« first day (2114 days earlier)      last day (2805 days later) » 

11:00 PM
And might occasionally be useful.
 
Of course.
I wish I knew about it.
 
Actually, most people would probably benefit most from a short course in logical thinking.
 
How would such a course commence?
I did do logic when I was studying philosophy.
 
@Cerberus I'm not starry-eyed about math. I think educators tend to overstate its advantages. As with much conventional education. You'd probably be better off taking courses in flirting with girls. Or other practical things.
@Cerberus Yes, logic is good.
 
@FaheemMitha To be fair, if they're arts students, say, why should they know complex analysis? It's not taught until midway through undergrad maths.
@FaheemMitha rofl
 
11:02 PM
@FaheemMitha I don't think that would get me very far!
 
@Randal'Thor I think the UC teams tend to be a mixture of arts and science people. Though they seem to be skewed heavily in the direction of arts. Would you agree?
 
What is complex analysis?
 
Or a choice between courses in maths and courses in flirting, given that mathematicians are stereotypically incapable of social interactions.
 
@Cerberus Analysis on the complex numbers. Analysis is probably better known as calculus. Which is the same thing to a first approximation.
 
Hmm I don't really know what any of those things are.
 
11:03 PM
@Randal'Thor Well, social interaction, like other things, can be learned. People aren't born being able to read and talk, either.
 
I did like maths well enough in school.
 
@FaheemMitha I haven't noticed any skew - seems like a fairly good mix to me.
 
@Cerberus You must have run across calculus. They teach in in UK and US high schools. And certainly in European ones as well.
@Randal'Thor Ah. Possibly I'm mistaken.
 
Probably, but I have no idea what it is.
 
@Cerberus Ok. Well, it's not a big deal.
 
11:04 PM
There are some particular teams which are very skewed, like Imperial last year which was all scientists, but overall it's not bad IMO.
 
I think the toughest things we did in school were integrating goniometrical functions and stuff.
 
@Randal'Thor Well, it certainly is lively. And impressive.
@Cerberus Integrating is part of calculus/analysis.
 
@FaheemMitha What kind of maths were/are you most into?
 
OK.
 
@Cerberus Differentiation? Integration?
 
11:05 PM
Yes, we did those.
 
@Randal'Thor I once tried to be a grad student in Algebraic Geometry. That didn't go so well.
 
@Cerberus Complex analysis is the coolest part of analysis :-D
 
What kind of math do you do? Where do you work?
 
Oh!
What is it about?
Or that's probably too complicated to explain.
 
Complex analysis is fun.
@Cerberus Not that complicated.
 
11:07 PM
@FaheemMitha Yikes, algebraic geometry is hard. I always hated it (though part of that might be because I learned it badly from an awful lecturer).
Also, it should be called algebraic algebra.
 
@Randal'Thor Yes, it's hard.
The problem with research math is that unless you're really really good at it, there is no space for you.
 
@FaheemMitha I do analysis. Sorry, I'd rather not say exactly where I work :-)
@Cerberus You know complex numbers?
 
Also, of course, you have to really, really like doing it. Like, all the time.
And you can't do anything else afterwards. Because you won't be qualified. It's a fairly drastic form of specialization.
 
@Randal'Thor I've just read about them.
 
@Randal'Thor No problem. Are you a grad student?
 
11:09 PM
I know what i is.
> The Italian mathematician Gerolamo Cardano is the first known to have introduced complex numbers. He called them "fictitious" during his attempts to find solutions to cubic equations in the 16th century.
 
@Cerberus Complex numbers come about naturally as the algebraic closure of the reals.
 
As in, when solving x²=-1?
 
@Cerberus Right
 
Or is a purely imaginary number simple?
 
@Cerberus Don't follow.
 
11:11 PM
@Cerberus Right. Well, complex analysis is when you do analysis (differentiation and integration) on the plane of complex numbers (x+iy). Instead of considering functions mapping real numbers to real numbers, look at functions mapping complex numbers to complex numbers.
It seems as though you've just made everything much more complicated, but in a sense it actually becomes much simpler.
 
