« first day (540 days earlier)      last day (4474 days later) » 

11:00 AM
Now when you say tongue...
 
@JM Fortunately, there aren’t many lampposts ...
 
@BrianMScott I thought we used assumptions. We get to make them, too? neat :-)
 
Not just neat, but tidy and efficient!
 
@BrianMScott Oh, it's not a literal pole? :D
 
@BrianMScott I thought that was the physicists. Consider a spherical boat in a frictionless river...
 
11:01 AM
@JM No, the barber’s in Seville, not the Arctic.
@RahulNarain Jearl Walker prefers frictionless penguins on frictionless ice.
 
@JM Frostbite in your tongue? Awww.
 
Man, I love Jearl Walker's stuff...
Speaking of spherical things, this was entertaining...
 
Some of his students got a little tired of the penguins, though. (Actually, he has a very good reputation as a teacher.)
 
Actually it's the wind that's important, not the friction.
 
Also, assuming laminar flow makes things easier...
 
11:07 AM
i feel unwelcome on physics.SE since i started philosophizing there
also i feel like some of my questions were underappreciated
it's been a year maybe time to try again
 
@Dan They have a nice new design, at least.
 
@RahulNarain Only at the elementary level. It’s the economists who are most guilty.
 
@RahulNarain Yeah, after they went chalkboard for some time..
 
no question count on main page, i can't tell how well the site has been growing
 
@JM Would hypergeometric functions also give the roots of polynomials? The other guy in my new desk has a PhD in special functions and he suggested me to look there 8-).
 
11:13 AM
@JonasTeuwen That is the other route, if you don't want theta functions. However, those can get complicated too...
 
@BrianMScott Your solution assumes v<< c ;-)
 
I've only read a passing reference that one could use Kampe de Feriet functions, but I have yet to see an explicit construction...
 
@Skullpatrol True. Seems pretty likely, though. :-) Or should I say relatively likely?
 
@BrianMScott In a special kind of way :-)
 
@JM There are three special functions guys here on this floor and they all don't have a reference for me!
 
11:15 AM
@Skullpatrol If v is not much less than c, you have to worry about which reference frame the boat trip took 2 hours in...
 
And don’t forget the psychological factor: the elapsed time is different for the rower and the passenger!
Grf. I’m starting to yawn, and it is 0615; I should probably head for bed.
 
@BrianMScott If you throw the problem into a black hole you'll never find an answer.
 
@rahul haha needs a gamma factor
 
Is that true? Or will I simply never return with an answer?
 
also the possibility of tunneling
 
11:18 AM
@BrianMScott Good morning, then... :)
The day a boat tunnels...
 
If the boat is disassembled and reassembled Ship-of-Theseus-style after travelling 20 miles downstream in 2 hours, is it still the same boat that takes 6 hours to travel 12 miles upstream?
 
@JM One of the small joys of retirement is being able to keep a schedule (or lack thereof) that’s actually comfortable.
@JM You’ve never heard of an ATB (all-terrain boat)?
 
@BrianMScott Yeah, but I was thinking of quantum tunneling (which I believe Dan was alluding to). Makes for interesting electronics...
 
I expect that he was, yes.
 
indeed
there is a positive probability that the boat never left
 
11:22 AM
Like British Rail trains.
 
BUUURN. :D
 
Is there a Schrodinger cat on the boat?
 
You’ll have to look and see.
 
I can't see inside of a black hole.
 
But can you see out?
 
11:25 AM
Maybe we are in a black hole right now.
that is inside of another black hole .... etc etc etc
 
maybe you are in a tree.
 
I’m going to call it a night. See you folks later!
 
@BrianMScott See you later!
 
l8s
me too
math out
 
Peace
Peace is a state of harmony characterized by the lack of violent conflict. Commonly understood as the absence of hostility, peace also suggests the existence of healthy or newly healed interpersonal or international relationships, prosperity in matters of social or economic welfare, the establishment of equality, and a working political order that serves the true interests of all. In international relations, peacetime is not only the absence of war or conflict, but also the presence of cultural and economic understanding . Etymology From the Latin pax, meaning "freedom from civil...
 
11:30 AM
@Jonas: hell! you just arranged a lamp there )) and what about Igor?
 
