« first day (1301 days earlier)      last day (3615 days later) » 

12:01 AM
@Robusto Good.
 
Too intrusive.
 
I cannot do without it, but it is easy to just only allow it where you need it.
I have it set to "always allow" on a few sites, and "ask" on all others.
 
c c
@Cerberus if you mean applets, that's just one part of java (that was a major error)
 
@cc Yes, that's what I mean. It is the part of Java that most people see.
 
c c
they are deprecated, so they should slowly disappear
 
12:06 AM
Let's hope so!
I still have one website that I use that uses it.
 
c c
I don't even have installed it on my browser
 
And ask to play doesn't seem to work for Java on that site, so I have to open it in Chrome. Which is just the click of a button.
Good!
 
12:38 AM
 
12:49 AM
@Robusto She's the cat in the Hathaway shirt.
 
Wow. Just . . . wow.
 
@JohanLarsson it's supposed to be Buttercup, but I call her anything but.
Anything But isn't a great name for a cat, however.
 
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 muted trombone wah-wah
 
1:32 AM
@Cerberus That belongs up there with lying down outside in a lightning storm.
@MετάEd What, so you like have natural immunity to toxoplasmosis?
 
@tchrist Oh, yeah?
We do not have bears here.
 
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 Oh my gosh! What a cutie.
 
@Cerberus Wild carnivores that outmass you by that amount are never “safe”. You may be able to work something out with them, but you might not. I suggest having a small sacrificial dog along with you when you run.
 
I don't like dogs.
> Although an adult bear is quite capable of killing a human, American black bears typically avoid confronting humans when possible. Unlike grizzly bears, which became a subject of fearsome legend among the European settlers of North America, black bears were rarely considered overly dangerous, even though they lived in areas where the pioneers had settled. Black bears rarely attack when confronted by humans, and usually limit themselves to making mock charges, emitting blowing noises and swatting the ground with their forepaws.
So they are not "safe", but not super scary either. Far less dangerous than grizzly bears.
 
1:48 AM
@Mahnax Thank you!
 
@Cerberus I give bears a wide berth, regardless.
 
2:10 AM
@Cerberus People still use Java because it's a powerful language that's relatively safe and there are tons of tools for it. It's ubiquitous. Oh, did you mean Java applets? That I have no idea. But then I wonder the same thing about Flash.
 
3:09 AM
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 The thinker. Just a little coy. But very nicely shot.
 
@Robusto Thank you!
 
@Cerberus Ah, so you have profound psychological self-loathing issues? A dog who hates dogs, interesting. Or is it just that one of your heads hates another? After all, multiple personality disorder is normal for you.
 
@TheodoreBroda Three persons in one dog. The triune dog.
 
@Robusto Yes, the one true tricephalous canine.
I wonder which head controls movement.
 
Now I know how it must feel to feed your pet snake live mice.
 
3:16 AM
@tchrist Did you just feed your pet snake live mice? That's the only way to know how it feels that I know.
 
I’ve been shooing down moths perched too far up my walls for the kitties to reach them.
I feel somewhat guilty.
 
But those are insects.
 
@TheodoreBroda I only hate other dogs! Don't like competition.
 
@tchrist The hemolymph of many moths is now on your hands.
 
Alpha male @Cerberus?
 
3:19 AM
@Cerberus Competition for what? Leg-humping?
 
@skullpatrol Alpha dog.
@Robusto For example!
All legs are belong to me.
 
!!wiki alpha male
 
@skullpatrol The Wikipedia contains no knowledge of such a thing
In social animals, the alpha is the individual in the community with the highest rank. Male or female individuals or both can be alphas, depending on their species. Where one male and one female fulfill this role, they are referred to as the alpha pair. Other animals in the same social group may exhibit deference or other symbolic signs of respect particular to their species towards the alpha or alphas. In hierarchical social animals, alphas usually gain preferential access to food and other desirable items or activities, though the extent of this social effect varies widely by species...
 
why must I feel like that / why must I chase the cat / nothin' but the dog in me
 
@Robusto Now I know what punishment awaits in Hades.
 
