« first day (474 days earlier)      last day (4507 days later) » 

12:37 AM
"Microsoft, Google, and Amazon have the experience and the engineering depth to get operational and security issues right." -Ed Bott
lulz. I knew there was a reason I didn't like him.
@TomOConnor I keep Facebook very well hidden. =) It's the one and only place online that I actually serious-up and share real things.
Well, "realer" I suppose. Looking over what I've shared in the last year, I suppose I'm just as evasive there as elsewhere, only slightly more personable in my evasiveness. =)
 
NHL player is out with an "infected hand". Well ok then. I'll just be over here cleaning my guns for the coming zombie hockey apocalypse.
I'm not fond of FB. About the only reason I keep it around is for family
I'm more "myself" on Twitter than I am with family on FB. Strange, that.
 
@Holocryptic Pretty much me too. Except, I don't have family on Facebook but other people that I've grown close to. Oddly, the people I trust most are some folks I've met online and have never met in person.
 
yep
 
@WesleyDavid Who the heck is that?
 
Never heard of Ed Bott? Long time IT analyst and author of many Windows OS books.
Quote is from this article, page 2: zdnet.com/blog/bott/…
 
12:44 AM
@WesleyDavid I guess I should read more Windows books. Or less. Not sure which.
 
0
Q: Build a small business gigabit network

Patrik AlienusI'm looking to build a gigabit network for a small business of mine. Within the network, I have: 1 Mac server functioning as internal file server, nothing public. 1 Windows server functioning as a web server with several sites on it. 3 Mac clients I need to: Be able to route incoming http r...

"HAI, I NEED EVERYTHING. WHO DO I GIVE MY CREDIT CARD TO?"
SU sent it to SF
Brilliant.
 
FFS, now SU is sending us their shit?
 
Can we send it back? That'd be amazing.
 
I just flagged that on SU with the following:
This should not have been migrated, as shopping questions are no more on topic on SF as they are on SU, or any other Stack Exchange site. Moderators should know better.. please revert migration.
 
good man
@growse I don't want to bounce it back and forth. Just kill it here
 
12:50 AM
It was a diamond move, from one of the diamond names that I recognized from chatpocalypse.
@WesleyDavid Where does ZDnet get this garbage? I don't run across their stuff regularly, but what I do is always drivel.
Hahaha.. my flag on SU was marked helpful, and no action was taken.
 
I wonder if we have to revert from here...?
 
@Holocryptic The revert system is kinda a mess, I think. They need to nuke the migration history on the original question - but that leaves the migrated copy in place over here. So, they may just be waiting to reset until they can get in touch with a mod here to delete the migrated copy. I'll go ahead and assume that, because I want to give them the benefit of the doubt.
 
Okay, I'm going to go postal.
>_<
 
@WesleyDavid Is there a limit on edit count for a single message?
 
12:56 AM
Moving on before I commit my lifetime's worth of felonies in one night...
 
@ShaneMadden Apparently it's not within practical reach if there is one. =)
ZDNet is legendary, is it not?
 
@WesleyDavid You'll hit the time limit first, I guess.
Yeah.. do they just gather the most bizarre and baseless opinions and have people write article on them, or what?
 
@growse Am I missing something? The guy has searched "everything" and he can't find things that fit his needs? Every networking device manufactured after 1996 would suffice his scenario.
@ShaneMadden Well, they have IT analysts write things, so the whole "bizarre and baseless opinions" thing is a given.
 
Because Google and Microsoft have never had major security breaches. Google didn't get spear-phished and lose a bunch of code to China. Microsoft doesn't have to release a swarm of updates for remote code execution every single friggin month.
To say nothing about being able to just throw resources at engineering problems. Ask Amazon and RIM about massive infrastructure outages.
 
12:59 AM
I'm ripping pages from @Iain's book of rep building and waiting until the major players are offline and then answering the low hanging fruit questions that will likely be closed in an hour. =)
Well, @ShaneMadden is still here, but at least I don't have to contend with Quanta.
 
@WesleyDavid I haven't caught up on questions since a few hours ago - you're home free until I get back from walking my dog. Get to it!
 
@ShaneMadden Gotta eat and watch something on the TV, so... shakes fist
Walk longer!
 