@Ilya Jonas ate Igor. He's actually a cannibalistic serial killer.
 
Your mother?
 
No, not her.
 
fuh. that's good. I will have a lunch in peace then
 
Are you also having some Igor?
 
11:33 AM
I have diet restrictions: I can only eat what they serve on the lunch in the cafe. If it is Igor, I have no other choice.
nice justification for cannibalism, isn't it?
 
I think that's the same reasoning with the Donner party...
 
@Ilya Not really.
 
@Ilya Talking about cannibalism really eats me up.
 
@BrianMScott Good night.
 
11:49 AM
@Ilya Igor is still there but he's not here now I think. I'll check.
@Ilya Nope.
Eating Igor? He's 39 I believe. Must be tough meat.
 
12:07 PM
@JonasTeuwen With Bill being stripped of all his reputation points and QED deleting his account we need a little peace, love, unity, and respect around here. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PLUR
Especially the respect.
 
12:49 PM
@Skullpatrol what about Bill and QED?
 
@JM I have the Tata Lectures on Theta II!
 
@JonasTeuwen I think I should have been better prepared - my monologue was quite messy I guess
 
No, it was fine.
 
1:11 PM
@JonasTeuwen Great! :)
 
Horrible typesetting! :-).
 
It's old; don't complain. ;)
 
hi @Rahul, @Ilya, @Dylan
 
Heya heya.
 
heya Heya
 
1:13 PM
"heya heya Ilya"... :D
Sounds like the chorus of a song...
 
(hi Jonas)
 
@JM the summon of Ilya )
 
(hi Srivatsan)
 
@Asaf: (hi!) Can you delete this answer? You are the final vote, I think. Thanks.
:/ Rahul just slipped out of the room =)
 
@Srivatsan ?
What answer?
 
1:17 PM
The one he linked to...
 
Done; thanks.
 
@JonasTeuwen you have a bit more space in your new room then in the old one ) how are you going to use it?
 
@Ilya Not sure. Maybe I can juggle!
 
You actually juggle? :)
 
@JonasTeuwen btw, OU operator acts on infinite-dim Banach space? you've omitted it in your talk somehow
 
1:19 PM
You should build your own personal gallows, then execute annoying students.
 
@Ilya On $L^2(\gamma)$.
 
where $\gamma$ is finite-dimensional measure or not necessary?
 
Well, it is on $\mathbf R^d$. But you can take a Banach space :-).
This is my office.
 
the new one
 
Yes.
 
1:23 PM
It's very small. 144px × 108px
 
@AsafKaragila not as big as your... [?] ;)
 
@Ilya You should run BibTeX and recompile, some reference and labels have been changed since the last time.
 
@Jonas I was wondering if you've also covered the case of Wiener space when you discussed the equivalence of norms
 
1:25 PM
I need to drink a cap of crappy coffee
 
What is this Birkhauser there?
 
David Mumford - Tata Lectures on Theta II.
 
I see.
 
@Asaf: if you see why do you ask?
 
@Ilya Because I only saw the title in the chat when Jonas answered my question.
 
1:29 PM
What's the yellow one, @Jonas?
 
Phelps - Lectures on Choquet's Theorem.
 
@Asaf try to move with a speed 400000 kmh now to violate the casuality
 
The red thing is my preparation for teaching analysis 2.
 
@Ilya Nah, I wanna see Asaf diffract when he tries to go through corners...
 
One of my students said something about going back in time and not submitting homework for the past month (since we only take the sixth highest grades)
I told him that if he can do that I really have to talk to him after the class.
 
1:38 PM
@AsafKaragila or in the sense of the topic, before the class
 
@Ilya Well, yeah but if he doesn't have a time machine with him then to meet me before class would require him to go home and he might get killed on the way. Seeing me right after class is a safer option.
 
@Kannappan (re the tag) :)
 
2:04 PM
Good time of day, everyone.
 
@Asaf: think this post should be closed? There are a couple of close votes (are you one of those voters?)
 
I think so, yes. Two more needed.
 
Executioner needed.
Thanks, rob. Thanks Asaf.
 
Not really.
I think I'll go and take a nap.
 
Sure. Later, Asaf.
 
