TL;DR: How much is lost in translating a work of literature, and similarly, what more is gained by reading the source work?
I'm currently in the process of reading Cyrano de Bergerac (translated by Charles Renauld). There, an introduction is made by Adolphe Cohn, said to be the Professor of the ...
@steelersquirrel I don't know. It's still a well-formed question and it could be argued to not be too broad. Besides that, it's private beta, show me a question that doesn't have 5 upvotes. ;-)
In The Nose by Nikolai Gogol, Gogol references many times various ranks as had been established in The Table of Ranks. Given this, should The Table of Ranks be used as a reference while reading The Nose? What impact does it have on the understanding of the complete work?
HDE's got a point. This is the only part of the site that the public (or even just the network in general) can see while we're in private beta. Let's not make it give everyone a terrible first impression of memes, memes, memes.
@HDE226868 saying meme's are offensive to some folks, makes me respond with not being able to post memes is offensive to even more folks, so moot point
Okay. We're not having this argument - it's not up for discussion. Memes are not banned. Overuse of memes is annoying, and is liable to get you stern words, a kick, or a suspension, depending on who deals with it and how annoyed you make them.
We're enjoying our new stack with our questions and answers. We are making it happen. By all means, take your troubles elsewhere because there's ample proof that blue actions have a chilling effect and poking Himarm only results in more memes coming out... until you suspend him, which has an even worse chilling effect.
I'm not even sure attribution is really required. Afterall, all those Area51 questions have is a title stub without any content. — Christian Rau2 hours ago
@TrojanByAccident Oh, so the Area51 suggestions then. I don't know. But you can always rephrase the title anyway. As said, they're just stubs afterall.
The study or theory of the methodical interpretation of text, especially holy texts.
1885, Thomas Seccombe, Saunders, Richard (1613-1687?), article in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, Volume 50,
SAUNDERS or SANDERS, RICHARD (1613–1687?), astrologer, a native of Warwickshire, was born in 1613, commenced the study of hermeneutics about 1647, and practised astrology and cheiromancy during the golden age of the pseudo-sciences in England.
1885, Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson (original translators and editors), Arthur Cleveland Coxe (editor of American edition), Philip Schaff (also credited as editor), Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series I,
I have included in this volume the four books of St. Augustin On Christian Doctrine. It is the first and best patristic work on biblical Hermeneutics, and continued for a thousand years, together with the Prefaces of Jerome, to be the chief exegetical guide. Although it is superseded as a scientific work by modern Hermeneutics and Critical Introductions to the Old and New Testaments, it is not …
@Emrakul Following on from the last paragraph of your meta answer ... reminder to post this example question on the main site :-) It's a good one, and I'd like to see it here.
@Randal'Thor Why not stop arguing about arguing about fruit that isn't actually happening and present a cook book? Or is that not considered literature?
I went to Dublin recently, and a local told me about "the greatest book ever written:" The third policeman, by Flann O'Brien. I bought it, but haven't read it yet and was wondering if anyone else ever read it and agrees with that person's probably hyperbolic remark about the book? :P