« first day (1901 days earlier)      last day (3277 days later) » 

22:07
@TildalWave looks like we had a large meteor explosion in Scotland 3 hours ago. Starting to see dashcam and CCTV footage. Quite cool
@RoryAlsop Wow, again? Interesting because there was a pretty big one close by here too a week or so ago. And that last year's one over the Loch Ness or thereabouts was also following the one in the Alps about a week before
@kalina see what I mean...
22:14
@RoryAlsop Dude! That sounds awesome.
@MickLH your statement doesn't make sense, how does @kalina suggesting she doesn't know you equate to her hating you
Seriously? I should explain that?
@MickLH sure why not
@TildalWave conspiracy confirmed?
@SEJPM what conspiracy?
22:16
@RоryMcCune The joke is that she doesn't make time to know me better so I over-react to it immensely.
@TildalWave METEORS DON'T APPEAR RANDOMLY
CAPS MAKES IT MORE BELIEVABLE
@SEJPM Clearly a CIA tractor beam project
@SEJPM quite the opposite, meteor activity is often periodic due to Earth's position in its orbit at specific time of the year... thus meteor showers
@TildalWave Correct
@MarkBuffalo CIA is also written in CAPS AND YOU BELIEVE (IN) 'EM!
22:17
@MickLH well that is funny but not for the reason you intended, I'd guess. Your some random blue avatar on a random chatroom on the Internet, why should @kalina make time to "know you". Why would you only want @kalina to do so... I don't see you suggesting that @MarkBuffalo hates you too
although given he's seen your NSA held records he probably does
@RоryMcCune Don't worry, I hate him too
@RоryMcCune LOL no this is precisely the reason I intended
If it weren't for me being some random guy on the internet, it would just be excessively needy and insecure
@TildalWave IF YOU WANT TO SPREAD KNOWLEDGE GO TO SPACE.SE!
@MickLH ok I think your definition of "hate" is different to many other people's... hell you're up against people like @Simon in here, trust me you ain't going to make "hate" in a hurry
that takes work, it takes dedication
it takes saying "pls" several thousand times
you've got to work at it
I'm not setting out to actually incite hate
22:19
@RоryMcCune what if I write a spam bot that spams "pls"?
then and only then might you get the participants of the room to hate you
There are very few people in the world that I actually hate
@SEJPM well I'd applaud the automation, but ultimately it would lack the feelings to provoke hate which is generally a visceral reaction
and none of them are in this channel
I can't say I've ever "hated" someone online
offline, very rare but possible
online for all I know every one of you is a bot
22:21
@RоryMcCune a "pls" reply to every post ever made here wouldn't suffice?
For example, I hate people who hurt children
and hating computer programmes is silly
@SEJPM it'd lose efficacy I'd guess, and you'd get banned quick-style. If you could have the bot register new accounts, get sufficient rep. to post in here, then come in and use variants of pls on the mods... that would definitely upgrade you past casual annoyance
@SEJPM geez dude I was a mod there like a month ago, still by far the highest scoring member and right now chatting in its main chat room since one of our members is live on The Space Show with a project I've also contributed to :P
and knowing @AviD you might get some brief hate
@RоryMcCune BOT SEJPM does not approve of that. BOT SEJPM gives it best to simulate human behavior. BOT SEJPM didn't yet succeed the turing test. This makes BOT SEJPM sad :(
22:22
you have no chance with @RoryAlsop though
@RоryMcCune When you put it like that... pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls totally joking
@TildalWave your profile told me some of that ;)
@MickLH ahh I'm not @RoryAlsop he's like the most patient dude on the planet, you can try your excessive pls strategy on him but I doubt it'll fly
annoying me at the moment is tricky as I've had a whisky
that significantly increases my annoyance threshold
Well that's good, like I said I never am actually setting out to annoy, I just like playful fun
@RоryMcCune we clearly need @Simon
22:26
@SEJPM well @Simon is the master... if you want to study in the tradition of annoying DMZ participants, you should follow his every word, kind of like a pls'in Zen master
well him or @AviD , they both seem to have the knack
@RоryMcCune OOOHHHHH @Simon TEACH ME THE HIDDEN WAYS TO ANNOY THE CRAP OUT OF EVERYONE!
5
Well done
@RoryAlsop ooh
@RоryMcCune that's why I just clicked the ignore button :\
22:29
@RоryMcCune there's a much better video - I'm trying to get it
@RoryAlsop nice! it looked like quite a big flare!
@MarkBuffalo there's an "ignore" button!? what a sacrilege to use it on @Simon!
@SEJPM I can stand the pls/donutting, but the constant negativity with nearly nothing nice to say - ever - wears thin after a bit
@MarkBuffalo Simon is often nice to folks
@MarkBuffalo so you want to hear (more) nice things?
22:31
@RoryAlsop nice, yup similar one again ... angle of attack, speed, size,... I think we have a new meteor shower to declare, we just don't know what from it is LOL
@TildalWave :-)
@SEJPM Yeah, click a user and view their chat profile
@MarkBuffalo :O does this hide all posts made by this user?
