« first day (1806 days earlier)      last day (3078 days later) » 

4:00 PM
might just ignore you all
thanks for wasting your time on me though
 
@kalina Because I first wanted to see if there wasn't a better option
 
yes, this is a good idea. Call the person that will interview, and you havent met yet, your "Bestie".
 
to which we gave you several!
 
thats something @Simon would do.
 
@AviD "Beste" does not mean "Bestie"
 
4:00 PM
@NateKerkhofs you just said "bestie"
 
@AviD dutch remember
 
@AviD No, I said "Beste", not "Bestie"
 
@NateKerkhofs oh. Is the last "e" silent?
 
@NateKerkhofs I apologize for @AviD, we don't usually let him come this far out from under his bridge
 
lol
 
4:02 PM
@AviD If you're saying "beste heer/mevrouw", you're basically saying "Dear sir/madam"
although such terms don't translate all that well between languages
 
he knows this, English isn't his first language
his other language is Mongolian
because he is a Mongol
 
heh
 
@NateKerkhofs could you just go with "beste" then without "heer/mevrouw"?
or that sounds silly?
 
@NateKerkhofs when you pronounce "Beste", is the e silent?
 
but I just checked the Dutch language union website, and they say "beste" without anything after it isn't appreciated by some people
 
4:04 PM
Just go with something universal
 
heh
 
"Ween lover,"
 
hey I've got a great idea
 
@NateKerkhofs wait wait. How did Raya sign the email?
 
why not go for "Good <time of day> <first name>,"
3
 
4:04 PM
you should use the same thing.
 
@AviD No, why would it be? It's Dutch not French you silly donut
 
@AviD They said "Dag Nate" as their intro
 
@kalina how many times must you say it, and I must agree with you completely, until someone hears it?
 
@AviD I don't know but I'm bored now
 
@NateKerkhofs not intro, signature.
 
4:05 PM
"mvg Raya [lastname]"
 
regardless, either what @kalina said, or "Dag Raya".
using anything besides the same level of formality they chose - either more or less - is rude.
(okay slightly more or less is okay).
 
According to the language union website, the usual thing to say if you have a lastname, but no gender is "Geachte heer of mevrouw [lastname]" (Dear madam or sir [lastname]")
 
@AviD not if you're addressed by the queen tho
not the hive one :)
 
dammit, true there are certain titles that always pertain.
 
I'VE GOT AN IDEA
CALL THE PERSON!
Pretend to be someone else.
 
4:07 PM
@Simon I don't have a phone number
 
BOOOOOOOO
 
it comes back to equality. With the queen, you are excepting that you not at an equal level of footing. With a job interview, you are explicitly at the same level.
unless the Queen is interviewing you.
 
No you're not at the same level.
 
@AviD depends on the company culture
 
@NateKerkhofs no, it does not.
 
4:08 PM
If you'd be working for them, you'd be at the same level.
 
Sometimes companies are confused, and have it wrong.
 
@AviD What @Simon said
 
@NateKerkhofs what @Simon said didnt make any sense.
 
HERE
 
I'm not working for them yet, and I don't want to come across as either too familiar or too distant
 
4:09 PM
or were you asking, what did @Simon said?
 
NOW YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND YOU FOGEY
 
@NateKerkhofs exactly.
@Simon uhh nope
 
Jesus Christ go to some fogey rehab classes or something.
 
@Simon actually, this is me trying to give you rehab.
or, an intervention, so to speak.
It's not the 19th century any more, y'all.
 
@AviD no no no nononono if you want analogies then a better one would be that as a job seeker you're doing a business deal with them... but I don't expect that people within the same company would talk to each other as if they're making a deal, at least not all the time ... thus, not at the same level, and even if, there's different protocols
 
4:11 PM
@TildalWave the only difference is - you don't know them yet.
 
Yes and when you don't know someone, you don't go "sup boi".
 