@WesleyDavid Hell no, it's cold!
 
Oh yes, you people who live in non-tropical zones. Pity.
Damn
Markdown, Y U NO LIKE UNICODE?!
 
Right. Baskettime.
 
 
1 hour later…
2:31 AM
 
2:55 AM
@Iain How about a search that looks for questions with an accepted answer, but the question itself has no upvotes? I saw a thread like tonight that and it was sad. I'm sure some deserve nothing, but I would think that is a question was 1) Good enough to garner responses, and 2) The OP was nice enough to courteously reward an accepted answer, that the question itself should get an upvote.
@Iain Oh! Oh! How about accepted answers that have 9 or 24 upvotes? I always toss out an upvote to give the answerer a badge. =)
 
3:31 AM
Can anyone else get to this page? It's the Secretary of State in South Carolina: sos.sc.gov
Seems like they have a rather broad IP address ban and no network I've tried to reach it from is accepted.
 
@WesleyDavid Blocked here too. Googles don't turn anything up on google.com/search?&q=site:sos.sc.gov - seems like their real site is scsos.com
maybe the .gov is their internal naming only?
 
Hosers.
That's a good point though. Hadn't thought about that. I don't know where the guy that's complainign to me got that URL.
 
Yeah - that was one of my favorite rants when I worked in government.. entities not using .gov or .us addresses.
 
My client is having to file paperwork with almost all fifty states and somehow they need to do businss with the SC sec of state and got that URL
 
We used co.___.co.us as a Colorado county, for both external and internal DNS. Meanwhile, other gov't entities using .com addresses for everything, and our elected officials whining about the URL being too long..
@WesleyDavid Yeah.. probably internal-only zone, if I had to guess. Some confused employee giving that address out
 
3:39 AM
Man I can't wait to get into a new job. One last interview to go through next week and it's lookin' good.
 
@WesleyDavid Nice! Something down there?
 
Yeah, I started my own LLC as soon as I arrived here in Arizona. Short story: Lived in Cincinatti for 5 years with the parents. Worked internal IT and did side-work as an indie contractor. Step-dad got job transfer to Arizona and since I'm young and unencumbered with my own family, I took the opportunity to go to a place I've always wanted to go to (plus, mom's health is kinda bad and I help her a bit).
Soooo... got her, loved it and immediately started my own consulting company.
Kinda slow going though. Really, I should have focused on managed services to get the business built up and then I could hire people to take care of that menial work while I try and land bigger projects.
So after a year and a half, I think I have two choices:
1) Grit my teeth and make a three year plan to take the MSP space in Phoenix by storm and then work my way out of that position within my company.
2) Work for someone else.
So I shopped my resume around and found a MSFT gold partner in the area that's got an eye towards rapid growth but diesn't have a Sr Engineer position filled. Looks really good so far, and I've got one last interview.
 
Gotcha, makes sense.
 
I did the phone interview, in-person with the CEO, skills assessment, technical interview, DISC exam. Last one is with the director of professional services.
 
Might be a bit of a rough transition back to working for someone else, though.
 
3:48 AM
You might be right. I'm a bit worried about it. However, the things that make me not be so apprehensive about it is that this company is shifting it responsibility structure. Formerly the CEO was heavily involved in the technical aspect of clients because it was so small. Now he realizes he needs to move away from that. I'd be where the buck stops.
It's up to me to solve client problems that the network and sysadmins can't. Up to me to spearhead client projects. Up to me to design and implement internal processes to streamline what we do and to deliver services
All that sounds good on paper. However, it remains to be seen how it works in practice. =/
 
Nice -- that sounds like a good role to move into from where you're at.
 
For example, he mentioned to me in the one-on-one interview that they need to make a standardised way of deploying client PCs, but they're having trouble with licensing and deployment methods. I'd be the one to architect how to deploy PCs in an automated, repeatable fashion. Right now it's just one of the techs sitting at a desk clicking through the OEM wizard screens. =/
They do work for small biz in the area. So it's not uncommon for a client to only need like 3 PCs.
However, he wants to really focus on aggressive growth. That means doubling in 2012. However, you need to scale your practises for that to not cost you an arm and a leg in personnel.
So I'd be charged with streamlining and automating the crap out of everything that we do for clients so that we can do more with less fuss.
The business model is "all you can eat" i.e. Clients pay them a flat fee per month based on PC and server count. No matter if the firm does one hour of PC work or 1000 hours.
(Major projects and upgrades are above that fee)
So you can bet I'll be trolling their ticketing system for the first month and picking out the time-sucks.
 
