To the VTCers... why on earth would this belong on Stack Overflow? It's off-topic there as well. — Mark Buffalo9 mins ago
@MarkBuffalo FWIW I VTC-ed as unclear, can't help it if 3 people before thought it belongs on SO and it was auto-migrated (even tho it clearly should be)
I maintain this position:
OK, an unclear question doesn't become any clearer if it's migrated elsewhere. So they shouldn't be and any issues with them (besides the off-topic part) should ideally be resolved before we migrate it. Anything else is just rude to the migration target site. TL;DR is not to use off-topic close reason with auto-migration option to dump bad questions and defer the problem elsewhere. — TildalWaveFeb 26 at 17:38
but the system repeatedly disagrees with me even when it doesn't know what it's doing :(
@RoryAlsop Looks like our unnamed meteor shower already has a name:
> The February Mu Virginids (FMV) were discovered by Damir Šegon and colleagues from the Croatian Meteor Network using their data and that of SonotaCo. These meteors are active from February 15 through March 4 with maximum activity occurring on February 26. The current radiant position lies near 16:28 (247) -01, which places it southern Ophuichus, close to the 4th magnitude star known as Lambda Ophiuchi. Rates are expected to be less than 1 per hour no matter your location.
> These meteors are best seen near 0500 LST when the radiant lies highest above the horizon. At 62 km/sec. the February Mu Virginids would produce mostly swift meteors. As seen from the mid-northern hemisphere (45N) one would expect to see approximately 3 sporadic meteors per hour during the last hour before dawn as seen from rural observing sites. Evening rates would be near 2 per hour.
looks like we get most of the bigger ones from the Antapex radiant which is kinda neat if not novel even
debris in the wake :)
kinda shame it's not new moon and better weather here, seems to me these would have a good chance of hitting the Moon when they'd actually be visible
A compiler is a computer program (or a set of programs) that transforms source code written in a programming language (the source language) into another computer language (the target language), with the latter often having a binary form known as object code. The most common reason for converting source code is to create an executable program.
The name "compiler" is primarily used for programs that translate source code from a high-level programming language to a lower level language (e.g., assembly language or machine code). If the compiled program can run on a computer whose CPU or operating system...
@TildalWave next questions I was planning to learn python but by watching a few videos I got to know some basic html so I am stuck between python and html which to start with?
I don't see a problem with it either and I've eaten fried grasshoppers and they're pretty good, tho I don't like that there's parts of their wings left which are like cartilage and not nice at all
and legs I guess
any case there's bits that kinda stick between teeth
oh I wouldn't say that biodiversity is simplistic, the environment has largely been friendly and stable so most of it can be found within a very narrow group, but it's still fairly complex
I mean, there is definitely a lot of diversity within the range that is supported by the environment
still...
that won't last, it never has and we're certainly not at the Kardashev scale to preserve it artificially
@AviD well it's possible that they have had a better docker based submission, I know some of the docker people do conf. talks so may be one of them has submitted...
@Adi I started having another play with it yesterday and I think I can make it useful for this task, I just need to be a bit more patient and look for larger temp diffs.
so I think it doesn't work too well for smaller temp diffs, so if I run it when it's colder, it'll work better...
The idea is this: if I am running a DNS server, 99% of what my generic OS can do is pretty much a waste so to reduce attack surface let's make a DNS server out of a kernel.
First i hope that my question isn't off topic here, i'm sorry if it's the case but i don't know where i should ask if it's not here.
I'm asking a question about security risks and what i should do when adding a particular fonctionnality, yet my post has been moved to SO without any comments of w...
To summarize the disadvantages (joyent.com/blog/unikernels-are-unfit-for-production), 1) I can re-implement TLS in Scheme and I won't be vulnerable to the latest big-name bug, but there may be other bugs, 2) I've replaced the OS-Userspace boundary with VMX-VM boundary and 3) debug dat.
A common problem that I see with questions is that they ask something like "Is (x) secure", which to me is an unanswerable question, the same way as asking "is the city north", it has no meaning in an absolute sense and requires context
In order for a question to make sense the asker needs to pr...
@Lighty x86-64 is a common name given to Intel/AMD chips which are 64-bit, other chips can also be 64-bit, but that doesn't make them x86-64 (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64 )
Alright, so question is, since its labled as a "new 64-bit processor", the new Pi, does it make it capable of running x64 architexture stuff, for example, would anyone dump WIndows 95 on a RasPi 3, or run a nintendo 64 emu, such things
@Lighty no for ARM chips you need an OS compiled for ARM chips, or you need an emulator. Emulation slows things down a lot so you can only run older stuff typically. Nintendo 64 might be a possibility I guess, and I know that arcade emulators are a common use for Raspi2's
@Lighty In really simple terms, you have two instruction sets at play here (x86 versus ARM) and THEN the bitness of the instruction set - usually in terms of register size.
It is entirely possible to have a 16-bit x86 processor; the first ones were.
@RоryMcCune True, I run "RetroPi", a pre-compiled OS for the RPi 1 and 2 that has EMulationStation in it, alot of arcade emulators and such, but the N64 was hard to emulate because of the n64's ROM and processor architexture, thats why the question of the new RPi 3, since it's "x64", thus more or fully capable of emulating it
@Lighty en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IA-32#Operating_modes explains some of the fun with x86. Not everything can cope with protected mode, so there is "VM86" where the processor kinda pretends to be in real mode.
Oh yeah and just for fun IA-32 = x86 in 32 bit mode, but IA-64 = Intel Itanium, not related to x86_64 but also 64-bits :)
and just while we're on the topic, even modern x86 processors contain a decades-old hack called the A20-line. If enabled the processor can address more than 2^20 memory, however by default it doesn't and you have to turn it on, otherwise you're stuck addressing a maximum of 1MB. wiki.osdev.org/A20_Line
but if you thought x86 was insane, ARM limits you to intermediate values of 12-bits wide.
if I crack a game before buying it just to test is that tor protect me 100% such as font problems just to be safe, I'll buy sorry after I speak French I 'm just a little shy , I want just testing the game , I already hack games on google but not tor and I do not want to have problems.
I have been using this RFC822-compliant regular expression for email validation. Pen testers on HackerOne have used the following horrendous email addresses which satisfy the regex:
'/**/OR/**/1=1/**/--/**/@a.a
[email protected]&a=////etc/passwd
[email protected]&&a=a
%00%[email protected]
Are those email addresses valid? Ho...
I quite like the examples of neat regex bypassing "email addresses", and think they're kind of useful to have here, but the actual question is probably programming...