« first day (1901 days earlier)      last day (3277 days later) » 

20:00
aand I realised that comic is older than several participants in this room
@RоryMcCune Haha.
port 8443/tcp is open on stackexchange
@HenryWHHack way to scan something you don't own
@HenryWHHack I have a feeling it is supposed to be :-)
@HenryWHHack oh, yeah - what @Ohnana said...in many jurisdictions, even scanning for open ports can be illegal :-)
why did the firewalls and ips allowed the scan any way.
20:03
@HenryWHHack Way to be on a list before you're even legal.
this is why you practice on your own machines/vulnerable VM's
@HenryWHHack ...that's not how it works at all
@HenryWHHack why do roads let you drive down them when you don't hold a driving licence?
lol
@HenryWHHack And you're an expert?
I guess I'm a supreme expert then.
20:04
firebounty.com/bug-bounty-program/302/stack-exchange <--claims stack exchange has a bug bounty programme, but the link they have for SE does not say that...
Thomas is a gigantic expert.
Roros are donut experts.
okay I am going to jail and yes I am a expert.
lolwut
@Simon "donut forsake me oh my darlin'"
Mich is an expert nurd.
@RoryAlsop 10/10
20:05
@Simon will munch again?
Exactly roro, exactly.
@Simon I'm pretty ballin on a few areas of CS, tbh
@MickLH Yes but you're stalking kalinuh which gets you in the realm of nurdz.
@MickLH phrase I don't know - does that mean really good or really bad
@Simon in the realm of dead by conflagration, more like
@RoryAlsop good
20:06
@RoryAlsop That too.
o lawd I called you Mich.
lol i got you guys I just called a random port number.
I'm totally calling you Mich from now on.
dgaf
Good.
That's fine because it saves me from having to hear that plink! sound over and over, @Simon
20:07
It's gonna be hard to keep track of those nicknames at some point.
My brain does have a ton of room for useless information though, it's quite impressive actually.
@HenryWHHack that's alternative 443 (HTTPS) port on some web servers, like 8080 is for 80 (HTTP)
Mich pls
jeezus mich
done
okay phew
well it was a joke
20:08
@HenryWHHack Are you seriously going to pull the Markus trick of saying "it was a joke" when you say something dumb and people call you out?
I suspect it's needed for the CloudFlare
Because we can't have 2 donuts who do this, here.
@RoryAlsop It does, in fact, mean very good
o pls
You guys got numerical evaluations, hit me up breh I gotchu
20:09
if it was true will I go to jail?
one can hope
@TildalWave Dayuuum.
@HenryWHHack in reality - one scan: no. But there is nothing that says how much hacking is too much
The law allows for very minor things to be major offences (in UK, US, much of Europe, bits of S. America etc)
@Simon Lol this place feels so gentle in contrast to the other chatrooms I go to
@MickLH Yet I get flagged 185 times a year.
2
20:11
@MickLH That's because @RoryAlsop is a totally unflappable mod.
@ThomasPornin ... so far... :-)
Lol just being on stack exchange at all precludes even being comparable, I go on some pretty atrocious chats
@RoryAlsop ROCK AND ROLL IS THE WORST MUSIC
@RoryAlsop NIRVANA IS POOP
I haven't dared to go to many chats.
@Ohnana right - you've done it now
20:12
The idea scares me.
wolololololol
@Simon most just have too high a noise to signal ratio - and my old brain doesn't cope
@RoryAlsop Really? Even more than us?
@Simon soooo much more
@Ohnana well much of its lead singer is currently in a similar gooey form
20:13
What are they discussing about, actual stuff from their site?
What a bunch of peasants.
@TildalWave :OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
just saying :P
@RоryMcCune Yeah, that's kind of...strange. Though the whole thing seems a bit slap-dash, to be honest.
@Xander yeah I wonder if that site is at all legit... If SE don't have an official programme they should probably tell 'em to take that page down.
@RоryMcCune They got the text from here: stackoverflow.com/help/security-reports
But yeah, unless SE actually added themselves to that site, I don't see anywhere thanks or gifts are officially offered.