@WesleyDavid Yeah, there's always gonna be some level of politics - but it sounds like a good role for you, it'll be nice to not be the first person to get a call no matter what issue a client has.
 
Yes, it's going to be the first time that I'm not on the front line! So exciting. =)
I'm going to buy The Practise of Systems and Network Administration for ever NetAdmin and SysAdmin there.
Then Time Management for Systems Administrator.
Actually, I think they only have three sub-Sr. workers there.
 
For sure! If this does work out, then I'll make sure you yell HALP I CANT LOG IN a few times to help you ease into the transition.
 
3:54 AM
It's weird though. I'd be the youngest worker there at age 29, and yet the Sr-most technical position. Hope that doesn't rub people the wrong way.
Doesn't even cross my mind though - not like I'm thinking i'm superior in any way. But still... I dunno. =/
 
@WesleyDavid I've gotten used to that - I've been senior over people older than me for a long while (I'm 26).
 
@ShaneMadden HAve you been in an actual management position? I've never been. Fortunately, I don't think this position has any personnel management involved... yet. As the company grows, I'm sure it would happen. I'm okay with growing into that role, but I don't want to be a purely managerial role.
Sr Technical roles that are more like Project Manager or Team Lead are okay by me. Not management. Not yet. Maybe in my mid or late thirties, but even then... I doubt it.
 
@WesleyDavid Nope, just senior technical roles - never had any direct reports.
 
@ShaneMadden Ah, okay.
 
Though at that gov't job, one of my teammates of about the same age (I think he was a year or so older) took a role as manager of the help desk, where all of his direct reports were at least 5 years older than him.
 
4:01 AM
And when anything goes wrong, what's the first thing that people pick on?
"Stupid kid, thinks he knows everything..."
Annoying.
 
That actually lasted.. only about a month, I think. He knew how to do it, got some respect pretty quick.
 
@WesleyDavid That will never end so long as someone is more than 5 years older than you.. It's just the older you get the less people there are that are +5y.
 
4:26 AM
@ChrisS Do you manage people at all in your position now?
 
 
2 hours later…
6:10 AM
0
Q: From TCP/IP network to IPX/SPX network?

120dn3lOk so can a computer from a TCP/IP network communicate with a computer from a IPX/SPX network? If so how will the routers handle the addressing scheme? And what if i wanna telnet that computer from the IPX/SPX network, should I use the IPX addressing scheme even if my network is using the IP addr...

Really?
 
6:53 AM
@ShaneMadden I'm disappointed that token ring, ES-IS and X.25 didn't make it into the equation. He should really try harder.
 
 
1 hour later…
7:54 AM
Have fun...
0
Q: CentOS 5.5, realated to EPEL

Darshanwhich is EPEL package is better for CentOS, and how i am able to findout that whether my CentOS 5.5 is 64-bit or 32bit Second Problem in following command i am not able to execute the 3rd command(i have enable the EPEL5) 1)wget -P /tmp http://centos.karan.org/el5/extras/testing/SRPMS/xmlrpc-c-1...

 
8:45 AM
G'day
 
9:18 AM
Morning all
 
pfo
morning
 
9:38 AM
@TomOConnor just reading that. Hes a cock.
 
@t1nt1n You should read the webcrawler guy i chewed out laast night
 
I learnt about peering in my "Networking 101" didnt understand it but want to intergrate it into my bed room.
 
I did!
 
i wanted to peer in my bedroom, but LINX wouldn't have me
 
9:39 AM
@TomOConnor I thought the response was just.
There are some right T4@ts here recently...
Most of them looking for help with homework. Should have a tag, "Homework Help"
 
we do, it's called "Vote to close: Not a real question"
I think this isn't too snarky serverfault.com/a/344963/16732
Stop! Showertime.
 
