« first day (2929 days earlier)      last day (1400 days later) » 

12:00 AM
no longer needed (see OP's comments)
several comments here are no longer needed
These repeated "Status please..." comments, appearing multiple times on the same posts, are not great.
(I don't think anything should be done but clean them up though.)
no longer needed (see OP's comments on answer)
the "status please" comments on this question are no longer needed
no longer needed, see comments on answer
the "status please" comments on this other question are no longer needed
this and that are no longer needed
the "status please" comments on this question are no longer needed
and here (there are three)
this, this, and that are no longer needed
To avoid overburdening moderators in the event that this intersects with other sources of increased flagging, I'm actually not flagging (nor posting here) all of them, only the ones that are especially clearly noise.
this and that are no longer needed
the "status please" comments on this question are no longer needed
the "status please" comments on this answer are no longer needed
possibly the comments on this question should be cleaned up, I'm not sure
the three(!) "status please" comments on this question are no longer needed
and the two on this answer
no longer needed - not part of any above pattern (different author, different everything). It's effectively an "accept rate" comment in all but name, suggesting that the OP should accept an answer to improve the chances that future questions will get answers.
 
12:44 AM
all comments on this question are no longer needed
 
 
1 hour later…
1:57 AM
@EliahKagan My flags have all been handled.
 
Thanks for flagging
 
No problem.
 
 
3 hours later…
4:34 AM
Rebooted at 2020-07-03T04:34:57.223739Z
 
4:50 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in answer (1): How to enable wireless on Ubuntu Server 20.04 via CLI? by hamza sheraz on askubuntu.com
 
5:25 AM
 
@Natty welcome back
 
not doing anything for now
should we comment?
is using last not a reasonable idea here?
seems like a useful suggestion to me
 
6:47 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, bad ip for hostname in title, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in title, potentially bad ns for domain in title, +2 more (400): dragonsdenketo.com/knightwood-male-enhancement/ by bnqwasdhmkop on askubuntu.com
 
7:04 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, link at beginning of body, +8 more (635): supplementsnetwork.org/genbrain/ by patrici atedesch on askubuntu.com
 
7:30 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at beginning of answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (35): Cannot install libgles2-mesa-dev by john on askubuntu.com
 
OT Kali
 
8:29 AM
@Natty tp
@karel It's out of the queue.
@Natty tp
@Zanna Doesn't that just list some users? Anyway, I don't see why it was deleted, at least without a comment. It was an answer.
@Natty tp
 
@EliahKagan You're right, it should be undeleted so I voted to undelete it.
 
@Natty tp - borderline, but it seems mostly to be a request for information
 
@Zanna I voted to undelete it.
 
You were able to cast an undelete vote on that post?
(It was deleted by a moderator. In most cases, the system doesn't allow non-moderators to cast undelete votes on such a post, and this particular post does not show any undelete votes.)
 
8:45 AM
I did undelete vote it, but when I checked it again to see if my undelete vote was posted I got the same message that the system doesn't allow non-moderators to cast undelete votes on such a post.
 
@EliahKagan it shows when the system shut down or booted and if it crashed
 
Oh.
The first line.
wtmp begins Wed Jul  1 00:09:18 2020
Right, that should be undeleted.
So if there it went down due to a kernel panic, that's shown there?
 
Currently there are 43 questions which have "[SOLVED]" in their title. Some of them have no answer. They are worth looking. I have rolled back 2-3 such edits who had just "solved" and no answer in question body.
 
it also shows "run level changes" although I don't know about run levels
 
Should I raise a custom flag on the post so that the reason for undeletion is documented? Or no need?
 
8:50 AM
@EliahKagan from my output, it looks like it, because I see a bunch of crashes around the time I had a kernel problem, but I can't be sure
@EliahKagan it's always better if there's a flag I think. There were two flags on that post - one as low quality and later another one as NAA. The second one made me think maybe I'm missing something about this post. But seems to me the deletion was just wrong.
 
Sorry to interrupt, I need an upvote on this CW answer to mark the question as answered.
 
@Zanna Flag raised.
No hurry to undelete, since the flag will remain in the mod queue until handled. (I'd guess there's no reason to wait either, though.)
 
thanks for the nice flag :)
going to make lunch
 
@Kulfy Read and voted. Thanks!
@Zanna No problem. And I see the flag has been handled!
Also, the pun was unintended.
@Kulfy I wonder if sometimes people use solved without the [ ] punctuation and if it would make sense to broaden the search to that.
 
9:09 AM
@EliahKagan Thanks :)
@EliahKagan In my experience people generally use it with punctuations. But yes they may have used them without that also.
 
@Kulfy No problem. Btw interruptions are pretty much always good here because it means there's more stuff getting talked about, worked on, and improved!
@Kulfy I'll search. I shoud've just done that. Logging in to SEDE is taking longer than usual though. Still easier than doing CAPTCHAs.
 
I have modified query a little bit and added "and answercount=0". This returned 15 rows.
@EliahKagan Indeed. I got captcha even at AU when I was posting that CW answer.
 
Hmm. For that answer? That's odd.
 
Yeah. for that answer. Maybe because rolling back edits and posting answer was done within 2 mins or so.
 
There are some others, at least with - solved and (solved). But also lot of false positives. data.stackexchange.com/askubuntu/query/1258344/test-query
Is there a way to match a word boundary (or similar) with LIKE expressions?
Some of the false positives involve occurrences of solved that appear in other words.
 
