« first day (2076 days earlier)      last day (2754 days later) » 

6:00 PM
@trichoplax The first one was $0.99, the rest were the usual $5 each
 
@PhiNotPi not that I know of
 
@NathanMerrill Imagine a Beowulf cluster of those!
 
@TimmyD What?? That doesn't sound right...
 
@TimmyD Ah of course. Things always cost more in bulk...
 
6:02 PM
That is when you call over a bunch of your friends.
 
Oct 3 '15 at 21:34, by minxomat
user image
Clusters of cheap computers are fun.
 
Oddly enough, the grocery store here is selling 12-packs of soda for $3.33 and 24-packs for $7.48. I'm not sure what they're thinking....
They're not on sale or anything, that's just the usual price.
 
@Geobits I've been seeing this more and more recently. Especially with cereal
 
I guess you can get away with it if you train people their whole lives that buying in bulk is cheaper.
 
6:03 PM
The breakfast bars I usually get are $4.99 for a 5-pack, or $8.99 for an 8-pack
I get the 5-pack
 
Yeah, every time I go shopping it makes me wonder how many people just straight up don't look at prices at all.
 
@DJMcMayhem or any of my YT subscribers - Does my livestream event show up for you?
 
Are you streaming an in-universe MC debate?
 
Lord no
 
Zombie vs Creeper, 2016
 
6:07 PM
wait, I know why bulk is more expensive: you save energy as you only have to move a single item
 
@Geobits I think quite a large percentage.
 
@TimmyD "My opponent literally wants to blow up the world"
 
I think the VP candidates would come into play more there. One is already dead, and the other probably won't last long.
 
Starting soon
Kinda just a test
 
also, I went to the store last week or so, and whole milk was more expensive than 1% or 2%. Have you guys run into that ever?
 
6:11 PM
@HelkaHomba Well, the timer seems to work :)
@NathanMerrill Yep. Cause it's the whole milk, of course it's more :P
 
@HelkaHomba it says offline
 
@NathanMerrill More fat and less processing (maybe?). Seems reasonable.
 
@NathanMerrill We don't buy milk in my house. My wife's allergic to the casein, and as a result, I no longer even like the taste of it.
Now, almond milk. I could tell you if the price of that went up.
 
Milk varies from store to store IME. At Publix whole milk tends to cost more. I think it's part of their "eat healthy" tax.
 
@DJMcMayhem It is. But see the timer? I'll start soon.
 
6:13 PM
@TimmyD I love me some vanilla sweetened almond milk.
 
A pallet of 12 cartons of 3.5% milk (1l each) is about 4.5 € here (more or less $ 5).
 
wat
 
@NathanMerrill Yes, but don't use it to make mac & cheese.
 
Price for 1.5% is usually the same
 
@NathanMerrill That's weird. It's lighter and costs slightly less to transport...
 
6:14 PM
@Geobits Is that a "wat that's cheap" or "wat that's expensive"?
 
Compared to here, that's quite cheap.
 
@HelkaHomba I don't see it. Maybe cause I'm on mobile
 
@Geobits Yeah, that's actually a huge problem for the farmers here.
 
@DJMcMayhem Ah. Good to know.
 
It's still getting cheaper by the year.
 
6:15 PM
A gallon here is at least $3
 
ditto
 
I don't know what a gallon is.
 
Just under 4l ?
 
Ah.
 
3.78 liters
 
6:15 PM
For comparison, your price works out to about $1.5 per gallon
 
Yeah. Milk really is dirt cheap here.
 
How about cheese?
 
I wouldn't know
 
You'd think with all the cows the US has, it wouldn't be so much.
 
@Geobits I don't know about the EU in general, but in the UK it's subsidised
 
6:16 PM
It's like $10 for a good quality 2lb block here
 
^ same
 
@HelkaHomba We don't buy blocks in cheese. Everything is a bit smaller here.
 
@trichoplax I can't even keep track of what farms are subsidized here, but it's a lot.
 
@mınxomaτ Blocks in cheese? :p
 
Argh
 
6:17 PM
Europe would have city blocks made of cheese. Mmmm..
 
I know that 12 slices or so of Tilsit (the only cheese I really eat more than once a month) is about $ 2 maybe.
 
@Geobits Aren't most of our cows beef and not dairy, though?
 
That's a good possibility, but I'm honestly not sure.
Maybe Rainbolt knows?
 