I know.. I do flag... Nice response.
 
@t1nt1n one day, you'll have enough rep to vote with us
:D
 
@TomOConnor im working on it :) nearly got my flag weight to 500, next goal is to get to 3000 on the rep :)
 
10:45 AM
 
10:56 AM
What's an internet exchange?
 
11:08 AM
@growse LINX, AMSIX, a number of large carrier POPs in a huge warehouse.
 
11:45 AM
Done :D
 
Am I right in thinking that AD servers don't actually need a lot a lot of oomph? They sit there all day, holding all the cards, but don't actually do a lot?
 
I just edited like 50 questions and retagged them. Now the front page is filled with my name.
oops :3
 
12:33 PM
@TomOConnor Yeah, saw the front page right before I had breakfast. Wondered if there had been some "serious" Internets event which caused everyone to get DDOS's. :)
 
@growse No, DCs needn't be beastly.. This is 2003, but should help a bit: technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc728303(WS.10).aspx
 
@jscott it just annoys me that I've got to set up a non-virtualised AD, and the smallest thing I've got is a 2-socket quad-core blade with 8GB ram.
 
seems a little.... overkill...
 
12:44 PM
afternoon
 
Can you just install Hyper-V and run DC as VMs?
 
You can make the host run Domain Services as well
Not that I think services on the host are a great idea... Just if you have a paper requirement for such.
 
@TomOConnor the trouble with that is that most people arriving with a denial-of-service will just use DOS
 
1:03 PM
@WesleyDavid and another data.stackexchange.com/serverfault/q/122871/… but beware quite a lot of the questions don't deserve an upvote
 
@Iain And i shall keep editing them.
I got the Excavator Badge for editing a question from 2009
 
@TomOConnor :)
 
1:26 PM
Hi, today I came across this interesting subject: Scaling Up vs Scaling Out. While I think it's obvious, I would still like to ask... Isn't it at the easiest to sysadmin when you are scaling up than when you are scaling out? ('coz you have fewer servers than when you are scaling out)
or am I wrong?
 
depends on your code, whether it'll benefit from things like faster/more cpus and memory
not all does, in fact not much really benefits past about 4-8 cores, some does though
 
@Chopper3 I am not talking about performance benefits. I am talking about the easy of managing, system administration, etc
scaling up wins in this regard right?
 
well yes, less servers generally means less work
 
I see that there are 1U, 2U, & so on, servers. What's the biggest server unit size that you've heard or seen?
(asking out of curiosity)
 
Hi everyone!
 
1:32 PM
@its_meα we have HP DL980 G7's which are 10U
 
are there larger units?
 
maybe Sun do I imagine
 
& how much ram and how man CPUs does that 10U hold?
com'on I am serious
 
that dl980 takes 4TB of memory (128 slots) and has 8 cpu slots - why do you ask?
 
@Chopper3 'coz it's really interesting. Although the hardware costs involved are HIGH, scaling up means a smaller team.
 
1:34 PM
agreed
 
@itsme But back to @Chopper3 original statement "depends on the code". If your app can't use that 4TB/8CPU, the cost of the box is wasted on the "savings" you have from a smaller team.
 
@jscott yeah, true.
I see that HP offers 42U servers, wow, that's really big!
 
exactly although we're 98% a blade house we use DL580's and 980's for specific roles where the code can handle the core count - even then we never really fill those boxes out, it's just nice to know we can add more cpu's as an 'extra gear' if needed
 
isn't 42U pretty much a whole rack?
 
that'll be a superdome - itanium, not x86
yes, and that's what it is
 
1:37 PM
@JourneymanGeek Only if you've a 42U rack :)
 
@JourneymanGeek yeah, I guess. It says "42U wide"
 
they don't offer a single x86 server over 10U
 
@jscott: I thought thats the standard height
off hand, of course. I don't get to play with the big boys yet :/
 
@Chopper3 okay, that's also big enough :)
 
one of them, 40, 42, 50 - there's no real standard but 40/42 is common
 
1:38 PM
ahh
 
@JourneymanGeek Yeah, 42 is common. We're all 44 (because of a typo on a PO), but mostly I was just trying to make a poor joke.
 
