@think_meaning_buildß Say what you will about ChatGPT but it is much easier to use than StackOverflow and is also more satisfying (whether it is more accurate is almost irrelevant)
and I bet once some time a long time ago one guy did by mistake walked out with something he didn't pay for (it's always a dude) but really it was a mistake he forgot the -50 gallons of crude oil- in the lower rack of the cart.
@Robusto T be frank, to be honest, and to be clear, I may have been talking about BJ's this whole time.
@tchrist I like ELU and would like it to survive, but the closure rate is only a symptom of a product that’s losing (or has lost) competitiveness. So what do you do? Experiment with looser application of the rules; stretch the model; find new areas to explore.
@Robusto I have both 'Musk' and 'Trump' as mute words for any messages, so not only can I not read what you said, I don't know what I'm even saying right now.
@Robusto I did not mean to suggest you did. My apologies. I'm just trying to avoid people rounding up a posse on elu meta, complete with wanted posters and mug shots. That never ends well.
@Xanne No arguments from me on any of that. Some of the good questions go to ELL now. But I do feel you've identified a real issue that deserves to be addressed and which can be improved. I just don't know how to go about trying to do that. ELU opted out of the AI experiment, which we didn't think would help the site.
Remember too that things exist prior to and independent of the nomenclatural act that creates their name; see earlier discussion here of holotypes and such. Said nomenclatural act does not reïfy things out of thin air that never existed before. The thing was always already there; only the name is new. But their names can survive them, in which case we are left with only the pristine word, naked and alone.