I thought that, in a way, is an oxymoron, listening to music that hates work whilst walking to work. It then spurred a runaway thought train, wha...
The blog you linked to was my own. I first came across the agency fallacy in a series of audio lectures on evolutionary psychology by Allen MacNeill ('Evolutionary psychology' from 'The Great Courses' audio series available for download on Audible). I'm pretty sure Ben Shermer references it in hi...
I've been trying to search for a question to legitimately ask on ELU but as I'm browsing Meta, what's being filtered over to ELL, and what's downvoted or duplicate, I sometimes wonder if there are any questions left to ask :) So, changing the subject, what would be a type of question that you'd like to answer?
I'm not quite sure why you throw in duplicates into the mix like that.
Or downvotes, for that matter...
Really these are three entirely separate things.
Anyway, why are you specifically searching for a question to ask? If you have a question, then ask it. If you don't, don't. Why invent a question you don't actually have?
duplicates: because they remind me that the question has already been asked. Downvotes because ... never mind. Why am I searching for a question to ask? Because in other realms, I'm usually the one answering questions. Sometimes I'd just like to find out what other people think about things I find curious.
Actually finding interesting questions is not easy, whether here or elsewhere on SE. Simply browsing the top voted questions doesn't cut it, lots of outliers in there. Picking a top user and browsing through his top answers is a tad better, but still ultimately the same. What seems to work better is picking a bunch of top users and browsing through their top favorited questions.
Basically, as with so many things, the higher the payoff you want, the bigger the effort you need to put in.
@Mari-LouA Do you truly believe that the “answer” you reference adds value to the site? However nicely formatted it may be, it contains virtually no new material whatsoever. This conflicts with the directive an answer consist principally of the poster’s own words, not just copied-in text. It’s also a veiled appeal to authority, feigning to support its position with a dictionary yet disallowing independent verification. Lastly, it conflicts with these directives. — tchrist37 secs ago
@RegDwigнt I was thinking about that. I’d like to preserve your comment. I feel though that you have made it before, and so perhaps there is somewhere else for me to find essentially the same thing.
But comments on a meta post aren’t the optimal place for discussion either, so I’m not exactly contributing in the right way. But I don’t know what else to do there with Mari-Lou’s response to Andrew, and I do feel like she is a conscientious member who deserves not to be ignored.
Ok, I’ll verbatim copy in your text I guess. With proper attribution. :)
@AndrewLeach Ok, I’ve put a band-aid on the issue by copying in @Reg’s comment, so now he can delete that answer without completing orphaning the text I’m linking to. But if you want to use it to flesh out your answer, that would be great, since then we don’t have a long comment chain and we can cut down on my non-constructive stuff.
@tchrist I realize I'm new here, but I'm in the camp that copy/paste dictionary definitions is wrong in general, attribution or not. Especially, formatted as a dictionary definition. That's not an answer, that's a reference copy.