It is how I was hired. I told Philippe, "I am trustworthy, and there is no cause for concern in hiring me." He said, "Wow, you said that so confidently that it must be true," and hired me.
If you want to explore Staging Ground here - well, we haven't turned it on anywhere but Stack Overflow, so far. I have no idea what sort of work would be required. But I would recommend taking a bit of time to explore how it works on Stack Overflow. Then discuss it a bit on Physics Meta.
I mean, Arrow's theorem is just a theorem, but the article sort of leaves completely unanswered why Arrow's theorem should be considered the causative agent in jury evaluations seeming subjectively worse than single-agent evaluations
What a horror; a whole person taken and reduced to a tag label. To celebrate her birthday in such reduced form is mere consolation. I wish only to restore her from margaret-atwood to her physical form some day.
@Slate probably in the clear; dev's monitoring for ~1 hr further. I won't be monitoring actively personally - at my EOD - but if it falls over it won't go unnoticed
FYI - we're performing a deployment imminently related to this morning's downtime incident that may break the public API on the platform. If broken, it may go down for at most 5-10 minutes while we perform a rollback. Please report quickly if you see signs of dysfunction (but do not be alarmed); we'll be monitoring as well on our end.
You. Yes, you: What’s on your mind?
When you think about the future of the network - years from now - what worries you? What makes you anxious? What do you look forward to? What might make you hopeful?
I’ve spent the last few months thinking about the state of the Stack Exchange network and wher...
We will be doing a quick failover test of api.stackexchange.com on Wednesday, November 20, 2024, 10:00 PM-11:00 PM EST (Thursday, November 21, 03:00 UTC - Thursday, November 21, 04:00 UTC).
During this time, the public API will only allow GET routes. PUT, POST, and DELETE routes will be unavailab...
@Dragonrage I mean, as an ex-dev watching the proceedings, I can honestly say I was genuinely surprised that there was a second issue hiding in this case.
Yeah, I sort of went by "least access" principles tbh. If access isn't needed, granting something introduces risk. Even just human error. Decided better to just not mess with it and keep em separate.
But as far as directly managing network traffic is concerned, for now, my opinion is that it's something for us (Stack Exchange) to worry about, more than it is something for mods to worry about, even though community building is of course within the scope of what moderators do.
I also want to say that as far as moderators' stewardship of the network is concerned, decreases in traffic aren't strictly negative (yes yes, except insofar as they are decreases, I always have to remember I'm talking to mathematicians here ;). Still, in my personal opinion, meaningful changes in traffic are important for mods to be mindful of, particularly since they can significantly change site culture.
Based on the evidence available to me, I don't have cause to believe that the decline in post rate on Math Stack Exchange is unique network-wide, or directly caused by a particular decision the moderators or community here made. It's always possible I could discover evidence that might implicate some community decision, of course, but given that nothing stands out on review, I'm probably not going to spend too much time looking.