@0celo7 Graphics cards back then wouldn't have been able to render much more objects at once than you see there - the fog hiddes those that would have been too much.
Kennedy was the "richest" although he only had control over his family's trust, not the estate
I think Washington was officially the richest
user54412
@Danu You should ask on the main site. I just worked through the equations myself to see if I could understand what's going on, but I haven't gotten anywhere.
@dmckee Heh. Do ex-biologists make better particle physicists? Or do they approach the particle zoo in the wrong way?
user54412
@Danu Of course it's interesting that for $Q < \sqrt{3}/2 \times M$, $C < 0$. Negative heat capacities are sort of weird, but actually self-gravitating systems tend to have them (e.g. stars and globular clusters). So maybe C going positive is the weird thing. Once a black hole is charged enough, it's emitted radiation per unit area increases as the area grows?
I am using the newlfm package to create a cover letter. And I am trying to replace the logo at the top of this cover letter with a title. Now I know how to remove the logo, but I have no idea how to add a title above the black line at the top ?
Plus, I cannot find any latex code that created tho...
@KyleKanos Well...I know 1 physicist doing biophysics and 0 biologists doing biophysics. Thus I conclude by anecdotal data that it's physics + bio and not the other way around ;)
user54412
1:11 AM
@Danu Thinking more on this, the divergent behavior of C comes from $\partial\kappa/\partial M$ passing through 0. So the question boils down to "Why does surface gravity as a function of mass have an extremum?"
@ACuriousMind I've run into a smidge of a problem in responding to your comment to my meta answer.
If you've got an accepted but incorrect answer, you ought to comment to the questioner about unaccepting it
if they do, then you can go back and either edit or delete (depending on existing other answers)
But what happens if OP doesn't respond in some timely fashion? Should you then just assume that they're gone for good (i.e., one-and-done users) and edit for future users? Or should you then post a new answer?
Still, the whole issue seems to stem from pentane's misunderstanding of the Edit How-To
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is more appropriate for our sister sister site smokeanotherdoobie.stackexchange.com — Alfred Centauri9 mins ago
I just wanted to save that one because it was too funny
Aha...apparently a font I just downloaded made serif fonts on FF get screwy. I removed them & now it's all okay
@0celo7 That's what I'd classify the stuff that I used to work on as (statistical physics of soft matter stuff with biological applications; mostly simulations), but the field is quite diverse as biology too tends to be.
General science/physics/chemical physics/physical chemistry journals also publish a lot of the stuff, just pick up any issue of PRL, say, and you'll probably have something there here's an example of the most recent issue; one of the 4 or 5 papers this week in PRL that are related to soft/biological matter.
@0celo7 Does physics research? Or most academic research in general? Nobel prizes have been given for what could be classified as biological physics e.g. Hodgkin-Huxley, but I'm not sure if that's really a good metric to go by.
@0celo7 As for direct applications, it's not really what academics do, so that's always a difficult question. As an example: Almost all of biology works through proteins, and for their function the shape they fold into is super important. Suppose we had a model that could give the shape given the sequence (this is a Nobel prize for sure; they already gave out prizes 2 years ago for the current models, too, though).
That'd be cool, and I'm sure super useful for designing drugs and whatnot, but there'd still be the engineering side of things of actually figuring out how to build those sequences and to come up with ways where the shape can really be leveraged.
Which is to say that figuring out how something works is separate from applying this knowledge. The unpredictability when it comes to applications is an integral part of fundamental research and the reason it is the government that funds it rather than private companies.
@ChrisWhite Thanks for your response. I'll post it as a question soon.
@ChrisWhite The equations are messy. It involves solving a cubic polynomial
@ChrisWhite Negative heat capacities are fine by me: The book I read on QFT in curved spacetimes gives negative heat capacity as the generic behavior of black holes (Schwarzschild, in any case, has negative $C$).
@ChrisWhite Hmm, really? I think I'm keeping $M$ fixed when plotting the thing that diverges...
Consider the Reissner-Nordström metric
$$ds^2=-f(r)dt^2+f^{-1}dr^2-r^2d\Omega^2\hspace{2cm}
f(r)=1-\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{M^2q^2}{r^2}$$
where I defined the charge-to-mass ratio $q:=Q/M$, which satisfies $|q|\leq 1$ to avoid naked singularities. As is well known, there are two horizons (or only a si...
@ACuriousMind Would a question "how long can a particle survive inside the horizon of a black hole without hitting the singularity" 1. be a good PSE question 2. be a duplicate?
> A groom had to return home without his bride from a marriage hall in Uttar Pradesh's Kanpur Dehat district after he failed to solve a simple mathematical problem.