If I'm out and thirsty I sometimes buy a bottle of milk instead of water, because it's cheaper.
 
I really wish I could buy milk in containers bigger than 1 measly litre.
 
6:19 PM
Yeah, wow. Single-serve bottles of milk are usually around two bucks here.
 
Bigger things are hard to find and really expensive.
 
The part of cows I use the most is - strawpoll.me/11370077
 
I do love me a good steak, but I eat white meat more often.
 
I've assumed milk covers all milk products too
 
I guess
 
6:20 PM
It does now :P
 
5 milk
woah
 
8 minutes and counting...
 
@trichoplax That's just insane. Like, the cheapest thing out and about here is usually soda. You can get 64oz gas station fountain soda for like $0.49 usually.
 
@HelkaHomba since I can't see the timer, what's it at?
 
44 secs ago, by Geobits
8 minutes and counting...
 
6:22 PM
Oh. -_-
 
What's the timer?
 
A YouTube live stream
 
Unfortunately, I have to leave in the next couple minutes, so I won't be able to bask in the radiant light of Helka stream.
 
oh ---_-
 
I'm trying a livestream in a few minutes. Nothing fancy. youtube.com/HelkaHomba/live
 
6:24 PM
@HelkaHomba CMC for stream: pronounce /y/ :p
 
@TimmyD You can buy 4lbs of soda??
 
Don't know if serious...
 
Oh wait that's only about 2 litres
 
2.5l bottles of coke are pretty easy to get here.
 
To be fair, 64oz of soda probably does weigh around 4lbs :)
 
6:25 PM
We do have 2 litre bottles I was just thinking of servings
 
Some weird duty-free airport store probably sells soda in barrels. To go along with their 15m toblerone.
I never got this oversize thing.
 
6:42 PM
Can you hear the stream?
 
in mathematics, is the statement infinity > 2 true?
 
Yes?
 
I mean, we don't consider infinity to be a number
 
Oh. I'm not sure
 
6:47 PM
there's positive and negative infinity
and also a concept of "undefined"
+infinity > 2 is true, while 5/0 > 2 is undefined
 
@NathanMerrill infinity is defined as a symbol such that for all real numbers x, infinity > x is true
 
@NathanMerrill TypeError: infinity is not a number
 
(usually, anyway)
 
Don't floats have a special value to represent +/- infinity and NaN?
 
Depends on the implementation.
I know that MSIL floats do have -Inf and +Inf separately.
 
6:52 PM
@flawr this video really confuses me. the -1/12 makes no sense (and I even watched the extra footage)
 
@DJMcMayhem IEEE 754 floats do
 
$  echo '#include <math.h>
1> main(){printf("%d",INFINITY>2);}'|gcc -x c - -lm -o inf 2>/dev/null && ./inf
1
 
(which are the ones you'll most likely work with)
 
C says INF > 2
 
if all of the elements of 1,2,3,4 are strictly greater than 1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, then the same proof should apply to both
 
6:52 PM
@MartinEnder That's what C# uses, right? Do you know what C does?
 
@DJMcMayhem C# compiles to MSIL, so yes.
 
I don't know what MSIL is...
 
@DJMcMayhem The bytecode that powers all DotNET languages.
 
{C,J,F}#, VB.NET etc.
What C does depends on the settings the compiler uses. I.e. how strict it should adhere to the IEEE float std.
 
6:55 PM
Isn't it CIL now?
 
Yes, now.
 
Anyone golf in it?
 
You mean IL assembly, or DotNET things in general?
 
IL assembly, I've seen people use x86.
 
Dunno, but in that case it might be a better idea to use IL bytecode and not IL assembly, that'll be shorter and equally inconvenient.
Quite powerful:
Main article: Common Intermediate Language This is a list of the instructions in the instruction set of the Common Intermediate Language bytecode. Base instructions form a Turing-complete instruction set. Object model instructions provide an implementation for the Common Type System. == See also == Common Intermediate Language is the assembly language that uses the instruction set. Common Language Infrastructure is the standard in which the Common Intermediate Language is defined. .NET Framework is a platform and implementation of the Common Language Infrastructure. Mono is a cross-platform open...
 
