« first day (642 days earlier)      last day (4274 days later) » 

2:00 PM
@tchrist But it is not, nor will it ever be: 99 % of our questions are not "highbrow".
@Robusto This.
 
@Robusto yeah. That's not exactly helping.
 
Look at Linguistics.
 
@RegDwightАΑA You can’t tell whether anything is or is not working without a metric of the same. How do you count it?
@Cerberus In what sense? The all-highbrow sense?
 
That site has far fewer questions, and they are much more academic. But TPTB may kill us sooner or later, because we don't generate enough views.
 
So you think they’re more apt to survive than we are?
 
2:02 PM
@RegDwightАΑA I see lots of questions being closed, I hear lots of complaining. If anything, it seems to be more than a year ago. From that I conclude that mission to eradicate or greatly decrease the number of non-academic questions is not a great success.
 
See, this roils my reactionality, so I say nothing:
0
Q: One word for "every now and then"

CodeBlue The system shuts down every now and then. He comes late to office every now and then. I go swimming every now and then. For the above statements, how would you replace "every now and then" with one word?

 
@tchrist what I'm saying is, Cerberus says, we got X crap questions a year ago, we still get X crap questions now, so obviously it's not working. But that's not taking into account how many more users and page views we have now. It's kind of the opposite of the Homer Simpson argumentation about stones keeping lions away.
 
To me all these synset questions are GenRef.
 
The proportion of uninteresting questions has also not increased or decreased a great deal, if at all.
 
@Cerberus again, you completely drop out of the equation that if there were no efforts whatsoever to keep the site clean, we'd have even more crap questions.
@Cerberus EXACTLY.
We are keeping it at bay.
 
2:04 PM
@RegDwightАΑA I actually meant decreased there.
 
If we stop, it will be 100% in no time.
 
I wonder whether "good" questions are being foisted off on the highbrow Linguistics.SE . . .
 
It has not decreased.
Nothing seems to have much impact.
 
@Cerberus but it has increased?
 
@Cerberus do you even read what I say?
 
2:04 PM
@RegDwightАΑA I doubt it.
 
@Cerberus that's not an argument.
 
I appreciate all the work that you do and have done, by the way. That's not the issue.
 
Neither is it for me.
 
@tchrist Sometimes they are, because they are not deemed "on topic" for English.SE.
 
@Cerberus I wish I can some examples of those. Yes, I know how to look.
 
2:07 PM
Has anyone ever had any proof that deterring a small percentage of non-academic questions works to significantly prevent the proportion of academic to non-academic from slipping off to zero?
@tchrist I don't remember the particulars, but I have seen such questions.
I don't have a real problem with that: at least they weren't closed.
 
@Cerberus ZOMG! Maybe we're in a Twilight Zone show-ending epiphany wherein we suddenly realize that we are the ELU Lite for Linguistics.SE! Mind = assploded!
 
@Robusto Hehe.
 
@Cerberus yes. Clay Shirky did.
 
Those bastards at Linguistics.SE are feasting on our flesh.
 
2:09 PM
In fact, our interesting questions are often about linguistics, but focused exclusively on English, and our answers there are often on par with the quality of Linguistics.
 
That is required reading for every mod on SE.
 
@Robusto Writers must feel gypped - we fed them our poop
 
@RegDwightАΑA I think I read that around the time when I joined the site.
 
Yes I posted it before.
 
I believe it was linked to from the SE blog about the various phases an on-line community goes through.
 
2:11 PM
I'm sure it was.
Clay is on SE's Board of Advisors.
 
Then I have read it.
 
Maybe we should just have Everything.SE and rely on tagging to sort things out.
 
@Robusto Your "as the dictionary says" comment has GR smackings all over it.
 
@Robusto if I had a dime for every time this gets suggested.
 
Ah, Golden Retrievers! Great dogs
 
2:12 PM
@Robusto Do think tagging instead of closing would be nice, as discussed a while ago.
 
