« first day (1229 days earlier)      last day (3692 days later) » 

3:00 AM
It is the same here.
 
If I'm covering obstetrics, I usually net about 4 hours of sleep.
 
Especially those who have not yet attained their specialisation thingy.
 
If I'm covering the OR, I usually get about 6.
 
I know I make more mistakes after only 4 hours of sleep...
 
My specialty is strange. Fully qualified anesthesiologists take in-house call.
 
3:01 AM
I find it harder to have an overview of everything that's going on, and my intuition and motor skills don't work as well.
 
That is not the case for most specialties.
I sleep an average of 5 hours on a typical night.
 
I don't need to tell you about the disadvantages of that hehe.
 
I don't require much.
I've always felt those "studies" were very questionable.
 
Yeah?
 
For me, if I sleep 8 hours, I feel groggy.
 
3:02 AM
I feel groggy after 9 hours maybe.
 
If I sleep 7 hours, I feel extremely well rested, but I may have trouble sleeping that night.
 
But they say it mostly varies between 7 and 9 hours, what's best for most people?
 
I believe it to be highly variable for each person.
 
It's probably complicated...
 
Exactly.
 
3:04 AM
Older people clearly seem to need less sleep.
 
Absolutely.
 
Then again, about 1/3 of the population have sleep issues.
So "what everyone does" may not be healthy or optimal.
 
I believe that many sleep issues are actually caused by people who think they need more sleep than they do.
But, most are caused by sleep apnea and other respiratory causes.
 
Even if one gets used to less sleep, that doesn't mean it's healthy in the long term, even if one feels "normal".
Most, you think?
 
In the US, probably 50% of the cases are un-diagnosed.
or under-diagnosed.
 
3:05 AM
I know I can function on 5 hours, but I can also feel my body is not functioning optimally.
 
6 is probably my optimal.
But, 5 is perfectly functional for me.
 
How do we know it's 50 % if we can't see the other 50 %?
The thing is, when I'm doing easy stuff, I don't notice my lack of sleep so much.
 
@Cerberus It's my back of the envelope estimate based upon the number of people who obstruct while I'm sedating them.
 
Ah!
Interesting.
I know I get a bit of a headache when my nose is a bit obstructed.
 
That is understandable.
 
3:07 AM
Do these people also get headaches, but they don't realise it?
 
They have numerous issues that they don't recognize until they improve.
 
Hmm.
 
Excessive daytime sleepiness, muscle aches, etc.
Irritability.
 
I can tell when I'm waking up at night in a "bad" way, as opposed to the normal waking-up that one sometimes does at night. I think.
 
Yes. You are probably fairly aware of some of it.
 
3:09 AM
Like a nightmare, stress, headache, short breath.
 
People who do so chronically, though, are often unaware.
People with sleep-apnea, may wake 50 times a night or more.
 
I imagine if they never wake up without any of those things, they don't realise it.
What does it feel like to wake up from apnea?
 
It depends.
Have you ever snorted, coughed and woken up?
 
Not that I know?
I have never been accused of snorting.
 
You've never fallen asleep on the couch, and woken with a start?
For no reason.
 
3:11 AM
I have woken up with a start, sure (though not on the couch, that I remember).
 
@Cerberus Where is immaterial, of course. It's just more frequent when you are sleeping in a less than ideal position.
 
Oh, hmm.
I actually sleep really well sitting, when I'm tired, though I will eventually wake up. But not with a start.
 
It feels like a catch in the throat, which causes you to make a large snort like a gasp for air. Then you wake up and it resolves.
 
I have had that, in bed.
And then something feels wrong.
 
But, the chronic cases stop noticing, and just have multiple wake cycles without being conscious.
 
3:13 AM
Hmm.
Even though the feeling is the same?
 
@Cerberus It's one of the most disturbing feelings I've experienced.
@Cerberus Yes.
 
It feels about as disturbing as waking up from a mild to moderate nightmare, I'd say?
 
@Cerberus Yes. In a way worse. Because, gasping for air is one of the most terrifying things a human can experience. It's hard wired in our DNA.
 
I suppose.
But there is less enduring fear.
 
@Cerberus Sure.
It's a momentary terror, though.
 
3:15 AM
I don't know, there are probably different degrees.
Sure.
 
Air hunger is the description that is used.
 
By the way, do you think waking up from a nightmare is normally related to some physical thing happening (like apnea or something else)?
Or can it just as well be "merely mental"?
 
And, it causes a very rapid release of catecholamines.
 
What?
 
@Cerberus Probably not. I think it's the psyche's protective mechanism.
 
3:17 AM
OK.
But protective against what?
 
@Cerberus The hormones responsible for fight or flight. Epinephrine, etc.
@Cerberus Fear.
 
@DavidM Ah, yes. Also adrenaline?
 
Sorry, I sometimes lapse into med speak.
 
