« first day (1246 days earlier)      last day (3775 days later) » 

Bob
12:00 AM
next thing you know you'll need one to use search
time for yahoo to make a comeback, heh
 
Update your account
Create a public Careers profile and get great new features in SuperUser
 
Bob
!!tell 12955966 no
 
Bob
Actually, I wouldn't really mind...
My accounts on SE are what I want possible employers to see.
I wouldn't mind those being linked to my physical identity, tbh.
But my personal, private email/youtube stuff? NO
 
> Technical details of permanent failure:
DNS Error: Domain name not found
sent email successfully to my gmail but the reverse still doesn't work
 
Bob
12:02 AM
separation of personal and professional life
something google seems to not fucking understand
 
lol
Jokes on them. Anything interesting about me is under a psudonym or three
and there's plenty of noise, I share a real name with a fairly (in)famous local lawyer who fights human rights cases.
 
Bob
:12956081 someone star this for a sec
aww
(I can't make the first star on mobile, which is also pretty stupid)
 
@allquixotic: I neither confirm nor deny sentience. I mean being a dog.
 
Bob
@JourneymanGeek just hope someone targeting him doesn't mix it up
sooo... JSLint...
1	Expected exactly one space between 'function' and '('.	var readRules = function(rules) {
!!no
 
12:06 AM
@Bob: it would be the government, and in that case I can get my namesake to defend me. That or plot a cunning escape from the dogpound.
 
1:00 AM
Guys, we have a very nice mod over on English Language & Usage who is very serious about hats and needs help. Too shy to post here directly but if anyone has the time, it'be great if you could simply view (it's a views hat) this question:
19
Q: What does the fox say?

KitFoxIt is true that as a fox, I should know this, so consider this a spoilers warning. In a recent post, Geek Girl mentions that the mating call of the fox is a series of sharp, eerie barks and that this is called gekkering. This is supported by a citation in Wikipedia, but the reference is not one ...

(she did not ask me to do this)
 
Bob
...
!!foxno
 
Bob
hey look another fox gravatar :D
 
@Bob that's a nice one, hadn't seen it
 
1:19 AM
@Bob :D thought you might do that
now the emails from StartCom CertMaster start rolling in
 
Bob
lol
 
1:30 AM
at least they're fast
> Could you please send us your driver license or birth certificate? (The employe card is not really working for us)
!!meme okay
 
Bob
@allquixotic o.O
> not really working for us
> Are you certain?
 
@Bob I think what they mean is that it isn't an acceptable form of ID
 
Bob
@allquixotic The way they phrased it sounds really unsure :P
 
you'd think they'd be a little more sure considering how well-known they are ("cheapest SSL in town")
 
Bob
1:38 AM
@allquixotic also kinda new
I don't think they're on XP
 
just got a call from a guy with a very heavy accent verifying my stuff... sounded central European
they're working pretty fast
it might be a low period of activity for people doing new validations
 
Bob
@allquixotic they're based in Israel
if you can't do the phone validation, they apparently send registered mail from there, too
 
@Bob phone validation done -- had a bit of a problem understanding him, but it worked out in the end
I always wonder how they get trustworthy people to do these validations, etc... obviously StartCom wouldn't be in the trust chain for Windows, Mac and Linux (and Firefox) if they weren't at least somewhat trustworthy and audited and such, but the employees could do so much damage with the info they are exposed to
they might have something similar to what the defense sector does for highly sensitive information
In United States security and intelligence parlance, a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF; pronounced "skiff") is an enclosed area within a building that is used to process Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) types of classified information. SCI is classified information concerning or derived from intelligence sources, methods, or analytical processes, which is required to be handled within formal access control systems established by the Director of National Intelligence (DNI). Some entire buildings are SCIFs where all but the front foyer is secure. Access to SCIFs i...
 