1:49 PM
@WesleyDavid this may be better as it uses live data (accepted answer with 9 votes) serverfault.com/…
and accepted answer with 24 votes serverfault.com/…
 
2:12 PM
sleeps in by 2 hours, just walks to his desk like a boss
 
Boobs?
is that still the standard greeting around here?
 
@WesleyDavid No, I used to have a lackey but the budget got tight two years ago and I didn't care for him much. There's IT people who love their work and there's IT people who can stumble through the motions and get by. He was the latter.
 
Can't believe my PXE server is syncing with its master at 143kB/s over a gigabit network.
twiddles thumbs
 
Can I ask for some eyes on a question I had this morning? I think I know the answer, just looking for confirmation.
 
@DanBig Sadly no, we had to take it out back and shoot it
 
2:25 PM
@DanBig which question?
 
Can anyone help me!? About 2/3 years ago, there was a joke/mock picture on a big-ish site... I think Fark/Reddit/Hacker News or similar that was a drunk system admin who was on the floor with a smashed up server and a drink in one hand... I am trying to find it to show someone and can't seem to find any trace of it!... has anyone seen it?
 
0
Q: Change Outgoing SMTP port in Exchange 2003 with a slight twist

DanBigI feel like I should know this, but its been a long week already. I have a customer with an SBS Exchange server on their LAN. They currently have their MX going to Postini, who is then delivering the mail to the Exchange box. Postini currently will only deliver on port 25, this is not adjustable...

 
Residential ISPs block port 25 because they should block port 25. Clients should not use 25 as it's for Server-to-Server communication only (the original spec called for all mail originators to basically be servers, so clients still default it today in a convoluted attempt to preserve functionality). Clients should only submit e-mails via the Mail Submission Agent port (587) to an MTA.
 
2:45 PM
Tom found it on SU!
 
@ChrisS, I'm aware of the port 25 issues. I did add a second virtual SMTP on 587, assigned the existing cert and I'm able to test. Thanks.
 
Well, at least he picked a cheap bourbon to drink himself into a stupor with. I would have been cranky if he had wasted a good one.
 
@DanBig Your welcome! I'm particularly attune to e-mail issues, lots of people just don't have time to keep up with it all though.
@ScottPack That reminds me I need to pickup a fifth of Single Barrel Jack for this Friday.
 
@ChrisS Since I now realize that Jack is technically a bourbon, might I recommend Blanton's?
 
2:57 PM
I'm slightly obsessed with this stuff;
 
Ugh, and now 587 mail is sitting in the queue
 
@ScottPack I'll see if I can find it, haven't seen that bottle (though could easily have missed it)
 
@Chopper3 How strong is the peat flavou?r?
 
@Chopper3 How much does that cost per fifth?
 
@ChrisS It is a proper Kentucky bourbon. Probably the smoothest bourbon I've had. Great stuff, but it does seem hard to find. I generally see it around 40-45 for a 5th.
 
2:59 PM
hardly any, can't abide too much peat
@ChrisS it's about £30/$50 for 700ml
 
@ScottPack Hrm... I'm not particularly fond of smooth whiskeys, hence my favorite being Jack. I'm still up for just about anything though.
 
not very good with imperial measurements sorry
 
@Chopper3 That's good. I've had some lovely scotch, but by and large I don't much care for peat. I don't mind a subtle earthy finish, but some even good scotches just taste like dirt.
 
couldn't agree with you more
 
@Chopper3 Oh that's not bad at all. I figured you'd drink $500/750ml scotch.
 
3:00 PM
@Chopper3 A fifth is 750ml.
Well, strictly speaking .2 gallons == 757.08 ml. But what's a quarter ounce between friends?
 
nah, my tastes in most things are pretty basic, don't have the ears for lossless, the palate for too expensive drinks - though I do like good food - rather spend my money on living in a nice place and having good vacations
it's really nice scotch, quite strong aftertaste, really 'burns' if held in the mouth for too long
quite similar to some of the very strong irish whiskeys but with more depth
 
I'll have to stop by the shop and look for some. I'll be spending New Years with another scotch drinker.
We usually end up with, at the risk of sounding trashy, Cutty Sark. It seems to be the easiest crowd pleaser.
 