2:11 PM
Later.
 
2:41 PM
hi all
 
2:56 PM
hello there!
 
3:50 PM
We have the first 100k user.
 
@MartinSleziak Yeah, a few hours ago. Amazing. :)
 
@MartinSleziak With an impressive lead too... :=)
 
And J.M. is back. Two reasons to celebrate.
 
@MartinSleziak :)
 
Where do I find the "Review" link? Did it recently move? (The link to posts to review..)
 
3:56 PM
@Srivatsan You have a "Tools" link?
 
Yes, I do. Let me check.
 
Once you're in "Tools", you can toggle between that and "Review" on the upper left corner. Click whatever is gray to select the other choice.
 
Yes, got it. I was blanking out temporarily. Thanks.
 
4:12 PM
can u plz 3d17 7h15 c0mm3n7 for m3 2 plz plz plz? -- Do you understand what 3d17 and 7h15 mean?
I now see (with some staring) that the first one is edit.
Ha, finally! The second word is this. My first guess was that, and that did not fit. (5 cannot mean t, can it?)
 
'grats on acquiring 1337-reading powers. :D
 
@JM I can't really do this, JM. =)
But thanks.
This would certainly come in handy in case I am stranded in a desert, and my only escape is by reading some directions written in 1337.
 
But yes, "5" is a common substitute for "s". Just like in cheap calculators...
 
Well, I hadn't made note of that, it seems.
 
Hello! Good evening.
 
4:21 PM
Hi.
 
Pac-Man Proved NP-Hard By Computational Complexity Theory
 
What happens when I divide a disequation for a number minor than 0?
I have to change the sign of the disequation?
 
"minor than 0" is not a standard or common terminology. Do you mean a negative number?
And a "disinequation" is usually called an "inequality".
 
Sorry...
However, yes, I mean "negative number"
 
@unNaturhal (No problem, I am just informing you the terminology conventionally employed in English.)
 
4:31 PM
(which are the differences between "minor than 0" and "negative"? All number minor than 0 are also negative, right?)
 
"less than", not "minor than". :)
 
First of all, "minor" is not a word used in this context. We say a number is less than 0 (not "minor than 0"), or greater than 0 (not "major than 0"), or equal to 0.
 
@JM, @Srivatsan. Aaah! Ok, understood! It's a grammar problem. I think that It was a logic problem :P
 
@unNaturhal Oh yes, I was going to say that. It was just a language issue.
So: when you divide by a number strictly smaller than 0 (i.e., a negative number), you flip the sign of the inequality. So "<" becomes ">" and vice versa. Equality is preserved; i.e., if you had "=" then you will continue to have the same sign.
 
Or multiply, for that matter.
 
4:36 PM
@JM ?? (What are we multiplying?)
 
I mean, either of dividing or multiplying by a negative number.
(Since division's just the same as multiplication by an appropriate reciprocal.)
 
Oh right. The same rule applies for multiplying by a negative number.
 
@Srivatsan, @JM: I have this situation:

$x - \pi - x\tan\left(1\right) + 4\tan\left(1\right) >= 0$
 
It's just $x$ (i.e., $x$), not $\x$
 
Okay, $\tan\,1$ is just a positive constant...
 
4:40 PM
Ok, it's something like
However, I'm styding the positivity of this, together with $x > 4$ (that is in the denominator)
 
@JM Do you know why some posters just remove the question after getting an answer? math.stackexchange.com/posts/101557/revisions
 
So, to isolate the $x$ in the left member, I do this:
$x\left(1 - \tan\left(1\right)\right) > \pi - 4\tan\left(1\right)$
Then I divide both members by $\left(1 - \tan\left(1\right)\right)$
 
@Srivatsan No idea, but we never condone vandalism...
 
@JM I did just rollback, I just thought it might be good to understand what's going on. Perhaps one could include something relevant in the FAQ. (Not that anyone reads it, but still..)
 
In doing this, I have to flip the sign of the inequality? $\left(1-\tan\left(1\right)\right)$ is a negative number (about $0,5$)
 
4:46 PM
@unNaturhal You are right till now. But you mean $\color{Red}{-}0,5$, don't you? I.e., negative 0.5.
 