@tchrist I need more. I don't recall every comment I ever made, even today.
 
@RegDwightАΑA or just a dime for everytime MRS&N suggests it ;)
 
@Cerberus tagging as what? ? ?
Genuine question.
 
@RegDwightАΑA Thank you for giving my joke the serious consideration it deserves.
 
@Robusto Sorry.
As the dictionary shows, sometimes would work as well. — Robusto 9 mins ago
 
2:14 PM
@Robusto I will always give you some consideration. It can be negative, but it will be there.
 
People don't use the dictionary. They don't use the thesaurus.
 
@tchrist I was referring to his citation. I originally wrote "your* dictionary, but then felt it would seem to accusatory.
 
Because they find it easier to get custom gimmes here.
And if we close those, we get yelled at for unfriendliness.
 
@tchrist people don't use ELU, either. I.e. the next person, rather than looking at the answer here, will go ask on Reddit. Or Yahoo Answers. It's a perpetuum mobile.
 
@RegDwightАΑA There is just this problem with the "great questions attract great answers" adage. First of all, we don't know exactly how and to what extent this works. Secondly, there are many other factors. Thirdly, unless we become much, much more restrictive, there is no way we can get a majority of interesting questions. Fourthly, there is nothing that proves that a non-majority of great questions attracts anything.
 
2:15 PM
@tchrist voted to close anyway :D
 
So many questions that have been answered here two years ago, with charts and COCA stats from nohat and all, get asked yet again in the Grammar Subreddit. Just go and check for yourself.
 
In short, there is no proof at all that closing a certain small minority of non-academic questions in a fairly aggressive manner works at all to increase the number of academic questions significantly.
 
right. that's it. language is too subjective for SE, all xL&U sites must be closed forthwith
 
@MattЭллен I see my strong GR encludoing is working then.
 
@Cerberus I agree, and that's kind of my point: I will often let questions attract answers first and then use that in judging whether it's any good.
 
2:16 PM
0
A: One word for "every now and then"

tchristGeneral Reference: alternately, at intervals, at random, at times, ever and again, ever and anon, every now and then, every once in a while, every so often, fluctuating, from time to time, here and there, infrequently, intermittently, irregularly, now and again, now and then, occasiona...

 
Still, the broken-windows theory is, well, broken at best.
Stapel was a fraud.
Nothing is ever that simple.
 
It did work for NYC.
 
1 min ago, by Cerberus
In short, there is no proof at all that closing a certain small minority of non-academic questions in a fairly aggressive manner works at all to increase the number of academic questions significantly.
So what's with this extreme rain? Is it some sort of divine punishment?
 
@Cerberus getting trash out does help in getting trash out, by definition. Whether or not it helps in not getting trash in the first place, is a different question entirely, but if anything that's an added benefit.
 
@simchona How’s your nose doing today?
0
Q: makes or make for this sentence

ThinkerWhich sentence is grammatically correct? What are the elements in the poem that make it joyful. or What are the elements in the poem that makes it joyful.

 
2:21 PM
@Cerberus The thing is, people who are already here know not to break windows. it's the people who have just shown up and rillyrillyrillyrilly want their question answered that throw most of the stones
 
@RegDwightАΑA I don't think of ESL and GR and such as trash.
 
@MattЭллен You mean the ones that ask plaintively to please please please help me right now come on guys?
 
@MattЭллен Eh I can't follow the metaphor.
 
@Cerberus don't get hung up on semantics. You know what my point is.
 
Or not completely.
 
2:23 PM
@Cerberus broken windows - they mostly come from people who don't know how not to break windows.
 
Also, @Cerberus, do make your mind up on whether we close a small minority of questions, or whether everyone's running amok 24/7.
 
@RegDwightАΑA I think having a few GR and SWR and ESL questions less is not really a benefit, since we have so many others. And I doubt closing a few of the non-academic questions will increase the number of academic questions.
 
