"Microsoft, Google, and Amazon have the experience and the engineering depth to get operational and security issues right." -Ed Bott lulz. I knew there was a reason I didn't like him.
@TomOConnor I keep Facebook very well hidden. =) It's the one and only place online that I actually serious-up and share real things.
Well, "realer" I suppose. Looking over what I've shared in the last year, I suppose I'm just as evasive there as elsewhere, only slightly more personable in my evasiveness. =)
@Holocryptic Pretty much me too. Except, I don't have family on Facebook but other people that I've grown close to. Oddly, the people I trust most are some folks I've met online and have never met in person.
I'm looking to build a gigabit network for a small business of mine. Within the network, I have:
1 Mac server functioning as internal file server, nothing public.
1 Windows server functioning as a web server with several sites on it.
3 Mac clients
I need to:
Be able to route incoming http r...
This should not have been migrated, as shopping questions are no more on topic on SF as they are on SU, or any other Stack Exchange site. Moderators should know better.. please revert migration.
@Holocryptic The revert system is kinda a mess, I think. They need to nuke the migration history on the original question - but that leaves the migrated copy in place over here. So, they may just be waiting to reset until they can get in touch with a mod here to delete the migrated copy. I'll go ahead and assume that, because I want to give them the benefit of the doubt.
@growse Am I missing something? The guy has searched "everything" and he can't find things that fit his needs? Every networking device manufactured after 1996 would suffice his scenario.
@ShaneMadden Well, they have IT analysts write things, so the whole "bizarre and baseless opinions" thing is a given.
Because Google and Microsoft have never had major security breaches. Google didn't get spear-phished and lose a bunch of code to China. Microsoft doesn't have to release a swarm of updates for remote code execution every single friggin month.
To say nothing about being able to just throw resources at engineering problems. Ask Amazon and RIM about massive infrastructure outages.
I'm ripping pages from @Iain's book of rep building and waiting until the major players are offline and then answering the low hanging fruit questions that will likely be closed in an hour. =)
Well, @ShaneMadden is still here, but at least I don't have to contend with Quanta.
@Iain How about a search that looks for questions with an accepted answer, but the question itself has no upvotes? I saw a thread like tonight that and it was sad. I'm sure some deserve nothing, but I would think that is a question was 1) Good enough to garner responses, and 2) The OP was nice enough to courteously reward an accepted answer, that the question itself should get an upvote.
@Iain Oh! Oh! How about accepted answers that have 9 or 24 upvotes? I always toss out an upvote to give the answerer a badge. =)
We used co.___.co.us as a Colorado county, for both external and internal DNS. Meanwhile, other gov't entities using .com addresses for everything, and our elected officials whining about the URL being too long..
@WesleyDavid Yeah.. probably internal-only zone, if I had to guess. Some confused employee giving that address out
Yeah, I started my own LLC as soon as I arrived here in Arizona. Short story: Lived in Cincinatti for 5 years with the parents. Worked internal IT and did side-work as an indie contractor. Step-dad got job transfer to Arizona and since I'm young and unencumbered with my own family, I took the opportunity to go to a place I've always wanted to go to (plus, mom's health is kinda bad and I help her a bit).
Soooo... got her, loved it and immediately started my own consulting company.
Kinda slow going though. Really, I should have focused on managed services to get the business built up and then I could hire people to take care of that menial work while I try and land bigger projects.
So after a year and a half, I think I have two choices: 1) Grit my teeth and make a three year plan to take the MSP space in Phoenix by storm and then work my way out of that position within my company. 2) Work for someone else.
So I shopped my resume around and found a MSFT gold partner in the area that's got an eye towards rapid growth but diesn't have a Sr Engineer position filled. Looks really good so far, and I've got one last interview.
I did the phone interview, in-person with the CEO, skills assessment, technical interview, DISC exam. Last one is with the director of professional services.
You might be right. I'm a bit worried about it. However, the things that make me not be so apprehensive about it is that this company is shifting it responsibility structure. Formerly the CEO was heavily involved in the technical aspect of clients because it was so small. Now he realizes he needs to move away from that. I'd be where the buck stops.
It's up to me to solve client problems that the network and sysadmins can't. Up to me to spearhead client projects. Up to me to design and implement internal processes to streamline what we do and to deliver services
All that sounds good on paper. However, it remains to be seen how it works in practice. =/
For example, he mentioned to me in the one-on-one interview that they need to make a standardised way of deploying client PCs, but they're having trouble with licensing and deployment methods. I'd be the one to architect how to deploy PCs in an automated, repeatable fashion. Right now it's just one of the techs sitting at a desk clicking through the OEM wizard screens. =/
They do work for small biz in the area. So it's not uncommon for a client to only need like 3 PCs.