Yes, because with some natural restrictions, you get much nicer analysis to work with.
 
Because differentiability (existence of the derivative) for a complex function is a really REALLY strong condition. Which means that any differentiable complex function has loads and loads of other cool properties.
 
In some sense, the complex plane is a natural place to do analysis.
 
@FaheemMitha The number i is purely imaginary, isn't it?
 
On the reals, you can get a function which is differentiable everywhere and second differentiable nowhere, or infinitely differentiable everywhere but can't be written as a power series.
 
11:13 PM
@Randal'Thor Ah OK, I see.
 
In the complex plane, every differentiable function is also infinitely differentiable and can be written as a power series.
 
In other words, the
In the field of complex analysis in mathematics, the Cauchy–Riemann equations, named after Augustin Cauchy and Bernhard Riemann, consist of a system of two partial differential equations which, together with certain continuity and differentiability criteria, form a necessary and sufficient condition for a complex function to be complex differentiable, that is, holomorphic. This system of equations first appeared in the work of Jean le Rond d'Alembert (d'Alembert 1752). Later, Leonhard Euler connected this system to the analytic functions (Euler 1797). Cauchy (1814) then used these equations to...
 
And they asked students to solve a problem about integrating complex numbers in the UC?
 
@Cerberus Yes.
@Cerberus Oh, no. Much simpler than that.
At one point, Paxman described the Taylor series expansion of the exponential, and asked them to identify it. They had no idea what he was talking about.
 
@FaheemMitha Oh yes, I remember that one!
 
11:14 PM
He then asked for the radius of convergence and they were like - what???
 
That's not even complex analysis.
 
@Randal'Thor True.
 
Taylor series are in A-level maths, I think.
Or at least A-level Further Maths.
 
@FaheemMitha I've never heard of one Taylor...
 
@Randal'Thor yes, they are. It's actually a really easy question for a quiz, provided you know a little math.
 
11:16 PM
@Randal'Thor Hmm what kind of simple function can be differentiated only once?
 
I thought they were pretty well up on biological terms, though. I can never keep those straight.
@Cerberus Those are typically pathological.
 
@FaheemMitha So, if it is only imaginary and not real, is it still complex?
 
@Cerberus All real numbers are complex too.
 
Oh.
 
Complex numbers are all numbers of the form a+ib, where a and b are real.
 
11:17 PM
But if you have just i, where is the a?
 
That's an algebraically closed field.
@Cerberus a=0, b=1
 
OK then any number is complex?
 
@Cerberus No simple functions. Things like the Weierstrass blancmange function are continuous everywhere and differentiable nowhere, but pathological and complicated to define.
 
@Cerberus Any real number, yes.
 
Unless you mean differentiable only once at a point, in which case think of a curve whose rate of curvature changes abruptly.
 
11:18 PM
@Randal'Thor Ah OK, interesting.
@FaheemMitha Then differentiating x=2 is also complex analysis?
 
@Cerberus Taylor was a British 17th century mathematician, from memory.
 
Or (which might be easier) think of a curve which is continuous but not differentiable at a point - i.e. has a sharp bend - and then integrate that function to get one which is differentiable exactly once.
 
@Cerberus x=2 isn't a function. Do you mean x-2?
 
@FaheemMitha Specifically English. As opposed to Maclaurin, who was Scottish.
Bit of rivalry there, I think ;-)
 
Brook Taylor FRS (18 August 1685 – 29 December 1731) was an English mathematician who is best known for Taylor's theorem and the Taylor series. == Life and work == Brook Taylor was born in Edmonton (at that time in Middlesex) to John Taylor of Bifrons House in Patrixbourne, Kent, and Olivia Tempest, daughter of Sir Nicholas Tempest, Bart., of Durham. He entered St John's College, Cambridge, as a fellow-commoner in 1701, and took degrees of LL.B. and LL.D. in 1709 and 1714, respectively. Having studied mathematics under John Machin and John Keill, in 1708 he obtained a remarkable solution of the...
 