7:03 PM
@flawr Man, the ant on the rubber band is so mind-blowing, but then it totally makes sense. :P
 
after more research, it appears that 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 diverges but also has a value of -1/12
which is odd
aka, it approaches positive infinity, and then, after adding all of the terms, it hits -1/12
 
Hey guys!
I have a new language!!!
 
have you been watching numberphile, @NathanMerrill
 
CMC write a QFTASM-to-CIL compiler
 
The infinite series whose terms are the natural numbers 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ⋯ is a divergent series. The nth partial sum of the series is the triangular number ∑ k = 1 n k = n ( n + 1 ) 2 , {\displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^{n}k={\frac {n(n+1)}{2}},} which increases without...
 
7:07 PM
@MamaFunRoll 10/10 logo
 
@Poke yes, look at my earlier comments
@MamaFunRoll what does rng do, and why doesn't it generate a random number?
 
@NathanMerrill pretty cool channel
 
@NathanMerrill it's range
 
@Geobits @DJMcMayhem Did you watch? It seemed to say 1 viewer the whole time ;_; Jk, I just wanted to make sure the audio was ok. (youtu.be/Pir3olQlfxc)
 
7:11 PM
range is too many characters?
are you a golfing language or not?
 
lol yes
not rly
just a language for lazy people
 
well, rng IMO means "random number generator", not "range"
 
@HelkaHomba Umm, I had the tab with the timer open, but I was out until just now, so no idea.
 
@WheatWizard If you're not careful there, you might end up giving Dennis (or someone else) all of your rep at this rate. :P
 
@DJMcMayhem I make a 500 rep bounty every time I hit 1500. I don't care much for rep past 1000.
 
7:16 PM
huh. I certainly do! A lot of the privileges are really nice
 
@Geobits >.> (here's some substantive discourse so this message is not viewed as spam: Does anyone else like raw potatoes?)
 
@WheatWizard you should also be aware that the privilege thresholds will increase once we get our design
 
Well I tried to give warning :P
54 mins ago, by Geobits
Unfortunately, I have to leave in the next couple minutes, so I won't be able to bask in the radiant light of Helka stream.
 
@WheatWizard Hey, would you mind if I did a more extensive edit on your post to provide some more information about what brain-flak is, and to fit with the general flow of most tips questions?
 
@DJMcMayhem removing vim
 
7:18 PM
@betseg ???
 
@DJMcMayhem ok that would be nice.
 
@HelkaHomba Raw potatoes? No, I'm not a savage.
 
installing gvim (bcoz it has clipboard support)
 
@MartinEnder How much will they increase?
 
Why remove vim? Why not just have both? (Also, what OS are you on?)
 
7:19 PM
@DJMcMayhem arch, they conflict with each other
same package, different configs
 
@MartinEnder Hey, could you this question? It seems like it would be a nice FAQ
 
I still think we need a faq listing all of the standard types
"What counts as a boolean/integer/double/string/list"
 
normal vim in arch isnt built with +clipboard, gvim is, and both have /bin/vim
@DJMcMayhem any recommendated bind for :paste :nopaste?
 
Ooh, there's been an update to the mobile site... You can now upload pictures for answers
 
yup
 
7:32 PM
Has anything else changed?
 
@betseg I've actually never used those options, so I'm not sure what they do. How about nnoremap <leader>p :se paste!<cr>:se paste?<cr>
 
@BetaDecay the code tag became actually monospace a while ago
@DJMcMayhem it says vim "this thing im gonna paste has indentations, dont mess with em"
 
Oh. That sounds really nice. It really bugs me when I do (from insert mode) <C-r>* and it screws with the indentation.
 
@betseg Oh, I thought it did but I thought I'd done something by messing around with Firefox
 
lol
oh i think +clipboard disables :paste
sad :(
wat
 
7:46 PM
@El'endiaStarman I didn't really get that one.
 
i think its removed from vim 8
 
I no longer have 15k. Oh well, it was fun while it lasted
 
wat happened
 
Dennis had to go ahead and break a record...
 
@NathanMerrill Well obviously with our epsilon-definition of limits, 1+2+..+n diverges. But then you can still try to assign a real value to a divergent series (and you can do that in very different ways) and in one of these ways you'll end up with -1/12
 
7:48 PM
wait I'm an idiot
it's :set paste and :set nopaste
 
Or :se paste! to toggle
 
@flawr right :) I eventually came to that conclusion. It makes me wonder what other divergent series have finite sums
 
Is it possible to start a bounty on a question (by someone else) which already has an active bounty (also by someone else)?
 
@BetaDecay No
 
Another way that does not work for 1+2+...+n, but for other divergent series is the Cesàro summation.
 