@Srivatsan Exactly $-0,5$
 
"Exactly" is a bit much...
"about" was fine.
 
@JM I think they meant: "Exactly. I meant negative 0.5, not 0.5".
 
@Srivatsan Oh, that makes more sense.
 
But you are right that 0.5 or -0.5 is not that exact value. (Good to keep this at the back of your mind, unNaturhal.)
 
4:50 PM
Is any one here aware of a reference for general linear groups for undergraduates? Please point out to some papers.
 
@JM, @Srivatsan. Yes, it's "about" $-0,5$. It is a trascendental number $-0,55740...$. "exactly" was for: "You're right" :P
 
@Srivatsan When I saw this behavior at other web fora, it seemed to be an attempt to hide his homework question. (Probably the OP was afraid that the teacher would google to see whether someone posted the assignment online?) E.g. here at sosmath. I think I remember seeing the same behavior at mathhelpforum - but it is down again, so I cannot locate it.
 
@Martin Do you know of a reference I am asking for? Please help me.
@Srivatsan You as well!
 
@KannappanSampath Sorry, it's definitely not the area of mathematics I am good in.
 
@MartinSleziak OK fine! My bad...
 
4:58 PM
@MartinSleziak Martin, if you are talking about my question, these are not homework. I attend the University, I left the homework to the high school :P
 
@unNaturhal No, that was reaction to what Srivatsan asked. (As you can check by clicking the arrow next to my post.)
It happens in the chat, that several conversations are running at the same time, so it's not clear what belongs where...
 
@MartinSleziak, Okok, sorry :)
 
@KannappanSampath Why do you need papers for an undergrad level reference? Why not books? There should be a plenty of books on this subject.
@MartinSleziak Doing that (hiding homework question) is so not cool. Thanks for the explanation.
 
@Srivatsan I am not sure if books address this particular question of mine!
 
Why not ask here?
 
5:05 PM
Huh, Yes, I will try a little harder before I post a question here! I don't want the question to be completely trivial :)
 
(only for 10k+ rep users)
 
Yeah, lotsa nutty stuff on meta.
 
@JM And a lotsa nutty stuff from a MJ.
Oh, I linked to MJ's answer in particular. I had seen the whole thread (minus this deleted post) before.
 
Anyway, I'm off for today. See you later. :)
 
Bye!
 
5:15 PM
@JM Bye
@Srivatsan How's it going?
 
It's going ok. How about for you?
 
I wish Dylan was here.
 
@Srivatsan Alright, thanks for asking.
 
Wow. Arturo has 100k points over 2.2k answers (and two questions) which makes an amazing average of 45 points per answer. This is not including the CW stuff he might have there, and reputation caps.
 
@AsafKaragila Be careful what you wish for because you just might get it...
 
5:21 PM
Yeah, 5 votes for my answer makes me more than happy usually.
 
I am not happy with the voters here :(
 
More than happy sounds like a serious mental illness to me. Something like delirium with psychosis.
 
Very silly answers get 7 votes but some answers that require deep understanding get one vote after a lot of advertising !
 
I'm lucky, my answers get usually between 5 to 10 votes.
 
sms.cam.ac.uk/collection/545358 this course looks interesting
 
5:25 PM
@KannappanSampath that also happens in some other SE sites. Why? Because they require thinking
 
I don't mind Arturo answering faster, but I hate when he edits faster.
 
@Daniil yes, it is. And thanks for posting a link to it. (I wanted to thank you the last time you did so, but forgot.)
@AsafKaragila Well, it is a textbook phrase. The person who made it up could very well be delerious. :-)
@AsafKaragila why Dylan?
 
@Srivatsan I have homework in algebra, I could use someone who knows that stuff to consult with.
 
Ehm..
For which reason the moderator deletes post?
 
@AsafKaragila Ha. (Thanks.)
 
5:32 PM
@Srivatsan I've posted that link before? I am terribly sorry then, I had no intentions of doing so.
 
I foresee another Batman (on a smaller scale though). Someone retag that.
 
@Daniil Thanks for the great link ....
 
..?
 
@AsafKaragila And that’s about the best that you can expect, since the audience for those answers is smaller than average. It’s the same way with the set-theoretic topology questions.
 
