/dev/chat

General discussion for unix.stackexchange.com. If you have a q...
Mar 21, 2017 22:01
thanks, I'll ask on the site
Mar 21, 2017 21:44
connect*
Mar 21, 2017 21:43
the server puts the public ip of my router, and I, behind my nat connects to it
Mar 21, 2017 21:43
I'd like to know if it's possible to do a reverse ssh tunnel with the client and the server behind NAT
Mar 21, 2017 21:16
quick question on ssh
Mar 21, 2017 21:16
hey anybody on?
 

 Root Access

For all you Super Users out there. You have backups, right?
Jan 24, 2017 18:53
if so, then if there was an ip such as 999.99.99.99 would be output as well
Jan 24, 2017 18:52
or.. does it mean each character is from 0 to 9?
Jan 24, 2017 18:51
since an IP would start at 1 up to 255
Jan 24, 2017 18:51
stackoverflow.com/a/25351743/4844191 the [0-9.]{7,15} part.. why did the person put [0-9.] and not [0-255.]?
Jan 24, 2017 18:45
having trouble reading some regex I believe
Jan 24, 2017 18:45
I'm looking for someone good with grep
Jan 24, 2017 18:45
heyya
May 21, 2016 17:15
with my ip table restriction?
May 21, 2016 17:15
lol
May 21, 2016 17:14
Quick question: Could I use a raspberry pie with a wifi adapter to act as a man in the middle and forward all traffic between the two hosts? I know it is possible, but could I do it only with ip tables with PREROUTING and --to-destination ?
May 21, 2016 17:11
Good morning!
May 5, 2016 22:04
Could any of you expans a bit on it because I have been reading routing for a while and all the answers I see are about commecting 2 subnets together (ping the other subnet)
May 5, 2016 22:03
It is in order to learn linux and networking haha + it is always good to know how in case I need something like it (when I don't have the perticular hardware such as the wireless repeater)!
May 5, 2016 21:57
Hey I was wondering if It was possible to make a device that is usually not able to access the wifi range able to connect to it using a device in a middle (between the router and the device that is in the wifi's range). The device in the middle is a linux box. With routing, would it be possible to set the middle device to act like the router(be the gateway for the far away PC and forward the traffic to the real router and finally forward the replies from the real router that far away device
 

 The DMZ

A serious place where infosec is discussed PS we don't do hard...
Jul 6, 2016 17:59
any pentesters here that may help me out for a sec?
May 15, 2016 20:33
Finally, is proxychains the right way to go in order to use tools/services anonymously such as ftp/ssh/nmap/sql etc? OR is there a better way
May 15, 2016 20:25
and IDK how to make sure it is indeed stealth and IF someone could use -sV as an argument
May 15, 2016 20:24
If someone would use proxychains nmap -n -Pn -sT "ip", it should be stealth, but first, it takes 2 hours to complete
May 15, 2016 20:23
nmap uses more than 1 protocol (icmp, dns, tcp, special ip packets and udp) but proxychains only allow tcp
May 15, 2016 20:22
One would use proxychains with simply tor as a proxy (127.0.0.1, 9150) and would wish to use, lets say nmap
May 15, 2016 20:21
Hi, I have a bit of a controversial question about proxychains
May 12, 2016 20:36
dig myserver.org A (to get the A record work).. but not the ANY
May 12, 2016 20:32
I am not able to get a result if I use the ANY (type). Lets say I run: dig myserver.org ANY, that doesn't work... If I use -t ANY, neither.
May 12, 2016 20:31
I need help with the dig command
May 12, 2016 20:31
hello guys!
May 9, 2016 03:12
Hey! (Nmap wise) I was wondering if anyone knew if the os detection and the service version detection was only using tcp or if it was also using udp, icmp and other protocols
May 4, 2016 21:27
@Xander I'll go read about that! thanks for the help!
May 4, 2016 20:52
In that mean, that would be a situation named: ip forwarding?
May 4, 2016 20:50
@Xander I could to do instead, PC1 -> PC2 ->Webserver -> PC2 -> PC1?
May 4, 2016 20:49
Ah true...
May 4, 2016 20:42
@SEJPM The webserver is on a remote network (internet)
May 4, 2016 20:41
@Xander I would modify the ip of the source in the header to the ip of PC2. The PC2 would have ALLOW on port 80 so the connection would go in and record the reply. Does that make sense?
May 4, 2016 20:11
because if there's a vulnerability, he may simply exploit it and ask for a tcp connection to my computer to the port 80 *?
May 4, 2016 20:09
But how would it be easier for an attacker to infiltrate my network easier?
May 4, 2016 20:09
I would like to learn each way but in this case, it would be PC1 -> Webserver -> PC2
May 4, 2016 20:01
IDK if I expressed myself clearly enough :p
May 4, 2016 20:01
Hi I would like to know if it is dangerous to accept any connection (on lets say port 80) by making an ACCEPT rule in IP TABLES on that port? The purpose would be, lets say I make a request to a website but I wish that the reply goes to another computer, that computer would need to allow traffic in
 

 Ask Ubuntu General Room

Normally: General discussion around Ask Ubuntu, Ubuntu & offic...
May 21, 2016 18:04
thanks guys
May 21, 2016 18:01
@Seth Thanks, and where should I ask the question?
May 21, 2016 17:56
@Seth It could be a real computer, it could be a vm, a Pie, whatever: I just wan't to understand how to forward traffic from a computer to the repeater to the router AND from the router to the repeater to the device
May 21, 2016 17:50
@onebree Yep, others told me the same thing, but no one actually is able to answer my question hahah
May 21, 2016 17:26
by the internet, I mean : send to the router
May 21, 2016 17:25
It's not a question about security (no arp poisonning/rogue dhcp). It's more about a device that is not in range to get any signal from anywhere so, there's a device in the middle that forward all the traffic he receives from that device and send it to the internet
May 21, 2016 17:24
Quick question: Could I use a Raspberry Pie with a wifi adapter to act as a man in the middle and forward all traffic between the two hosts? I know it is possible, but could I do it only with ip tables with PREROUTING and --to-destination ?