20:16
that doesn't grant anyone the right to scan for vulnerabilities tho
Adi
Adi
Oh my GOD! holy F! deep breathing right now! Thank you for helping me out. Yeah, he might be a little, big nerd but he is pretty wonderful...but it's kinda soon..lol OMG — MBC 24 secs ago
> but it's kinda soon..lol OMG
:|
@Adi Hahahahaha.
@Adi !!!
I hope it doesn't get closed, it's golden.
@RоryMcCune The idea seems reasonable. Just something that would be really hard to execute well. I can't imagine they can keep a reasonably complete, or reasonably accurate list of bounty programs.
20:18
@Simon I VTC'ed
Adi
Adi
@Lamia Hey there!
@TildalWave NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
osfirsttimer
BUT TOMMY LEEKY USED THE WORD "NURD" IN HIS ANSWER
@Simon good answer doesn't make the question any more on topic I'm afraid
20:19
@Simon Why? It's been answered, it doesn't need to stay open. It's cute, but nothing more particularly valuable can be added.
He made a spelling mistake but I'm fine with it.
@Lamia never heard of it actually.
Adi
Adi
Not sure if a shitty nerd or a really smart one
@Lamia Nope, but then, I'm not in AUS.
we closed every other "pls dekodz dis 4 me" question
Adi
Adi
20:20
He hashed it using an online too, which means it's added to rainbow tables
We need more!
Adi
Adi
I think he deliberately used an online tool.
@Adi not if you just use the duck for it duckduckgo.com/?q=md5+you're+such+a+nurd!
Adi
Adi
@TildalWave Ha?
Is it safe to use tor I know online privacy is not a real thing you can still be tracked but is it safe to use tor
Adi
Adi
20:24
I'm debating whether he used a public online service to include it in rainbow tables so it's Googlable later
@HenryWHHack Stop doing shady shit online. You know what's the best way to not get caught? Not doing anything illegal.
@Adi I know, I'm just saying that there's "online tools" that wouldn't result in being automatically included in some rainbow table
Adi
Adi
@TildalWave Plus the millions of tools that use JS
@Adi I dunno. He told her it was in MD5, which seems a bit specific, if you just intend for someone to drop it in the Googles to see what comes back.
I am not doing anything illegal
20:27
@Adi Jeezus dude I was just trying to be a dick, can't I even have that here?
Adi
Adi
@Xander If you Google the hash, you get a result on md5hashing.com
@Adi Yup, I found that too. I'm just not convinced that it was intentional.
I just want to stay protected from the nerd with the big black hat.
Adi
Adi
@Xander Which is not even in the first 3 pages of Googling for "md5 hash"
and it explicitly tells you to check this box if you want to save the result in their DB
@HenryWHHack most ToR exit nodes are run by people wanting to sniff the traffic (this is an unsupported opinion), so no I wouldn't use Tor unless you have to
20:29
so a vpn will be better.
@HenryWHHack depends on who you're hiding from
@HenryWHHack How do you know that your VPN provider is not keeping logs?
@Adi Ah, ok, interesting. I didn't bother to look hard enough to find that. That does make it seem a bit more intentional then, for sure.
ultimately you have to trust someone, your ISP, the VPN provider, the nameless Tor Exit node providers
Adi
Adi
@HenryWHHack Chain 'em. VPN, a few proxy chains, and then Tor
20:29
well me
Adi
Adi
When I want to do shady shit on the internet, I do that
@HenryWHHack Ok Billy, and who provides Internet access?
@TildalWave There is an on-topic question in there, but it is a bit hidden. The question is: "what is the methodology for finding a preimage on a hash function ?"
@Simon mom and dad
@Adi Good luck with that
20:30
@TildalWave Sounds like it.
VPN chaining only protects you if "they" don't care.
Adi
Adi
@MarkBuffalo Thanks. It works very very well
So you think :]
@ThomasPornin answer: google it :/
20:31
@MarkBuffalo You really think @Adi is a dumbass or what?
Adi
Adi
@MarkBuffalo No no, dude. Don't pull that shit
@SEJPM Exactly. As the first step.
