What's better than sniping easy questions for rep? Sniping questions where your answer is basically made from referencing another question you remember on the site.
@Basil Yeah, but that was a screen shot... I can make a screen shot that says absolutely anything. I couldn't find the revision where it says that about toddlers, so I'm thinking it was faked.
@Basil. Nice. My boss approved half the department for PTO today and then the other person left broke her wrist. We'll see how many staff are still living at the end of 2 days of me doing all IT functions for the agency.
The underlying question (how can I snarf all the URLs out of an email and feed them through a test program to see if they're on Google's shit list) isn't a bad one
but oh god my brain. It crashed the English parser!
I forgot my password on one of our software vendor's sites. They sent me my password (not a new password for me) by email. The only part of the login form that is https is google analytics. These are not good things!
@WesleyDavid the cotton wadding I have to shove up my ass to stop the bleeding after paying my Verizon bill shows that they do in fact give a fuck. A brutal one. With no lube.
One of our managers sent an email asking us to "prioritize" his intermittently jamming fax machine. I complied immediately, prioritizing it appropriately down, since I'm the only damn one here.
@ChrisS Of course they all suck, it's email. Everything about email sucks. Still I haven't had any problems with our postfix installs. They link nicely with our openldap and don't give us any grief.
How did my crappy OpenIndiana ad that I threw together in Gimp while rushed get the most votes of all our community ads? meta.serverfault.com/ads/display/2468
@84104 I even have a question open about it. One of our teams wants outgoing emails from a group of their staff to have the 'To' and 'Reply-To' rewritten to be the workgroup's email alias.
If I had time to prioritize that one, it would be easy to fix but it appear to be something you have to code up and not just an option or rule to set.
@wesley There's one particular site where performance is terrible... the application really should NOT be virtualized... But the client is more interested in a $60k SAN to boost performance rather than spinning the one app off onto its own $5k server.
@WesleyDavid Well, yes... but one thing that's a sticking point for me is that we're knowingly taking a drop in performance when we go to a virtual solution.
@ewwhite Let me guess, it's disk bound right? They put 5400RPM WD Green drives into a DL320s, installed Windows Storage Server on it and then put their VHDs on a CIFS share? AMIRITE??
@ewwhite So it's just virtualization for the sake of virtualization. Do they plan on vmotioning servers for disasters or cloning on demand for local POPs or... anything?