However, he wants to really focus on aggressive growth. That means doubling in 2012. However, you need to scale your practises for that to not cost you an arm and a leg in personnel.
So I'd be charged with streamlining and automating the crap out of everything that we do for clients so that we can do more with less fuss.
The business model is "all you can eat" i.e. Clients pay them a flat fee per month based on PC and server count. No matter if the firm does one hour of PC work or 1000 hours.
(Major projects and upgrades are above that fee)
So you can bet I'll be trolling their ticketing system for the first month and picking out the time-sucks.
@WesleyDavid Yeah, there's always gonna be some level of politics - but it sounds like a good role for you, it'll be nice to not be the first person to get a call no matter what issue a client has.
@ShaneMadden HAve you been in an actual management position? I've never been. Fortunately, I don't think this position has any personnel management involved... yet. As the company grows, I'm sure it would happen. I'm okay with growing into that role, but I don't want to be a purely managerial role.
Sr Technical roles that are more like Project Manager or Team Lead are okay by me. Not management. Not yet. Maybe in my mid or late thirties, but even then... I doubt it.
Though at that gov't job, one of my teammates of about the same age (I think he was a year or so older) took a role as manager of the help desk, where all of his direct reports were at least 5 years older than him.
@WesleyDavid That will never end so long as someone is more than 5 years older than you.. It's just the older you get the less people there are that are +5y.
Ok so can a computer from a TCP/IP network communicate with a computer from a IPX/SPX network? If so how will the routers handle the addressing scheme? And what if i wanna telnet that computer from the IPX/SPX network, should I use the IPX addressing scheme even if my network is using the IP addr...
which is EPEL package is better for CentOS, and how i am able to findout that whether my CentOS 5.5 is 64-bit or 32bit
Second Problem
in following command i am not able to execute the 3rd command(i have enable the EPEL5)
1)wget -P /tmp http://centos.karan.org/el5/extras/testing/SRPMS/xmlrpc-c-1...
Am I right in thinking that AD servers don't actually need a lot a lot of oomph? They sit there all day, holding all the cards, but don't actually do a lot?
@TomOConnor Yeah, saw the front page right before I had breakfast. Wondered if there had been some "serious" Internets event which caused everyone to get DDOS's. :)
Hi, today I came across this interesting subject: Scaling Up vs Scaling Out. While I think it's obvious, I would still like to ask... Isn't it at the easiest to sysadmin when you are scaling up than when you are scaling out? ('coz you have fewer servers than when you are scaling out)
@itsme But back to @Chopper3 original statement "depends on the code". If your app can't use that 4TB/8CPU, the cost of the box is wasted on the "savings" you have from a smaller team.
exactly although we're 98% a blade house we use DL580's and 980's for specific roles where the code can handle the core count - even then we never really fill those boxes out, it's just nice to know we can add more cpu's as an 'extra gear' if needed
@WesleyDavid No, I used to have a lackey but the budget got tight two years ago and I didn't care for him much. There's IT people who love their work and there's IT people who can stumble through the motions and get by. He was the latter.
Can anyone help me!? About 2/3 years ago, there was a joke/mock picture on a big-ish site... I think Fark/Reddit/Hacker News or similar that was a drunk system admin who was on the floor with a smashed up server and a drink in one hand... I am trying to find it to show someone and can't seem to find any trace of it!... has anyone seen it?
I feel like I should know this, but its been a long week already.
I have a customer with an SBS Exchange server on their LAN. They currently have their MX going to Postini, who is then delivering the mail to the Exchange box. Postini currently will only deliver on port 25, this is not adjustable...
Residential ISPs block port 25 because they should block port 25. Clients should not use 25 as it's for Server-to-Server communication only (the original spec called for all mail originators to basically be servers, so clients still default it today in a convoluted attempt to preserve functionality). Clients should only submit e-mails via the Mail Submission Agent port (587) to an MTA.
@ChrisS It is a proper Kentucky bourbon. Probably the smoothest bourbon I've had. Great stuff, but it does seem hard to find. I generally see it around 40-45 for a 5th.