That's OK.
 
@Cerberus Adrenaline = epinephrine.
 
3:18 AM
@DavidM A nightmare protects the psyche against fear?
 
Look at the root. ;-)
@Cerberus No, waking protects the psyche from the nightmare.
 
Ad ren...kidneys?
Nephr...also kidneys?
I forget.
 
@Cerberus Ad renal. Epi nephrine.
Yes.
Near the kidney, the adrenal gland.
 
Greeks and Romans often mix up body parts.
Ah OK.
 
Funny story.
Adrenaline was the original name for the hormone.
 
3:19 AM
Whenever I read those words, it will 99 % of the time be about the seat of emotions or whatever, never about anything medical, so "some place inside the body" is precise enough hehe.
 
Then, a company in the US came up with a method to synthesize it. They named it Adrenalin (sans the -e)
 
I see. Was that useful?
 
It angered the medical community in the US, and they started referring to it as Epinephrine
 
Why angered?
 
@Cerberus VERY
 
3:21 AM
OK when do they feed you adrenaline?
 
@Cerberus IDK. It just struck them as distasteful. (This is probably back in the 1960s before brash consumerism.)
@Cerberus It is injected intravenously to restart the heart during cardiac arrest.
 
You mean the cutting off of the -e struck them as distasteful?
 
@Cerberus The use of the proper name as the trade name.
 
So it does strike me, but the obvious solution would seem to be: keep using the term adrenaline?
 
Essentially branding nature.
 
3:22 AM
@DavidM Ah OK, noted.
 
I would never have found offense in this. I think that the process of naming drugs with trade and generic names is silly.
It makes my life confusing.
 
That is absolutely true.
Just use whatever chemical or other scientific term you were already using.
 
I understand the desire to set your product apart, but why not just give it a name, and then later call it GENERIC (Name)
@Cerberus That could get confusing for some of the more complicated names.
 
This desire can be quenched by the state, or rather, stamped out.
 
Some of the antiviral drugs have names that are unpronounceable.
 
3:24 AM
@DavidM Abbreviate them?
 
@Cerberus Complicated, but medicine abhors certain abbreviations, and loves others.
Pen = PCN = Penicillin.
 
Or come up with one scientific name that describes the function of the substance.
Hah.
 
@Cerberus That would be sensible.
 
And use that always.
Adrenaline sounds OK?
 
@Cerberus It should be.
And, in the UK and the rest of the world, it is the preferred term.
 
3:26 AM
It is the one I know.
Which doesn't mean much.
 
It is really easy to say EPI, though in an emergency.
@Cerberus It means more than you know.
 
Yeah?
 
Weekly I have to tell patients that they are NOT allergic to Epinephrine.
 
(You can also say adre fast in an emergency?)
 
Perhaps
 
3:27 AM
Have to tell them?
 
Yes.
 
Why?
 
They go to a dentist who give an injection of lidocaine + epinephrine. (Epi causes vasoconstriction to prevent bleeding).
 
Okay.
 
Some of this combination gets injected intravascularly, and they have a typical reaction. Their heart races, they feel panicky, etc.
 
3:29 AM
Which should be normal for adrenaline?
 
Some might even go into supra ventricular tachycardia.
Yes.
Normal.
 
Above the stomach?
 
But, because they don't know what Epinephrine is, they think they are allergic.
 
What does supraventricular mean?
Hmm.
 
Supraventricular = originating above the ventricle
That is, in the atrium of the heart.
 
3:30 AM
Ah, it is part of the heart.
 
Yes. Heart is divided into four chambers
 
I knew that.
 
Right and Left Atria, Right and Left Ventricles
 
Ah OK.
 
Ventricular tachycardia = VTach = bad arrythmia
 
3:31 AM
And those people do know the term adrenaline, presumably?
 
Supraventricular Tachycardia = SVT = Usually an annoyance.
 
@DavidM Ah, particularly bad, OK.
Noted.
 
Can be really bad, at times.
Yes, they do know adrenaline.
So, I have to explain to them that if they were truly allergic, they would have died the minute they were born.
 
Heh.
 
Actually, in-utero, but that's just splitting hairs.
 
3:33 AM
It strikes me as odd that people should even think of allergy when they respond by stress-like symptoms to an injection.
 
Another pet-peeve of mine.
 
Allergy makes me think of rashes and bumps.
Although...asphyxiation can also occur, of course.
Or what is it called?
 
All correct.
Anaphylaxis
 
Right, that. I get that a little bit from exercise sometimes.
And I imagine it is the same as what my friend gets when he eats nuts.
 
Anaphylaxis from exercise?
 
3:35 AM
Yeah.
 
Yes. Definitely a nut allergy.
 
It exists, I Googled it haha.
It's really weird.
 
I've heard of it, too. But it's rare.
 
Only happens the first couple of times when I haven't exercised in a while.
 
