@Mitch Really? It's my impression that the Klan generally hated on any ties to Jews or blacks. If you had Jewish or black ancestry, it mattered not a whit whether you were also married. See what I'm saying?
I'm just reading some statistics.
Last year there were 3000 observations, this year there are only 1000. This is described as showing a "fall by a factor of 3".
This phrase doesn't ring true. If a factor of 3 is a 1/3, then a fall by a third would be down to 2000. So the phrase is meant to r...
@Cerberus Right. Nazi and Klan race hatred overlap to a considerable degree. The Nazis, though, I think were Catholic friendly, plus they also hated on the Gypsies. I think the Klan would have hated on the Gypsies too if we had any though.
> Back at home, apparently this included following on the FBI's tactic of assuming that "brown skin = terrorist." As such, they've spent the past few years spying on "Muslim neighbrhoods" throughout New York (with help from the CIA), sending undercover agents and informants into Muslim groups and organizations:
Yay, here's racism and vocalised consonants in one quotation!
@Cerberus Well I am certainly no expert on that. There seems to be much controversy about what Hitler would have done to the Catholic Church eventually. He seems certainly to have expected it to report to him, just like every other institution. Imagine Hitler as Pope. 8P
> the main "suspect" actually alerted the FBI to the informant who was trying to coax him into taking part in a plot (which didn't stop him from being arrested, even if the case was eventually dropped)
@ΜετάEd Yeah, would have been fun. Mussolini needed the Pope's (tacit) coöperation, and the Pope needed Mussolini to get off his back, so this deadlock-turned-coöperation was unlikely to change any time soon.
I'm just reading some statistics.
Last year there were 3000 observations, this year there are only 1000. This is described as showing a "fall by a factor of 3".
This phrase doesn't ring true. If a factor of 3 is a 1/3, then a fall by a third would be down to 2000. So the phrase is meant to r...
Sorry, Yoichi. I have to vote "Not Constructive" on this one. You're probably already aware from press coverage that Akin is about the only anglophone on the planet who would speak of ‘legitimate rape’ (modesty forbids me from saying exactly what I think of Akin - but I can assure you it's not much, and none of it's favourable! :) — FumbleFingers2 mins ago
> For his fellow pro-lifers, fellow Republicans and fellow PCA leaders, Akin’s only crime was one of candor, not heresy. For them, his mistake was his tactlessness, and not the substance of what he said.
> Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is impossible to create a parody of Fundamentalism that SOMEONE won't mistake for the real thing.
Hang on. No. That's the amended version. The original was specific to Creationists.
> Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is utterly impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that someone won't mistake it for the genuine article.
Today when I checked the Oxford American Dictionary for the pronunciation of overseas, I got this in IPA: /oʊvərˈsiz/.
According to my understanding, the /ʊ/ phoneme is pronounced o or something like put, so the pronunciation of this word would be very difficult, or even meaningless.