« first day (2724 days earlier)      last day (2199 days later) » 

5:00 AM
It's like applying to colleges or something
hehe
 
@BalarkaSen ok what were we talking about
 
vzn
yep. in some ways better (they pay you instead of vice versa) in some ways worse (acceptance odds)... etc
 
I don't remember
I just came here to see vzn shitposting crack physics all over the place
 
@BalarkaSen representing H_{n-1} by manifolds
 
yeah I look forward to making 6 figures
 
5:01 AM
Aha
 
like a boss!!!
 
vzn
@BalarkaSen youre the one with the questionable/ sketchy "substance" bkg :P ps have no idea why you find it nec to dis me so much on here :|
 
riiiiiiiight
 
I am openly sketchy
 
For my part, I don't really care about a job that makes a lot of money. What I'd really like is one with stability.
 
5:03 AM
@BalarkaSen who is the most cited living mathematican, no cheat
 
living? Hm
Is it
G R O M O V
 
Witten :P
(no not really)
 
Not a mathematician
 
He has like 8k citations
 
Just got a Fields medal on a fluke
 
5:04 AM
nowhere near the top, even for mathematiicans
@BalarkaSen this is true
it was a controversy at the time
he got the fields for reproving a known result without rigor
 
@0celo7 Hmmm
Serre?
 
gromov has 11k
fuck, you might be right
damn son
 
vzn
(quite a googleble question...) someone on this list aperiodical.com/2010/10/…
 
I was just talking about this with some profs...we could only think of analysts
 
@vzn Doubtful if that list is ordered in terms of # of citations.
 
vzn
5:07 AM
@BalarkaSen it doesnt seem to be in any order.
 
so thats not helpful. it has some potential candidates on the top, but
honestly i expect the citation rate to be way higher in combinatorics than any other branches
 
I think Serre is the highest
 
Me too
 
@Cows People from my group (mathematical physic) got offers.
 
More than Yau, Trudinger, or Tao
 
5:10 AM
what's the number for Tao
 
12k
 
shite bro
 
Serre 14k
Trudinger 13k
tho like 11k is from the book lmao
 
@BalarkaSen LOL
 
milnor 11k
rudin 10k
 
5:13 AM
@BalarkaSen questionable /sketchy ''substance'' bkg? WTH does that mean?
 
hell if i know man
 
@BalarkaSen as far as I can tell, the single most cited work is Gilbarg-Trudinger
 
i can't read vzn dialect
 
11k citations
 
its all hieroglyphics and l33tspk mashed togather in a fucked way
 
5:14 AM
seems kind of low tbh, basically every geometry and PDE paper since 1980 has cited it
 
Huh
 
@EricSilva Giant new paper, Andre will probably mention it arxiv.org/abs/1804.07230
 
Hm, oh, have you tried Deligne? Another one from the Grothendieck crew
those have huge citation #
 
10k
 
vzn
Apr 13 at 23:58, by Balarka Sen
roll weed everyday-dee-dub-dee-daaayyyy
 
5:16 AM
aw
 
@vzn Oh come on, even if he was, that's not sketchy/questionnable, it's plainly mundane.
I hate messing around with raw meat
 
@vzn if you think that's incomprehensible you clearly lack cultural background
 
@BalarkaSen Tao's citation / year number is twice as high as everyone else tho
 
its just a Snoop Dogg song
 
@0celo7 How come tao has so many citations!
 
vzn
5:18 AM
in Physics Meta, Mar 20 at 23:02, by vzn
@nitsua60 there has been some random joking about marijuana ("generally" not by me) which coincidentally is legal in the mile-hiâ„¢ city.
 
@G.Bergeron he has the most diverse research of anyone who has ever lived
 
@0celo7 Jeez
 
@BalarkaSen the guy is like 42 and has 2k less than Serre who is like 80
 
@0celo7 Fair enough, I consciously do not pay attention to that, although I probably should.
 
he's 91
 
5:20 AM
@0celo7 Yeah, when you mentionned Serre, I thought to myself: ''That guy's alive?''
 
vzn
@BalarkaSen lol so youre a big snoop dogg fan eh? riiight have heard about him and his ... music (1 random google result, 1d ago) o_O :P fortune.com/2018/04/18/…
 
i like that one song
 
@G.Bergeron the guy is the main player in three fields (dissipative equations, random matrices, analytic number theory), and a big guy in basically every other field
 
@0celo7 I read a few of his blogposts when they where closing in with physics.
 