@Simon true.
Then again, you shouldnt EVER do that with someone you do know, either.
unless it's ironically.
okay @NateKerkhofs, after taking everyone's input into consideration, the consensus is:
8 mins ago, by kalina
why not go for "Good <time of day> <first name>,"
like "Good morning, Raya,"
 
What if Raya is not a name but a position?
> raya

n.
Any subject of the Sultan of Turkey who is not a Mohammedan.
n.
An Indian broadthroat of the family Eurylæmidæ, Psarisomus dalhousiæ, inhabiting the Himalayas. The term is also one of the several generic designations which this species has received.
 
or a strange slang nickname? like "boi"?
 
I googled the name and it appears to be predominantly a female name
so I think the best idea is just to address them as female
and if they're not a female, then they probably are used to being called a female
 
4:17 PM
Dutch language doesn't have a plural form that can be used as gender neutral way of addressing a single individual?
"eervol"?
 
@NateKerkhofs "Jobs motherfuckers, do you have any?"
 
@NateKerkhofs Yeah man, at some point you just gotta say "fuck it" and go full on #yolo.
 
translate: eervol
(from Dutch) Honorable
hmmm, might be a bit much
 
@TildalWave no, such honorrifics are usually reserved for dignitaries, like judges or public servants
 
yeah I just realized that
 
4:20 PM
The closest we have to that is Edelachtbare, and we only call judges that
I'm going to stick with my original instinct of referring to them as female. thenamemeaning.com/raya says it's a girl name
and if they turn out to be male, they're probably used to being referred to as female
but if I call them male, and they turn out to be female and care about it, I lose a great deal of standing.
 
how about "gerespecteerde"?
translate: gerespecteerde
(from Dutch) respected
so "gerespecteerde Raya,..."
 
@TildalWave again, rarely used, even in the situations that call for it
 
damn
 
its too formal
 
4:23 PM
4 mins ago, by kalina
@NateKerkhofs "Jobs motherfuckers, do you have any?"
 
hehehe
 
@TildalWave the only way you would use it is in "Edelachtbare"
which is to adress a judge
 
@TildalWave My problem is not the honorific, my problem is that referring to them by their first name without permission is impolite
 
Yep, so I'd do "Ms. lastname,".
 
so I want to refer to them with their last name, but that can't be done in Dutch without a gender
 
4:23 PM
@LucasKauffman I thought that's an edelacht berry fruit bar" :)
 
I start all of my emails with "hey"
 
@NateKerkhofs you can just say Dear, if you are really unsure
 
cba with formalities
 
"Beste,"
 
Okay, I just sent the mail using "Geachte mevrouw [lastname]"
 
4:24 PM
@LucasKauffman "ensure"?
 
@NateKerkhofs I understand, but I don't see a good way around it
 
so "Dear miss [lastname]"
 
translate: Geachte mevrouw
(from Dutch) Dear Madam
 
@kalina sorry Im emptying all my half full whisky bottles
@TildalWave didnt know you spoke dutch :P
 
@LucasKauffman me neither :)
 
4:25 PM
@LucasKauffman All mods speak google translate.
 
@TildalWave It's somewhat more neutral than Madam, but that's the gist of it
 
It really depends on corporate culture tho, I know at EY I would never send an email with lastname, always firstname
internally
 
when I worked for ungratefuls I never started my emails with anything
it was normally just WHAT HAS HAPPENED ZOMG?! <screenshot>
or "LOL look at this developer including the binary column storing images in the index"
"Are you really running DBCC in the middle of the day on production? REALLY? REALLY?"
oh, stressful times
I'm glad life isn't like that anymore
 
@kalina well rejecting is always so much easier, no need for any of this formal crap you just reply with "I'm afraid we're wasting each others time" if you wanna be polite or "Stop wasting my time" if you don't care for that :)
 
@TildalWave that's still too polite
 
4:28 PM
At my previous job I had to start all mails with "Dag firstname," Didn't matter if it was addressing a client or internal.
 