@Cerberus the poor question itself is a broken window - the [close] is the board covering the window so that vagrants don't get in.
 
@Cerberus funny you'd mention SWR. You wanted to get rid of them wholesale, since day one.
 
@Robusto no animus. i just votes on what the deletion machine gives me
 
2:25 PM
@RegDwightАΑA A minority is still a large number in absolute terms here.
 
@Cerberus I'm afraid I'm not following.
 
@RegDwightАΑA I didn't say that: I just said I didn't find them interesting at all.
Doesn't mean I don't want to let others ask them.
 
@Cerberus yes, but we have some context here.
This discussion.
We are talking about whether broken windows attract more broken windows.
I thought you'd want to check out the SWR tag.
 
I think we should just make up our minds: either we close 90+ % of all questions and only keep the academic ones, or we just let all the non-spammy and non-incomprehensible ones be.
The other criteria seem arbitrary to me.
 
@Cerberus yes, but you have to define "incomprehensible".
-1
Q: Is these sentences gramatically correct?

manjari He is standing at the gate. He is standing among the crowded place. If both are wrong what is the right usage?

Is this question comprehensible?
 
2:28 PM
Yes, certainly.
 
@Cerberus so you want it to get an answer, but you won't answer it?
 
So you want to spend every day on a site that deals with such questions?
2
 
I also think moving less interesting questions to a different sub-list would be much better than our current closing system. But we can't change that.
@RegDwightАΑA As I said, 90 % is uninteresting anyway. I don't see that as a problem per se.
@MattЭллен I may very well answer it. When I used to answer a lot of questions, I answered those kinds of questions too.
Now I am afraid to answer it, because you will not like it if I do.
 
@Cerberus Is there a reason you have become less active? Was it the Jeff/Kosmo debarcal?
sorry, I can't spell debarcal
 
@Cerberus That is the problem. The thing is — and I don't mean that in a disrespectful way, quite the opposite in fact: that's the only way how you can stay sane —, the thing is, you don't come here for the main site. You come here to chat with ten-odd people. You openly state that you couldn't care less about the main site. For all you care it might not exist. Again, I don't mean that as an accusation; I'm just saying that it's hypocritical.
 
2:32 PM
@MattЭллен Yes, and other stuff, like boredom.
débâcle
 
@Cerberus so what would stop you being bored with the site?
@Cerberus thanks :D
 
@RegDwightАΑA I do care about the main site. I like to answer a few interesting questions now and then. I just don't care about whether there are uninteresting questions, just as I don't care about the uninteresting people on the street. I just leave them be, and they don't bother me.
 
@JSBձոգչ I don't see a deletion machine. Also, if you voted on deletion, why is there only one delete vote? Had there been another in the "deletion machine" then there ought to be two by now. I'm still puzzling over how this whole review system is supposed to work now. I see no delete votes anywhere.
 
@Cerberus but what if other interesting people can't stand it and they all go away? Would you stay? Or would you move on, too?
 
@MattЭллен Nothing: I don't think many people continue to maintain the same level of activity on a site for an indefinite period. Moods and interests change. I chose to remain active on a lower level, answering questions regularly but not nearly so often as before, when Rob and I would hurry to answer any new question as soon as it appeared.
@RegDwightАΑA I don't know. But of course that would be bad. However, I am not convinced closing a minority of uninteresting questions as we do now has much effect either way. At least I haven't seen any strong evidence.
 
2:37 PM
@Cerberus And I only had to outrun the doggy before my interest waned.
 
@Robusto Which deletion machine is that?
 
@Robusto It was mutual.
 
@tchrist Ah, frick. Them's keeps changin' things around! It ain't fair.
 
@Robusto A dog is the best bear protection out there. He as a functional snickersnack will distract the bear long enough for you to run away.
 
unless your dog outruns you
 
2:40 PM
@Cerberus It's a curious dynamic. I often have to fight someone before I can be friends with them. Just like an old John Wayne movie or something: you learn mutual respect by knocking each other's blocks off.
 
