« first day (2622 days earlier)      last day (2410 days later) » 

5:00 PM
So the smoke is apparently vaporized metal from both the projectile and the railgun barrel.
That's pretty... metal.
 
Alright, mount it on the walking robot.
 
@Yuuki Damn, that's cool
@Yuuki I wonder how many times they can fire from a single barrel
I also wonder what it would take to magnetically levitate the round inside the barrel
 
5:16 PM
@SaintWacko That's a coilgun
 
I'm thinking the Navy has won the Nerf Gun war.
 
@DanmakuGrazer Yeah, I'm wondering if they could add a coil or something to the railgun, not for propulsion, but to remove barrel friction
 
A railgun requires the bullet to be touching the barrel
 
are css gradients done with floating point arithmetics?
 
@DanmakuGrazer Oh
Duh
Forgot about that aspect of it
 
5:26 PM
try making the textarea bigger
 
Pheew, finally got the flag for the email spoofing assignment
 
@badp Whoa. What are those lines doing?
 
lol, firefox is refusing to have newlines in the textarea. It doesn't want any of this nonsense. It also doesn't care about background-attachment: local;
@SaintWacko I have no idea
 
@badp Huh, that is weird
Is it like, I don't know, Windows newlines?
 
@PrivatePansy try typing in the box
removing white-space: nowrap; makes the newlines happen
 
5:30 PM
Might be because of the white-spae: nowrap
Yeah
 
those were just supposed to cause horizontal scrolling... and I guess they did the job there? like with extra power.
 
It's not autowrapping at the end of the line, is that it?
 
Mildly annoyed that I took all the time to learn how SMTP works, when it turns out I can just point curl at the server and be done with it
 
DO YOU WANT HORIZONTAL SCROLLING? GOTCHA HAVE SOME HORIZONTAL SCROLLING
on the other hand the gray lines aren't acting up
on the other other hand firefox doesn't know that middle clicking on a scrollbar on linux is supposed to set the knob to where I middle clicked
 
@badp To be fair, neither did I
 
5:35 PM
middle clicking is one of the best features of Linux
 
yes
 
@badp Oh yeah? What else does it do?
 
try selecting some text and middle clicking the new tab button on chrome
 
Okay, that's cool
 
try selecting some text and middle clicking a textbox
...I think that's it
but it's hard to go back to things that don't do this
 
5:37 PM
@badp Not sure that's any faster than going +ctrl, t, v, -ctrl, enter
 
It's a second copy/paste buffer. It doesn't interact with the ctrl+c/ctrl+v one, right?
 
yup
 
Oh
Okay, that does change things
That's nice
 
All DEs I used on linux were muuch happier about scrolling
like
 
@SaintWacko if you're mousing around you can paste text with just your mouse
 
5:38 PM
@badp Yeah
 
I LOVE LOVE LOVE the ability to scroll on volume icon to modify sound and middle click to mute/unmute
 
I tend to lean the other way and prefer all-keyboard interfaces
 
it's the tiny things that make linux great
 
Which is why I use vim while I play Dwarf Fortress
 
@Avery holy shit I didn't know about middle click to mute
 
5:38 PM
@SaintWacko You should play Cook Serve Delicious.
 
@badp it's amazing isn't it
 
I mean if I want to mute this laptop I can just pull the earphones out but
 
Also something that makes linux great (but windows has it too): keyboard shortcuts
tons and tons and tons
 
The brightness-indicator on Ubuntu also accepts scrolling. That makes me so happy.
 
I'm so happy Windows stole "scroll on hover, not on focus" with 10
 
5:43 PM
@badp I am so glad that middle mouse buttons are a standard feature these days
Windows needs to expose a configuration knob for focus behaviour, really
 
I prefer Windows to Linux because I prefer to spend as little time setting up my computer as possible, and things just work on Windows that take time to get working on Linux.
For the year or so I used Linux I only used one monitor because having two monitors of different resolutions was not a thing I could figure out how to get it to do.
 
@SaintWacko According to docs, they're aiming for 1000 rounds per barrel.
 
With Windows you plug in the monitor and it's just figured out everything it needs to about it and just makes it work.
 
KDE handles multi monitors out of box
 
@Yuuki Hm, alright. Not bad
 
5:44 PM
So does cinnamon
and unity
and gnome
 
And Gnome
 
XFCE is a bit trickier but it works too
LXDE is pain.
 
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
It would have required research and installing a new OS to get that to work = work
Windows just worked.
 
I've actually had better luck making things work in Linux than in Windows
 
ditto
 
5:46 PM
@SaintWacko I mean, I don't know if they're there yet.
But that's what they're looking to have.
 