"WASSSSSSSAAAAAAAAAAAAP????! ps I have removed <managers> login from production because he keeps doing select * from bigtable"
 
@LucasKauffman and this is at Big4.
literally the most corporate place you can find.
 
@AviD ey has a very flat hierarchy
 
@LucasKauffman oh. uh huh. Sure sure. Riiiiiight.
Remind me again, how Partners work?
 
with a mallet
 
4:31 PM
well basically the partners are the bosses
and everybody else are... present
 
are present
 
what is ey?
 
yes, they're those people that the partners don't care about and turn up for less money than the partners would accept for a short game of golf
 
@NateKerkhofs Ernst & Young
 
oh, I see. I thought it was an abbreviation for something else
ah, so it is an abbreviation
 
4:32 PM
That'd be an acronym, I believe.
 
nurd
 
fkin rekt
One could argue that an acronym is an abbreviation, though.
 
@Simon you'd have to try really hard to make an acronym that was not also an abbreviation
 
@AviD depends on the partner, but in general i can just walk up and have a chat, there are no issues there mostly
 
HELLO COLIIIIIIIN
HOW IS IT GOING MR. CASSIDY?
 
4:34 PM
HIIIIII!
 
An acronym is an abbreviation used as a word which is formed from the initial components in a phrase or a word. Usually these components are individual letters (as in NATO or laser) or parts of words or names (as in Benelux). There are broad currents of consensus but no universal standardization of various names for such abbreviations and of their orthographic styling. In English and most other languages, such abbreviations historically had limited use, but they became much more common in the 20th century. Acronyms are a type of word formation process, and they are viewed as a subtype of blending...
 
fine, just finishing up, and figured I post something here
 
yeah, so an acronym is literally an abbreviation
 
and that post rekt simon
10/10 would read again
 
pls, I did say that
 
4:35 PM
it's a bit of an assumption on your part to assume I read the nonsense you type
 
blablabla
 
have you written an arrangement yet?
 
What do you think I'm doing right now?
 
masturbating
 
pls
 
4:36 PM
sorry
tweezerbating
 
@kalina Isn't it always an assumption to assume something? or did you mean presumption?
 
all
 
it's getting a bit hot in here
like something or somebody is about to burst into flames
 
@kalina Because you got burned?
 
rekt
 
4:37 PM
I'm fireproof
we've established this already
many times
 
PULL DA TRIGGER MODAFUKA AM BULLET PROOF
 
@LucasKauffman I meant their existence. And Junior Partners. And Directors. And etc.
 
@kalina so you mean you're covered in flame retardant material?
 
@NateKerkhofs no I have extreme levels of control over space and time
 
@AviD I play league of legends with one of my directors and the other one offered to pick me up before we went to Texas because he knew I had a goodbye party the night before :P
 
4:38 PM
@kalina Hello Doctor
 
sssh
you can't do that in here, a Rory might see
 
a roro
 
I've been told that if I am any character from Doctor Who that I am a weeping angel
 
@kalina Weren't you sad when you had to say goodbye to Amelia Pond during the Weeping Angel invasion of Manhattan?
@kalina because you stiffen up whenever someone looks at you?
 
@LucasKauffman that doesnt mean there is no hierarchy, it means there is no inappropriate overformal distance between you.
 
4:40 PM
I don't watch Doctor Who so I don' tknow
 
She doesn' tknow
 
@NateKerkhofs heeey SPOILERS
 
I assumed they were ridiculously badass and dangerous
 
@AviD there is hierarchy in decision making, which is normal
but there isnt hierarchy in terms of formality
 
@kalina Weeping Angels turn into stone when someone watches them, including the camera. That's what makes them so creepy
 
4:40 PM
10 mins ago, by Lucas Kauffman
@AviD ey has a very flat hierarchy
@LucasKauffman thats not what that means
 
@NateKerkhofs well that correctly suits my introverted nature
 
@NateKerkhofs and then they hit you so hard you literally go back in time.
 