The bride-to-be got suspicious of the groom's educational qualification. Her cousins asked the groom to solve simple mathematical question, what is 15+6. The groom failed to give the correct answer and the girl refused to marry him on Wednesday.
By examining the causal structure of a Schwarzschild black hole, one can see that a particle in region II is unable to escape to $r=\infty$.
Such diagrams do not show, however, how long a particle can survive inside of region II without hitting the singularity. Can a particle survive indefinit...
@KyleKanos My bad, I didn't go through meta.se's guidelines first. I thought just because it's relevant for more than one SE site, it's on-topic for meta.
@JohnRennie The abstract of that paper you linked indicates rockets can be used to extend the lifetime of the particle. This is contrary to my analysis? Am I wrong or am I misreading the abstract? (My Q&A is based off of an exercise in Wald.)
@obe Yes, I think it's an interesting question and the answer should be on PSE.
@KyleKanos That being said, if ever such type of questions were to occur in greater frequency in the future, would the discussion be less relevant now than then ?
A month or so ago, we had a question stemming from legal interests. The question mostly follows the site's guidelines, and it doesn't seem promotional in content. But certain characteristics of the questions make it seem of an interest not those of "active researchers, academics and students of p...
@KyleKanos That way, we could argue it goes through you too, and if the left and right are topologically identified as the same, it goes on to innisfree (comment star), and back to me and you, and ...
The answers so far have focused on public-key encryption, in which someone publishes a public key which can be used to encrypt messages to them, and which is not secret. Quantum computers are known to be efficient at breaking several of the problems most commonly used as the basis of public-key c...
This is precisely why that question is off-topic
There's nothing in there about physics, it's all crypto stuff
@KyleKanos I need an astrologist's help. I was playing around with some numbers and calculated the time it takes for a particle to be sucked in by Sagittarius A, then divided this number into its radius. The result is greater than the speed of light. Should I chalk that up to shitty data for its radius?
@Danu Well, I'm not sure your "physical reason" exists. Is there a "physical" reason why other phase transitions happen at the points where they happen?
Most of all, I want to know why one happens at all
Also, why is $C(|q|)'$ strictly negative everywhere (q.1)?
For instance
@ACuriousMind Consider a fox chasing a rabbit in a circular arena. The fox starts in the middle. The rabbit's tactic is to always run towards the edge of the arena and then just run in circles along the edge. The fox is "straighforward", and always runs exactly towards the rabbit
There is a phase transition here when $v_{fox}=v_{rabbit}$
and it's quite obvious to me why it's there, and not somewhere else
mfw walked all over goddamn DC collecting signatures from lawmakers and no one bothered to tell me about the typo in the last person's name until I got there
@ACuriousMind what I also find very surprising is how fast one arrives at the "boundaries of knowledge" in this area: I was able to compute this stuff in like 2-3 days and arrived at some result that still is up for interpretation, it appears
I'd rather meet Roger Penrose. Did you know he failed a grade in elementary school? The teacher said he was too slow to finish exams. So his teacher in the next grade gave him and the rest of the class as much time as they wanted on exams and he got 97%! True story, as told by him.
@Kyle Kanos: "You need to edit the question to make it less unclear than it currently is." -- Thank you for notifying me that the wording and/or the status of my question has (again) been changed without my doing. (I had not been notified of the prior changes; but I suppose there's no point complaining about that to someone who resorts to weasel words like "clarity of the question" ...) Now, since I feel compelled to edit my question, for better or worse, I'll just incorporate some of the comments above; thereby also correcting a formula I had stated incorrectly above. — user1226215 mins ago
I don't recall ever using the phrase clarity of the question
Nor would I consider it weasel-ish to use those words
@santiago We-ell, it's not nonsense. I just don't think it's a question that's bounty-worthy (but of course users are free to bounty whatever they want).
Hi @Danu: Minor comment concerning this retagging. Here is my position: Normally qft tags should be saved for actual qft questions. OP is only asking about a non-quantum (=classical) setting. Also, if you wonder about the diff geom tag, it was introduced because of the vielbein tensor structure.
Hi! I'm studying a usual linear accelerator for electrons and I'm trying to get the force that corresponds to the power radiated ($P=m\tau \ddot{x}^2$). I've tried calculating the associated work which gives me $W=m\tau\int_0^T\ddot{x}^2\mathrm{d}t=\int_0^T\vec{F_r}\cdot\vec{\dot{x}}\mathrm{d}t$, how do I continue ?
I thought maybe some integration by part would yield $\dot{x}$ but that square is most troublesome