@MattЭллен Dogs never run away from bears. You do.
Rather pathetically. A bear can easily outrun a man.
 
I've yet to run away from a bear.
 
@Cerberus see, that's the thing. We constantly need fresh people. Because people constantly burn out. How do you attract fresh high-quality contributors if your front page looks exactly like that of any other grammer-related forum ever?
 
Me too. The bears always run from me, the poor things.
 
for obvious reasons
 
2:41 PM
Oh. Right.
I forget that you live in a people zoo.
 
peopled by people. watched at by bears
 
Old joke: Two hikers in the woods spot a bear, and one of the hikers tosses down his pack, takes off his hiking shoes and puts on running shoes. The other hiker says, "Hey, why are you putting on running shoes? You can't outrun a bear." The first hiker says, "I don't have to outrun the bear. I just have to outrun you."
 
bahs
 
@Robusto Yeah, it is a strange thing. I don't feel that I have to fight, but somehow a certain serenity and understanding can follow. Doesn't always happen.
 
old laughs
 
2:43 PM
@RegDwightАΑA You're assuming that what we do now helps (and I'm not talking about deleting spam and real gibberish, which is always good).
 
And you're assuming it doesn't.
 
Stephen: Do you . . . Do you know the best way to escape a charging polar bear?
Jeremy: Shoot it in the face.
Alan: I know! I know! [presses buzzer, which sings "Everything's Coming Up Roses"]
Stephen: Yes, go on.
Alan: You take your clothes off.
Stephen: Exactly. It stops to pick up your clothes and smell them, and you just get further away from them.
Jeremy: That is the biggest load of nonsense . . .
Clive: And then you die of . . .
Stephen: You would obviously be chilly, I suspect.
Alan: But you won't be eaten, so . . .
 
@Robusto Hah. I may have heard it before, but it's still good.
 
@tchrist My, that's quite interesting
 
bows
Clarkson’s wrapper bit at the end is what makes it work.
 
2:47 PM
@RegDwightАΑA I am not sure what to think; but I am not convinced as of yet. The damage, on the other hand, is clear: you and others spend lots and lots of time doing a janitor's job instead of having fun studying English; and lots of people are unhappy because their questions get closed, and others because their answers are to a closed question.
 
I hate Clarkson, but he can on rare occasion be funny.
 
it's true
 
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
 
@KitFox Not if it's a digital clock.
 
2:48 PM
@Cerberus I have to do a janitor's job in order to earn the right to be here.
 
@tchrist Lovely.
@RegDwightАΑA For me, you have earned it a thousand times over, so you need not worry.
 
@Cerberus it's not a thing you earn once.
 
@RegDwightАΑA Let us know when you're getting close to earning it. We'll start planning a party for you.
 
See, Rob's right on the money as usual.
 
2:49 PM
But, yes, the majority want it this way, so I suppose in that way they expect this cleaning of you.
 
I have no idea if the majority want it this way. In fact I suspect they don't. But I want it that way.
 
As I said, I am the minority.
 
"I Want It That Way" is a song by the Backstreet Boys, and their first single from their 1999 album Millennium. It was written by Max Martin and Andreas Carlsson along with other producers. The song was highly played on the radio and the video, directed by Wayne Isham, was well played on television. It was later released on the Backstreet Boys' greatest hits album, The Hits: Chapter One, in 2001. It is considered one of their signature songs. The song is still routinely played on both radio and video and the single has been highly critically acclaimed, winning and being nominated for v...
 
@RegDwightАΑA They do: look at the voting and the election.
 
@Cerberus Shall we take that as your minority report?
 
2:50 PM
@Cerberus no, you are the majority. Stop whining.
 
@RegDwightАΑA The majority are always whining.
 
@Robusto I thought that's what it was...
 
@Cerberus it's not that cut and dry. Don't pretend it's that simple, or simple at all.
 
