« first day (736 days earlier)      last day (4187 days later) » 

3:00 AM
@Cerberus yes
(sorry I had to go afk for a bit)
@Cerberus but
flashing the stock images erases the phone
like a factory reset
 
Are you sure?
Isn't that only when you unlock the bootloader?
I mean, oops, too late, already started...
 
@Cerberus I've flashed the stock images several times
it's not like applying an OTA update
 
Ah OK.
I'll think about it.
I am a bit lazy right now and I don't feel an irresistible urge...yet.
On the other hand, if the OTA will fail anyway...
 
3:17 AM
okay so I flashed the twrp recovery and the dead android is gone
but I want stock back
 
Yay!
Maybe you can try stock now.
 
I can't find it
 
Hmm.
Have you tried reflashing stock recovery through the toolkit already?
Or is there no toolkit for your S?
I know there is one for the S3.
 
what is this "toolkit"
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 There is the Nexus Toolkit, the S3 Toolkit...an all-in-one program to do stuff to your phone through ADB/fastboot. Made by Wugfresh, at least the Nexus Toolkits.
 
3:26 AM
@Cerberus I would prefer to use an official tool for this purpose.
It should be possible... I don't know why the stock recovery isn't in the stock images
hm, it seems I have a "Galaxy Nexus Toolkit" file already. But this is the nexus S that I'm having issues with
which is not the same as the "Nexus Root Toolkit". hm
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 The Nexus Toolkit is better than anything out there btw.
It is as official as it gets: instead of having to use all the official ADB commands in a terminal, the program does it for you.
I don't know about the S.
 
Yes.
 
Well, I can type a fastboot command pretty easily. What I need is the img file to flash.
 
It supposedly has the img file included.
 
3:32 AM
hopefully.
 
That's why it has an option to flash stock recovery.
It just didn't work for me, for whatever reason.
This is for the Galaxy S, but...
It may be outdated.
It does not mention Android 4+.
 
user19161
I have gotten used to my Android phone.
 
Wait, what?
You have an Android phone??
Since when?
 
user19161
Since a few weeks ago. It came free with the subscription. I would not buy such a thing.
 
Great!
What type is it?
 
user19161
3:39 AM
I still prefer my old phone of course.
 
Of course.
 
user19161
It is a Sony Xperia.
 
Great!
 
@WillHunting gah! Kill it! Kill it!
 
@WillHunting Is there a letter after Xperia?
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Now, be nice.
 
user19161
3:40 AM
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I remember you have that too.
 
This must be encouraged.
 
@WillHunting I had an Xperia Arc S for work testing.
 
Xperia P?
 
I didn't like it
 
Xperia something?
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Silence!
 
user19161
3:41 AM
Ouvert et haut !
 
so Nexus Root Toolkit's "stock recovery" is the dead android
!!!
So I held down "vol down" and "power" and a menu appeared!
damn thing wasn't dead after all!
That means I could have gone to bed an hour ago
 
Congratulations?
 
now if only 4.2 would come out for the Nexus S
and if only cyanogenmod were stable on my TF101
@WillHunting Anyway, Jasper, I'm sure your phone is very nice. But if you get to like it, try a Nexus device sometime. Invariably any problems you have with the Sony will be Sony's fault and be caused by some questionable decision they made in the product design. Google's Nexus phones are the best Android, period. But I would still take an xperia over, say, an iphone.
well, I'm off. good night folks.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Huh?
But I tried that.
I specifically read exactly that, held down the buttons on the red android, but nothing happened.
Tried other button combos too.
Good night!
 
4:17 AM
The rabid anti-Pelosi reactionaries are letting their politics irritate their peeve buttons again:
0
Q: Are these sentences in the _Christian Science Monitor_ acceptable English these days?

Bill FrankeThis is from a Christian Science Monitor story on Nancy Pelosi's decision to stay on as House Minority Leader. The first report I saw in the Washington Post had only one questionable sentence, but this second report has two: “Being actively involved in politics at this level is really insatia...

 
4:57 AM
Perhaps he thinks "being...involved" is the dangling modifier?
 
But that’s just a gerund.
It isn’t modifying anything. ”Telling the truth is easier than confabulating.” No dangles, just gerunds.
 
If you read I am for is, that fixes insatiable (though it seems unlikely she would say that) and creates a dangling modifier.
 
