may not work because I just fixed a bug

:P

@CᴏɴᴏʀO'Bʀɪᴇɴ \o/

?

FOG, 23 bytes

^d'\\'*Z'/'*_'o't''sj_;

:D

:D

can i win?

Oops, I don't think what I did works in GS

\o/

can i win now?

at least a prize for most epicness?

q~_'\*'o@'/* works fine in CJam though

@EasterlyIrk of course, here's your cookie: 🍪

\o/

eats

@Dennis dammit, pl would win if it had repeat

I keep forgetting * doesn't do that in Perl

rofl

go add that to pl

nah

should * and ^ both be used for string repeating in Cheddar?

no

only *

@Downgoat Julia has * for concat and ^ for repeat I think

ok

@quartata why not + for concat?

@quartata * should definetly not be used for concat

that is jsut dumb

@Dennis how does this work?

^

^

@CᴏɴᴏʀO'Bʀɪᴇɴ Did you see this @Downgoat?

@CᴏɴᴏʀO'Bʀɪᴇɴ now I have

\o/

@AlexA. julia needs to be added to homebrew.

@Downgoat It's better than using . for concat :/

@Dennis ^^

^^

@Geobits no-moar-php

@Geobits PHP + does work for concat hthoug

oh that was fast.

@EasterlyIrk There is a Homebrew formula for it

hai @AlexA.

@AlexA. name?

not julia or julia-lang

Julia

github.com/staticfloat/homebrew-julia

okai got it

You have to brew tap staticfloat/julia

Then you can brew install julia

Do you think it would be clearer if I make the background plain white for this?

yeah, or black

also: how to add moon?

the box doesn't do anything when I hit enter.

@Downgoat For string concat? I could have sworn it didn't...

it uses both

Haha, the current version of V outputed: \\///o\` instead of \\\o///`

rofl

#invalid

I know what was wrong though.

NO BUG FIXING

Chat mini-challenge: given a string and an input s and an input n, repeat s n times.

J, 1 byte, #.

>.<

invalid pls

@Dennis Can you pull Cinnamon Gum?

Jolf, 1 byte: *

@EasterlyIrk I can mark it as noncompeting?

really?

pyth *z

Function version. Assumes input is on stack, leaves output on stack.

@DrGreenEggsandHamDJ yeah

@Downgoat ideone.com/2cV279 <-- this is not string concat

roflmao

@EasterlyIrk Ah

^_^

well not for some cases

still valid

What is V?

his languague

A very unfinished language I'm working on.

It's extremely buggy.

cool!

I was just about to show off a new update to Cinnamon Gum that does it 6 bytes too :/

@CᴏɴᴏʀO'Bʀɪᴇɴ you never told me if I won.

won what?

the minichallenge

@Doorknob For input n, ;1 appends 1, ; appends n and x@ repeats the characters in the string n, 1 and n* times.

Oh, no, I won.

Unlike my last V minichallenge, this one would actually work.

jelly won n1, I won n2.

@CᴏɴᴏʀO'Bʀɪᴇɴ D:

:P

You win

NO SELF ANSWERS THAT ARE COMPETEING

ohai @gladsocc

pardon the mess

What brings you here?

hallo?

don't scare him

@CᴏɴᴏʀO'Bʀɪᴇɴ I think we already scared away new users by our starboard

I should bring my IRL SE friend here sometime.

^^

Haha, mercury is so small you can't see it... what a joke of a planet

@DrGreenEggsandHamDJ username?

@Downgoat ._. my grandma lives there

@EasterlyIrk This guy: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/users/8792/hadesherald

He's not super active.

@EasterlyIrk O_o

okai

@Downgoat .-.

she must have a lot of sun screen

@Downgoat no. she lives inside the planet

oh

and uses a heatshield

does she get good wifi inside mercury?

no

not at all

D:

@quartata Pulled.

one nbps

Oops, made a typo.

rofl

Can you pull again?

Woah. I have a question with 30K views. 0_o

@Dennis ah, I see. So the @ basically expands to this?

@DrGreenEggsandHamDJ nice, upgoat downgoat only has 12K views ;_;

@DrGreenEggsandHamDJ Aww, my top is 9k :(

This question is a julia party:

@Doorknob Pretty much. @ swaps the argument order.

@Downgoat @Geobits Wait, on PPCG or network?