Bob
2:03 AM
> The Bureau of Statistics identifies "broadband" speeds as anything more than 256 kilobits per second.
...
 
looks like my hopes of EV are basically zero
> StartSSL™ Extended Validation certificates are currently restricted to corporations, business entities, government entities and other legally established organizations.
that's okay, that just means my binaries will randomly break in 2 years
 
2:24 AM
Question, how often do you all back up, how big are the backups on average, and how long do you keep each backup?
 
Bob
2:37 AM
@allquixotic no prob! :P
(the only thing that would really hinder is redistribution, no?)
@ekaj ask me again in... 6 hours
 
haha =p
 
Bob
I think I have something like a 200 GB system image, and daily incrementals (full every week) of my documents of maybe 1 GB each (complete guess)?
You'll have to ask me later for concrete numbers
also a couple of full images of laptops, totaling maybe 1 TB
 
I was asking because of this question... Windows says not to use snapshots on production machines and definitely not to back up databases, so even 50 seems like a bit of overkill: superuser.com/questions/696285/…
 
Bob
and photo backups, totaling maybe 40 GB
@ekaj snapshots of VMs are very different from traditional backups
 
I know
similar in some ways =p
 
Bob
2:40 AM
also, incremental saves a lot of space
I maybe have 50 MB of changes, max, in my documents
 
Agreed, you wouldn't want to backup 200GB each time
 
Bob
by using incremental backup, I'm saving many gigabytes every week
 
What util do you use for backups?
 
Bob
I haven't had to delete any yet, but my 2 TB backup destination is approaching capacity
@ekaj Acronis True Image at home
currently using BackupAssist on a server at one workplace, though that's an old version (Server 2003) - we're looking at moving to Roxio Retrospect
 
I need to start backing up, especially my software/iso/music/movies =p
 
Bob
2:42 AM
Acronis is decent
I'm using the paid version, though
 
Acronis is paid, right?
 
Bob
I've tried the Windows builtin backup, and I'd advise to avoid it
 
Our school uses Cobian for staff
 
Bob
too opaque
I like to know where the backups are going
@ekaj Yea, it's paid.
It does have a trial.
Others are free, but generally don't have good incremental support
or tend to be a little unpolished
for backups, what I really want is a set and forget
if I have to pay $50, so be it
 
Does it back up via wifi, is this a tower with two drives, what do you do?
 
2:44 AM
@Bob: actually windows 7 backup is 'just' a image + incremental backups that are zipped up
 
Bob
@JourneymanGeek I know.
 
also, I'd use VERY different backup stratergies for system and data files
 
Bob
But you can't choose the increment period.
It seems somewhat random.
 
@JourneymanGeek how so?
 
Bob
I've had some over a month, some two months, some two days.
@ekaj Mine is a secondary drive on the same machine.
My current setup is RAID 1 (mirror) for OS + data (2x 2TB), 2TB backup, 2TB scratch data, 1.5TB scratch external
 
2:46 AM
'file' level backups for data - something like bvckup 2 (currently a free beta, though I'll happily pay the 20 quid for it) or bitorrent sync (very nice for 'cloudish' backups), and windows backup for system files
 
Bob
@JourneymanGeek I just dislike how Windows backup is handled.
 
so I can use the windows backup to get a running system with my applications, and my file level backups would help me get my personal files synced to the latest
 
Bob
Especially in Win8, it just screams "dodgy"
 
@Bob: hence me saying windows 7 backup ;p
 
Bob
I considered moving to bvckup on your suggestion
didn't see it during my original research
but now that Acronis is all set up, I'd rather just leave it
 
2:47 AM
I consider them different sorts of backup
 
Bob
@JourneymanGeek the fact that they call it "Windows 7 backup", and considering their track record (dropping support for the XP bkf format entirely) is concerning
 
I don't need constant system backups, just reliable ones
 
Bob
@JourneymanGeek Ya.
Different strategies, but you don't have to use different programs.
I have two backups defined for my main system in Acronis
one is a "one-off" for the system image
the other is a scheduled for the file incremental, and it's only the important files selected
I don't want to be backing up redundant GBs of non-critical data all the time
 