Tao is 2 good
 
5:23 AM
Otherwise I don't usually read papers in any of the fields you mentionned
@BalarkaSen Well, that's great
 
dissipative equations are one of the few interesting aspects of physics
 
@0celo7 I'm all in algebra
There's plenty of algebra in physics
 
probably the worst aspect of physics, sorry
 
are you into spin representations of Lie groups or whatever the shit
 
5:24 AM
@0celo7 I think the converse :p
 
lol Salamon has a new functional analysis book
 
vzn
@BalarkaSen how about california girls with katy perry? classic + luv video o_O :P
 
Orly
 
@BalarkaSen Stuff like that, but mostly hopf algebra, quantum groups, etc. all applied within the context of integrable systems
 
oh nice, a collaborator of one of my profs has a new book coming out on NS
I should probably get it
 
5:26 AM
@vzn only plebs listen to modern popular music
 
@BalarkaSen To be fair, Snoop Dogg is popular music in my books. :p
 
but he isn't modern!!
Snoop Dogg is 90s rap
 
@BalarkaSen You're just getting old :p
 
vzn
kissed a girl & liked it :P
 
I think he released a new album or something that everyone panned
 
5:27 AM
kissing girls is really unmanly tbh
 
vzn
wtf!
 
@BalarkaSen Or maybe I'm getting old, and it still seems modern to me...
@0celo7 Yeah kissing guys is the new manly
 
vzn
outta here now! o_O
 
@0celo7 LOL
Now I lolled at (removed)...
 
was me
 
5:30 AM
no vulgar expressions in my Buddhist channel
 
not some flagging troll
 
Also, why do I always start to cook around 1h00 AM
 
@G.Bergeron I'd listen if you want to explain how the context of integrable systems play out
 
@BalarkaSen Well we study and classify algebraically the physical models that can be solved exactly
In that context, all the analysis is a realization of the algebraic structure behind integrability. But you can always see it reversed :p
 
It'd be nice if you have a toy example for that
 
5:33 AM
@BalarkaSen An actual explanation involving Lax pairs, Yang-Baxter equation all the bells and whistle is beyond what I can do efficiently when cooking
@BalarkaSen The harmonic oscillator
 
So what does one mean when they want to "study and classify algebraically" the dynamics of the harmonic oscillator?
I know the analytic part but not the algebraic counterpart
 
The problem can be encoded algebraically (Weyl algebra) and then solutions are found by studying representations of this algebra within some constraints from physics
 
Huh
 
night
Don’t burn down the room with this algebra
 
For instance, if one is working with a quantum system, then one is looking at positive discrete series representations
 
5:36 AM
gnight
 
@0celo7 Like you don't with your chains and cochains
 
we just need to keep vzn from trashing it with crack physics
and its all good
 
Actually chains are too algebraic for your taste, maybe :p
 
Oh if you saw the analysis that was behind the algebraic topology
You’d be horrified
Just wait until my thesis is done
 
vzn
lol crack physicist :P
 
5:38 AM
@0celo7 Yeah it has its unchallenged uses even in QM
 
This analysis is worse
 
Some key results are only known using analytical proofs
 
I’m an expert on that stuff
But this is much worse
 
@0celo7 It's the only kind beyond undergrad analysis I've fiddled with
Oh well, this an a graduate topics classes on entropy
 
Even defining an integer multiplicity rectifiable current takes a month
 
5:40 AM
@0celo7 Have you looked at the work of people trying to make sense of the path integral
I mean when the integrand is not gaussian
As in that case you can just map it to the work with Brownian motion
 
Yes
Just vaguely
Doesn’t seem too interesting
Ok I gotta go, need to be healthy for some Federer theory tomorrow
 
@0celo7 Maybe not mathematically, but having a symbol actually mean something is pretty useful in physics! :p
@0celo7 Cool, good night
 
I'm going to push the whole day and sleep at night
 
vzn
did someone say entropy? =D
 
@BalarkaSen Like all-nighter?
 
5:43 AM
I already did the all-nighter
 
@BalarkaSen The second one, then
 
I am going to skip my sleep schedule 24 hours forward
 
I mean, is it night for you
 
Nope, day
 
vzn
5:44 AM
↑ number theoretic entropy analysis cooked up recently, connected to Collatz
 
Thought you where in the states
 
I am very not in US
 
@BalarkaSen Well me neither, just closeby
 
But yeah after 2 all-nighter, things get weird
So you have a messed sleep schedule too?
 
