There are much larger entanglements - most thermal states are entangled, i.e. the equilibrium state of a quantum system at non-zero temperature is typically entangled, regardless of how many particles the system consists of.
I think I might have found someone to sponsor half my tuition over the 5 years, but I still need to get that straight and then get my parents to meet halfways
dont know much about go either, but think its totally awesome from AI perspective, learned a bit more last few wks, beautiful game... ~2.5M old... (chess only ~1.5...)
but it does tend to get very heavy math later on... hey you got great results and dont worry about not getting into those really intense other schools. think "work/ life" balance suffers in those anyway. (some dicussion about that in here in the past)
QC is an excellent area to study and can also be approached from the CS angle if youre more interested in software aspects. physics angle would involve the physics of the setups etc... both really great...
But before that I was working a little project with DS and I'm developing a beautifier for shell script (using python and regex) as well as porting the factorial algorithms I helped develop from C++ to Python
Since they are faster (in C++) that Python's default implementation I wanted to try and push a change to Python itself
Then I'll finally feel like I gave a little back to a language who I feel gave me so much
@vzn I found his page on factorials, I stalked the hell out of him until I found his email, I hit him an email and he was very nice and explained everything to me
I helped translate some of his stuff from German to English
Relativistic simultaneity means assigning objects a "time zone" that is v * x ahead of your own, where v is your relative velocity to the object and x is your distance from the object (in your frame). I find this annoying.
@skillpatrol The light two observers see in one location is the same, they just assign different times to the same event. This leads to "paradoxes" like the Andromeda "paradox".
Both observers above are seeing the same thing, but they assign Earth a different time.
@skillpatrol I'm thinking there must be a better way. The idea that you re-assign time to everything in the entire universe every time you accelerate (or even move) seems ludicrous.