5:50 PM
@BrianMScott I do get to 10+ relatively often, though.
 
I’ve not kept track, but I know that I’ve had quite a few accepted at 0 , 1, or 2 even when mine was the only answer.
 
Hello everyone, is there anybody here is familar with plane geometry?
 
@Victor Depends on just what you want to know. You can give it a try.
 
Ouch. No, that goes beyond my knowledge of the subject.
 
5:57 PM
@robjohn - May you help me with that please?
 
Could someone tell me for which reason a post is deleted? There are problem with homework?
 
@MarianoSuárezAlvarez - are you familar with geometry? you get 57 vote
 
@Victor I did edit the question to make it a little more readable, though.
 
@BrianMScott - Thanks
 
I get 57 vote? what does that mean? :D
 
6:03 PM
@MarianoSuárezAlvarez - That mean you are a top user on geometry tag
 
ah
well
that must mean I am familiar with geometry :)
 
@MarianoSuárezAlvarez - May you help me with a geometry question?
 
what's the question?
 
0
Q: Two theorems about an inscribed quadrilateral and the radius of the circle containing its vertices

VictorI think those two theorem are two of the most complicated formulas I have ever seen; please prove it because I am not able to find proofs on the internet: It is known that if the sides of an inscribed quadrilateral $ABCD$ (that is in the order $AB,BC,CD,DA$) have lengths $a,b,c,d$ respectively a...

 
oh
I am completely incompetent about that kind of geometry
 
6:07 PM
@MarianoSuárezAlvarez - what kind of gemetry did you learn?
 
see pballew.net/cycquad.html for the first question
 
@MarianoSuárezAlvarez That was quick: I’m impressed!
 
@MarianoSuárezAlvarez - ThanKs a lot
 
@BrianMScott, my googling makes up for my ignorance of plane geometry :)
 
That’s my solution, too, and I’m not bad at it, but I don’t think that I could have found these references nearly so quickly.
 
6:13 PM
The formula for the radius is a consequence of Brahmagupta's formula; see also mathworld.wolfram.com/CyclicQuadrilateral.html
 
@BrianMScott And, your dialup might have as well played its part in the speed?
 
Probably, yes, but I was mentally making allowance for that in the comparison.
 
geom.uiuc.edu is one of the greatest web sites in the history of the internet
 
@MarianoSuárezAlvarez And, the diagonal formula comes from Ptolemy!
 
I hope the videos from geom.uiuc.edu/video are on youtube, for example
 
6:17 PM
@Brian: You might know the answer, what is the correct requirement for an unmeasurable set of reals? I recall it is only that there are $\aleph_1$ many reals.
 
Which is the MathJax instruction to write an absolute value?
 
$|x|$?
 
the proper way is $\lvert x\rvert$
but no one sanely does that
you can define a command to do it for you
 
And the absolute value of an entire fraction?
 
\left|\frac ...\right|
 
6:18 PM
$\left\lvert \frac{1}{2} \right\lvert
 
@BrianMScott There's no actual assumption of any choice?
 
Thank you
 
@AsafKaragila Both work.
 
Well, DC is not enough to generate an unmeasurable set...
 
6:19 PM
Oh, sorry: I was answering the wrong question. My ‘yes’ was about the abs. val.
 
@AsafKaragila Solovay’s model?
 
@BrianMScott Yeah.
 
It's possible to draw an enourmous bracket ( { ) with MathJax? As to solve a system of more than 2 functions
 
I recall that $\aleph_1$ many reals should be enough.
 
6:27 PM
$$\begin{cases}1\\0\end{cases}$$
 
@unNaturhal Use \left\{...\right. The dot is part of the construct, not a period to my sentence. Of course there’s also the \begin{cases}...\end{cases} construction that Asaf and Kannappan are showing you.
 
Exactly!
 
Is it OK @unNaturhal
 
@unNaturhal Do you mean $\begin{cases}x^2& x<0\\ -x& \mathrm{otherwise}\end{cases}$
 
$$\begin{cases}2x+3y+17z=0\\23x+37y+98z=0\end{cases}$$
 
6:28 PM
@AsafKaragila, @BrianMScott, @KannappanSampath, Yes, the last example is what I need, but with more than two functions
 
@unNaturhal You can just use \\ to linebreak and add more.
 
