It's around quarter past nine at UTC-0 right now, I bet a bunch of people are turning on their computers to SO for the first time and seeing our meta post
Seriously are you playing games or what? Who posts a question like the one you did in the grace period <p>wcdddasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasc</p> and then edits it so many times with what you obviously had as the original question. I'm unimpressed — Yvette Colomb12 secs ago
@M.A.R. that's not the point. At the time the early flaggers flagged it, it was tpu. At the time the later flagger gave feedback it was fpu
Well the question is offtopic as it is now, it's primarily opinion based. So I wouldn't be expecting it to be reopened as it is. Next time you get errors, delete the post and edit it in one go then undelete it. It does waste many people's time. — Yvette Colomb31 secs ago
> asked 1 hour ago by Tanapornclinic this is an offensive username thanks – Yvette Colomb 51 mins ago declined - This is actually a legit business name. It's a website that sells beauty products. You can check it out. I will not change the user's name @Glorfindel
@Cerbrus it was because the post continued to be edited.
I am in a bad mood for now, so will go do some work :D
> Could the name of this user be changed - we're a professional site, and even though (s)he doesn't run a porn clinic, the name suggests it. – Glorfindel 1 hour ago declined - This is actually a legit business name. It's a website that sells beauty products. You can check it out. I will not change the user's name
@angussidney ugh no, that reminds me of a creep at uni. He always did that and then he'd also abuse all the women when he got drunk. It was online and you should've seen the stuff he'd write
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL-only title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body, pattern-matching website in title: healthguidewebs.com/mylyfe-garcinia-cambogia/ by helenbud on askubuntu.com (@ThomasWard)
@Undo this autoflag failed because the user didn't have the required reputation (15) for a spam flag. Is that something which can be checked as well before attempting an autoflag?
There was a 50-something rep user back then that started feeding back to Smokey while people suddenly realized they had a rude/abusive post (Gibberish) on some site. Hell broke loose
@Glorfindel Sounds like a new issue... We need to filter users on flagging capabilities... I suggested something similar here, but the failures for that case are simply ignored now.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL-only title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body, pattern-matching website in title: maxmuscleleansupplement.com/rexadrene/ by ericmudge on askubuntu.com (@ThomasWard)
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, pattern-matching website in body, pattern-matching website in title: www.supplementoffers.org/parisian-glow/ by loreal diaz on graphicdesign.SE
@Glorfindel Wouldn’t it be “How to help a postgraduate student to write a book?” and wouldn’t free copies be sent to every SE employee?
AIM v0.10 is now available; this userscript adds autoflagging/post deletion information to Smokey reports in this room. v0.10 fixes live updates. See the diff for more.