Adi
Adi
I know that works.
Nope. Go ahead, and keep doing it.
:]
@ThomasPornin sure, if you edit to ask that, I'll vote to reopen or remove my vote to close, whichever applies
20:31
It is surprising how many people don't know that.
I'm not pulling any shit. It doesn't work as well as you think
Adi
Adi
It's extremely too much effort to track someone chaining multiple VPNs, multiple proxies, and then Tor
so far, it looks like those kind of questions are acceptable here
Adi
Adi
It does
It sooo does
Unless I'm specifically being targeted by the NSA, I'm good
@TildalWave Oh, I don't think I can be bothered with that. Plus, it would mar the effect.
20:32
@ThomasPornin honestly, I'd never have had the idea of googling for a hash.
Adi
Adi
and even then, they're probably better going after me other ways
Okay, well VPN chaining is one thing. VPNs, multiple proxies (doesn't count if unencrypted), and then adding TOR definitely makes it harder
...or if your intermediate connections cross US borders
But VPN chaining does not work.
Adi
Adi
@MarkBuffalo "makes it harder" is an understatement
20:33
@SEJPM So you just learned something. SE works !
Adi
Adi
3 mins ago, by Adi
@HenryWHHack Chain 'em. VPN, a few proxy chains, and then Tor
@MickLH TOR?
@ThomasPornin isn't there some gold badge for editing n many questions you answered? Or do you already have that one?
I just got back in here
Adi
Adi
My original message
20:33
I am billy-bo-bob.
there are, indeed, many better ways to unmask vpns
such as hacking the computer using them
but it's not necessary
"hacking"
Stop using that term Markus.
even with multiple chains (proxy/vpn/tor), it's indeed possible to unravel your connection to them
simply by meta data
Adi
Adi
Once you involve multiple systems, multiple machines, over multiple countries, including multiple organizations.. it's done
Too much effort
20:35
haha
Oh ho ho
@TildalWave I rarely edit questions or answers.
Adi
Adi
It's far better to go after your target in many other ways
You guys are arguing about something that, by definition, nobody can be sure about.
@Adi Yeah, but this can be automated for the most part :-b
Adi
Adi
@MickLH When you're faced with uncertainty, you assess risk and argue about likelihood
1 min ago, by Adi
Once you involve multiple systems, multiple machines, over multiple countries, including multiple organizations.. it's done
No, it can't.
20:36
The core of the problem is whether or not "too much effort" is required to track the chain.
@MickLH Not really.
Adi
Adi
NSA != God
Yes. Really.
@MickLH welcome to information security
20:36
Mich, you wanna touch tips?
I always have to have this argument with folks because they don't believe it can be done
Adi
Adi
2 mins ago, by Adi
Too much effort
multiple systems / machines doesn't count
Adi
Adi
Oh my god!
No it isn't too much effort
Adi
Adi
20:37
Impossible != too much effort
Or do you need "!==" to get it?
cruising with kali linux.
@Adi HAHAHAHAHA
IT'S A PHP SHITTY TYPING JOKE
Adi
Adi
@Simon :D
It's ok, I managed to not burst at work, phew.
20:38
Xkeyscore logs every single connection "hop" worldwide
@Adi so I should stop praying to them !?
I do heavy data analysis, this is so incredibly easy with that data
but back to work
Adi
Adi
@MarkBuffalo From now on, this will be my answer to everything.
@TildalWave i kinda want this one
@Adi He has a point, though: Tor is easily defeated with correlations between entry nodes and exit nodes (temporal + size). On the other hand, you also have a point: who would bother tracing you ?
Extended tracing abilities work better when potential targets don't believe they exist.
Adi
Adi
20:42
10 mins ago, by Adi
Unless I'm specifically being targeted by the NSA, I'm good
@ThomasPornin If you go out of your way to be "anonymous" like that, you're targeted by default by the NSA
Per the Snowden leaks
oh shit I forgot to send lmao
If you know precisely what is "too much effort" to your adversary...
Adi
Adi
I like how we're all arguing about different things
Yeah but I'm still right
@MarkBuffalo Yes, but they will take care not to reveal it.