If you want them left-aligned like that, the cases construction is easiest. You can get as many lines as you want; just end each (except the last) with \\.
 
\begin{cases}blah1\\blah2\\blah3\end{cases}
 
@BrianMScott It doesn't work :/
 
If you want to be able to align the equals signs, for instance, then you’ll want $$\left\{\begin{align*}2x+3y+17z&=0\\23x+37y+98z&=0\end{align*}\right.$$
@unNaturhal What doesn’t?
 
6:33 PM
@BrianMScott, Sorry, Now it works :P
Following this command: \.begin{cases}blah1\\blah2\\blah3\end{cases}
(without the dot)
 
$$\begin{cases}blah1\\blah2\\blah3\end{cases}$$
 
Yep. And mine (without the first three dots but with the last one) was \.left\{\.begin{align*}2x+3y+17z&=0\\23x+37y+98z&=0\.end{align*}\right.
 
@BrianMScott Aaaah, okok, understood :)
 
@Brian: So, do you have an answer about the unmeasurable set of reals? Is the condition $\omega_1\le2^\omega$ or do you also need DC accompanied by that?
 
Ehm, sorry but I'm learning MathJax right now, it's the first time that I use this language :P
Haw I can draw the union symbol and the >= symbol?
 
6:37 PM
\cup and \bigcup and \ge
detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html use this to draw the symbols and get the code.
 
Wont $\geq$ work? @Asaf
 
And there's a link to a huge dictionary of symbols on that page as well.
 
@KannappanSampath Both would work.
 
@AsafKaragila I’ve been thinking about that. CH definitely works, but I’m not sure about the weaker hypothesis. I don’t think that the usually Vitali set construction will do the trick if $\omega_1<2^\omega$.
 
6:41 PM
@AsafKaragila: Real useful! Thanks!
 
@unNaturhal This is my favorite quick reference.
 
@BrianMScott Hm.
 
@Daniil No, it's totally fine; there's nothing called too much publicity :=). And the course seems great.
20 votes in an hour? That's surprising.
 
@Srivatsan Not really...
It's a popular mathematics question, and the answer is straightforward too.
 
Not really 20 votes? Or not really 1 hour? =)
 
6:49 PM
@AsafKaragila mentioned earlier that it might be "batman" effect
 
I am kidding.
 
Not really either.
 
And the current version of the answer is considerably better than the original, which was pretty telegraphic.
 
@BrianMScott I had never come across that adjective before. Apt meaning, I guess.
 
Hmpf. I could only find a comment (directed at me, actually) saying that Shelah's bound on non-measurable sets is ZF+DC+$\omega_1\le2^\omega$, and doubtfully anyone has improved that bound.
 
6:53 PM
@BrianMScott Thanks also to you :)
 
@unNaturhal You’re welcome!
 
I once asked Shelah about his choiceless-work, and he gave me an outline and references, and in the part where he told me his choicey assumptions he said something like "And of course DC is assumed, you always assume DC."
 
@AsafKaragila :-)
Does Shelah do anything besides mathematics?
 
@BrianMScott Now, I know that removing $\omega_1\le2^\omega$ is not enough. But what about removing DC?
 
6:56 PM
Brian: Is that just a question, or a sarcastic remark? =)
 
Genuine question.
 
@BrianMScott I'm not sure. Several teachers of mine are his students (and I sat through one of his courses last year) and I think that his brain is really about pure mathematics.
He broke the 1k papers a few weeks ago.
 
I actually have a ‘Shelah number’ of $2$, though it’s via a co-author whom I’ve never met.
 
How do you keep track of it?
 
The only one with more published results is Erdos, but the weight of the results and average length of the papers makes Shelah about three times more productive, if we want to argue that.
 
6:58 PM
Euler has to be up there somewhere.
 
Weight of the results? How do you propose to quantify that? // Let me play the devil's advocate and disagree with your comparison (just for the sake of disagreement). =) Not that we want to argue who is right though!
 
@Srivatsan Keep track of what? Shelah? He has a site with an index, and there's a secretary working for him.
 
Oh ok. :)
 

« first day (540 days earlier)      last day (4474 days later) »