3:21 AM
Yes
 
@Cerberus If you are the alpha, which one of us is the beta? Or are you a lone dog, without a pack?
 
!!youtube who let the dogs out
 
The triune dog is the alpha and the omega.
The triune dog is the omega-3.
And I am beyond omega. And off to bed.
 
Hey, I'm usually not super destructive.
@TheodoreBroda Are you a dog?
 
3:25 AM
@Cerberus I think I am some variety of hominid, but I am not certain.
@Robusto Dyslexic atheists don't believe in "Dog".
 
@skullpatrol Do you know wicked that sounds? Just swap in anything else, like lap dogs or lions or loons or lorikeets or lemmings or lemurs or lepers or lobsters or mobsters or Lakotas or losers or terrorists or mothers-in-law?
 
@tchrist But they're just mothers-in-law.
 
See, and now the Nazis have won.
Probably best not try it with lawyers, either.
Nor politicians.
 
@tchrist , championing the campaign for universal acknowledgment of lorikeet rights.
 
Teba, have you ever seen a flock full of fifty or more rainbow lorikeets? It is glorious to behold in the tropical sun. However, seeing is the good sense in their case.
 
3:33 AM
!! wiki lorikeet
 
Lories and lorikeets (tribe Lorini) are small to medium-sized arboreal parrots characterized by their specialized brush-tipped tongues for feeding on nectar of various blossoms and soft fruits, preferably berries. The species form a monophyletic group within the parrot family Psittacidae. Traditionally, they were considered a separate subfamily (Loriinae) from the other subfamily (Psittacinae) based on the specialized characteristics, but recent molecular and morphological studies show that the group is positioned in the middle of various other groups. They are widely distributed throug...
 
@tchrist They do have magnificent plumage.
@Cerberus Something lends me to believe that this is somewhat disingenuous.
 
They fly so quick and powerfully, in random but frequent peregrination. Like a bunch of shiny falcons. But the din!
 
@tchrist Are flocks of polychromatic birds a typical sight for you?
 
They move as a mass, all of them suddenly zipping off together in frantic but phenomenal formation.
@TheodoreBroda You forgot an L.
 
3:41 AM
@tchrist I didn't know that you frequent Australasia. Or do you moonlight as an ornithologist?
 
Why can’t both be correct?
 
@tchrist The "or" was intended to represent an inclusive disjunction. Next time I shall use "and/or" for disambiguation.
 
I‘ve been to Australia twice. And a litte avocational ornithology never hurt anybody.
 
Personally, I have never had the fortune to see such colorful birds in the wild, although my birdfeeder is occasionally graced by the reasonably colorful painted bunting.
 
It’s the same idea.
Except for the mass and numbers and raucousness and guano. But yeah, the colors are right.
 
3:48 AM
@TheodoreBroda Then you are not a threat to me.
 
I was ever charmed by them.
 
@TheodoreBroda whistles
 
@tchrist "Guano", a lovely, almost euphonic eupemism.
 
> Materia excrementicia de aves marinas, que se encuentra acumulada en gran cantidad en las costas y en varias islas del Perú y del norte de Chile. Se utiliza como abono en la agricultura.
No punches pulled there.
 
@Cerberus I did not know that dogs were capable of whistling.
 
3:52 AM
 
@tchrist The first part could almost be Latin!
@tchrist Thank you!
 
I want to know how the rat snuck in for a role clearly meant to be cast as a canine.
Rule 52, or something, but for everything else, too.
 
@tchrist It is hard to believe that the U.S. government has annexed over a hundred guano islands since the 1850s. Poop can be quite valuable!
The U.S. government has spent / much effort gaining excrement / gathering the feces / of avian species / to offset its vast deficit!
 
@Cerberus Because you cannot use an accusative de aves instead of ablative de avibus? You can’t construe a hypothetical de + acc. as some sort of coming down out from heaven or something?
 