9:13 AM
I avoided use of "like '%solved%'" since it would return title with "resolved" as well
I used "'%\[solved]%' ESCAPE '\'" instead.
@EliahKagan Use whitespaces or punctuations?
 
I enjoy all puns hahaha
@Kulfy thanks for posting! +1
 
Got another revival badge :D
(unrelated) Another CW answer posted
 
9:32 AM
Voted.
 
Thanks.
seems dupe. I posted a CW answer too referring thread from Ubuntu forums linked by OP in comments.
 
 
1 hour later…
10:42 AM
@Kulfy I don't recommend removing the answer from the question if you aren't going to immediately post the answer as an answer. Like here
I was doing the same thing at one point in the past, and some people told me not to do that, because even if the answer is in the question, at least it is there for people to see
no-repro? Or better to keep it?
This question is about an issue I had.
 
11:26 AM
 
@Zanna Another reason not to edit answers out of questions without posting them is that new users often don't know how to use the revision history, or don't know how to do so efficiently. @Kulfy
 
11:55 AM
true, they may not be able to find it, or remember what they did
 
This was posted in SEBotics but not here:
in SEBotics, 2 mins ago, by Natty
[ Natty | Sentinel ] [tag:package-management] Link to Post BodyLength: 652 Rep: 1 Ends with ?; Low Length; No Code Block; Low Rep; Unregistered User; Body Starts With: Similar problem here, Lubuntu version 18.04 that hasn't been re-installed in 2-3 years. But the odd thing for me is that it does not always start. It justled starts somehow, most
(and is NAA)
 
12:28 PM
@Zanna I'd say no-repro
 
thanks :)
 
12:52 PM
@EliahKagan I agree with you and @Zanna as well. Today I fixed ~7-8 posts out of which I rolled back 3 edits with a a comment. Out of those three, the owner of the question which Zanna mentioned visited Stack Overflow two days ago, one was edited today and the last one's OP also visited couple of days ago.
So, I rolled back and commented on those posts whose OP was active some hours/days ago.
 
1:05 PM
(unrelated to above) false claims
 
1:21 PM
@Kulfy yes, but, even if OP is active and you want to give them a chance to post the answer themselves, which is nice etiquette, though not necessary, you can just post the comment, then make the edit if needed after they reply and/or post an answer
removing the answer from the question in the first instance, I think, is not a good idea
the better state for the post to be left in, for a short or long period of time, is with the answer still visible
2
 
Makes sense. Should I roll back the roll back I made? Or wait for 3-4 days?
 
2:05 PM
@Kulfy I would roll it back
 
@Natty ne
 
 
1 hour later…
4:20 PM
@Natty tp
 
5:14 PM
@Natty tp
 
I'm sure this answer was accepted but its timeline has no sign of it, or am I missing it?
strange
oh it is there
it just looks different from how it used to
it appears as a "vote"
I had not considered accepts to be votes
 
It appears normally for me.
 
5:30 PM
hmm
I mean, that is what accepts look like in the timeline these days, but I think they used to look different before the timeline got redesigned?
 
Oh, sorry, it does say vote for me too.
Are there guidelines about how many comments there should be before a moderator considers moving them to chat? I think all the comments on this question should be moved to chat, but perhaps it's too few. The comments qualify as no longer needed and could simply be removed, but it seems people don't want that. Also, would the chat room just be deleted due to inactivity after a couple weeks? Normally this happens to rooms with fewer than 15 messages.
 
the reason I looked at that, was that the accept is no longer visible on the page, so I wondered if that happened when the question got deleted (and should that be considered a bug?), or if the answer got unaccepted before that
 
@EliahKagan In my experience, people unfamiliar with Stack Exchange sites don't notice the difference between comments and answers, and focus on what appears higher on a page before focusing on anything lower.
 
@Zanna belated congrats ♦ 👍
 
@guntbert thanks! :D
 
5:34 PM
You got finally lured into spending still more time on the site :-))
 
very true
@EliahKagan I was looking at those comments and wondering about them
earlier
nobody has told me how many comments should be moved to chat
Community ♦ flags posts with >20 comments in the last 7 days
earlier I decided to do nothing about the comments for now, because the question is new and OP hasn't responded to anything for a while, and the current text of the question directly responds to the first comment, and would be confusing without the comment existing in some form
so I thought I'd try to check back on that post in a day or two
to see if there was any way to make the situation better
@guntbert last night I woke up about 3am (due to mosquitoes) and wondered if I should check if there were any flags. I made myself dismiss that idea and go to sleep. Woke up properly later and turns out some folks had been on a comment flagging spree.
My consciousness has merged with AU
3
 
6:10 PM
@EliahKagan I think that's true
If you were to flag the post and suggest moving the comments to chat, that would probably happen. I am going to sleep (or to a little hell of sleepy itchiness, depending on the mosquitoes' appetites) though
Also, if you think of anything you might ask sudodus to do that would improve things, I know that person to be exceptionally helpful
That conditional seems broken but I'm too lazy to fix it
 
6:39 PM
@Zanna I've done that. I plan to wait for a reply before raising a flag to ask that comments be moved to chat.
 
6:56 PM
Per this reply and the reasons in my comment that preceded it, I've custom flagged the post to request that all its comments be moved to chat.
 
@Natty fp - even without the link, it's an answer
 
 
2 hours later…
9:39 PM
@Natty tp
 
 
1 hour later…
11:52 PM
OT Windows or unclear
 
@EliahKagan I assume it's OT
 

« first day (2929 days earlier)      last day (1400 days later) »