All this talk of voting rings - I flagged what I thought was one on the 8th of March, and it was marked helpful but no rep removed, so I thought I wouldn't bother doing it again - but just checked it to get the date and saw the user had 110 rep removed on 2nd of April \o/
if you feel it's not worth your time then sure, let's not waste time on solving a problem which will go away by itself; but perhaps the effort could still continue if we found a way to fix the wrinkles
and then perhaps also get more people on board to share the load
if there's a way to do that and still stay within the guidance you have received
Perhaps what's needed is a Meta discussion about what "helpful", "disputed", and "declined" mean to mods vs. what they mean to users. Recently, there appears to be a disconnect between what a few mods on SO have been attempting to communicate with "declined" flags vs. how users have interpreted those flags being declined.
From a user's perspective "declined" means: "Flagging this way doesn't help the site. Don't do it. What you flagged, or how you flagged was wrong. You need to go back and re-evaluate how you are flagging posts." That hasn't appeared to be what has been desired to be communicated.
@tripleee Right now it looks like if i continue this I'll sit at a bunch of declined flags and possibly a flag ban at some point. Not that I mind this much but compared to my normal flagging activity getting any declined flags indicates a mistake I need to rectify
If I get declined flags I need to stop what is causing these.
@MetaEd On the contrary. I do what I do because that's what the moderator documentation tells us to do. "unless the flag was entirely against the spirit of the site or shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the network and the purpose of flagging, you should mark any flag as Helpful if it leads to you taking any sort of action" - see /help/mod-flags on your site, specifically the last section. — ArtOfCodeNov 15 '16 at 17:46
@Magisch What this tells me is that some mods apparently have slightly different standards for declining than you'd expect (and I'd agree more with your perspective).
@Magisch I can certainly understand you coming to that conclusion. That is what the numbers support. However, it's clear from what other people have been saying that that conclusion is the opposite of what is intended/desired. That strongly implies there is a miscommunication/misunderstanding.
@Mag I totally understand you doing it - but a) seems like a lot of work - especially if everything turns out fine and you have to add them again and b) I doubt it'd add any favour with the mods
A Meta post seems more appropriate as a first action instead of retracting all of them, or at least a post afterwards. There's a conversation here that the community needs to have about flags.
@Magisch 220 flags are quite a lot; they still help the mods in some way to catch bad content. If it would be my choice, I'd not retract them all; whether the mods see it or not, you're doing the community a huge favour, especially as fraud accounts aren't easily caught.
@Magisch The conversation that's needed is about what the responses from mods to flags are/should be/mean, not about your flagging, or about you, or anyone, flagging for serial voting (which is what you were asked to keep on the down-low). That is happens to be you that's affected in this specific case is tangential.
@CalvT븃 That's not in dispute. "declined" means "You shouldn't have flagged this", "disputed" means "You were right to flag this but it turns out to be a coincidence" and "helpful" means helpful
reinforced by the fact that you get that condescending message telling you to triple check before flagging if you had any declines recently
@Magisch You can keep it disconnected from the specifics about the flag. You can say you're doing a lot of flagging, which the community has generally indicated is desirable and that you're getting other feedback from people/mods that indicates that you should be doing it, but your getting declined flags which mean X to you, but appear to mean T to the mod.
@Magisch I assume that by "condescending message" you mean the standard system messages you get with declined flags (e.g. something like "you got a declined flag check what you're doing"), not a message written specifically to you by a mod when declining the flag. Correct?
Whatever you end up doing, I really wouldn't recommend retracting all your flags - not only would it be a total waste of your time, but it would also mean that everything that's pending probably won't be dealt with at all. if you really think that you need to stop and re-evaluate, you can just stop - no need to delete all your hard work.
@ThomasWard Yeah, the former. I'm not suggesting we should have multiple reasons, just that we should not end up with weird reasons when users are dumb - so an error message is fine.
I've been flagging a lot of posts recently with more complicated reasoning then the standard flags allow. On response to that I've gotten several declined flags and it got me thinking, when can I expect to have declined flags and what can I do about it?
In this particular topic I'm flagging stuf...
You are raising flags about things that we don't have that much more information about so some flags will get declined as we won't necessarily see what you see. Why don't you send the information direct to the CMs? — ChrisF ♦1 min ago
This means I just need to stop alltogether since the CMs have more accurate tools then I do themselves so it's necessarily not a priority for them
@Magisch I'm gonna be blunt: You're overreacting and reading more into things than their authors intended. Declined flags don't mean "stop or ban", they mean "mod thought that was the right thing to do". Chris saying "send it to the CMs" doesn't mean "stop", it means "send it to the CMs".
The CMs will deal with serial voting when it's there in front of them, but they don't necessarily have the time or tools to go looking for them. You have both of those things. That seems like a pretty good arrangement to me - you do the finding, they do the hammering. Makes best use of everyone's time and abilities.
From what I hear from SO mods about 70% of what I flag gets escalated, the other 30% are socks the mods can deal with or false positives I can't know about
I have a feeling all that sending these to the CMs directly will elicit is a "stop abusing the contact us feature" after 2 or 3 attempts
I've never gotten a response to a contact us ticket (tried twice, been both pending or status-ignored for more then half a year) and pinging shog in chat over that feels wrong
@Magisch that's actually the kind of thing chat would be good for. A quick "hey Shog, if I sent you a spreadsheet of potential serial voting each week would that be useful" would be the quickest and easiest way to find out.
@YvetteColomb That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@Magisch They don't do "we received your ticket" on contact-us, nnor they do it when they close it, they only send message when they want it (and if their anti spam code didn't block it from arriving in their system)
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Bad keyword with email in answer and Bad keyword with email in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@tripleee That pattern looks like it's already caught by Bad keyword with email in answer and Bad keyword with email in body; append -force if you really want to do that.