7:49 PM
Chat mini-poll: What license do you use/recommend for open-source code? Why that one?
 
@DJMcMayhem Ugh, that's annoying. I'll forget in 7 days
 
What are you hoping to bounty-ize?
 
I will give a bounty to the shortest code which colours the output using red and black to make the heart — Beta Decay Sep 27 at 21:56
 
@DJMcMayhem Why would anyone care about a license.
 
@BetaDecay Post to the open ended bounties meta question then someone can remind you if you forget
 
7:51 PM
Good idea
 
I either starred or posted every single message currently on the starboard. Interesting...
 
wouldn't the sum of randomly chosen integers (out of all integers) be the same as 0 + 1 + -1 + 2 + -2 ...??
 
@BetaDecay Presumably that also has to be code that can't be shortened by removing the colour requirement, otherwise it'll be deleted as insufficient effort?
 
because over an infinite number of "picks", you're going to get an even distribution across all numbers
 
I guess the mean remains zero, but the variance and standard deviation will grow without limit as you increase the range you choose from
 
7:54 PM
@trichoplax Yeah, I would've thought so
 
The problem here again is, how do you choose "random" numbers? You need to assume some distribution first.
There is no uniform distribution over the integers (every integer equally likely)
 
why not? every integer has a uniform 0 chance of getting picked
 
I must admit I assumed uniform over a range, then extended the range, even though uniform doesn't work for an infinite range...
The problem with uniformly picking an integer is that the expected length of the integer is infinite
 
@NathanMerrill But the probabilities should sum up to 1, in order to form a probability distribution.
 
Oh there's that too...
 
7:58 PM
@trichoplax I don't understand this...expound?
 
youtube.com/watch?v=bMtLvFpBmI8 i did a video about :set paste :P
 
is it just me
 
flawr's is the serious mathematical point to be paying attention too. Mine was more a jokey "it'll have infinitely many digits"
 
@flawr well, since 1/infinity isn't really 0, my initial "uniform 0 chance" isn't actually true
 
or did google chrome just update it's looks?
 
7:59 PM
the fact that you can't define a probability to a particular integer doesn't really matter
@orlp I had this a couple weeks ago
I really like it
 
@NathanMerrill You can make the range as large as you like, and still have a small but finite probability for each integer in the range, but that breaks down if you let the size of the range tend to infinity
 
I think the font is different
 
Anonymous
@orlp It did about a week ago
 
it just changed for me
'material' it's called
 
@NathanMerrill You end up with weird properties, like the probability of your randomly chosen integer being less than N from zero being zero, for arbitrarily large finite N
 
8:01 PM
@trichoplax right, I agree. The probability of each integer is "undefined". That doesn't mean that the original "uniform distribution" is undefined though
 
@WheatWizard Pro tip when you're offering someone a bounty: leave it up for the full 7 days before awarding it. That draws more attention to the answer which usually rewards the answerer with some additional upvotes on top of your bounty.
3
 
1
Q: 2048-like array shift

greenwolfAssume we want to shift an array like it is done in 2048 game: if we have two equal consecutive elements in array, merge them into twice the value element. Shift must return a new array, where every pair of consecutive equal elements is replaced with their sum, and pairs should not intersect. Sh...

 
Anonymous
Why do I get the feeling that, if anything with Chrome changes once I start working at Google, people here will be like "Mego what did you do?!?!?"
10
 
In other words, if you pick a uniformly random integer, it's infinite
 
@Mego and now you wonder why I didn't accept the job
 
8:03 PM
oh you didn't? I thought you did.
 
@trichoplax But you can show by induction that every integer is finite.
xD
 
@MartinEnder I technically accepted, then went back
 
oh okay
 
I had only accepted for a couple of days
 
Anonymous
@NathanMerrill So really now you're an android pretending to be the late Nathan Merrill
 
8:03 PM
@flawr Hmm. True. Perhaps I should have said arbitrarily large?
 
@Mego I'm actually giving up chrome. Every time I use it it's more buggy than the last time
 
@trichoplax makes sense.
 
So adding two of them together could give you +/- infinity
 
@trichoplax Yes probably. But it is still fun ot see how many people do not get that every real number is finite=)
 
wait..
this assumes that all integers are larger than 0
I didn't make that assumption
you can't say that the probability of the number < N for an arbitrarily large N is 0
 
8:05 PM
Well, not infinity. Again I should have said arbitrarily large. Is it obvious how far out of my depth I am? :P
@NathanMerrill I often make assumptions without spotting them. Where was it?
 
nevermind, I proved it to myself
 
I meant the size of the number, so -5 would be 5 from zero. My wording was appalling though
 
you can say that the probability of the number A, being between N<A<M is 0, for arbitrarily small N and arbitrarily large M
 
@NathanMerrill under what distribution?
 