@RegDwightАΑA Yeah. Tall, white, educated Dutchmen can't claim minority status.
 
@RegDwightАΑA Okay, it's not simple.
 
2:51 PM
@Cerberus the majority didn't vote in the election
 
But most voices I hear seem to favour the strict approach.
 
@MattЭллен Hm.
 
@Robusto Three-headed dogs?
 
@Cerberus and the most voices you hear belong to twenty-odd people. We have 20 thousand users now.
 
With snake manes, even though they can't have manes?
 
2:52 PM
17 hours ago, by Caleb
> 2,698 voters were eligible, 604 visited the site during the election, 695 visited the election page, and 137 voted
 
@RegDwightАΑA Cut and dried is the more common expression. Just FYI.
 
@RegDwightАΑA Yes, yes, I meant the majority of the high-rep users, and of the voters, and of the moderator's electorate.
 
@Robusto I was expecting that. You are getting slow.
 
@Cerberus If they bite people, yes, that confers majority status instantaneously.
 
@Robusto here's the fancy new deletion page i was referring to: english.stackexchange.com/review-beta/low-quality-posts/749
 
2:53 PM
The majority of the people who normally concern themselves with policy.
 
@RegDwightАΑA I was going to post an NGram but I figured people wouldn't get the joke and I would be pilloried for it. Oh well.
 
@Robusto Oh, bummer.
 
Hmm, that's quite a lot of cut-and-drys.
 
@Robusto where's the line for "pilloried"? The graph is lacking a line for "pilloried".
 
2:54 PM
@Cerberus But it proves I'm right in all things.
 
@JSBձոգչ oh! they've rolled it out the beta to here! yay!
 
@Robusto That line doesn't look right at all. Crooked, rather.
It's not even a line, mathematically.
 
@MattЭллен Easy, big guy. Take a breath. You talk better when you're not so over-amped with excitement.
 
@Robusto I am not the pineapple of the English language speaking
 
@Cerberus Nevertheless, I'm still right in all things. Six eyes and you still can't see that. snarf
 
2:56 PM
I am of native speaking the English
 
@MattЭллен That's more like it.
 
@Robusto I can't see the big triangular square in the sky either—gosh, there must be something wrong with my eyes.
 
@MattЭллен You mean "I am native of the speaking of the English."
 
@Robusto I assures youeth they're is never mistaken on my speaking
 
@MattЭллен What ever is doing mistake has apprehension of you.
 
3:00 PM
@Robusto takes away your autochthonoparlant creds
 
@Robusto I precise the grammar and correcting image
 
@Cerberus It's a plot!. I knew it!
 
ok, I give in, I can't talk like that any more
 
Hm, chatty buried cars.
 
3:01 PM
@Robusto Huh, if it's plotted, is it a plot?
 
Alles muß man selber machen.
 
@RegDwightАΑA Schade.
 
@RegDwightАΑA so... pilloried isn't a word
 
@MattЭллен and neither is "Robusto".
 
Or RegDwight.
 
3:03 PM
Or orange.
 
@Robusto Chapter the Eleventh: In Which The Plot, Behaving In Much The Same Manner As A Soup To Which Cornstarch Has Been Added, Begins, At Last, To Thicken. (quoth Paarfi of Roundwood)
 
At least there are things that rhyme with RegDwight. "Edge light," for example.
 
However, oranges do exist.
So there. English haz pluralz only.
 
ur ngrams crashed chrome
take that, googlez!
 
@tchrist Don't you dare make me start looking at tvtropes.org.
 
3:06 PM
@Robusto Phoenix Guards, Stephen Brust. NFTVTROPES.
 
Your English sounds a little Brusty.
 
You mispronuncified it.
His surname rhymes with roost.
He’s hungry.
 
Brustil is a great country.
Better than Magyarorszag.
 
Hence the soup.
Brussels is not a country.
 
I thought Brussels is Europe?
 