20:43
My point still wins all currently active arguments
This is a known dilemma. During WWII, Allies had to let Germans sink some boat convoys to avoid letting them realize that they could decrypt the Enigma.
Adi
Adi
sigh
@ThomasPornin It was in the movie!
Adi
Adi
It's really sad that some people over estimate the power of something like the NSA.
There's nothing wrong with being realistic
20:45
Similarly, small fray like @Adi will escape the Long Arm of the (almost-)Law because his spectacular demise is not worth the cost of admitting data analysis capabilities.
Also, they probably don't have a bureaucratic procedure for that.
Pretty much that
Adi
Adi
It's ridiculous to think so incredibly easy to de-anonymize someone chaining multiple VPNs, multiple proxies, and Tor. Not just merely possible, but so incredibly easy.
@Adi Do you know what data analysis is? I do it for a living. It's one of my many hats.
@Adi On the paper, it is very hard, until you come to the point where it becomes easy. It is a percolation thing.
ok bye lads xox
20:46
It is incredibly easy once you've done it at least once
Adi
Adi
@MarkBuffalo Of course, because
If you only have part of the data, then it is nigh impossible. But at some point you have enough that it becomes easy.
The NSA is dancing a complicated ritual by which they try to say that they have such power, but also that they do not.
Adi
Adi
The tinfoilhattery sometimes.. wow.
20:47
Is the talk about the nsa true
@Adi I'm not saying the NSA is all-powerful, but the amount of data they have, and what they can do with it, is just mouth-watering to me. There's no tinfoil hattery here... I'm in awe of the data, and would love to analyze it.
But you shouldn't think you're secure when you aren't
Adi
Adi
@MarkBuffalo No no.. they have a lot of data, 100% agree
They need to make US taxpayers believe that they can spy on everybody, because they have a 10 billion dollars budget to justify. They need to make "bad guys" believe that they cannot, so that they keep on using the said network.
@MarkBuffalo did you already apply?
Adi
Adi
Is possible? Of course!
20:48
You see, even if you're behind 247 million layers of Dr. Dalek Encryption, it doesn't matter. The meta data cannot be hidden
Adi
Adi
Is it incredibly difficult? I don't think so
But is it "so incredibly easy"?
I very much doubt it
@Adi This is relative
You guys need to mathematically characterize the problem already
Many things are difficult at first... but once you have your pattern down, it's so easy
@Adi Theoretically it is a cross-matching among N elements; it can be done in N log N effort.
Being a system engineer at NSA must be rather interesting. Big data analysis is fun when it is really big.
The same kind of challenge as real-time trading platforms. You have to master the whole chain from electrical signals on the wire to applications.
Adi
Adi
20:54
@ThomasPornin Well, at least you'd go to bed with a huge boner offloaded from your hugely inflated ego after you read how much people on the internet overestimate your powers.
3
@Adi Oh, rest assured that I don't need Internet people to inflate my ego. I can do that pretty well myself.
The bottom line is that while I don't think that the NSA is all powerful (notably because it is a government organization and I don't believe in efficient government organizations), my point is that it does not make an actual difference.
Whether the NSA can or cannot trace every chain of VPN won't change their observable behaviour -- but for distinct reasons.
@ThomasPornin swoons
It still is amusing to imagine a complicated plot where some NSA people prepare a complete trail of fake documents to be "revealed" by Snowden (and it can have extra twists, depending on whether Snowden is aware of the tricks).
With a proper script, that story can easily last for two or three seasons.
Burn Notice 2
@ThomasPornin Yeah, I worked on a system that was just about 4 terabytes of data. It was really fun to make correlations, statistics, random charts, etc
Queries were instanteous
21:52
@MickLH I don't know you so hating is a little bit overkill
@kalina you could just mildly disapprove of him I suppose
@kalina BTW there were some people with interesting hair colour choices at Securi-TayV last week, it wasn't you relatively incognito was it?
I'm assuming of course that you have the hair colour of Rainbow Dash here...

« first day (1901 days earlier)      last day (3277 days later) »