@Bob: I also fairly regularly sling around 100gb audio file collections ;p
 
Bob
@JourneymanGeek those aren't backed up :P
 
2:49 AM
.bkfs.. meh
 
Bob
I just happen to have copies on my desktop, laptop and phone
 
@Bob: I've survived 2 HDDs going sour in the same week.
Music files are important ;p
 
Bob
@JourneymanGeek eh, been considering a move to Spotify anyway :P
if only they didn't use p2p
but, yea, my music isn't explicitly backed up
I just happen to have multiple copies
 
@Bob: a lot of this is lossless.
 
Bob
come to think of it, it's the most likely to survive the event of a house fire
I don't really have an offsite
 
2:51 AM
@Bob: neither do I ;p
 
Bob
no where really to put a HDD
and internet connection is crap
 
but getting offsite backups would be trivial with my setup ;p
 
Bob
hm?
eh, I could easily set up a remote drive on that dedi (it has 1 TB)
the problem is trying to upload anything substantial at these speeds
 
@Bob: two things - ipv6 (if necessary) and bitorrentsync (which gives me a way to move large numbers of files reliably between systems)
I'm actually testing this with a friend who needs something thats ~80gb that I have ;p
 
Bob
@JourneymanGeek I don't see what ipv6 has to do with it, and btsync is meaningless - I can do the same over FTP or rsync or SCP or any number of protocols
the problem is I can only upload at maybe 30kB/s without impacting anything else
50kB/s if I want to push it
80kB/s if I want to kill all other connections
 
2:54 AM
@Bob: rsync yes
ipv6 means that my systems at home have consistant, globally routable IP addresses
so I can rsync or connect to my btsync admin console without needing to port forward.
 
Bob
@JourneymanGeek eh. I've had a static ipv4 for over 5 years now, including a house move
I don't think we specifically requested one, but we have one
 
btsync basically provides me a config free, error correcting way to throw files around.
 
Bob
(it did change at one point a few years ago, but changed back a few months later)
@JourneymanGeek and rather chatty too
 
I can deal with chatty ;p
 
Bob
@JourneymanGeek the dedi that is a potential target has five IPs
but this is all pointless when it'll take a good year to upload a system image
 
2:56 AM
@Bob: oh, I mean if I was using my home systems as backup targets
 
Bob
@JourneymanGeek chatty is crap for large upload
 
I'll let you know how it was once my friend starts downloading ;p
 
Bob
the advantage of bt is multiple connections
for point to point, I don't think it would be as effective
 
spotify:track:2fkmmlI7E8OsogEnQLXr6X or open.spotify.com/track/2fkmmlI7E8OsogEnQLXr6X
 
Bob
@allquixotic so what is it?
 
3:09 AM
 
@Sathya I'm pretty sure you should also find a question it's a duplicate of, to round it out
 
ikr.. same thoughts
I'm pretty sure there is a dupe..
 
Bob
@Sathya link to the question?
never mind, found it
must. find. duplicate.
@Sathya @allquixotic is this close enough?
maybe too much of a stretch :(
 
Bob
3:39 AM
> Yup, MS-DOS 4.0 patched the running windows binary to make sure Windows would still continue to work.
O.O
 
Does this make sense? pastie.org/8595271
*disk speed at the end, not space though if anyone bothered to read
 
Bob
@ekaj yea.
pretty much why you shouldn't have incremental backups going back too far either
there's also the increased risk of corruption at any point
 
> Yup, MS/Linux 4.0 patched the running Xserver binary to make sure Windows would still continue to work.
 