@Chopper3 That's good. I've had some lovely scotch, but by and large I don't much care for peat. I don't mind a subtle earthy finish, but some even good scotches just taste like dirt.
nah, my tastes in most things are pretty basic, don't have the ears for lossless, the palate for too expensive drinks - though I do like good food - rather spend my money on living in a nice place and having good vacations
it's really nice scotch, quite strong aftertaste, really 'burns' if held in the mouth for too long
quite similar to some of the very strong irish whiskeys but with more depth
we've got lots of new games recently (assassin's creed X, halo anniv, BF3, MW3, SWTOR, new zelda) but he's just playing nothing but skyrim, it is a massive map - all on one DVD too
quite enjoying SWTOR but it's SO like WoW there's got to be a law suit on its way to lucasarts at some point - it's almost like they just reskinned WoW
Blizzard stole a ton of ideas from other MMOs and made them better, so much so that WoW is the standard of MMOs today. This behavior should be encouraged because then it will only improve gaming experience.
SWTOR is doing the same and also improving most things Blizzard did and hopefully willc ontinue to improve once they start shaping their endgame better
... Can anyone recommend the most light weight and simple SMTP server? Just something internal, will send out a few emails a day... I am lost in a list of hundreds!
@Chopper3 Things are just getting a bit hard to manage, so, I downloaded a Redmine appliance, but, the SMTP features are disabled... It will only send out a few a day to my address (which is hosted Exchange), so, the simplest thing I can think of is just to install a SMTP server on that machine... nothing critical, but, there is just a list of hundreds!
@Chopper3 Ideally yes... again, it is only to send a handful of emails... I have root access to this machine and have done similar things for Windows at home... I am confident it will work/is ok... I just don't know one Linux SMTP server/daemon from another!
I'd be tempted to just go with sendmail - I know it's dull and a bit long in the tooth but there's a hell of a lot of knowledge out there and a lot of other users
@Chopper3 .... Lol, sendmail was the one I have heard of, I just couldn't think of it's name... looking through the Ubuntu repository just gives so many, I got overwhelmed! heard of postfix but never used it... happy with sendmail.
I've dealt with sendmail before... If the out-of-box configuration is good enough for you, then I can tolerate it; but the configuration files might as well be in Klingon they're so hard to decipher.
@ChrisS I don't need anything more advanced than block all apart from localhost, send to a handful of addresses... it is perfect, thanks, that's all I needed!
I've never run across a MTA suite that I could really whole heartedly recommend. I run Courier but it's got enough quirks that I don't recommend it to the faint of heart.
@voretaq7 I said I wanted a simple SMTP program! :P ... I didn't have this much trouble in Windows!!! the SMTP component in IIS can be set up in seconds!!! I have been learning a lot of Linux over the past few weeks and thought that this is what it was good for!!!
@ewwhite It's been out so long that the application is so well understood that for any simple use cases you can get the config you want in about 15 seconds with the googles.
I've mucked with lots different parts of the sendmail cf files... Almost always by finding step-by-step directions on the Googles and following them carefully.
... If you are an expert, I don't suppose you can quickly help... the last time I had to do this (well something similar), I just installed webmin.... Is sendmail's configuration purely in /etc/init.d/sendmail or is there elsewhere as well? ... Just want to make sure it is locked down and only localhost can send emails
@Chopper3 I drove/ learned how to drive in a Ford F350 Superduty with a dually rear end (4 rear tires). That was a monster, no way in hell you could get that in the EU.
ok... well... I don't have a clue how to tighten this configuration, but, I just telneted to it, and, it can send email fine... I will have an open relay thing, but just won't port forward from outside... a bit annoying, but, it will work!
Ha, I learned to drive, in Fairbanks AK, in the Chevy version of the same (dually, really heavy front end). Oddly, more tires & torque meant it was easier to lose rearend traction on icy roads
@Iain I couldn't quickly see any basic settings I want such as block/allow list :/ really I just want to set it to 1) only allow localhost to send, 2) only send to one domain... to be honest, it works at the moment, so, maybe I will just look at this another time
We're under a Winter Weather Advisory... meaning it's snowing. I don't think the national weather service takes into account how accustom a location is to snow before issuing those warnings.
@quux It doesn't matter what actually happens... Large numbers of people on a vehicle where there's only a single person in control == people freak out about any little possible incident.. Just look at how many people are scared to fly but happily drive 20 miles to work everyday.
I think it's a bit funny how many people put up Christmas decorations early, even before Thanksgiving. But then Dec 26th hits and they rip them all down.
I'm a Cisco MDS FC SAN kinda guy but I'm getting annoyed that they don't seem to ever want to offer any 10Gbps FCIP interfaces - anyone using any Brocade kit that does this?