I think it's because I used to randomly appear in the Bridge, hold a conversation with nobody and then immediately leave teh second anybody became active
 
aw yo lil friendz from da bridge gave u a lil nickname
 
I have several nicknames I have collected over the years
including pixel for "small and insignificant but a massive problem if you upset her"
like dead pixels
oh right, that would have been an op sec fail
apparently the name before pixel returns google results
!
well not that massive, seems to be just a collection of game forums
#chatkiller
#monologuer
#angel
#innocent
#outspoken
#riskeverythingfearnothing
 
4:56 PM
@kalina apart from telling us your DJ name :op
 
that's not fear
that's being sensible
 
@kalina it's also not risk
but then I suppose risk implies reward, and the only reward to telling us would be a small blip in your twitter followers
and @Simon gawping over the fact that he has a picture with you already
 
"small" is being generous
 
wat
 
@Simon doesn't have a picture of me already
well, I suppose he might have
 
4:58 PM
@kalina we talking about @Simon again?
 
@Simon doesn't have a picture WITH me already
 
pls leave my ween alone
 
@kalina right steph
 
HEY LIGHTY HOW'S THE MISSIONARY GOING?
A LIL' BORING AT TIMES, YES?
 
"Guys, I've had enough, I'm <X>, here is proof <link>"
"Simon: I feel dirty"
well delete your crank bank collection
 
4:59 PM
I'm sure that I own 0 tracks of yours.
 
that's even worse
you'd steal my music and then call yourself a friend?
 
o pls
 
@kalina you've upgraded him to friend?
when did that happen?
 
@RоryMcCune re-read what I said
I didn't say anything about what I class him
 
There's literally one track that wasn't bought in my tracks and that's because it couldn't be bought.
 
5:00 PM
@kalina I did , I was purposely finding it ambiguous to make a point
amusingly from the few I've seen, there's an easy way to rule out most DJs from being @kalina 's IRL persona which is that the grammar on their sites is awful.
 
5:16 PM
@RоryMcCune I have narrowed my list down to 31 possibles. But I have no obvious way to narrow the list further, other than to visit each one and whisper "*** pixel" into their ears. I foresee that being high effort and likely to get me slapped
 
@RoryAlsop website grammar check I'd wager would rule some out :)
 
@RоryMcCune that ruled a few - also ones I knew had gigs on when @kalina was active in here
I have almost resigned myself to the fact at some point she may well tell me, and I'll find out she was one of the ones we ruled out ages ago :-)
 
@RoryAlsop you mean Taylor Swift ...right
 
@RоryMcCune Taylor is on my list of likely to meet, but not likely to be kalina
 
@RoryAlsop what is "*** pixel" ?
 
5:28 PM
@AviD a username @kalina had
 
@RoryAlsop oh never seen that
why wouldnt you just whisper "kalina" in their ears?
or "flyk" ?
or "PONIIIIEEEEEESSS!!"
though that last one would likely be misheard, and definitely get you slapped.
 
weenies?
 
see, this is why I dont go to dance bars, I dont think these things through, then I go and whisper inappropriate things in the DJ's ear and get myself slapped.
@Simon c'mon man.
 
I just liked that exact comic on FB 10 minutes ago.
Stalker.
 
it just came up in my feed literally moments ago.
made me think of you.
 
5:33 PM
ghey
 
like, that guy IS you.
you ARE that guy.
 
It looks like you haven't seen the tweet I've sent you this morning yet.
 
@Simon pls
and it was this afternoon.
hopeless.
 
@RoryAlsop hmmm
 
@kalina I'll wait and see if you say hi IRL at some point. Don't worry, I'm really not the stalker type
Although I was quite impressed at the mobilised power of this chat room to try and locate and help that poor individual last week
 
5:44 PM
you're not?
 
u r not?
 