Bob
5:07 AM
holy mother of
> Expert C# .NET development skills with an understanding of the CLR and writing web applications (5+ years)
> Expert Objective-C (iOS) and Java (Android) mobile development skills (3+ years)
> Expert with ASP.NET MVC development (3+ years)
> Strong SQL development skills with an understanding of how database systems work internally
> Strong in HTML/CSS/JavaScript for front-end development
> Experience with Server Operations (“devops”) on both Windows and Linux using tools such as Ansible, Saltstack, Puppet/Chef
that's just half of what's required
and then desirable includes:
> Experience with C++, Node.JS
might as well say "knows every language in the world" -_-
 
this is about the wierdest game I have ever played.
well, DLC. It outwierded the actual game.
 
Bob
@JourneymanGeek which game?
annnd now I just realised it's been five years since VS2008
I feel old :(
 
@Bob: saints row IV, enter the dominatrix.
 
Bob
@JourneymanGeek well, what the hell did you expect? :P
 
if this had been the original game, it would have been the most totally whacked out thing ever.
it still is.
I might be wrong tho. There's another DLC....
 
Bob
5:22 AM
1329
Q: Why does HTML think “chucknorris” is a color?

user456584How come certain random strings produce various colors when entered as background colors in HTML? For example: <body bgcolor="chucknorris"> test </body> ...produces a document with a red background across all browsers and platforms. Interestingly, while chucknorri produces a red background as...

 
@Bob unless you've already been in a job where you've been doing all those things at once, you probably aren't going to have enough years in your productive professional life to be able to do each of those things individually (especially the iOS and Android part as it contrasts with the platforms typically used for .NET)
sounds like they want to hire one person to implement the entire shebang... if you hired the right person it'd work, but it's less risky to hire 2-3 people with fairly focused expertise (a .NET dev, an iOS dev, an Android dev, at the very least)
they use a lot of complicated technologies in their stack, which makes it look like a nightmare to work on
fails the "quiet working conditions" part of the Joel test. that's a dealbreaker for me... can't stand current job because it's so noisy
unless they mean the sound of your CPU fan ;p
 
Bob
@allquixotic also, the workload... ouch!
@allquixotic heh, it's usually fairly quiet here... until that day they tried testing some rack servers
sounded like a hurricane moving through
^
 
@Bob I don't know about you, but I work best when I'm not doing too many projects at once -- especially if I have to constantly provide status updates whenever people happen to walk by and want to know what's up with their pet project -- I have to take time to convince them that I'm on schedule instead of just getting work done
 
Bob
that's the problem you had with zombie
@allquixotic hey, I didn't say I was interested in that job :P
I wonder what it pays, though
meh. I'm happy where I am
 
@Bob I could be pleasantly surprised and maybe they are actually willing to shell out real money for that kind of a self-starter who can do everything, but cynically, chances are, they want a rockstar and they're probably going to pay them in peanuts
 
Bob
5:34 AM
@allquixotic Ahem:
> We are looking for a Senior Full-Stack Engineer rockstar...
O.O
1284
Q: Cycles in family tree software

Partick HöseI am the developer of some family tree software (written in C++ and Qt). I had no problems until one of my customers mailed me a bug report. The problem is that he has two children with his own daughter, and, as a result, he can't use my software because of errors. Those errors are the result of...

 
@Bob it would be good if they were hiring a whole team of those guys, but it sounds like they're putting most or all of their eggs in one basket
 
Interesting
 
@Bob maybe so, but "the document object doesn't exist yet" hardly inspires confidence, especially when every single way I tried of making it wait for the document to start existing ended up doing nothing
was I supposed to write a busy loop that would suck up CPU time until the document is ready?
I can't think of any single-threaded or multi-threaded, synchronous or asynchronous, blocking or non-blocking solution to "the browser.document object is undefined", except to not run that line of code until after the engine has completed whatever processing it needs to do to define it
and since every single form of delay that I tried produced no delay at all, we're at an impasse
 
Bob
@allquixotic no, you were supposed to put everything that requires the wait into a callback function
 