Hmmmmm . . . .
 
3:36 AM
Oh, you have even heard of it!
And you know what's strangest?
 
Stretching my memory to remember the causal relationship.
 
It is not directly related to exhaustion.
 
American ignorance makes people associate untoward reaction with allergy.
 
I don't remember the details, but I seem to remember they weren't sure how it works.
 
Yeah. It's a complement mediated reaction or something.
 
3:37 AM
It gets worse as I get older, I think.
 
But, is it full-blown anaphylaxis? Requiring epinephrine injection to reverse it, throat swelling to the point of inability to breath, etc?
 
I once thought anthistamines helped, but...not enough, or placebo.
No, I can stop in time.
 
Hmmmmmm ... Give me a minute to google.
 
I probably don't have the worst kind/degree.
 
Yeah, Exercise Induced Anaphylaxis
They don't mention how to mitigate it, though.
 
3:40 AM
Some people on the Internet (I know!) recommended antihistamines.
 
This is a more in-depth article.
 
@DavidM I think I read that exact article once.
 
It's 4 years old.
The journal is a so-so publication. But, it's respectable enough.
 
That's probably ancient, in medical land?
 
@Cerberus Not ancient.
Just had enough time for adequate peer review and digestion.
 
3:43 AM
Heh OK.
 
10 years is ancient.
 
But hey, it's not a very serious problem, at least for me.
 
@Cerberus Like most issues of the sort, it's never serious until it's serious.
 
But this builds up gradually.
 
You should have an adrenaline self-injector available.
We call it an Epi-Pen.
 
3:45 AM
Or I can just stop exercising when I feel it coming.
 
@Cerberus Granted.
 
Would this pen help me continue to exercise?
Or can it even be preventative?
 
@Cerberus Mmmmmmm . . . probably not.
You wouldn't use it preventatively
 
Right.
I mean, I can predict when it will happen.
 
You would use it to keep your throat from swelling shut.
 
3:46 AM
It never gets that bad for me.
 
It sounds like you have a mild enough form. But, perhaps you should discuss this with a physician. Having this device on hand is never a bad idea.
 
Perhaps I should.
 
I would.
Not to make you worry.
 
But I feel like I'm in control: I know what it feels like, how it works, when it will happen.
Heh.
 
It's just a better safe than sorry.
You probably are.
But, I'm sure you've purchased insurance in the past.
 
3:47 AM
I can feel the itching in advance.
Heh.
 
My attitude is never take an unnecessary chance.
 
Right.
But I really hate sounding like a hypochrondriac with a "rare disease" to my doctor.
I know, it's silly.
 
Rare, but potentially dangerous.
If it was just itching skin, I would say . . . eh
But, the throat is nothing to fuck with.
 
It starts with itching, then nausea, can be severe. It feels horrible, but no other symptoms.
 
@Cerberus May be a different process at work, then
 
3:51 AM
I mean, apart from short of breath.
 
Short of breath or difficulty moving air through your glottis? Makes a difference which.
 
All I know is that's quite different from just the normal shortness of breath from exercising.
 
@Cerberus Well, I wouldn't say to run to your doctor. But, next time you have a physical mention it. ;-)
 
Heh.
Perhaps I should.
 
I would.
You have socialized health care. Get your money's worth
 
3:53 AM
Haha.
Yes, it's free.
 
Nothing is free.
You pay much higher VAT and other taxes.
 
Sure.
I haven't seen my doctor in years btw.
 
He's probably lonely.
 
Haha unlikely.
 
People in socialized countries tend to visit the doctor more often from what I hear.
 
3:55 AM
Is that so?
 
@Cerberus That's the data I've seen.
 
Hmm.
On average?
How about the top 10 % visitors, do they also visit more often?
 
@Cerberus I'm not sure the measurement method. I just remember hearing that it was up to 3x more often than in the US.
 
It would of course make sense for poor people to see their doctor more often.
 
True.
 
3:57 AM
I have to pay all costs up to € 360 a year, anything over that amount is paid for my insurance.
 
I remember reading that in England, people see their physician for conditions most Americans would likely ignore.
 
I hear you have very complicated systems with co-pays and such.
 
That's just the surface
 
Heh.
Derobert in the other room showed me some forms and menus on the Obamacare website.
 
The insurance companies pay what they want.
@Cerberus I try not to look.
I'm lucky to be a salaried employee.
 
3:58 AM
By the way, the theory here is that people should see their GP more often, and that this saves money in the end, because disease can be diagnosed earlier, and they don't need to go to specialists as often.
 
I don't worry about my billing beyond a cursory interest in making sure the hospital does well.
 
Good for you.
 
@Cerberus I don't disagree with it.
 
I only know that total healthcare expenditure in America is about 60 % higher than here...
And the quality is about the same.
 

« first day (1229 days earlier)      last day (3692 days later) »