@tchrist Never. De is never used with the accusative.
Only some prepositions can take either case. De is not among them.
In, sub, sure.
 
4:03 AM
I’m trying to think of how to express shit falling from birds.
 
You could use de.
 
@Cerberus Is It mostly the same set as German?
 
Not really.
Some are the same.
Perhaps those are the cognates?
 
The German ones I remember as being for notions of motions.
 
In/in, über/super, that sort of thing.
@tchrist Yes.
If a preposition can be used with either, it is usually between motion/non-motion.
 
4:05 AM
That’s what I was wondering.
 
But, as in German, many prepositions that express a motion are always with the dative and v.v.
Zu dative always.
 
You have to admit, Latin has a lot of prepositions.
 
Not that many?
 
I think it’s the ones we DON’T have from are interesting.
We took a lot of them, down through the ages.
 
Have from?
 
4:07 AM
Prepositions. Latin.
 
Yes, and many are simply shared, like in, over.
 
But sometimes in compounds.
sub, supter, super, in change more, it says, in the acc-abl distinction.
 
@Cerberus Fortunately, I have a copy of Collin's German Grammar handy. The prepositions always used in the accusative (to show motion) are as follows: an, auf, hinter, in, neben, über, unter, vor, zwischen. The prepositions always used in dative are the same as the accusative, but when used to show position.
 
@tchrist Supter?
"Change more"?
 
That was exactly my question.
> A few prepositions change their meaning depending on whether they take the ablative or accusative, and these lines are a cunning aide-memoire to help. These are super, subter, sub and in. I.e Sub with the ablative has the meaning 'under' but with the accusatve 'up to'. 'Up to' implies movement whereas 'under' doesn't.
What's subter?
 
4:11 AM
@TheodoreBroda That list looks correct. But your last sentence I do not understand.
@tchrist As far as I know, an adverb.
 
The first part of subterranean, not doubt. :)
 
Meaning something like "down".
Tsk.
Naughty.
 
When it rains, it pours — frogs.
 
> subter (also supter), adv. and prep. [sub].

I. Adv., below, beneath, underneath: navem in fugam transdunt subter saxa, Att. ap. Non. 155, 8 (Trag. Rel. v. 630 Rib.): "terram fac ut esse rearis Subter item, ut supera", Lucr. 6, 537: "partim quod supter per terras diditur omnis", id. 5, 268: "aliam naturam supter habere", id. 5, 536: "omnia haec, quae supra et subter, unum esse", Cic. de Or. 3, 5, 20; "id. poët. N. D. 2, 42, 106: anulus subter adhaerens", Lucr. 6, 914: "oculum subter premere", id. 4, 447: "subter mediam fere regionem sol obtinet", Cic. Rep. 6, 17, 17.—Comp.: "subterius (op
 
@Cerberus That list of prepositions, when used to show motion, is in the accusative. That same list of prepositions, when used to indicate stationary position, is in dative.
 
4:13 AM
I'm not surprised supter exists, as it would be a regular variation; but I can't say I remember ever seeing it.
As to the prepositional use, the dictionary calls it "rare but classical", okay.
 
WOW!
 
@TheodoreBroda Yes, that is correct.
 
Finally subterfuge connects more subtly!
 
But there are many prepositions that express a motion but take the dative in German, and v.v., was what I was saying.
@tchrist How do you mean? When you do something sub or subter or hypo, the verb often means "secretly".
 
> The noun controlled by a preposition in Latin takes either the accusative or ablative, and so you need to know which prepostion takes the ablative and which the accusative. Luckily, there are some handy rhymes to help you remember preposition uses which:-

These chaps take the ablative (but beware the last line).
a, ab, absque, coram, de
palam, clam, cum, ex and e
sine, tenus, pro and prae.
Add super, subter, sub and in.
When state not motion tis they mean.

And these chaps take the accusative (but again beware the last line).
How cute mnemonics.
@Cerberus I was being naughty again. subt-.
 