11:20 PM
@FaheemMitha Okay, then f(y)=2
 
More accurately, 18th century.
 
Or just any very simple function.
f(x)=2x
 
@Cerberus That's a constant function. Yes, you could trivially define it on the complex plane. Along with any other polynomial function.
 
Since 2 is a real number, it must be a complex number, right?
And so differentiating this function would be complex analysis?
 
@Cerberus Right
@Cerberus Sure, I guess so.
 
11:22 PM
That sounds strange to a layman.
But I believe you.
 
@Cerberus Yes, but a very simple case of complex analysis which is also real analysis.
 
So it is a simple complex analysis.
What paradox!
 
Admittedly, every complex differentiable function is also real differentiable, so you could say that all complex analysis is also real analysis.
Then you might ask, what's the advantage of extending real functions to the complex plane? Why not just consider them as real functions, since imaginary numbers are, well, imaginary?
And this is where things get even more interesting. Many problems on the real line - for instance, calculating real integrals - can be solved by extending them to the complex plane, using the cool properties of complex differentiable functions, and then going back to the real line at the end.
 
I hear that some real functions are easier to differentiate/integrate in the complex plane?
Right, that.
 
@Cerberus he's talking about definite integrals. Mostly.
 
11:25 PM
OK.
 
Sometimes termed contour integration. Which is very cool, as math goes. And simple, as cool math often isn't.
Most research level math is, for better and worse, completely incomprehensible to the layman. And even to most math undergraduates, probably.
 
Yes.
 
So its coolness is lost on most people.
 
Alas.
 
@FaheemMitha Yes, one of the things I like about complex analysis is that you don't really need super-abstract ideas and structures in order to understand and even research it.
 
11:28 PM
@Cerberus You could hang out in the Math SE. There are actually people there who like math, and aren't research mathematicians. Yes, they do exist.
 
I mean, can you imagine trying to explain algebraic geometry to Cerb here?
What the hell is a scheme, in layman's terms?
 
@Randal'Thor Yes, it's a nice concrete area. And possibly still an active area of research. Though I wouldn't know.
 
@FaheemMitha I've been there.
But all the math stuff is way over my heads.
 
@Randal'Thor Well, it's not so bad. You can use cartesian geometry as an example. The conics are all schemes/varieties, of course.
@Cerberus Ok.
It's nice that there are people out there who like math, without doing it professionally. And who can now use the miracle of the net to find each other.
 
Yay!
 
11:30 PM
But granted, cartesian geometry only gets one so far.
 
Too much hyperbole. :)
 
@Randal'Thor The trouble with most math areas is that there are no applications. So you can't do anything with it afterwards. Even in industrial research.
Though some math people like to pretend otherwise.
 
@tchrist We're talking about hyperbolas now, not hyperbole :-)
 
@Randal'Thor So are you a grad student? You can tell me, without compromising your anonymity. :-)
 
@FaheemMitha I used to be a cloistered pure mathematician too. But certain mathematical cultures put too much emphasis on ultra-abstract things like algebraic geometry ;-) PDEs, for instance, can be studied in a fairly pure mathematical way but still have loads of applications.
@FaheemMitha Yep :-)
 
11:34 PM
@Randal'Thor Ok. I thought that was probably the case. :-)
@Randal'Thor Only at the very applied end of the scale.
Though I don't know anything about PDEs.
Is that your area?
 
@Randal'Thor I love mathematics because of the menagerie lions.
 
@FaheemMitha How about you? You said you "once tried" to be a grad student - does that mean you ended up leaving academia?
 
@Randal'Thor I did, yes.
Or it left me. Whatever.
I guess I gave up. Though I'd still like to do research, given the opportunity.
As I mentioned above, I wound up getting a degree in statistics.
 
@FaheemMitha I don't think of myself as a PDE theorist (PDE-ist? what's the word for someone who studies PDEs?), but I have got some results in that area.
 