Mine was intended to mean that, but with N = -M
 
8:08 PM
right
 
3
Q: 2048-like array shift

greenwolfAssume we want to shift an array like it is done in 2048 game: if we have two equal consecutive elements in array, merge them into twice the value element. Shift must return a new array, where every pair of consecutive equal elements is replaced with their sum, and pairs should not intersect. Sh...

 
@flawr uniform
 
What's unclear about this?
 
It doesn't describe the merging process very well
 
@NathanMerrill But as I said, there is no uniform distribution.
 
8:09 PM
right, but we were proving that.
 
Thanks to whoever's been browsing my network profile the last day or two. I've had votes and badges trickling in on ancient posts... :)
 
@NathanMerrill It does now
 
Wow. There are a lot of 500s on that list...
 
@NathanMerrill Just note that the probability is sigma additive. So if there was an uniform distribution with probability 0<p<1 for each number, then you could have at most 1/p numbers, but the integers surely contain more than that =)
 
8:13 PM
I find it fascinating that you can distribute probabilities that sum to 1 over the integers with all being non-zero, you just can't do it evenly
 
@flawr right, but I'm already ok saying that each number has an undefined probability, so that doesn't really hold
 
well undefined probabilities are especially cumbersome to work with^^
 
right :)
 
Never tell me the odds. Especially if they're undefined
 
We recently made a petition in our math department to only allow finite things, as everytime infinity shows up, trouble arises.
 
8:16 PM
@Mego have you gotten the massive "welcome to google" pdf packet?
 
Anonymous
@NathanMerrill Not yet. Still trying to get in touch with recruiter to finalize details
 
well, I got super spammed with a gazillion "you're a Noogler!" emails
ok, it wasn't that bad
but still :)
 
@flawr An ant starts walking on a 1-meter rubber band, at the rate of 1 cm per second. Every second, the rubber band grows by 1 meter. Does the ant ever make it all the way around? Yes, because the rubber band grows behind the ant too.
 
Anonymous
I'm sure I'll get those emails too when it comes time :)
 
Anonymous
@El'endiaStarman My brain hurts
 
8:20 PM
@Mego You can prove it too by directly linking it to the harmonic series, which diverges.
 
@El'endiaStarman Ah now I see, we stretch the band. Somehow I had the image of adding one meter at the end in my mind.
 
@DJMcMayhem so... I have a program that can parse bflk into a tree and vice-versa... now I'm trying to figure out the best way to implement simplification rules.
 
@flawr Yes, that's the trick. That's an assumption we pretty much automatically make.
 
Anonymous
@Mego The best part will be the one time it really was me
 
Even with that, not seeing how that works. Assuming a uniform band, that still means it's growing by 0.5m/s in front of the ant
 
8:22 PM
@ArtOfCode only when its halfway around
 
@ArtOfCode only when the ant is in the centre
 
Are we talking about a regular, circular band, or what
 
but since the ant is moving it don't be in the centre any more a little later.
you can consider it to be a rubber string if you like (not circular)
 
I can see it works on a line, but not on a circle
 
@ArtOfCode You'll expand the band uniformly.
 
8:24 PM
@ArtOfCode yes. When the ant is 1/10 of the way around the band, its growing .9m/s in front of the ant, but when its 9/10s of the way around, its only growing .1m/s in front
 
@NathanMerrill no, that would only be true if there was a fixed point on the circle, which you can't assume. Otherwise, it's permanently growing 1m/s in front of the ant, because "in front" can be all the way around the circle.
It doesn't work on a circle.
 
you define the "top" of the circle to be the start/finish
 
on a circle the ant is still increasing its angle relative to some fixed point
 
@NathanMerrill the "top" has to be a fixed point, then, for that to work.
 
well, the ant is moving relative to somthing
otherwise you could say that the ant moving 200 m/s isn't moving at all
 
8:27 PM
@DJMcMayhem but but no-internet-dinosaur game???
 