@Yuuki Right
 
I mean everyone is free to use whatever they want but eh
even with a distro like arch it's not that hard to get stuff working properly
 
@Avery The only reason I still use Windows anywhere is because on my SP3 the auto-rotate works better and at home, Overwatch doesn't really work on Linux yet
My work computer is linux, though
 
that's where you're wrong kiddo
 
And I'm probably going to switch back to linux on my surface
Oh, did they get it working?
 
@StrixVaria for at least ~15 years, configuring multiple monitors on linux has been more or less the same as on windows unless you're using an exotic distro/DE...
 
@ToxicFrog I was using Ubuntu and it literally couldn't work and the research I did told me that I just couldn't do what I was trying to do.
 
@Avery Hm! Last I checked it still wasn't working very well
 
it's plug and play on ubuntu?
 
It really wasn't.
 
5:48 PM
@SaintWacko You need to compile it if you want to use it for your main wine<something> but if you don't you can use playonlinux and it'll handle everything for you
 
@StrixVaria It has been every single time I've used it...
 
I could get the second monitor to show a gray background with an X on it.
 
What was it doing?
 
winedir?
wine something, ugh
 
@Avery Yeah, I'll just use POL
@StrixVaria Weird
 
5:49 PM
Anyway, the details pretty much don't matter anymore because I'm super happy with my current Windows setup.
I think another thing I prefer about Windows is that every time I want to do a thing I know how to do it. If I want to do anything new on linux I have to spend time learning how to do it.
This mostly comes down to how much experience I have with each.
 
Yeah, I'm not super familiar with Ubuntu but my work machine uses it and dual-monitor is just plug it in, display settings -> extend my desktop onto this monitor
 
Just installing a piece of software I find on the internet is a challenge on linux.
 
extremely internet voice You should use Linux
 
@ToxicFrog If they have the same resolution it's that easy.
I had two different resolution monitors.
 
@StrixVaria you generally don't "install a piece of software you find on the internet", you use the package manager
 
5:50 PM
@ToxicFrog ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Windows only has you manually installing stuff because windows package management is a total disaster
Like, the linux "add/remove programs" equivalent *actually lets you add things
 
FOUND IT
Wineprefix, yes, that was the word that I was looking for.
 
@ToxicFrog I find Windows more convenient in this regard.
Why does the OS need to know about everything I could ever want to install in advance.
I will just get the thing I want and install it on demand.
 
well, it makes updates easier
 
@StrixVaria huh. I find it the exact opposite. I hate having to run around manually finding the download site for each piece of software I want
 
5:51 PM
and you can USUALLY trust the stuff on package manager
 
And each one uses a different installer (or is just a zip/rar file you have to unpack by hand)
And you have to repeat the process every time you want to update something
 
If I'm on a webpage, it's much easier to click on a thing, wait for it to download, then click on a thing that I'm prompted to click on, than to like context-switch to some package installer.
 
stuff like chocolatey are things for windows though
 
@Avery chocolatey is alright, for something continuing the windows trend of re-inventing stuff *nix had decades ago
 
@StrixVaria most software is as easy as sudo apt install <package-name> if you're on a debian based distro
 
5:53 PM
@StrixVaria I think the difference here may be that I generally know a priori what I want to install, so I'm not browsing around looking for a thing
I'm going "I want thing" and installing it
 
and you can trust that it's latest version, it's virus free, it's not tampered with, it doesn't install toolbars or change homepages etc
 
@ToxicFrog I don't even know what I want on linux.
 
Which on windows is going to involve googling for thing's webpage, then trying to find the right download link, etc.
 
I have to spend time figuring out what the thing is that I want to install in the first place.
 
> it's latest version
 
5:53 PM
@Avery And it's way easier to update
 
well, not if you're on debian
 
@StrixVaria yeah, in that case things fall out a bit differently
 
@SaintWacko yesssss
 
And recently, I wanted to install atom, the code editor, and literally could not figure out how to do it even with apt-get.
I use a different text editor now.
 
I can install software from internet, yes
but just doing it through package managers is so much less pain
 
5:54 PM
@StrixVaria Yeah, a few things like that they don't put in the package manager and make you add their ppa instead
 
@StrixVaria sudo add-apt-repository ppa:webupd8team/atom, sudo apt update, sudo apt install atom
 
@Avery apt-get update / apt-get install, no?
 
@ToxicFrog you can use apt or apt-get, there are very little practical differences
 
@Avery Yeah, that first one is super intuitive and I could definitely type that without context switching to a web page.
 
is not a fan of deb and its profusion of package management commands*
 
5:56 PM
246
Q: What is the difference between apt and apt-get?

nik90I read about the new fancy progress bar which was added to apt 1.0 in Softpedia and how to enable it here. However on running sudo apt-get update, I did not see the fancy progress bars. On reading the second link again, the solution explicitly requires you to use sudo apt update. Hence my questi...