you wouldn't be disappointed, put it this way if you are I'll paypal you the cost :)
 
@Chopper3 You sir, are ostensibly a gentleman and possibly a scholar. :)
 
son got skyrim for his 16th on boxing day, it's ALL he's done since, 16-18 hours a day, he LOVES it
 
3:06 PM
I can believe that. When I was his age I would do that with MUDs.
 
we've got lots of new games recently (assassin's creed X, halo anniv, BF3, MW3, SWTOR, new zelda) but he's just playing nothing but skyrim, it is a massive map - all on one DVD too
 
pfo
lost my GF to skyrim last week
 
@pfo So she used to be your GF until she took an arrow in the knee?
 
pfo
@Chopper3 massive map? that is thing is a nordic countries in one combined simulator
 
@ScottPack haha
 
pfo
3:10 PM
@ScottPack she married an elf guy in skyrim or so.
but i don't mind sharing with NPCs so it's kinda ok for me ;)
 
quite enjoying SWTOR but it's SO like WoW there's got to be a law suit on its way to lucasarts at some point - it's almost like they just reskinned WoW
 
3:32 PM
@Chopper3 well, if Blizzard were to sue anyone for stealing ideas, then Sony could sue Blizzard for stealing from Everquest...
The concept of the MMO has been around for a while now
 
true
 
Blizzard stole a ton of ideas from other MMOs and made them better, so much so that WoW is the standard of MMOs today. This behavior should be encouraged because then it will only improve gaming experience.
SWTOR is doing the same and also improving most things Blizzard did and hopefully willc ontinue to improve once they start shaping their endgame better
 
I feel that SWTOR is a way better experience than WoW right now. I feel like I'm playing a movie
 
Personally, I'm still on the fence if I want to give it a try since it is so similar.
 
the zoomed-in cut scenes are better yes
 
3:35 PM
the gameplay and story arcs are so smooth
@TylerShads It's "similar" in that it's an MMO. That's about it.
 
Well the controls are the same too, hot-key based MMO
 
@TylerShads well, how would you do it differently? Yell at the screen?
 
My point there is, I played WoW for 6 years, do I really want to play a re-skinned & better version.
 
"TURN RIGHT DAMN YOU"
 
There are action based MMOs where you don't just auto attack DCOU for one
And skill shots are importatn, I think Terra is the other one I'm thinking of
 
3:37 PM
@TylerShads There's no auto-attack in TOR
I wonder if they have a free trial set up yet... That'd be the best way to find out if you like it
 
@Holocryptic that threw me at first I have to admit
 
@Chopper3 Me too. Still getting used to it. Managing my attack resource is tricky, too
 
only at level 10 right now though
 
I've got a 18 Jedi Consular and a 13 Trooper. One I play together with my friend, and the other I solo
oh, and a lvl 10 bounty hunter
 
... Can anyone recommend the most light weight and simple SMTP server? Just something internal, will send out a few emails a day... I am lost in a list of hundreds!
 
3:48 PM
@WilliamHilsum what platform?
 
Sorry, quite important! ... Ubuntu Server
 
OS, I mean
 
@WilliamHilsum have you any virtualisation platform in place? if so consider a pre-built appliance VM
 
Ah, I thought you might say something like that. A bit outside my area of expertise, though someone else might know something
Or Google Apps, if it's small time
 
@Chopper3 Things are just getting a bit hard to manage, so, I downloaded a Redmine appliance, but, the SMTP features are disabled... It will only send out a few a day to my address (which is hosted Exchange), so, the simplest thing I can think of is just to install a SMTP server on that machine... nothing critical, but, there is just a list of hundreds!
 
3:52 PM
and you want one in-house? no chance of just using an external one?
 
@Chopper3 Ideally yes... again, it is only to send a handful of emails... I have root access to this machine and have done similar things for Windows at home... I am confident it will work/is ok... I just don't know one Linux SMTP server/daemon from another!
 
I'd be tempted to just go with sendmail - I know it's dull and a bit long in the tooth but there's a hell of a lot of knowledge out there and a lot of other users
 
@Chopper3 Yeah, sendmail or postfix.
 
