« first day (1977 days earlier)      last day (3201 days later) » 

Henry White Hat Hacker
Henry White Hat Hacker
09:24
15 hours and nobody been here!
 
6 hours later…
Rory Alsop
Rory Alsop
15:45
Not quite correct @Henry, just no-one posted. It is the weekend y'know :-)
 
4 hours later…
Jacco
Jacco
20:15
hey, who locked security.stackexchange.com/questions/123384/… ?
I was just writing an answer for it?!
Bob Ebert
Bob Ebert
Hi, I have a bit of a controversial question about proxychains
One would use proxychains with simply tor as a proxy (127.0.0.1, 9150) and would wish to use, lets say nmap
nmap uses more than 1 protocol (icmp, dns, tcp, special ip packets and udp) but proxychains only allow tcp
Jacco
Jacco
@schroeder, the question you migrated was security related and it is unlikely to receive a quality answer at stackoverflow.com.
Bob Ebert
Bob Ebert
If someone would use proxychains nmap -n -Pn -sT "ip", it should be stealth, but first, it takes 2 hours to complete
and IDK how to make sure it is indeed stealth and IF someone could use -sV as an argument
Finally, is proxychains the right way to go in order to use tools/services anonymously such as ftp/ssh/nmap/sql etc? OR is there a better way
schroeder
schroeder
20:42
@Jacco how is it security related? it's a pure syntax question
Jacco
Jacco
21:01
Is is security related because he's asking for any known characters that an attacker could send him that would bypass his 'filter function' (such as the null-byte).
schroeder
schroeder
that's a consequence to a syntax reality - that only makes the question tangentially security related
Jacco
Jacco
I disagree, put there is no point in arguing about it.
schroeder
schroeder
who's arguing?
Jacco
Jacco
I'm was merely saying that it doesn't matter enough to me to start arguing about.
 
1 hour later…
Rory Alsop
Rory Alsop
22:32
Yeah - that's not a security question. It's php syntax. The two are only vaguely connected (eh @Simon :-)

« first day (1977 days earlier)      last day (3201 days later) »