 
2 hours later…
6:49 AM
And to think we’ve gone this long without a tag!
Or even .
 
7:03 AM
I’ve had to use for what should probably be called , but that is a tag synonym for .
 
 
2 hours later…
9:21 AM
Can anyone tell me if this sentence is in passive voice? "Many factors were operating in concert against ..."
 
user image
3
@soandos you can tell passive because the subject is being acted upon. in your sentence the subject is "many factors" and the action is "operating", since the factors are doing something, (compare with the active voice sentences "I was running" or "you were cooking") then the sentence is in the active voice.
 
So this is active?
 
yes. the factors are doing something, not having something done to them
 
@MattЭллен Even though what comes after against is also a subject?
 
I would say what comes after is an object
 
9:29 AM
Got it
Thank you
 
no problem :)
@soandos a passive version might be something like "Many factors were used in concert against..." because the factors are not doing anything themselves, but some other agent is using them.
 
Ah, got it. I think the grader of my paper just sees "were" and writes passive voice. Its annoying
 
hmmmm. Well, I'm not a teacher. let me just check wikipedia!
I'm almost certain that your original sentence is active, @soandos. You can't add a prepositional phrase to it to say who the active agent is:

(active and wrong) Many factors were operating by John
(passive and correct) Many factors were used by John
 
@MattЭллен thank you very much
 
no trouble :)
 
 
1 hour later…
10:55 AM
@MattЭллен I thought that publication closed its doors in the wake of the Murdoch scandal.
 
@soandos show him this:
12
A: How can I reliably and accurately identify the passive voice in writing or speech?

nohatA clause in the passive voice must have all the following: A form of an auxiliary verb (usually be or get) The past participle of a transitive verb No direct object The subject of the verb phrase is the entity undergoing an action or having its state changed Optionally, the agent is expressed...

It's from an actual linguist, too.
 
@RegDwighт thanks
I'm already attaching a note to the end of my essay (I get to revise it) with a bunch of other things (like being asked to use chicago style footnotes, and then losing points on them and the like)
 
@RegDwighт I feel like editing the title to say "How can the passive voice in writing reliably and accurately be identified in writing or speech?"
 
@Robusto not enough writings. OVER 9000 is the minimum wage.
 
@Robusto lol. that would certainly be a better paper.
 
10:58 AM
@RegDwighт Too much memesis.
 
Behind mememy lines.
Sweden has rednecks, too.
Just look at this beast.
 
11:41 AM
Hello.
@RegDwighт Just as with the Canadian rednecks, I must object.
No sun, no rednecks.
 
12:00 PM
false false false true true true false false false true true true true false false false true true true true true true true false false false false false
Commute
 
@Matt, how goes the writing?
 
@KitFox slowly, but I'm writing, so that's better than not :)
how's it going for you?
 
@RegDwighт Why would you need to drive a tractor that fast?
@MattЭллен Great! I've had two really good nights in a row.
 
@KitFox awesome!
that's great news :)
I can see your word count has rocketed ahead :D
 
Oh yeah. Two 2500 days will do that.
 
12:10 PM
:D
 
I'm almost caught up.
I'm going to sneak in some writing time at work today and see if I can catch up ahead of the weekend.
 
hehehe. Well, I'm aiming for the unlikely 4K words today. we'll see
 
@KitFox what else can you do in Sweden? Pray tell?
 
@RegDwighт Wax your bikini line?
 
Remember that one bottle of beer there costs more than two modded tractors.
Not to mention proper booze.
 
12:13 PM
Oh g2g. Back after commutes.
 
@KitFox and how is a modded tractor not helpful in that pursuit?
CU'aes.
 
12:51 PM
english.stackexchange.com/questions/89859/… is among correct? I thought between would be right.
 
1:06 PM
@JonasStein I think among/between is a regional difference. I would use between as well.
 
By convention, I think you would rather use among with more than two things?
 
user19161
Hey guys, it's Friday again!
 
You don't say!
 
Yeah it's really fast this week.
Like, Monday, Tuesday, Friday.
 
@WillHunting So what kind of Xperia did you have again? You forgot to tell us.
 
user19161
1:16 PM
@Cerberus MT25i is the model I think.
 
@Cerberus No, it has to be between here.
Among would be wrong.
 
a humourous thought: being among friends is good, being between friends is not.
 