@DrGreenEggsandHamDJ on PPCG & netowrk

PPCG, but that's probably my best for the network too. I do much more answering than asking on other sites.

dangit ninj'aed

@EasterlyIrk its also a python party

with 4 pythons

generators

@Downgoat python is typical

julia is not

haha, I have a PCB which has silk just saying "Comment", someone forget to change the default text...

@Dennis Can you pull again?

hey guys

I just made the most glorious obfuscated code ever

HAI

@EasterlyIrk I think the usual expression is "python is strongly, dynamically typed", not "python is typical".

in .kill()?

@Geobits no

paste.ee/p/mC8bg

No, in JavaScript.

It does the GATC DNA transformation

JSFuck hurts my head.

It's not really JSFuck

only partially compressed JSFuck for part of it

^

10/10

extra [ somewhere

wait it didn't work?

nope

Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected token [(…)InjectedScript._evaluateOn @ VM2058:878InjectedScript._evaluateAndWrap @ VM2058:811InjectedScript.evaluate @ VM2058:667

FML

FML?

F--- my life

That doesn't sound pleasant at all.

BAI

and ^^

bai

For the MotherLand!

Second favorite obsfucation. Guess what it does;

paste.ee/p/3jSCr

what makes you think that!

it calculates the backwards delta list given the first parts of the indices!

The first one wasn't >_>

should attempting to access an undefined variable throw an error or just return undefined?

no

oh, it is dynamic strict

oh, I thought you meant return undefined

oh

@QPaysTaxes what about in arrays?

so it should return undefined?

e.g. if I have an array: a = [1,2,3,,,6] what should a[4] output? what should a[32423] output?

why do you have a null value :(

Some people have strong opinions about whether nulls are useful.

@QPaysTaxes that's what an Option type should be for

@QPaysTaxes what difference does that make?

I'm of two minds about this. Option type is nice and all, but imo it's much easier to use a null for most things.

In other words, I have no strong opinion on this matter.

All I know is my gut says "maybe"

Here's something we can all agree on though: peanutButterVarieties = {"Smooth", null};

@EasterlyIrk Blitz 2D/3D is a Windows-only programming language. :(

@El'endiaStarman oo nice

I am planning on remaking it in Pytek or JS eventually.

@EasterlyIrk It is on my web developer resume.

Chunky peanut butter is a crime against legumes

@QPaysTaxes You could, but that's a bit clunkier as an offhand joke ;)

impl PeanutButter {
    fn new_from_string(type: String) -> PeanutButter {
        match &type[..] {
            "smooth" => PeanutButter {},
            "chunky" => panic!("BLASPHEMY!")
        }
    }
}

Grind it all the way or don't grind it at all

> panic!

OH GOD CHUNKY AHHHH

@AlexA. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

@QPaysTaxes fine :P

@QPaysTaxes it even has the ! lol

type PeanutButter
    consistency::AbstractString
    function PeanutButter(s)
        s == "smooth" || throw(BlasphemyError("ಠ_ಠ"))
        new(PeanutButter(s))
    end
end

Stop with the examples already. You're going to make me have to do a full Java enum, and my fingers can't take that sort of abuse :/

gnight

I didn't say you had to leave... :(

I believe that. It's not Java, but verbose enough ;)

If I didn't know any better...

I'm gonna interrupt you for a second with something totally random:

Ok, carry on.

Does anyone know a gimp plugin for .webp images? Fucking new formats...

@Geobits WHOA WHAT

Uncanny

@AlexA. ikr?

@QPaysTaxes GIF could be hard or soft, depending on how you pronounce it :P

It's not exactly new though.

@QPaysTaxes While that's one solution to naming conflicts, I'm sure it will cause a few wtf moments either way.

@quartata Done.

Downgoat's Gravity Simulator now supports interaction between planets \o/

Did you solve the n-body problem then?

I added Earth and its orbit was normal. Then I added Mars, which shot out into space and also caused Earth's orbit to be super close to the sun half the time and super far away the other half >_>

I have four right now, and two are whipping through the sun very quickly :)

Seems like the planet-planet interaction is calculated only once.

This time I got two planets relatively stable. Then I added one with zero initial velocity named SUNDIVE and it shot through the sun at an insanely fast speed out into space

@El'endiaStarman it is calculated every frame

Immediate huge effect upon adding another planet, but then both of them continue in elliptical orbits.