3:07 PM
@tchrist I pronounced it Broosty. You just misheard it.
 
You’re loosing it again.
 
He was born onboard the Loosertania.
 
Which is why he so enjoys a fine port.
In a storm.
 
i'm going to kill all of you.
where's @Martha when you need her?
 
That's a looser ping.
 
3:11 PM
Phoenix Guards is a Dumas homage, of the Musketeers and such. It’s delightfully witty.
 
Who you call a Dumass?
 
Your genitives are showing.
 
@Kit your website is impressive.
@tchrist I'm a grower, not a shower.
 
it keeps getting worse and worse
 
Just wait for it to get wurst.
Wurst ist ein Nahrungsmittel, das aus zerkleinertem Fleisch, Speck, Salz und Gewürzen, bei bestimmten Sorten auch unter Verwendung von Blut und Innereien zubereitet wird. Die vorbereitete Masse, das Brät, wird in Därme, Blasen oder Mägen gefüllt, durch Abbinden mit Wurstgarn oder Abklammern mit rostfreien Metallklammern in einzelne Würste unterteilt und je nach Sorte durch Kochen oder Backen gegart oder durch Trocknen mit oder ohne zusätzliches Räuchern konserviert. Bei industriell hergestellter Wurst werden häufig Kunstdärme, auch Gläser und Konservendosen verwendet. In Deutschlan...
 
3:15 PM
now it's a real sausage party
 
wooo! my friends just posted on facebook that their son has his last intrathecal chemotherapy treatment today!
(just to put the rest of your problems in perspective)
 
@MattЭллен a saw such party? What is this grammar?
 
@RegDwightАΑA I ain't no grammar
I don't even have kids
 
@JSBձոգչ that's unfair, using chemotherapy as combo breaker.
 
@MattЭллен then none of them have cancer. good for you!
 
3:17 PM
@JSBձոգչ I was talking about being a grammar, but that too :D
 
adds Matt to the list of punsters to be pun-ished
 
@RegDwightАΑA nods gracefully
 
@JSBձոգչ I'm on there twice now? That's double the pun for me
 
@JSBձոգչ Too right. Your puns are too weak to be considered proper puns. They are merely pun-ish.
 
@RegDwightАΑA But decidedly not punny.
 
3:22 PM
i just hit the deletion vote limit :(
for the first time ever, i think
 
@Robusto They make up for it by being puny.
 
@JSBձոգչ Slacker!
 
@JSBձոգչ Well, I guess we know what kind of a mod you would have been.
 
hey, my platform was entirely tag-based, not deletophilic
 
Or flagophilic?
 
3:24 PM
@JSBձոգչ But deleterious just the same.
 
well, @Kit just got elected for being foxy
 
Sex sells. What can I say?
 
sex cells!
 
Better foxy than faux-y.
 
better faux-y than folksy
 
3:25 PM
I'm folksier than Palin!
 
Sects sell!
 
poksier than flailing
 
Sechs söll!
 
Flailing wistix.
 
Plus, I didn't let my teenage daughter get knocked up because I think that adolescents shouldn't know what sex is.
 
3:27 PM
How is babby formed?
 
well clearly whatserface knew what sex was
 
Adolescent of a woman.
 
@JSBձոգչ Exactly. So her mom didn't do a very good job, eh?
Well, and to be fair, maybe she didn't know that that was sex, since no one was telling anyway.
 
Too bad the mom knows what sex is.
 
@KitFox did you allow her to at the end of a sentence a preposition put?
 
3:29 PM
I know, right? Especially since she was also a knocked-up-out-of-wedlock teen.
 
who? palin the elder?
 
Michael Palin!
 
@JSBձոգչ Yes.
afk
 
@KIt did not know that
 
So, anyone volunteering to answer Xavier's question? I don't feel up to the task. Even though I just learned that tomorrow's a day off.
 