5:46 AM
Yeah that's bad I only once did 2 all-nighters
Well I go to sleep at 5 AM and wake up at 12 PM
I need to set that right
 
@BalarkaSen I did to submit my master's thesis before taking a plane to the middle of nowhere
 
Urk
 
I hadn't slept for like almost 72 hours at the point
 
I did it experimentally, not out of necessity
 
@BalarkaSen And I used to sleep for 2-4 hours days after days during exam week as an undergrad
It took its toll on my sanity
 
5:49 AM
I can't function without sleep man
 
@BalarkaSen Not many can, but apparently I can. It's horrible, though
 
If I get too little sleep or if my sleep schedule is so bad that I loose all the daylight in my waking hours, I can't think anymore
 
You need to be somewhat stressed out of your mind. e.g. expecting A+ and not having been to most classes in the semester while starting to read the textbook the night before.
 
Lol
 
Humans can think in surprising conditions under stress! :P
 
5:52 AM
I should try this. I have exams in about three weeks, so I'll probably sit down with some stuff and imagine that the exam is tomorrow
That's sure to keep me from falling asleep until night
 
@BalarkaSen mad lad
 
\o @eulB
 
@BalarkaSen Oh no no, you have to do nothing until the night before. That raw panic works, I've never been able to simulate it
@BalarkaSen Alas, some people loose it under pressure, so don't take that as an advice
 
@BalarkaSen sup nocturne
 
Lol
@G.Bergeron gives bad advises, confirmed
 
5:55 AM
@BalarkaSen Hey its how I went through undergrad! I came out just fine... ish :P
 
@G.Bergeron yes, mathematical physicists are usually very smart people. There aren't many American universities pumping out Mathematical physics phd's .
 
citation needed
 
@Cows I'm not in the US
 
oh
 
5:56 AM
Really though I should get some work done
 
@BalarkaSen beautiful
 
Cya on the flipside
 
work done is overrated my dude
don't you know work undone is in right now
 
@BalarkaSen LOL
 
@Cows because American universities focus on engineering more?
 
5:57 AM
@BalarkaSen see you
@eulB Not just not done but actually undone!
as in de-done
 
@CaptainBohemian well not sure why, but we do have a lot of theorists I think
 
Ok enough of this blackhole that's this chat for me!
 
@Cows are you an American? It's like you are from Africa.
I feel engineering is intolerably rough when in conference regarding quantum information.
 
@BalarkaSen When I was working on my Masters, I got into a cycle where I was awake for 37 hours and asleep for 11. In other words, all-nighters on alternate nights. For months. I don't think any of my friends realised I was doing anything out of the ordinary.
 
So if Lebesgue integration is superior to Riemann integration, why is the latter still taught at all?
 
6:12 AM
Because Riemann integration is intuitively simple and Lebesque integration isnt'?
 
@SirCumference Because it's intuitively easier.
snap
 
:-)
 
And it's easier to understand why it's kind of the opposite of differentiation.
 
@DawoodibnKareem Well, they aren't really opposites, but regardless
I'm sure Lebesgue integration can be taught in a relatively simple way
 
@SirCumference That's why I said "kind of". They're "kind of" opposites.
 
6:15 AM
@DawoodibnKareem Fair enough
Ugh, this is bad. I need to finish this assignment by tomorrow and Word won't open
Why is this software so awful
 
@SirCumference I feel there are too many underlying concepts that you have to grok first before you can get to Lebesgue integration. Whereas Riemann integration is accessible to high school students.
 
@G.Bergeron yeee boi
 
7:39 AM
@DanielSank congratulations =)
I got 10 rep the other day
After giving up 250 rep in bounties
Definitely a good day too
@rob thanks for that deletion btw
@SirCumference easy. Switch to TeX.
 
@EmilioPisanty For normal essays?
 
Your life of complaining about software will be over forevermore
@SirCumference after a certain point, yes
 
I think it's a bit overkill if it's not for mathematics. I mean it's not exactly convenient to write up the TeX
 
The only stuff I do in Word is the absolutely simplest of informal stuff
@SirCumference the inconvenience dilutes over time
And if you're not pushing the limits with fancy typesetting, it's waaaay more stable than Word
 
7:57 AM
@SirCumference, reasons to use Word for normal prose essays:
1. You're used to it.
2. It works fine for that application.
 
3. You can see how it's laid out on the page, without having to run a typesetting step.
 

« first day (2724 days earlier)      last day (2199 days later) »