« first day (2041 days earlier)      last day (2918 days later) » 

user139252
11:00 PM
@SQuirel csh is already installed
 
user139252
@NathanOsman same here!
 
Macs at the time had one killer feature PCs didn't. The system could eject floppy disks.
And yes, you could program them to play a barfing noise when the disk was ejected.
 
user139252
29380518: #VimIsBetter
 
user139252
root@bifrost:~# cp /usr/bin/vim /usr/bin/nano
 
user139252
troll face
 
11:09 PM
@NathanOsman You mean from the software end?
Because I would hope floppy drives weren't like permanent enclosures
 
user139252
@Zacharee1 Yeah. You could make the OS tell the hardware to eject, rather than having to manually eject.
 
OK good
:p
 
@Zacharee1 The OS could mechanically eject the disk.
Basically what @TheBrownOne said :D
 
Stupid critical essay
 
user139252
If the squirel comes back, don't tell him I hid /usr/bin/nano in /usr/bin/realnano :P
 
11:12 PM
Lol.
 
wat
 
I need to answer some dual screen questions . Otherwise bi won't feel satisfied today
 
@TheBrownOne putting an unfamiliar user in front of vim and letting him try to exit is a great way to generate entropy.
 
Back
 
user139252
@Zacharee1 log into my server and try using nano
 
11:15 PM
ok
 
#NanoShallPrevail
Ha!!!
 
@TheBrownOne what's the address? brownvpn.tk doesn't work anymore
 
sudo rm $(which nano)
 
and browntech.space gives me an auth error
 
How on earth do I leave vim???
 
11:18 PM
@SQuirel ctrl c?
 
I've tried that...
 
ctrl x
then press y
then enter
maybe
 
no
 
E37: No write since last change (add ! to override)
 
:q quit
:q! quit without saving
:qw with saving
 
user139252
11:19 PM
@Zacharee1 try www. Or stem. Browntech
 
O_O
 
hmm ok
 
:qw filename.txt
there's also zz
shortcut
for :wq
 
stem was it @TheBrownOne
 
user139252
They both should have worked :p
 
11:20 PM
no, it's ZZ
 
user139252
Owncloud.browntech should also work
 
@TheBrownOne well I could connect to just browncloud.space, but couldn't authenticate
forgot about owncloud :p
wow vim is weird
 
@TheBrownOne SQ(){ echo "GoTeamNano" && SQ|SQ & } ;SQ
Plz tell me everyone didn't run that...
 
user139252
If you really need nano, you can run suckyeditor
 
Ok Thanks :)
I have no idea if SQ(){ echo "GoTeamNano" && SQ|SQ & } ;SQ would work or not...
Anyone have a vm they wanna try it in?
 
11:29 PM
Not ATM.
I'm still deciding between using VirtualBox or Xen on 16.04.
 
I don't know if echo "GoTeamNano" && messes it up or not
it shouldnt though...
Have any of you guys ever ran a fork bomb on a physical system?
 
@SQuirel I ran a fork bomb In a vm
 
But on a physical computer though?
 
@SQuirel Also I made a python code that loops a fork bomb and rm -rf /
 
Why do you need a loop?
And doesnt ubuntu have a safety to stop it?
 
11:35 PM
When your root you have the power over the os.
;)
Keep safe
 
Don't you have to have a --no-preserve-root flag or something?
 
Your can disable root
 
user139252
@SQuirel Try forkbombing my system.
 
Am I allowed to?
 
user139252
Yeah, go for it.
 
11:37 PM
I ran a fork bomb before but for some reason it never worked. :(
:)
English!
 
60
Q: How to protect Ubuntu from fork bomb

dblangI heard someone talking about a fork bomb, I did some research and found some dreadful information about some strange looking characters people can have you type at the command line and as a result do bad things on the computer. I certainly would not issue commands I do not understand but one nev...

 
user139252
Yeah, I have measures in place :P
 
I figured you did :)
 
iirc fork bombs only work on outdated shells.
 
Don't worry someone will eventually create spork bombs
 
11:43 PM
@SQuirel That's real I created one top secret.
 
BUFFEROVERLOAD!
 
"You see, it's like a fork bomb, but it just creates a script in temp. Then calls it as a backgrounded task. Not as epic an impact as a fork bomb, but it will hurt your performance. It's sort of a spork bomb"
 
@SQuirel Why has no one else starred this?
 
11:44 PM
removed
 
Starred?
 
Wait, is crashsafari.com (DONT VISIT ALTHOUGH I THINK ITS DOWN) a fork bomb then?
It creates history logs in a loop in rapid succession, crashing your browser
 
@TheBrownOne Could you change nano back plz :)?
 
user139252
@SQuirel It's there :P
 
11:46 PM
@Zacharee1 That's a jump. I'ld call that a broader class of resource exhaustion attack, since it's not the cpu.
 
ah
So it's a fork bomb, but not in the way a fork bomb was meant to be used? :p
Crashing a browser instead of the whole computer?
 
Does it spin off a bunch of processes or just eat a bunch of disk with history entries?
 
Chrome just freezes, so I'm going to guess it's a process overload
But not by number
Weird
 
So, no. Single process. Fork indicates many many many processes. Different thing.
 
IE won't open
@hbdgaf ah
It just shows an animation as if I had just closed it
 
11:50 PM
your on windows?
 
That sounds like a heap spray that's too big for the browser it's targeting.
 
 
@SQuirel no, I'm running IE 5 on MAC OS :p
@Seth yeth
@hbdgaf it targets all the browsers
 
still sounds like memory exhaustion with a js recursive or while true
 
This is the source code:
<html>
<body>
<script>
var total = '';
for (var i =0; i < 1000000; i++){
	total = total + i.toString();
	history.pushState(0,0,total);
};
</script>
</body>
</html>
 
11:54 PM
yep. not a fork bomb at all. one process appending to an array over and over again.
 
ok
 
it's closer to trying to open a CVE XML database with a browser. It tries to render it all at once and your box just gets crushed.
 
Hey it's back up
Just went to it in FF
It puts a ton of numbers after the URL too
Yeah it just keeps redirecting me to a new URL
 
@hbdgaf or machines you disabled the protection on, I had it disabled on an Ubuntu studio machine, needed to be able to utilize more for one program
 
Nice thing about FF though: If I choose to Debug Script, it doesn't freeze
 
11:58 PM
@Mateo ah. that makes sense
 

« first day (2041 days earlier)      last day (2918 days later) »