4:16 AM
I saw that.
 
@tchrist Until now, I did not recognize that subter was a Latin preposition, let alone the etymon of subterfuge. Fascinating!
 
But...it didn't make enough sense.
 
That was basically my point.
 
I would not say it is a preposition in subterfuge.
More like a prefix based on an adverb.
 
Aw shucks, there’s buttloads of tehm
subter- [pref.]
subteˈrannuating [vbl. n.] ← subter-
subteraquean [adj.]
subteraqueous [adj.]
subter-ˈbrutish [adj.] ← subter-
ˌsubter-ceˈlestial [adj.] ← subter-
subter-ˈconscious [adj.] ← subter-
† subterˈcubant ← subter-
ˌsubtercuˈtaneous ← subter-
subterˈduction ← subter-
ˌsubtereroˈgation ← subter-
ˌsubtereˈtherial [adj.] ← subter-
† subterˈfluent [adj. n.] ← subter-
† ˈsubterfuge [v.]
subterfuge [n.]
† ˈsubterfuging [ppl. adj.] ← ˈsubterfuge
† ˈsubterfugy [n.]
subterˈhuman [adj.] ← subter-
 
4:19 AM
> subter
subterduco
subterfluo
subterfugio
subterhabeo
subterlabor
subtero
subterpono
subterraneus
subtervaco
 
Ok, what the hell is the difference between subjacent and subterjacent?
I’m serious.
Because I’ve used subjacent for underlying, like inferior nodes in a tree data structure, further from the root.
 
Very little, probably.
I usually treat the two as synonyms, kind of.
> subter-dūcō, dūcere, dūxī, ductum (Plaut.) heimelijk onttrekken [se er stiekem vandoor gaan].
If yyou are laying low, you stay hidden...
 
I meant it in the sense of "lying beneath".
 
@tchrist I'm familiar with superannuate, but not subterannuate. Where did you find this great vocabulary list?
 
> A person reading a snippet of Perl code (or of English code, for that
matter) cannot determine the context without examining the surrounding
lexical elements. Sometimes you can’t decide what’s really going on
until you have more information. Don’t feel bad, though, because you’re
not alone: neither can the compiler. In this pass, the compiler descends
back down the subtree it’s just built to apply local optimizations, the
most notable of which is I<context propagation>. The compiler marks
subjacent nodes with the appropriate contexts (void, scalar, list,
@TheodoreBroda macbook# oed -A subter
 
4:23 AM
@tchrist To me, they would both mean the same thing.
The suffix -ter just means "this is an adverb", normally.
 
@Cerberus Good enough then.
 
Sometimes it is added to prepositions, and then strange things happen.
Like...inter?
Propter?
 
Huh.
 
But fortis "brave", fortiter "bravely" is very common and completely regular.
 
Sure.
 
4:25 AM
At least, I always assumed it was the same suffix...
Also because subter is normally an adverb.
 
> The compiler marks subjacent nodes with the appropriate contexts (. . .) imposed by the current node.
I couldn’t think of another way to say it at the time.
 
@Cerberus Adverbs and prepositions in English are often identical (like below); I wonder why we don't use a suffix, like belowly.
 
Maybe (de?)pendant or something.
@TheodoreBroda Because we don’t need to. To have something not take a complement/argument/object, just omit it. Don’t also add something.
Ah, child nodes! Duh!!!
I wish I had thought of it then.
 
@tchrist "Subjacent" sounds very esoteric; it fits nicely in a book about coding.
 
@tchrist That is probably the normal way to say it, but I must nevertheless praise your use of the adjective, as noun adjectives are meh.
 
4:31 AM
Gee, thanks.
 
@Cerberus Interjectional adjectives like meh are meh.
 
> subterˈjacent a. L. subterjacēre, underlying, subjacent.
What, you aren’t part of the Meh Generation?
 
@TheodoreBroda Yes, well, in the case of below, I would rather say the adverb can also be used as an adjective. But it is really an adverb, right?
@TheodoreBroda You could say that!
But now I must away, bed time.
Adieu!
 