@kalina nah - too much effort, and doesn't lead to an outcome I like
anyway - I'm obvious. So if folks want to say hi, I'm not difficult to find
 
@RoryAlsop I can't remember that. Was I involved?
 
@Arperum not sure - I wasn't useful, but was a spectator
 
weirdly google image search was very useful in that
led to the connection from the first alias to the second
which was what led to skype
 
5:52 PM
What was going on? Who had some problems?
 
@Arperum @Ohnana had seen a person on reddit who had taken an overdose and was keen to help them out, so asked if we could help find some IRL details based on their reddit profile
 
@RоryMcCune Oh right, I vaguely remember seeing some aftermath of that.
Or maybe the start. Or some random point of it anyway.
 
6:08 PM
 
You have to be one hell of a ween to be scared to ask a girl out.
 
@Simon You have no idea how hard it is for some people, being introverted and being bullied does not help.
 
I also don't recall my default browser ever paying for a night out, so it's a bit unfair to compare it like that
 
tildol
pls
 
frankly, in my student years, I didn't hesitate to ask a girl out because I didn't dare to, but out of pity for my dried out wallet
 
6:24 PM
I didn't ask girls out when I was a teenager because most teen gurlz are idiots.
As are teen dudes, before ovid complains.
 
6:53 PM
Speaking of Ovid
I just drove past that town a while back and laughed. Thanks a lot, Simon
 
My pleasure, sir.
 
 
1 hour later…
8:13 PM
@RoryAlsop You might wanna check this Villican guy out again.
Now that he has auto-edit powers, it's even worse than before.
 
@RоryMcCune ooh completely missd that
 
You were probably too busy putting your kids on a timeout.
 
@Simon hey I have a couple of teen girls. I know what youre talkng about.
 
o
 
Bears per 1000 square km in Finland, visualized as bears. #dataviz http://makijarvi.tumblr.com/ https://t.co/Ff6ZlZA9EI
/cc @adi
 
8:18 PM
... That's the only person you cc this to?
You can't think of anyone who's obsessed with bears in here?
 
that live in finlnd? .... no.
 
pls
 
okay, cc @ThomasPornin too, on casevyou decide to visit finland.
 
casevyou
What keyboard layout are you using to hit "v" after typing "case"?
 
@AviD I have already met a Finnish polar bear. I ate it.
 
8:23 PM
wat
 
In a soup.
 
@Simon typin a tablet. notvseeing what im typing, and hitting v instead ofvspace.
 
You like bears yet you don't mind to eat bear?
@AviD looool
 
@Simon Bears eat bears.
 
@ThomasPornin pls
 
8:24 PM
Usually smaller and/or deader bears.
That's Nature for you.
 
Mother Nature is evil.
 
not to mention the rowdy two year old bouncing on my other arm...
 
You're the one who thought it was a good idea to reproduce 134 times.
 
heh.
 
Seriously how many kids do you have?
At least 5?
 
8:38 PM
@Simon x, where x is the number more than is sensible to have
 
So, that's at least one.
 
@Simon well he mentioned "A couple of teen girls" earlier so I'm guessing it's 2+
 
@Simon "at least"
 
9:00 PM
 
9:13 PM
@RоryMcCune why are they wishing us a happy Thanksgiving?
 
10:07 PM
Wait there are Doctor Who fans here? \o/
 
@ManishEarth Spoilers!
 
10:39 PM
@Manish - it's an entrance requirement for this room
 
11:07 PM
I don't like it
 
Shhh
 
I haven't watched many of them though, perhaps I missed all of the good ones
 
11:48 PM
Except that one guy. He's not doing a good job. You know who you are. GET WITH THE PROGRAM, MANJeff Atwood ♦ 13 hours ago
I don't get it. Is that some Fallout ref?
 

« first day (1806 days earlier)      last day (3078 days later) »