@Chopper3 .... Lol, sendmail was the one I have heard of, I just couldn't think of it's name... looking through the Ubuntu repository just gives so many, I got overwhelmed! heard of postfix but never used it... happy with sendmail.
 
both much of a muchness, just pick one and get on with it
 
3:56 PM
@Chopper3 that's a nice one
 
I've dealt with sendmail before... If the out-of-box configuration is good enough for you, then I can tolerate it; but the configuration files might as well be in Klingon they're so hard to decipher.
 
@Chopper3 much of a mucness? It's like you're speaking a different language.
 
not heard that one before?
 
@ChrisS Sendmail configuration files are easy. twitch … bites head off bat
 
just watched the Diners, Drive-ins and Dives Christmas special - really made me want to be in Alaska right now - some NICE food
 
3:58 PM
@ChrisS Any program that takes your config file, runs it through a compiler, and generates the applications config file needs some tweaking.
 
@Chopper3 I hadn't, though wikipedia cites it as primarily UK, Irish, Australian, and NZ.
 
@ChrisS I don't need anything more advanced than block all apart from localhost, send to a handful of addresses... it is perfect, thanks, that's all I needed!
 
we're full of odd saying
 
@Chopper3 Full of something.
 
3:59 PM
I've never run across a MTA suite that I could really whole heartedly recommend. I run Courier but it's got enough quirks that I don't recommend it to the faint of heart.
 
@ChrisS again, don't need a whole suite, just SMTP! so... sendmail is great!
mind you... apt-get install has installed a bunch of other things already
 
@Chopper3 Texas has Chicken Fried Bacon!
Oh my friend, sendmail is SO MUCH MORE!
There's a UUCP transport buried in there somewhere :)
 
DOesn't everyone in the world hate sendmail?
 
@growse I hate it less than anything else I've set up.
 
In fact, isn't the point of existence of sendmail just to be hated by everyone?
But exim is lovely!
 
4:03 PM
also I can say one really nice thing about sendmail
 
@growse Some people hate sendmail, but nobody loves it. Most of us tolerate it.
 
It's better than qmail.
 
It's cuddly, and nice, and makes you drinks, and allows you to do anything!
 
@voretaq7 I said I wanted a simple SMTP program! :P ... I didn't have this much trouble in Windows!!! the SMTP component in IIS can be set up in seconds!!! I have been learning a lot of Linux over the past few weeks and thought that this is what it was good for!!!
 
(then again having your penis gnawed off by a pack of angry badgers is probably better than qmail)
 
4:03 PM
Batshit is better than qmail.
 
@growse apt-get install Batshit? :P
 
As sick as this is gonna sound, sendmail is a nice and easy default choice when you just need the system to send out it's own emails.
 
@growse Exactly: Sendmail.
 
No exim love :(
 
Why do you think the O'Reilly book cover is a bat? Sendmail is a pile of guano!
 
4:04 PM
sendmail... simple, easy
 
@voretaq7 Because it sucks the life out of you much like a vampire bat?
 
Does anyone here have experience with Acronis backup in a Linux environment?
 
@ewwhite It's been out so long that the application is so well understood that for any simple use cases you can get the config you want in about 15 seconds with the googles.
 
@ScottPack @ScottPack As long as you stick to editing m4 configs and stay away from the actual compiled .cf you're fine.
 
@ScottPack I'm looking at it for standalone server use to replace Cactus Lone-Tar.
 
4:06 PM
It's no more complicated than any other config file, just with a somewhat more annoying syntax
 
@voretaq7 I knew a few guys who never touched the m4, and did all their work in the cf. They scared me a bit.
 
@ScottPack Oh, yes... sendmail == easy
 
Daughter just finished QWOP again!
 
@growse No, nobody loves Exim anymore.
 
@ScottPack I've done that when I have to, or when it's ACTUALLY easier to edit the cf (defining some rulesets)
 
4:08 PM
:(
 
Hello everyone
 
I've mucked with lots different parts of the sendmail cf files... Almost always by finding step-by-step directions on the Googles and following them carefully.
Good morning
 
@Jacob hi Jacob, what did father christmas bring in his sack for you this year?
 