5:42 AM
@Bob I tried that, and it didn't wait a single millisecond
 
Bob
@allquixotic I must have missed that, then
 
I tried a wait with a callback function and a timeout of a million milliseconds and it instantly executed inside the callback
 
Bob
because the code you pasted used sleep(), which is asynchronous, and then put everything after it
 
I tried about 15 different things after I posted that
I think zombie.js just plain doesn't work with SE's chat... it's too advanced for it to parse, I guess
and there haven't been any commits on it in 2 months, so it's not exactly sizzling hot
with 176 open issues
 
Bob
@allquixotic what, browser.wait(1000, function() {yourstuffhere}); ?
 
5:45 AM
@Bob yeah, exactly -- yourstuffhere was executed immediately, irrespective of how large the integer supplied in the first parameter
 
Bob
huh.
 
try it, you'll see... who knows you might be able to spot a bug, I'm not claiming my code was perfect
but my hunch is that zombie.js just sucks
 
Bob
> Even with completion function, the browser won't wait forever. It will complete as soon as it determines there are no more events to wait for, or after 5 seconds of waiting (you can change this with maxWait option).
you can always hack it with setTimeout :P
 
I set maxWait to a billion milliseconds (I assume that's the unit they're using) and it didn't change anything
I think it was running it because it determined that there are no more events to wait for
 
Bob
@allquixotic setTimeout shouldn't care
 
5:48 AM
which basically means that the actual, fully loaded document of SE chat was undefined
which is laughably stupid, but that's jsdom/zombiejs for you
 
Bob
also, di...waitwhat
uhm. the document wasn't undefined when I tried it
@allquixotic you're still stuck on that error?
Dec 31 '13 at 4:41, by Bob
perhaps use browser.window.document there instead?
document is not supposed to be defined in the global scope
 
it's only in the zombiejs API...
 
Bob
swapping all references to document for browser.window.document fixes that
 
Bob
then I lost track of what happened cause I had to leave around that time
 
5:51 AM
ctrl-f for browser.document
 
Bob
@allquixotic that might work too
but document by itself won't
use browser.window.document or browser.document
 
@Bob I know. I fixed that bug and it was still erroring out.
 
Bob
ah.
yea, I wasn't keeping up past that point
but nothing about document being undefined
rather, the error I last saw was the xpath expression not finding the target
 
i think i found a way to hack around that too
i ended up forcing a bunch of URLs down its throat
 
Bob
Dec 31 '13 at 4:44, by Bob
Error: No target element (note: call with selector/element, event name and callback)
    at Browser.fire (/home/bob/node_modules/zombie/lib/zombie/browser.js:311:13)
    at /home/bob/chatbot/SO-ChatBot/runner.js:29:13
that was the last one I saw
 
5:53 AM
not even looking at the document, just visiting the URLs
can you post your latest code if you have a working copy?
 
Bob
I still have no idea where you got an undefined document
 
we really need a github gist for this D:
 
Bob
@allquixotic again, I'm at work :\
never did get the websocket thing set up
I'll be home in maybe 90 mins
 
you mean gateone?
oh, I'll be asleep long before then
 
Bob
@allquixotic yea
@allquixotic :(
well, it's saturday tomorrow
and you wake up around 1 AM here
 
5:55 AM
lol
 
Bob
eh, not like I needed sleep anyway :D
 
i do though, in all likelihood the snow won't be enough to keep me away from work tomorrow
i might work on zombie over my weekend, but phantomjs is working, so my motivation to work on the zombie port is.... diminished
of course it would greatly simplify things
everything running in node is simpler than java and phantomjs
 
Bob
@allquixotic probably halve mem usage too
Java doesn't exactly do wonders on the efficiency front.
 
i have very little running in java, and memory isn't a huge concern anymore now that Xrdp is gone
but node will probably even be less CPU
sleeptime
night
the fox says meow
 
Bob
@allquixotic night
 

« first day (1246 days earlier)      last day (3775 days later) »