@KitZ.Fox I feel really sick now
 
11:37 PM
@FaheemMitha Statistics is sometimes seen as part of maths, but then it goes all the way over to things like biostatistics, which AFAICU is not very mathematical?
 
@Randal'Thor I see.
 
@Randal'Thor numerical analysis if that's your application area. Just analysis otherwise
 
@Randal'Thor No, statistics is definitely not part of math. Though it does use some math at the more mathematical end.
Though nothing super-fancy, for the most part. Afaik.
 
wait that's the study area, not the person doing it. liek geometrician? Logician? Combinatorialist? Analyst just doesn't sound right
 
@Randal'Thor I met at least one eminent biostatistician who clearly didn't know what a limit was.
So no, it's not very mathematical. They like their formulas, though.
 
11:40 PM
@Mitch I think I'm gonna post a .
 
Statistics research can be quite interesting, I think. I did a bit.
 
@FaheemMitha it's all math, just not covering the same subcategories as traditional mathematics.
 
But it's very different from mathematical research.
 
more applied math
 
@Mitch What, statistics? No, it's not math. It's a different subject.
 
11:41 PM
@FaheemMitha I don't see how it's not math.
 
@Randal'Thor I am voting to close this single-word-request for lameness. Review Completed.
 
@Mitch Um, that would involve some explanation.
 
as would your point of view
 
@tchrist MOD ABUSE!
 
@Mitch It would be a bit hard to explain. There must be articles out there discussing it.
Unless someone else wants to take a crack at it. But you'd be better off talking to people in the stats SE chat room. If there is anyone there.
@Cerberus So, how are things going? Long time no see. Or type. Whatever.
 
11:45 PM
@FaheemMitha Even I know that!
@FaheemMitha Hah, not much new here, you?
 
@Cerberus Not a lot. I'm doing an Airbnb rental thing now. It's humble, but I need the money. Too much work for the money, really.
Might be better off doing part time tech work...
@Cerberus It was quite shocking.
 
0
Q: What's the word for someone who studies PDEs?

rand al'thorMathematics has many words for the people who specialise in particular subdisciplines: geometers, who study geometry algebraists, who study algebra combinatorialists, who study combinatorics probabilists, who study probability statisticians, who study statistics analysts, who study analysis ???...

Downvote away!
 
@Randal'Thor I nominate Podder.
 
@FaheemMitha Hmm but you've been doing that for quite a while, haven't you?
What does most of the Airbnb work consist in?
Is it the cleaning that takes the most time?
 
@Cerberus No, not that long. Started in April. Got my first business in May. Spent ages getting it ready, though. And it's take me a while to recoup my investment.
@Cerberus Lots of online correspondence. Checking guests in and out.
Keeping them happy when they are here.
Unfortunately, one cannot charge much here. The Americans and Europeans do a bit better. Though they have to do their own cleaning - yuck.
 
11:53 PM
@FaheemMitha Oh, but I remember you've been talking about letting this room to people for ages?
Or was that not through Airbnb?
Ah OK.
 
> You could, I don't know, call the field partial differentiation, and call the people partial differentiators?
@Cerberus That actually sounds pretty good!
 
So you never clean?
 
@Cerberus Yes, I'd been talking about it for ages. Hadn't done it till recently, though.
 
@Randal'Thor Oh, good.
 
@Cerberus No, only via Airbnb. I've not used anything else.
 
11:54 PM
@FaheemMitha Ah OK.
 
Like I said, it took ages to set up.
India isn't a good place for getting things done. Unless you've got a strong support system. Which I don't.
@Cerberus Other people clean. I'd hate to do it. And I don't have tons of time and energy anyway.
 
Every time I see people ask if something is an oxymoron on this website, the subsequent answers depress me. Does anybody else feel that way? >_>
 
@Randal'Thor we could just call them mathematicians.
 

« first day (2114 days earlier)      last day (2805 days later) »