@PhiNotPi Hmm. Well a start would probably be checking if any nodes whose children are constant can be joined together, like turning (()()())(()()()) into ((()()())) or (()()[()]) into (()). Only downside is that it won't drastically shorten things
You could also do single integer golfing on any (()()()()...) chunks
 
@DJMcMayhem Remember you can only do this in a zeroed scope
 
@PhiNotPi What I've been meaning to do for Stack Cats for a while is brute force short programs and sort them into equivalence classes. You could do the same for short expressions.
 
Oh, the top scope. Good point
 
Leaked photo of next year's Google Pixel.
 
8:29 PM
? it has a huge bar at the bottom?
 
@DJMcMayhem or inside of <>
 
 
@NathanMerrill That's the joke. The current Pixel is a design fiasco, mostly because of the useless chin.
 
@ArtOfCode Do you agree with that?
 
Okay, I simulated it for a circular rubber band. The position and the circumference diverge - i.e. it doesn't work.
ant position:  1 band circumference:  200
VM337:6 ant position:  2 band circumference:  300
VM337:6 ant position:  3 band circumference:  400
VM337:6 ant position:  4 band circumference:  500
VM337:6 ant position:  5 band circumference:  600
VM337:6 ant position:  6 band circumference:  700
VM337:6 ant position:  7 band circumference:  800
VM337:6 ant position:  8 band circumference:  900
VM337:6 ant position:  9 band circumference:  1000
VM337:6 ant position:  10 band circumference:  1100
VM337:6 ant position:  11 band circumference:  1200
 
8:30 PM
@ArtOfCode Don't you agree witht ht the formula above?
 
@mınxomaτ ah, I had no idea
 
@ArtOfCode You ignore the stretch behind the ant.
 
@DJMcMayhem we're talking some more in the brain-Flak room
 
@WheatWizard well (((()()()){})) would still be shorter
 
@flawr If we're on a circle, behind is in front.
 
8:31 PM
Wait, is that right?
 
That's our fundamental disagreement
 
@ArtOfCode Well you have to mark the starting point.
 
@ArtOfCode ok. Define "ant position"
 
@ArtOfCode every point on the circle is a fixed point. so there is always a reference point.
 
@NathanMerrill distance which ant has travelled
 
8:32 PM
from where?
 
wherever it started?
ah
:)
 
@DJMcMayhem Than what? I'm a bit confused
 
yeah, but the part between where it started and where it currently is has stretched as well
 
mkay, in that case, CMC: calculate how far the ant has travelled at second n
 
@WheatWizard if you have (()()())(()()()) but need the scope, I think you could do (((()()()))){}
 
8:35 PM
@DJMcMayhem Oh yes that will always work
 
@ArtOfCode did you see my formula?
 
are there are any convergent series that are infinite when evaluated?
 
I can't work on the numerical regex lang if I'm at school, does anyone have any good turing tarpit ideas?
 
@NathanMerrill isn't that a little bit contradictory?
 
well, there's the inverse. We have divergent series that are finite when evaluated
aka, 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5
 
8:39 PM
Finite when evaluated with a finite amount of elements
 
nope, 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +5 ... is equal to -1/12
 
You can't get infinity from a finite number of finite numbers
Oh yeah, that
 
but it also diverges
 
@NathanMerrill Well most "ways of evaluating" are trying to extend the notion of the convergence, so not much interesting is happening there.
 
> Indeed, limits are very often used to find a meaningful surrogate for f(x) for those cases where f(x) is itself undefined. In the case of convergent sums, f(∞) is generally undefined (by virtue of infinity not being a number), but if the function converges to 0, we can treat the limit of the sum as the sum itself.
If it converges, f(∞) = 0, and f(∞) is what makes sum(range[1,∞],n=>n) == -1/12
 
huh. Is that really true? If a summation converges, is that summation always evaluated to the value the summation converges to?
 
@StevenH. Consider zeta(s) = sum( 1/n^s for n=1 upto infinity)
Then consider the limit zeta(s) for s to 1
 
The limit only exists from the left side as a finite number
 
@flawr yeah
 
8:54 PM
-1/12
 
I'd argue that zeta is an extension of that sum, not exactly that sum
 
@TimmyD did you just verbify me
 
@mınxomaτ In my experience some psychologists try to squeeze too much of too few numbers.
 
8:58 PM
@NathanMerrill sorry, I'm too sick to watch that
 
in particular, 1/gamma(s) * integral([0, infinity], (x**(s-1))/(e**x - 1), dx)
 

« first day (2076 days earlier)      last day (2754 days later) »