3:40 PM
@JSBձոգչ Oh, my bad. She wasn't a teenager. She was 24.
@RegDwightАΑA Which question? His Meta question?
 
Yeah...
 
And it is theoretically possible that Track was just, you know, born early.
 
I wish I were in the mood to dig up the deleted exchanges. Not easy.
 
brumm!
 
@KitFox really? you believe the "track is really an illegitimate grandchild" conspiracy theory?
 
3:43 PM
@JSBձոգչ No, no, Track is their oldest boy.
Not Trig.
 
Jez
heh, 3 interviews in 3 days.
trouble is, it's with the 3 companies i was least interested in.
 
@RegDwightАΑA OK, OK, let me think it over.
 
@KitFox oh, right. i'm not up on the palin family tree. sorry for tarring you with that brush.
 
sok.
I just really hate hypocrites.
Really, really intolerant of hypocrites.
 
3:49 PM
Oh and @Cerberus.
 
A reminder to all our writing friends, chat starts in about fifteen minutes in The Overlook:
 
in The Overlook Hotel, Aug 11 at 1:02, by Neil Fein
@RegDwightАΑA I am vaguely tempted to open an Area 51 proposal: Close all the questions! All questions asked here will be migrated to ELU or closed. brickwall.stackexchange.com.
 

 The Overlook Hotel

General discussion for writing.stackexchange.com. Writing exer...
 
Damn, tweened.
 
Damn, tweened.
 
3:49 PM
I got a reminder already.
 
honestly i don't think sarah palin deserves half of the ire pointed at her
 
Jinx.
Oh stop this tweening.
 
it's not a jinx if you do it on purpose
 
@RegDwightАΑA That's a great article.
 
I want coke, is all.
@ΜετάEd he has more. If you can spare an hour or twenty, check out his other Internet Writings.
I used to print them out and read them on the bus.
 
3:50 PM
@RegDwightАΑA Yeah, I'm on the site.
 
Lots of stuff in there. From micropayment to email to reddit to google.
 
i've read a big chunk of his archives
 
@JSBձոգչ I really wouldn't expect you to understand. But her behavior directly threatens my personal freedoms, and her smug little face as she promotes sexism everywhere just makes me want to punch her.
 
i would never vote for her, to be clear. (of course, i don't vote at all these days.)
 
@RegDwightАΑA I knew it. You're a predialectic deconstructionist. The enemy of Habermasian public spheres.
 
3:52 PM
but i find it interesting that the fact that she's a woman and conservative evidently makes her fair game for every vile misogynist trope in the book
 
@Robusto stop with the Armenian already. I've had my share for the week.
 
@JSBձոգչ To be fair, most people who think Palin an idiot don't have to resort to such base tactics and would, in fact, decry them as well.
 
@JSBձոգչ You can be a conservative woman (Susan Collins, Olympia Snowe) without being a misogynist. Palin is a misogynist, and it's revolting how much she revels in it.
 
@Robusto you must live in a different part of the internet than me.
 
@JSBձոգչ Well, I don't live in a Fox echo chamber, if that's what you mean.
 
3:54 PM
Now I need to unknot my panties for Writers chat.
Later.
 
@Robusto eh, what? the fox echo chamber isn't the one attacking Palin with misogyny
 
@KitFox How come they get the unknotted panties? I think you're playing favorites.
@JSBձոգչ They're the ones who characterized every attack on Palin as elitist or misogynistic or whatever.
 
oh. can't say i noticed it, seeing as i have never watched fox in my life.
 
It's funny how attacks on millionaire politicians can be considered elitist at all.
 
@JSBձոգչ I watch them via The Daily Show.
@RegDwightАΑA Word. Also, $$$.
It's "class warfare" if you try to tax billionaires.
 
3:58 PM
@Robusto "elitist" attacks are probably fair game, seeing as she truly came across as an idiot during the campaign.
and she's cultivated that kind of persona in the meantime.
meeting.
 

« first day (642 days earlier)      last day (4274 days later) »