> subter- /ˈsʌbtə(r)/, prefix, repr. L. subter- = the adv. and prep. subter below, underneath, used in composition = (1) below, beneath; (a) advb. as in subterfluĕre to flow beneath (see subterfluous), (b) prep. as in subtercutāneus lying under the skin (cutis); = (2) secretly, as in subterfugĕre to flee secretly (see subterfuge); and, in some rare Eng. compounds, = (3) lower or less than (cf. sub- (def#14)). The following are instances either of little-used adoptions of L. compounds or mere nonce-words (in some cases suggested by antithesis to compounds of super-).
 
@Cerberus Goodbye!
 
4:35 AM
> ˌsubterlapˈsarian properly *subtersublapsarian a., pertaining to a view of redemption which conceived a sufficiency of grace for all, but a positive decree to save restricted to some
 
Gutenacht!
 
OMG we have an answer to all those SWRs after all!
Night!
I can see myself working subtersublapsarian into common conversation pretty quickly.
 
@Cerberus Goedenacht!
@tchrist I wish I had the skill to do that.
 
Well, you’d have to prattle on about religion a lot.
> 1659 Fuller App. Inj. Innoc. iii. 18 — Because he was Ελαχισ[τ]ότερος, (and if there be a more subter‐superlative) the least of the least of his brethren.
Long word for a yoyo.
I bet the Google Book Reader has a fine time with mixed script texts.
 
@tchrist "Shortestest"?
But I am not here.
@TheodoreBroda Dank!
 
4:44 AM
@tchrist Scripts are better when you can mix 'em; I don't like segregating my alphabets.
 
@TheodoreBroda How do you sort a wordlist where each word is in a different script?
That’s a serious question.
Because I don’t know “the” answer.
I know they were working on coming up with something, but I haven’t checked recent releases of the standards doc on the Unicode Collation Algorithm.
You must be able to weight the scripts somehow.
Wikipedia clearly has some algorithm for doing this.
 
@tchrist My best guess would be to take the first letter of one script and equate it to the first letter of the other script for sorting purposes (e.g., Aardvark, Αλφάβητο, Banana, etc.). To determine what script takes precedence should word orders match, use alphabetical order for the names of the script. That's the best idea that I can come up with.
 
zAragonés
Aymar aru
Boarisch
Brezhoneg
Català
Чӑвашла
Čeština
Dansk
Deitsch
Deutsch
Eesti
Español
Esperanto
Euskara
فارسی
Français
Gaeilge
Gàidhlig
Galego
हिन्दी
Ido
Bahasa Indonesia
Italiano
עברית
Basa Jawa
Latviešu
Lëtzebuergesch
Lietuvių
Lumbaart
Bahasa Melayu
Nederlands
नेपाली
日本語
Norsk bokmål
Plattdüütsch
Polski
Português
Runa Simi
Русский
Simple English
Soomaaliga
Suomi
Svenska
தமிழ்
Українська
Vèneto
Tiếng Việt
Walon
Žemaitėška
中文
Notice the surprises.
They sometimes use the second word first for sorting. But not other times. Odd.
 
@tchrist It looks like they compared the letters of the scripts to their Latin phonetic equivalents, and then ordered them using Latin order. Do you know any other sorting systems that are in use for mixed scripts?
 