I like how simple it is on pacman-based distros.
 
@StrixVaria So, serious question -- you find it easier to download and install something through the browser than to copy-paste a command from the same webpage?
 
Literally just sudo pacman -S atom
 
0
Q: How do I convert Japan to Christianity?

TotallyN0tABotI have been trying to get the achievement where you as a unified Japan, has to change your state religion to Catholicism. I did manage to get the unification part by the mid 1600's and I have trade connections to both French Mexico and a Flemish colony in Baja California as well as a Portuguese c...

0
Q: Do all guild members receive rewards from guild fest, or just those above castle level 15?

NicholasGuild fest requires that you be castle level 15 to enter, and the interface for it is disabled before you are castle level 15. We are a young guild with only a few members at castle level 15 and I'm wondering if it's worth pushing for the few of us that could contribute to reach tier 1. If we d...

 
@Lazers2.0 nice
 
@Avery zypper supremacy
 
5:57 PM
the whole ppa thing is confusing
 
I really don't like the way pacman uses short-options for all the commands
 
yes it's annoying for beginners
 
Also, doesn't arch have a PPA-alike in the AUR?
 
@ToxicFrog Yes.
 
I remember not knowing how to delete
 
5:57 PM
Because then I never have to leave the browser.
 
Pretty much every distro has something like that, Ubuntu's PPAs, SUSE's OBS, etc
 
@ToxicFrog well, AUR is one single thing, PPAs are much more split and you often need to google around to find an updated ppa
 
@StrixVaria but you do -- once it's downloaded you have to walk through an installer or open your archive unpacker or whatever
 
@ToxicFrog I will be automatically prompted to do that.
 
The browser doesn't automatically handle the whole install process for you, and every install process is different
 
5:58 PM
Or I will have to click one extra thing (the download in the download bar) to kick it off.
 
(contrast downloading a .rpm or .deb with the browser, which will still hand off to an external program but is at least consistent)
 
I mean you're free to use what you want, but it sounds like you expected to follow your windows knowledge on linux and had difficulties due to that.
 
@Avery aah
I think OBS is kind of midway between that
 
freedom is an illusion
 
AUR is kinda like uh
 
6:00 PM
In that there's lots of OBS repos, but one central place to find them
 
@Avery Yeah, probably. Familiarity is a huge issue.
 
It's more like brew I believe
 
I'm not familiar with brew
 
Like I said, if I want to do image editing on linux I don't even know where to begin. Gimp seems too complicated, and I don't know of any other options.
 
I believe it mostly runs scripts to install stuff
 
6:01 PM
@StrixVaria yeah, I think I have exactly the same experience in reverse when using windows
 
may compile stuff etc to get it running
 
I'm that way for literally every problem I come across in linux.
I want to do a new thing, and I don't even know where to start.
 
PPAs are strictly binaries
 
@ToxicFrog It's like 10 different package managers rolled into one
 
AUR has a ton of compiled stuff that run through a script
 
6:01 PM
Where's my package manager, how do I calculate disk usage, how do I instantiate services, etc
 
@Unionhawk only real freedom can be achieved when you ditch systemd
 
(the answer to ~all of these on windows seems to be "download and install an external program because it's not built in")
systemd is awesome
fite me
 
it is
well I really really don't hate systemd so
 
@Avery any freedom of choice in operating system that you have is largely illusory and meaningless
 
@StrixVaria for my part I came to Linux from SysV and SCO UNIX, which are reasonably similar, so it's been a gradual process of change
Whereas DOS/Windows are these awkward clunky things that can't do anything out of the box and which I tolerate only for gaming
They want me to manually install drivers ffs >.<
 
6:03 PM
ugh yes that's a huge thing about linux
 
If I wanted to actually do any reasonable amount of programming at home, I would install linux for that.
 
I never ever had to install ANY drivers ever
 
That's one thing I know how to do much better on linux than on Windows.
 
outside graphics
 
So I guess it is probably entirely about familiarity for me.
 
6:04 PM
@Avery I went through a brief but unpleasant period of having to manually install drivers for wifi
 
and that's only because I don't want to use nouveau
 
In college and at work we had to use linux for programming, so now I prefer that for those tasks.
 
@StrixVaria university for me was a weird mix of goddamn everything depending on the course
CS was mostly Ubuntu but also some OSX and two specific courses used BSD and windows respectively
Engineering was mostly windows but also some Solaris
 
ouch
 
I did have to set up an apache server on Windows for a PHP class.
Setting up the server was harder than any of the programming assignments.
 
6:06 PM
o.O
That seems weird
Like, if you're doing to use PHP, LAMP is a thing
 
And conversely if you want to use windows go all in and host it on IIS using ASP.NET or soemthing
 
Just... install xampp
 
@ave this is real but the site isn't public like Microsoft's
 
@RedRiderX I want to say /flag but I'm scared that TimStone's script will flag it so consider jokingly flagged but not really
 
6:07 PM
The thing I learned from that class is that I never want to do PHP programming again.
 