22
A: "between" vs "among"

simchonaGrammarGirl did a whole post on this. She explains that there is a difference between between and among. She writes: Here's the deal: you can use the word “between” when you are talking about distinct, individual items even if there are more than two of them. For example, you could say, "She ...

 
@WillHunting Wow! That is quite modern!
@tchrist Uhm I meant to say that among sounded wrong, and I mislooked at the question.
Arg!
I failed again.
When you're in a 2D plane, I feel that between is wrong if there are more than two objects around you.
 
it's those six eyes. it's hard to keep tack of what you're looking at
 
1:22 PM
When used metaphorically, it's different.
@MattЭллен Haha yes.
 
@Cerberus I think it is just Yoichi not knowing any better.
 
The phrase differ(ence/ent) between sounds like a cast-iron idiom to me.
@tchrist Yeah.
 
0
A: Is "between" always used for two things?

tchristYes, sometimes you do (and must) use between for more than two things alone. In these places, you cannot swap in among, or it will sound wrong. For example, between can be used with several points of geography: My territory lies between Denver, Dallas, and Chicago. and not My territo...

 
Hmm yes, I agree.
 
Differences are kinda always a 1:1 thing. So between.
 
1:25 PM
I suppose.
But I agree with @Kit that there is regional or dialectic or whatever variation: to choose among/between...
Choose between sounds slightly more neutral to me.
But I wouldn't notice choose among as unusual at all.
 
I wish I could ask it what the most common word to follow "choose between" might be.
@MετάEd may know how to do that, or rather, have the means.
 
averts eyes from incongruously rounded corners
@tchrist "Them"?
 
That bothered me, too. You have to crank the smoothing to fix it.
 
@tchrist No, I mean the ehm choose-between thingies are rounded, while the text boxes are not.
Nor the button on the left.
 
1:33 PM
Looks like something on SO is trying to make illegal x-domain requests to acksvr.com.
 
@tchrist Funny how people made up their minds as the War approached...
 
That is the same query, just run on a different browser (note roundedness differences).
@Cerberus That’s an interesting notion.
 
@Robusto Huh?
What is that domain?
 
Mar 8 at 18:57, by Robusto
@RegDwightѬſ道 Immediate disqualification for citing Grammar Girl as an authority.
@Cerberus Chrome listed a problem with a cross-domain scripting request on the SO page I was looking at.
 
It was Sim, not me! I simply cited the lady.
 
1:35 PM
@Robusto Neither Site Advisor nor the Web of Trust knows this domain.
 
@tchrist If you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas.
 
Is then the Web of Trust plural?
I surmise so, but would not have done so otherwise.
Ah.
 
Right, right.
 
Ok.
 
Well, they could be plural each.
I don't know what intuition led me.
 
1:36 PM
It would take only the nearer one.
 
@MattЭллен Well, depends on how you are situated between them, I suppose.
 
It ought to.
 
@Cerberus Probably that would be the intuition that talking about two things needs must demand plural concordance, despite the disjunction. Even St Billy the Bard was drawn to it.
 
I don't know.
I usually use plural for organisations.
 
That may be it.
 
1:38 PM
The police are.
So it coulds be either.
 
Everyone says police are. Police is is wrong.
 
One more reason why assigning every word an official Part of Speech from the 8-crayon box is a totally useless activity. If you know what color it's sposta be, what have you learned about its usage, meaning, and grammar? — John Lawler 6 mins ago
Another reason to like John Lawler.
 
I thought police is was American...
 
No, police is is wrong.
 
@KitFox true. I suppose I can think of some good ways >:D
 
1:39 PM
You cannot say: *The police is here.
 
@tchrist Unless you're speaking an urban dialect. "Hey, there's a police on the corner."
 
But it’s one of the only ones that should always be in the plural, even cisatlantically.
 
@JohnLawler: As long as you are not committed to cramming it into a single box, I think it can be interesting to explore and draw colourful lines over the boxes. — Cerberus 8 secs ago
 
@Cerberus Thanks for killing the metaphor.
 
OK, let's ease up on the commentary.
 
1:41 PM
I did that on purpose.
 
Now that is curious.
 
Look at a few examples.
You should always do that.
 