That was the manure list. Here is the list for cattle; it’s much longer.
@TheodoreBroda Not really.
Acèh
Afrikaans
Alemannisch
አማርኛ
Ænglisc
العربية
Aragonés
Avañe'ẽ
Авар
Aymar aru
Azərbaycanca
Bamanankan
বাংলা
Bahasa Banjar
Bân-lâm-gú
Беларуская
Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎
Български
Boarisch
བོད་ཡིག
Bosanski
Brezhoneg
Буряад
Català
Чӑвашла
Cebuano
Čeština
ChiShona
ChiTumbuka
Corsu
Cymraeg
Dansk
Deitsch
Deutsch
Diné bizaad
Eesti
Ελληνικά
Emiliàn e rumagnòl
Эрзянь
Español
Esperanto
Estremeñu
Euskara
فارسی
Fiji Hindi
Français
Gaeilge
Gàidhlig
Galego
贛語
ગુજરાતી
客家語/Hak-kâ-ngî
Хальмг
한국어
Hausa
Հայերեն
There has to be a Romanization step there.
How would someone who didn’t know the Latin script be able to follow those?
I certainly cannot follow plenty of them.
Wait, let's just look at the source.
<li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-tr"><a href="//tr.wikipedia<li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-ace"><a href="//ace.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leumo" title="Leumo – Achinese" lang="ace" hreflang="ace">Acèh</a></li>
<li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-af"><a href="//af.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bees" title="Bees – Afrikaans" lang="af" hreflang="af">Afrikaans</a></li>
<li class="interlanguage-link interwiki-als"><a href="//als.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hausrind" title="Hausrind – Alemannisch" lang="als" hreflang="als">Alemannisch</a></li>
 
5:01 AM
@tchrist Yes, there must be a Latin transliteration somewhere. What happens for letters that are romanized as two letters (like "Ц")? This Latin Alphabet primacy seems unfair.
 
Well you have to do something.
 
@tchrist My suggestion to Unicode/Wikipedia/whomever would be to associate letters based on script orders, not phonetic value compared to Latin. For instance, when comparing Latin and Greek, "α" would be sorted with "a", "β" would be sorted with "b", and "γ" would be sorted with "c", not "g". Therefore, no "master" script is required.
 
5:25 AM
Goodnight, it's getting late.
 
5:42 AM
Later
 
 
2 hours later…
8:53 AM
-1
Q: When i can use "Copy that"?

Ali RasoulianWhen i can to use copy that, just to response of "do you copy" ? tanks for your helps

He offers us tanks.
 
9:23 AM
ooo! what kind? fish tanks?
 
 
1 hour later…
10:38 AM
can anyone suggest me a nice username?
Not for SE, but I wanna open a new Gmail account. For it, a nice username... any ideas?
 
10:57 AM
email -> email@gmail.com
 
Saddam.Hussein.Obama@gmail.com
 
gmail@gmail.com
 
That is mine.
 
good choice
 
all@gmail.com
 
10:58 AM
You can have the credentials for three thousand pound, though.
Three thousand pounds of LEGO, that is.
 
ironmail
a bit girly perhaps
 
Zoe
myemailisbetterthanyours@gmail.com
 
myotheremailadressis
 
Zoe
It's not mine but you can use it.
yousuck@gmail.com
 
haha
I don't think he is even listening
 
11:02 AM
I wouldn't
 
It will be better to tag him in reply
 
we're not known for our comprehensibility
raises the question, why did he ask us?
 
Zoe
Because he was actually expecting something sensible?
 
but he's been here before. he shouldn't expect such things
 
yahoo@gmail.com
altavista@gmail.com
lycos@gmail.com
 
Zoe
11:03 AM
The mind forgets.
 
bing@gmail.com
cuil@gmail.com
backrub@gmail.com
 
Zoe
iloveunot@gmail.com
 
awal.garg@gmail.com
 
marissa.mayer@gmail.com
 
Zoe
grag.lawl@gmail.com looks funny. Lawl.
 
11:05 AM
iwishiwasnot@gmail.com
 
@AwalGarg Can you at least tell us the purpose so that people can help u !!
 
sometimesieatbees@gmail.com
 
Zoe
ihatethebees@gmail.com
 
iamallergictobeescanIstilleatthem@gmail.com
 
Zoe
Lawl.
 
11:07 AM
haha
 
zombocom@gmail.com
 
willpayforspam@gmail.com
 
myemailisnot@gmail.com
 
Oh, you will. You will.
 
I, Will.
 
11:10 AM
You, RegDwigнt.
 