Apache+PHP on windows sounds like a "just because you can doesn't mean you should" thing, although tbf I think of all deployments of PHP that way
Regardless of OS or frontend
@StrixVaria good call
 
Honestly Linux is very usable, much more usable compared to my experiences between 2009 and 2011, but FreeBSD is not, at least for daily use.
 
@Avery Wouldn't be the first time I've been accidentally banned by a script.
3
 
I still can't believe that PHP launches a new process to handle every incoming HTTP request.
 
maybe it'll be usable in 2025
 
6:08 PM
CC: @fredley
 
@StrixVaria idk if that's what PHP7 does
 
@Avery BSD was specifically for a systems programming/kernel/driver dev course
Presumably the BSD kernel has a simpler driver API or something
 
0
A: Is it correct for PHP-FPM to start a new process for every request?

Someone SpecialThis, you would probably need to understand php fpm configuration a little bit in your www.conf file (or whatever conf file depending on your OS). So depending on your configuration, FPM will usually fork more children depending on your demands hence different pid number. Choose how the proce...

hm, you can disable it it seems
well
limit it
 
@StrixVaria Well there is HHVM but not many people use it
 
Windows was for a microcontrollers course, possibly because PuTTY is actually really, really good and linux seems to have a dearth of good serial terminal connectors
 
6:10 PM
set it to one child and it'll be less terrible but still very terrible
 
other than facebook of course.
 
Or possibly because the compiler we were using was windows-only, that actually seems more likely.
 
I want to mostly try freebsd because of the native ZFS support
I mean, linuxzfs or whatever it's called works with arch but it's not perfect
 
@StrixVaria TBF this is how all CGI used to work
 
ah, it's ZFSonLinux
 
6:11 PM
FCGI and mod_foo are comparatively recent
@Avery I run ZoL on NixOS and it's pretty great
ZoL on SUSE is...less great
Haven't tried it on other distros
 
I want to reinstall arch and experiment more but it's really really a pain
 
@Avery I'm pretty sure PHP-FPM is an addon for PHP. It's not PHP's behavior by default
 
@murgatroid99 eh, a ton of stuff relies on PHP-FPM, so
Maybe I might backup the whole drive and try reinstalling tomorrow.
but eh
> This situation sometimes locks down the normal rolling update process by unsatisfied dependencies because the new kernel version, proposed by update, is unsupported by ZFSonLinux.
I'm really impartial.
 
@RedRiderX Her Highness's Virtual Machine?
 
I'll probably use LVM when I set up and put ext4 on that and use file swap instead of partition swap and also set up FDE but not sure about FDE tbh
wonder if I can configure FDE to use one of the things of yubikey
 
6:16 PM
@Yuuki Around here we use The Queen's Script
@Yuuki The real name is even better though:
HipHop Virtual Machine (HHVM) is an open-source virtual machine based on just-in-time (JIT) compilation that serves as an execution engine for the PHP and Hack programming language. By using the principle of JIT compilation, executed PHP or Hack code is first transformed into intermediate HipHop bytecode (HHBC), which is then dynamically translated into x86-64 machine code, optimized, and natively executed. This contrasts with PHP's usual interpreted execution, in which the Zend Engine transforms PHP source code into opcodes that serve as a form of bytecode, and executes the opcodes directly on...
 
hm, there's a document on it, but it's from 2012 so eh
 
@RedRiderX Could've just called it HipOnPHP.
 
6:47 PM
oh god
I'm going over archive.org captures of my first site and like
it's so bad
 
@Yuuki HHVM: HHVM HipHop Virtual Machine
 
Yeah, but you miss the Dr. Seuss joke that way.
 
11yo me, why
 
Oh hey, it's raining today.
 
12
Q: What's a good way to start making money in OpenTTD?

RicardoJust got back to playing the game and I'm sticking with transporting coal from a mine to a power plant with the cheapest locomotive, placing one train per route. What would be better ways to make money?

I know this is really old but it's pretty broad innit
 
6:57 PM
@cazc_941 It seems ok even by current standards. He gave an example of something he tried, at least.
I can definitely see the use in "I've tried to start playing [really complicated game] and I don't even know where to start halp" questions.
 
👍
 
Emoji are incomprehensible without zooming into at least 250% on this computer.
I thought it was a cupcake with a candle at first.
 
It's a chat thing I think, they're fine elsewhere for me
 
It's based on the OS/platform.
At home I get the Microsoft ones which are at least better than whatever this is here.
 
Sorry, on mobile
 

« first day (2622 days earlier)      last day (2410 days later) »