@ACuriousMind I obsessively feel I should know every topic in a standard physics curriculum in a way that if someone wakes me up at midnight and asks me a random question I can answer :/
a charged particle accelerating radiates EM waves. The equivalence principle says there is no local experiment that can distinguish between a uniform gravitational field and a uniform acceleration. So shouldn't, therefore, a charged particle sitting still in a uniform gravitational field radiate? Where is this energy coming from?
The local effects of motion in a curved spacetime (gravitation) are indistinguishable from those of an accelerated observer in flat spacetime, without exception.
if you go back to the elevator thing, sitting in an elevator on Earth that's not moving is equivalent to being in an elevator in empty space that is accelerating
The special theory of relativity (SR) is known for its paradoxes: the twin paradox and the ladder-in-barn paradox, for example. Neither are true paradoxes; they merely expose flaws in our understanding, and point the way toward deeper understanding of nature. The ladder paradox exposes the breakdown of simultaneity, while the twin paradox highlights the distinctions of accelerated frames of reference. In SR any paradox can be mapped on a geometrical 4-dimensional euclidean problem to be studied.
In general relativity (GR) things are not so easy. Among others, there is the paradox of a charg...
> a charged particle and a neutral particle fall equally fast in a gravitational field, despite the fact that the charged one loses energy by radiation
> When that is done, one finds no radiation in the supported frame from a supported charge, because the magnetic field is zero in this frame. Rohrlich does note that the gravitational field slightly distorts the Coulomb field of the supported charge, but too small to be observable.
Hm, by the equivalence principle, is the Rindler horizon fully equivalent to the Schwarzschild horizon? Has the frame of every one of us a Rindler horizon sitting deep inside the earth?
@0celo7 Well...it means that the "vacuum state" - the state a non-accelerating observer determines to be empty - is a thermal state for an accelerated observer
Ah, wait. Technically the Unruh effect just tells you what temperature the vacuum of one observer has as seen by another. So one needs to determine which vacuum the state of the universe corresponds to
@DavidZ I was told that you'd be interested by a fork of Chemobot here. If so, what should I name it ? PhysicsBot just doesn't have the same ring to it imo
@ACuriousMind This $U\subset\Bbb R^2$ problem is still stumping me. If we remove a point from $S^2$, it is still simply connected. Why does that fail for a subset of the plane?
@ACuriousMind Well, it's up to you to suggest commands that could be relevant here. For instance in the chem chatroom the bot can give a picture of a molecule with the img/molecule_name,identifier,... command
Hi all, I have a peak in some data with an assumed exponential background. I have fit the data to a gaussian + background model. Now I want to get an estimate of how likely this peak would be from chance, i.e. background only. What is a test I could do to figure this?
@Hippalectryon Hmm, doi and xkcd sound useful at first but then I realize the doi or the number of the xkcd is usually info I only have when I could just post the link myself
@ACuriousMind Tbh I don't remember the last time I saw that command used :( but I made it because someone initially asked me, so I guess it was useful at some point
a charged particle accelerating radiates EM waves. The equivalence principle says there is no local experiment that can distinguish between a uniform gravitational field and a uniform acceleration. So shouldn't, therefore, a charged particle sitting still in a uniform gravitational field radiate? Where is this energy coming from?
I am currently having a hard time solving a problem of GR from Lasenby's book.
I can't make it more clear than by quoting the exercise:
7.2 A charged object held stationary in a laboratory on the surface of the Earth does not
emit electromagnetic radiation. If the object is then dropped so that ...
The purpose of this question is to ask about the role of mathematical rigor in physics. In order to formulate a question that can be answered, and not just discussed, I divided this large issue into five specific questions.
1) What are the most important and the oldest insights (notions, results...
Hi! I'm studying a usual linear accelerator for electrons and I'm trying to get the force that corresponds to the power radiated ($P=m\tau \ddot{x}^2$). I've tried calculating the associated work which gives me $W=m\tau\int_0^T\ddot{x}^2\mathrm{d}t=\int_0^T\vec{F_r}\cdot\vec{\dot{x}}\mathrm{d}t$, how do I continue ?
I had a question about best practices for keeping a lab journal (specifically, should one only record experiments, or should one also include research for experiments, or time spent looking around on say McMaster Carr for parts). Is this on topic or off topic? It would seem to fall under experime...