... If you are an expert, I don't suppose you can quickly help... the last time I had to do this (well something similar), I just installed webmin.... Is sendmail's configuration purely in /etc/init.d/sendmail or is there elsewhere as well? ... Just want to make sure it is locked down and only localhost can send emails
 
@Chopper3 A new Toyota Tacoma V6 . (Do they even sell those in the UK?)
 
4:12 PM
ahh, think I found /etc/mail/sendmail.conf
 
That doesn't smell like a proper sendmail configuration file.
Then again you're using Linux - the fuckwits may have renamed it...
 
Sharp truck. Nice gift.
 
not in the UK no, but they look good, europe's not a great place for 4x4 makers
 
@jscott It's very nice.
 
4:13 PM
@Jacob If you put truck nuts on it I will castrate you.
 
@WilliamHilsum which distro ?
 
@voretaq7 Trucknuts?
 
hahqahah
Oh, gosh, I've seen those on some construction vehicles around here.
 
@Iain Ubuntu
 
@Jacob For the man who truly has none of his own. trucknutz.com
 
4:15 PM
@voretaq7 UM, no thanks, Trailor hitch yes, that not so much
 
@Gigili asked why I doffed my Santa hat. Answer - Christmas is over!
 
@Chopper3 I drove/ learned how to drive in a Ford F350 Superduty with a dually rear end (4 rear tires). That was a monster, no way in hell you could get that in the EU.
 
ok... well... I don't have a clue how to tighten this configuration, but, I just telneted to it, and, it can send email fine... I will have an open relay thing, but just won't port forward from outside... a bit annoying, but, it will work!
 
@WilliamHilsum then /etc/mail/sendmail.conf is the default config file along with sendmail.cf
 
You can drive anything you like here, you just get taxed to hell on it, got a volvo 4x4 myself
 
4:19 PM
Ha, I learned to drive, in Fairbanks AK, in the Chevy version of the same (dually, really heavy front end). Oddly, more tires & torque meant it was easier to lose rearend traction on icy roads
 
@Iain I couldn't quickly see any basic settings I want such as block/allow list :/ really I just want to set it to 1) only allow localhost to send, 2) only send to one domain... to be honest, it works at the moment, so, maybe I will just look at this another time
 
@quux Yeah, we don't get ice here much
 
@Jacob count your blessings
 
@quux But when it does, it's really bad. People can't drive
 
not surprising. Ice changes the physics of things enough to be rilly confusing
I've long-since left Alaska; my lower48 rule is simple. Ice on roads = take the bus.
 
4:26 PM
Ice on roads == stay at home. Bus drives tend to get you killed.
 
@WilliamHilsum this should work on Ubuntu too (and may be the default) midwesternmac.com/blogs/jeff-geerling/configure-sendmail-centos
 
We're under a Winter Weather Advisory... meaning it's snowing. I don't think the national weather service takes into account how accustom a location is to snow before issuing those warnings.
 
@Holocryptic Eh? Very, very few bus accidents involve passenger fatalities
 
@Iain thanks, will take a read
 
@quux It doesn't matter what actually happens... Large numbers of people on a vehicle where there's only a single person in control == people freak out about any little possible incident.. Just look at how many people are scared to fly but happily drive 20 miles to work everyday.
 
4:31 PM
@ChrisS I ... don't have a clue how to respond to this
 
=]
Just because almost nobody ever gets killed in bus accidents doesn't mean that people's fear/response will be proportional to that risk.
 
Eh. Facts matter to me. If people choose to disregard, that's their issue.
 
They outnumber you 1,000,000:1
... something about how great democracy is ...
 
~shrug~
 
4:48 PM
Eh, Christmas is over? =\ Didn't notice that ... @quux
 
I think it's a bit funny how many people put up Christmas decorations early, even before Thanksgiving. But then Dec 26th hits and they rip them all down.
2
 
I don't get why free times or holidays pass at light speed but work times don't pass or kill you to pass.
3
 
I'm a Cisco MDS FC SAN kinda guy but I'm getting annoyed that they don't seem to ever want to offer any 10Gbps FCIP interfaces - anyone using any Brocade kit that does this?
 

« first day (474 days earlier)      last day (4507 days later) »