@TildalWave if we had anything other than complete cloud cover this evening it may have looked cooler, although the cloud did make the flash bigger...
it's still not a Chelyabinsk
22:34
@SEJPM Yeah
@RoryAlsop Russians always make bigger explosions.
@TildalWave That looks awesome
@ThomasPornin Like Tsar Bomba? :p
this one - fast forward to 1 minute then watch from there
22:35
@ThomasPornin russians always have the largest (explosion)
@RoryAlsop Wow, that lit up the whole sky
@MarkBuffalo rumours say it was tuned down to not ignite the atmosphere
@SEJPM Let's burn the world...
or something
@RoryAlsop I agree
Let it burn in righteous fire!
twitches
@SEJPM That rumour is a deformation from an actual concern.
Big flash in the sky!
sorry
@ThomasPornin which actually was?
@SEJPM Prior to the first nuclear test (Trinity, July 16th, 1945), scientist Edward Teller had explained that maybe the test could trigger a sustained fusion reaction with the atmosphere nitrogen.
In effect, burning the planet, as the Scottish would say.
They actually did computations to find out that it was highly improbable.
So they proceeded.
It seems that the computations were correct.
@ThomasPornin the russians actually though before trying stuff out !? :O
22:42
@SEJPM It was the Americans...
@ThomasPornin oh, I though you were referencing the russians there... sorry :(
The Russian, when trying out the Tsar Bomba, had "tuned it down" for safety, from 100 Mt to a mere 25 Mt. But they made a mistake, and the actual explosion was rated at 50 Mt.
@RoryAlsop hahaha
@ThomasPornin so they didn't think before trying out their new toy as usual :)
gee that was a really corny movie LOL
and I watched it in the cinema as soon as it came out :)
22:45
Another anecdote in the same vein: in 2003 the US produced the biggest non-nuclear explosive device, the GBU-43/B MOAB:
The GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB pronounced /ˈmoʊ.æb/, commonly known as the Mother of All Bombs) is a large-yield conventional (non-nuclear) bomb, developed for the United States military by Albert L. Weimorts, Jr. of the Air Force Research Laboratory. At the time of development, it was touted as the most powerful non-nuclear weapon ever designed. The bomb was designed to be delivered by a C-130 Hercules, primarily the MC-130E Combat Talon I or MC-130H Combat Talon II variants. Since then, Russia has tested its "Father of All Bombs", which is claimed to be four times as powerful as...
So of course the Russians had to make something bigger:
Aviation Thermobaric Bomb of Increased Power (ATBIP) Russian: Авиационная вакуумная бомба повышенной мощности (АВБПМ), nicknamed "Father of All Bombs" (FOAB) Russian: "Отец всех бомб" ("Овб"), is a Russian-designed, bomber-delivered thermobaric weapon. In describing the destructive power of "FOAB", deputy chief of the Russian general staff Alexander Rukshin was quoted as saying, "all that is alive merely evaporates." The bomb is reportedly four times as powerful as the US military's GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast bomb (whose official military acronym "MOAB" is often colloquially called the...
Tsar Bomba (Russian: Царь-бомба; "Tsar-bomb") is the nickname for the AN602 hydrogen bomb, the most powerful nuclear weapon ever detonated. Its test on October 30, 1961, remains the most powerful man-made explosion in human history. It was also referred to as Kuz'kina Mat' (Russian: Кузькина мать, Kuzma's mother), referring to Nikita Khrushchev's promise to show the United States a "Kuz'kina Mat'" at the 1960 United Nations General Assembly. Developed by the Soviet Union, the bomb had a yield of 50 megaton TNT (210 PJ). Only one bomb of this type was ever officially built and it was detonated in...
@MarkBuffalo do you link this for the nice one-boxer?
No, @ThomasPornin is linking non-nuclear bombs
I linked nuclear
@MarkBuffalo but I already linked the tsar twice.
wait are the people on security.stackexchange.com experts?
22:53
@SEJPM Sorry, I didn't see it
@HenryWHHack casual experts
@HenryWHHack Many of them are, yes
except for @ThomasPornin who is an approved expert and ursine overlord
am I going off topic
22:55
@HenryWHHack not yet?
is there a topic
@HenryWHHack it's the DMZ, we have a variety of topics, including (but not limited to) sex chat, security, the main site, the meta, bombs, meteors, ...
hmm, I havent had the need for a nightcap in a while.
am I annoying?
Finally got around to finishing the last bits of my cask strength lagavulin
ahhhh forgot how damn goood that is.
23:00
@HenryWHHack It takes a lot more skills to be really annoying.
@RоryMcCune hey now, I do it ironically
@everyoneinthischatroom HI I am Larry Page.
@HenryWHHack proof pls?
what
okay
@SEJPM 1- Call people out on their bullshit.
2- Profit.
posting a link to a generic picture is no proof
@HenryWHHack consult @ThomasPornin for proper authentication (protocols)
On the Internet you are what you do. Any relation with a biologic identity is purely coincidental.
I am the Bear and I have 3748 answers to back up that assertion.
23:12
bitch please
lol I said that before reading the link
@Simon 37 "pls" to go
I am going to delete system32.
Good move, works like a charm
@ThomasPornin and how many to refute it?
delete system32

« first day (1901 days earlier)      last day (3277 days later) »