Right.
They are things like "Though necessary for democratic life, the autonomy of the police is to be feared as well. The police are, in any society, a powerful agency that could misuse or abuse the powers granted to them. "
Notice how that has both, and how it is a false positive for the red version.
> According to public opinion polls, the crime-fighter image of the police is firmly rooted in citizens' minds and is the main reason that recruits give for joining the force.
> The idea of the police is the product of society's permanent inclination to live in peace.
> As you probably already know, the basic mission of the police is to protect life and property, to find and arrest criminal offenders, to preserve the peace, to enforce laws, and to prevent and detect crime.
 
So as usual, the ngram proves nothing but its own inapplicability.
@Robusto I can’t say that.
 
1:45 PM
@tchrist It's a perfect system, one that functions as designed. It was built to prove useless, and succeeds on every failure.
 
I do get some hits from nonnative speakers.
 
@tchrist Exactly.
 
Or rather, it’s the NNS who hitted the most.
 
The opening chapter of A Confederacy of Dunces contains a passage in which New Orleans natives are talking about "a police" as well.
 
@Robusto It's not useless! With interpolation you can make it useful.
 
1:47 PM
@Robusto Don’t believe everything one of those Cree yoyos tells you.
 
Examine the first 100 results and hope those are representative.
Ah! I see now what you meant. But, as far as I can find, there is no etymological connection between do and the -dition suffix... — Berthilde 4 hours ago
What is she thinking?
 
> The attitude toward the police is ambiguous. ... The more the sons of the upper class are wild, violent, and destructive, and the more the upper class as a whole, including its agent, the police, is corrupt, the more the police and the state as a ...
 
Why won't she just read my answer?
 
@Cerberus That's like saying "Cheerios and milk provide 11 essential building blocks for a healthy body." Take away the Cheerios and you still have those 11 blocks.
 
waltzes Berthilde
 
1:48 PM
@tchrist I'm only reporting what other people are reporting.
 
@Robusto You’re not a janitor though.
 
@tchrist I didn't say I was cleaning up after them.
 
> They order the police to do all these things and they come here and plead justice and say that the police is doing their work. They are not doing it and you know it. The other day we heard hon. Kirwa say that you were going to disrupt a rally on ...
Kenyan, that one.
It scans as NNS to me.
And that is a wicked period.
 
@Robusto Not really. If you examine 100 examples from today, you can still have some idea of how phrase x was used historically based on the Ngram. If you just take any random 100 examples from, say, Google Search, you still have no idea at all.
 
@tchrist The only kind Elphaba has, I reckon.
 
1:50 PM
The same applies to comparing, say, British with American.
 
Several Indians seem to likes it, too.
 
@tchrist Did they like it today morning?
@Cerberus So you're saying nothing is better than less than nothing. Hmm ...
 
And yestermorn and tomorn.
 
user19161
@tchrist To likes?
 
user19161
Is that a whoosh?
 
1:51 PM
Very like.
 
If whooshes were horses, Jasper would ride.
 
user19161
You never know when you are whooshed in this room.
 
@Robusto Yes, and that it can be significantly more than nothing, but you won't know until you examine what you've got.
 
user19161
I still can't ride a bike!
 
56 secs ago, by Robusto
If whooshes were horses, Jasper would ride.
See the part about horses?
 
1:53 PM
A Frog he would a wooing go, Heigh-ho, says Rowley,
A Frog he would a-wooing go, Whether this mother would let him or no,
With a Roley, Poley, Gammon and Spinach, Heigh-ho says Anthony Rowley.

He saddled and bridled a great black snail, Heigh-ho, says Rowley,
He saddled and bridled a great black snail, And rode between the horns and the tail,
With a Roley, Poley, Gammon and Spinach, Heigh-ho says Anthony Rowley.

So off he set with his opera hat, Heigh-ho, says Rowley,
So off he set with his opera hat, And on the way he met with a rat,
Frog went a-courtin' and he did ride, uh-huh
Frog went a-courtin' and he did ride, uh-huh
Frog went a-courtin' and he did ride
With a sword and a pistol by his side, uh-huh.
 
@tchrist Your words-to-substance ratio is dropping faster now.
 
That’s gotta be worth a million words.
 
@Robusto Yeah, I would have expected that to be in a scrap of Perl code.
 
@tchrist This only proves that smoking kills.
 
tosses no scraps to the lapdog
 
1:57 PM
Fine.
 
Smoking causes Huntingtons.
This one shucks and jives:
 

« first day (736 days earlier)      last day (4187 days later) »