« first day (649 days earlier)      last day (4275 days later) » 

10:00 PM
@tchrist Yes. In detailed IPA, you would use different sumbols. In dictionary IPA, you would simply use /l/ for both.
 
user19161
@Robusto Yoichi Oishi can be shortened to Yoishi.
 
@Robusto That is very different: the u in fulsome is not a schwa at all to me.
@Robusto To me, that sounds like ɜ and a schwa.
 
user19161
@Cerberus Nobody will pronounce it like a schwa except in very lazy speech.
 
All right, I suppose it is possible to pronounce it as a schwa there.
Also depends on your accent, probably.
 
user19161
Well, anyone can pronounce any word in any way.
 
10:06 PM
@Mitch Really? It's my impression that the Klan generally hated on any ties to Jews or blacks. If you had Jewish or black ancestry, it mattered not a whit whether you were also married. See what I'm saying?
 
It was like that here too.
When the Nazis had conquered us.
 
@Mitch Impertinent in what sense?
 
Do we want this?
1
Q: A value has 'reduced by factor of 3'. Does this make mathematical sense?

ianmayoI'm just reading some statistics. Last year there were 3000 observations, this year there are only 1000. This is described as showing a "fall by a factor of 3". This phrase doesn't ring true. If a factor of 3 is a 1/3, then a fall by a third would be down to 2000. So the phrase is meant to r...

Funny, it's been open for a year with no answers.
Wouldn't happen on ELU.
 
@Cerberus Right. Nazi and Klan race hatred overlap to a considerable degree. The Nazis, though, I think were Catholic friendly, plus they also hated on the Gypsies. I think the Klan would have hated on the Gypsies too if we had any though.
 
10:13 PM
@ΜετάEd Yeah, they certainly hated gypsies. As to their attitude towards the Church, I think it varied.
Oh, we are two years old already?
 
We should host a party!
 
People have been getting their second Yearling badges for weeks.
 
I know, I'm stupid, and you're so smart.
 
Attentive != smart.
 
10:18 PM
> Back at home, apparently this included following on the FBI's tactic of assuming that "brown skin = terrorist." As such, they've spent the past few years spying on "Muslim neighbrhoods" throughout New York (with help from the CIA), sending undercover agents and informants into Muslim groups and organizations:
Yay, here's racism and vocalised consonants in one quotation!
 
See, attentive != smart. QED.
 
@Cerberus Well I am certainly no expert on that. There seems to be much controversy about what Hitler would have done to the Catholic Church eventually. He seems certainly to have expected it to report to him, just like every other institution. Imagine Hitler as Pope. 8P
 
> the main "suspect" actually alerted the FBI to the informant who was trying to coax him into taking part in a plot (which didn't stop him from being arrested, even if the case was eventually dropped)
comedy gold
Well, except for the suspect.
 
@ΜετάEd Yeah, would have been fun. Mussolini needed the Pope's (tacit) coöperation, and the Pope needed Mussolini to get off his back, so this deadlock-turned-coöperation was unlikely to change any time soon.
 
10:22 PM
@KitFox What I was trying to express I posted about 15 minutes ago in a reply to Mitch.
@Cerberus I am afraid of when we forget the lesson of Nazi Germany enough that we elect fascists in the US. We keep getting closer and closer.
 
Yeah, they never conquered you.
Certain taboos are still strong across Europe because of the War.
Even so, people seem to be offended by remarks on race more quickly in America, because of your history with slaves and such.
 
So do we want that Math question?
Here it is again for your consideration:
1
Q: A value has 'reduced by factor of 3'. Does this make mathematical sense?

ianmayoI'm just reading some statistics. Last year there were 3000 observations, this year there are only 1000. This is described as showing a "fall by a factor of 3". This phrase doesn't ring true. If a factor of 3 is a 1/3, then a fall by a third would be down to 2000. So the phrase is meant to r...

And anyway, I'm off for a bit more.
 