And now both of the other planets are orbiting into the sun

time to make planets be able to crash into each other...

Will they splode and make asteroid belts?

I want to

Hrm. I've seen numerous close encounters between planets and they didn't budge at all, from what I could tell.

but that would be extermely slow

The star simulator would make your computer as hot as a star

@Downgoat Not if you add more jQuery.

@Geobits that will just make it slower...

Like, I just saw two default earths pass through each other and their orbits didn't change.

I will have to learn WebGL or something if I want to have faster renderings...

jQuery is great and does all things though.

@El'endiaStarman really?

Yeah. How can I enable trails?

Like, do you have a boolean setting for it?

@El'endiaStarman kinda

trails should be on now...

@El'endiaStarman nice pretzel

Damn... ninja'd to the screenshot D:

Added the second earth when the first was opposite it, and this screenshot is from like 20 seconds later.

Mine looks almost exactly like that too :(

here is my gravity maths:

                let f = 1; // speed up factor

                var dx = planet.x - Sun.x;
                let dy = planet.y - Sun.y;
                let dist = Math.pow(dx, 2) + Math.pow(dy, 2);

                let grav = 10 * f * Sun.mass / dist;

                planet.velocityX -= grav * (dx / Math.sqrt(dist));
                planet.velocityY -= grav * (dy / Math.sqrt(dist));


                Planets.forEach((p2, n) => {
                    if (n !== name) {
                        let dx = planet.x - Sun.x;

Okay, the left orbit is smaller than the right. That means that distances between planets will change. Yet, the orbits are almost perfectly elliptical anyway.

Why not make both the planets and sun just Bodies and run through them in a list?

@Geobits that's a good idea

how should I make it so you can choose a color / image of a planet?

@Downgoat Everything in the planet loop is based off of the sun.

oh :|

So basically, adding a planet suddenly doubled the sun's mass. :P

That explains the tighter orbits :)

should be fixed now...

Oh yeah, that's more like it.

Looks much better.

Yeah, there we go!

Dammit I keep losing jupiter :/

@El'endiaStarman \o/

Now I have a belt of eight earths all screwing with each others' orbits.

This time I made SUNDIVE with max mass, radius, and distance, and zero initial velocity

Upon reaching the center of the sun, it immediately simply disappeared

They have become one

@Doorknob just hope Jupiter never actually does that...

I made a Jupiter with a tight sun orbit and it keeps slingshotting my earths into space :o

This is fun. :D

sweet, now you can delete planets... Time to add moons

Now turn it into some kind of game and monetize it :P

@Downgoat I was very disappointed when I tried adding a moon and it didn't work yet. Please fix :D

@QPaysTaxes cool, what's it's name?

@Geobits yeah, play for 30 minutes for free, then pay .99 cents per planet

@QPaysTaxes ohhhh, yeahh, that language

D:

@Downgoat Shoot, I'd be down a few bucks. I keep losing my earths to the big stupid planet in the middle.

Well, truth be told I'd probably forget I ever saw it if it asked me for a dollar per planet ;)

@Downgoat Woo! Now make its name disappear from the list. :P

it doesn't? :|

Helpppp ^^!!!

@QPaysTaxes Mine were fine until I put about ten or eleven in.

Sorry, didn't mean to interrupt but I actually need help cuz I only have 2 more days to work on this until like June 18 or somethin :(

Why are people so obsessed with making non-esolangs now?

@Downgoat that's a scary buisness model D:, imagine if something like angry birds was like that LOL (pay per level)

@AshwinGupta I modeled it after candy-crush

Ah well there you have it, candy crush is a scary game.

@MarsUltor ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ after Cheddar everyone wanted a piece of cheese

@QPaysTaxes ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

@Downgoat Pytek was first

@MarsUltor but I can't make a cheesy joke with Pytek

hahaha :P

@Downgoat ಠ_ಠ

Downgoat your planet simulator is neat.

Hmmm. Curious. I have two earths and a jupiter in the same orbit. They never pass each other, but the earths move from approximately the trojan positions to almost directly opposite the jupiter, and back. Over a span of a few minutes. This makes me wonder whether gravity between planets is actually repulsive, not attractive.

Slider's have some unintentional behaviors though

That's four non-esolangs in progress, right?

I can't drag them, only click on the spot where I want them to go...