We, Borg.
 
resistanceisfutile@gmail.com
I guess he got what he was looking for
 
Funny how English has no words for "resistance is futile". It has to resort to French. I guess the resistance was futile.
At least we got to keep the two-letter verb, hooray.
 
which verb is that?
 
There is exactly one two-letter verb in "resistance is futile". You have five tries.
 
11:13 AM
oh, I see. I thought we referred to some other group
 
Yeah I was being nice. We all know Brits don't belong to any group.
Except UKIP perhaps.
 
we belong to ourselves!
@RegDwigнt don't remind me
 
@MattЭллен And you totally like being part of the kind of clubs that accept yourselves, I know.
 
I don't understand how people hope to make Europe better by abandoning it
 
Hint: they don't hope to make Europe better.
 
11:15 AM
then they inadvertently hope to make their lives worse
 
They really don't hope to make anything better, for that matter, other than their salary.
Oh well. Let's talk about cheese instead.
 
mmmm. I have cheddar in my bag
 
Or the new LEGO mini announced last night.
 
in a cheese and pickle sandwich
it's nearly lunch time
 
It's got cheese, too.
 
11:18 AM
a mini
is that the new style of mini?
I can't quite tell
 
Doesn't matter.
It's a mini alright so who cares.
It's awesumsoce.
 
it is a very good model
 
Kaiser awesome soze
 
It's got a picknick, um, whatchacall that towel.
 
11:20 AM
@Mitch he'll kill his awesome family just to spite you
 
A picknick basket and a picknick towel.
 
picnic blanket
 
Will look awesumer still next to the VW bus.
@MattЭллен yeah that thing.
 
How do blankets work?
 
11:21 AM
@Mitch you put them on anthills and try and eat the food before the ants get to it
 
They seem to have figured out cars now.
 
very nice
 
I wonder what the next model will be.
 
Veyron
 
ants, what eill they come up with next?
 
11:23 AM
oh, maybe some kind of people carrier
more environmentally friendly than cars
maybe a bit too much formic acid
 
You mean like the people carriers in War of the Worlds?
I am not sure if Dakota Fanning makes for more environmentally friendly fuel.
 
well, you crack her for combustible parts and we'll see
 
wtf did just happen with all those emails?
 
did you find one you liked?
 
@SmritiYadav open a new account ofcourse
 
11:27 AM
Did you pay for your spam subscription?
 
ok, the power cut guy. I will take his hands and cut them...
 
@AwalGarg For professional use or u want something cool and hap !
 
@MattЭллен what were you guys doing? I can't see anything but random lawls!
@SmritiYadav cool and hap!
@RegDwigнt nope! dearly
 
@AwalGarg suggesting email addresses for you
 
really? yahoo@gmail.com!
 
11:29 AM
that sounds cool to me!!
 
resistanceisfutile@gmail.com?
 
lunch@gmail.com
 
Oh my, I am getting professional help!
I hope nobody flagged any as spam, or the mods shall suspend me for asking a meticulous question here :)
ok, please... tell me a nice username... cool and hap!
 
My uncle Prince Ndugu has a couple free email addresses for you. Problem is, they are stuck in Africa right now. He needs help in shipping them to your place.
 
hahahahahha
 
11:33 AM
31 mins ago, by Matt Эллен
we're not known for our comprehensibility
31 mins ago, by Matt Эллен
raises the question, why did he ask us?
^ wow!
@MattЭллен You are so genius! But I swear I didn't know you guys were comprehensible!
3 mins ago, by Awal Garg
ok, please... tell me a nice username... cool and hap!
 
Supercool !! 8-)
 
oh c'mon..
 
@AwalGarg a nice username... cool and hap!
 
haha
 
11:37 AM
You are welcome.
I can tell you other things at an additional fee.
 
I thought only I can troll people!
 
Only a troll would think that.
 
I didn't knew, when someone is serious, anyone can troll him...
 
11:56 AM
so what do you want in an email address?
other than @gmail.com
 

« first day (1301 days earlier)      last day (3615 days later) »