10:40 PM
Sorry, Yoichi. I have to vote "Not Constructive" on this one. You're probably already aware from press coverage that Akin is about the only anglophone on the planet who would speak of ‘legitimate rape’ (modesty forbids me from saying exactly what I think of Akin - but I can assure you it's not much, and none of it's favourable! :) — FumbleFingers 2 mins ago
@fumblefingers, you are, sadly, wrong.
His views are actually typical in his social circle.
 
That sucks.
 
> For his fellow pro-lifers, fellow Republicans and fellow PCA leaders, Akin’s only crime was one of candor, not heresy. For them, his mistake was his tactlessness, and not the substance of what he said.
 
I wonder why he thinks women can prevent themselves from impregnation.
 
@Cerberus Ah well, he can't be blamed for misspeaking.
 
10:47 PM
Haha.
Great.
 
@Cerberus Also,
> When are women going to face the fact that they don’t know their own bodies as well as men who have heard things?
 
@RegDwightАΑA Haha, WTF indeed.
 
Someone has watched too much Mr Bean The Movie.
 
@TRiG > Don Langrick, Bonsai Culturist
Cool job.
 
10:52 PM
@Cerberus The Onion is rather awesome. But I think they're often fighting Poe's Law.
 
user19161
Hey @trig. Nice to see you.
 
@JasperLoy Hi.
 
user19161
@KitFox I saw it was migrated to math. Actually I think they won't want it either, but never mind.
 
user19161
I see it more suitable for ELU, really.
 
user19161
In any case, that phrasing is ambiguous and should be rewritten. "Reduced by factor of 3" is just complete rubbish. QED.
 
10:55 PM
@TRiG I'm glad to see that not all the religious nutters are from Texas.
 
@RegDwightАΑA Like that!
@TRiG What's that?
 
@Cerberus I really think that's exactly what happened. Start to finish. Including the reaction from the art historian.
 
Possible.
BRB
 
@Cerberus Original formulation of Poe's Law:
> Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is impossible to create a parody of Fundamentalism that SOMEONE won't mistake for the real thing.
Hang on. No. That's the amended version. The original was specific to Creationists.
> Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is utterly impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that someone won't mistake it for the genuine article.
As an example, take this headline: "Tampa Bay Gay Prostitutes Gearing Up For Flood Of Closeted Republicans".
 
11:10 PM
@JasperLoy No, Math is asking us if we want it.
 
@TRiG Oh, yes, I remember. A sound law.
@TRiG Haha, I don't even understand this.
 
Maybe a Balrog could help me with AHK.
 
@KitFox oh Kit I have an NSFW picture for you.
 
@RegDwightАΑA What's the question? What a chapuza is?
 
A question? There was a question?
 
11:25 PM
There was a “WTF?”.
Perhaps it was exclamatory only.
 
Well have you looked at that?
 
No, I only looked at the words. Moment.
 
Well that explains it.
 
I hadn't know it was a link.
Oh my.
I don’t see how they’re going to fix that one.
 
user19161
@KitFox Sure, I'll answer it.
 
11:31 PM
@RegDwightАΑA I give up. What were you doing reading the newspaper of a minor village in Aragón with fewer people in it than Lake Geneva?
 
user19161
@RegDwightАΑA It is not for me?
 
user19161
@tchrist Isn't Aragon the guy in LOTR?
 
@JasperLoy glares
Damn non-rhotics.
 
@tchrist I was WTFing, that's what.
And now I must be off.
Ouvert et haut !
 
user19161
-2
Q: How does one pronounce /oʊ/ in /oʊvərˈsiz/ in American English?

CoderInNetworkToday when I checked the Oxford American Dictionary for the pronunciation of overseas, I got this in IPA: /oʊvərˈsiz/. According to my understanding, the /ʊ/ phoneme is pronounced o or something like put, so the pronunciation of this word would be very difficult, or even meaningless.

 
user19161
11:46 PM
Why -2? OP shows research effort...
 
user19161
I think we are too liberal with the downvotes here, really.
 
@JasperLoy It’s my bad answer. Probably if I deleted it, the question would look better.
 

« first day (649 days earlier)      last day (4275 days later) »