@FaheemMitha I was also amazed that Indian armies, skilled in combat and having guns and metallurgy and the knowledge of the land, lost to the British.
@CowperKettle I doubt they were remotely as well equipped as the British, but I suppose they could have easily overwhelmed the British army with sheer numbers if they weren't fighting among themselves
@M.A.R. In fact, a good proportion of the Indians were employed as paid soldiers (sepoys) by the British Raj. But when they revolted in 1857, slaughtering their overlords when they could, the British beat them back brutally.
The Indian Rebellion of 1857 was a major uprising in India in 1857–58 against the rule of the British East India Company, which functioned as a sovereign power on behalf of the British Crown. The rebellion began on 10 May 1857 in the form of a mutiny of sepoys of the Company's army in the garrison town of Meerut, 40 mi (64 km) northeast of Delhi. It then erupted into other mutinies and civilian rebellions chiefly in the upper Gangetic plain and central India, though incidents of revolt also occurred farther north and east. The rebellion posed a considerable threat to British power in that region...
Sutor, ne ultra crepidam is a Latin expression meaning literally "Shoemaker, not beyond the shoe", used to warn individuals not to pass judgment beyond their expertise. The expression led to the term ultracrepidarianism, which is the giving of opinions and advice on matters outside of one's knowledge.
Its origin is set down in Pliny the Elder's Naturalis Historia [XXXV, 85 (Loeb IX, 323–325)] where he records that a shoemaker (sutor) had approached the painter Apelles of Kos to point out a defect in the artist's rendition of a sandal (crepida from Greek krepis), which Apelles duly corrected...
Dictionary discussions of 'la-di-da'
J.E. Lighter, Random House Dictionary of American Slang (1997) has this entry for la-di-da:
la-di-da adj. {shortening of earlier Br[itish] E[nglish] lardy-dardy, perh[aps] imit[ative] of affected speech} affected; pretentious; precious in expression or manner...
NASAMS (National/Norwegian Advanced Surface to Air Missile System) is a distributed and networked medium to long range surface-to-air missile defense system developed by Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace (KDA) and Raytheon. NASAMS was the first application of a surface-launched AIM-120 AMRAAM (Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile).
NASAMS 2 is an upgraded version of the system capable of using Link 16, which has been operational since 2007. NASAMS 3 is the latest upgrade deployed in 2019; it adds capability to fire AIM-9 and IRIS-T SLS short-range missiles and AMRAAM-ER extended range missiles...
Suddenly Russian Wikipedia readers became very interested in the NASAMS air defense system. I can't understand why exactly.
From an average of 500 vews/day to 10 000 views/day. A mystery.
@CowperKettle Not wow really. I went outside for 1 hour and I sweat a lot. Had to drink lot of water.
Also I woke early today hoping for a cool morning. But I was really surprised as soon as I opened the door. I could feel humidity and hot weather already.
@CowperKettle Well, at the battle of Plassey, the East India Company bribed the commander of the armed forces of Nawab of Bengal (Jafar?) to stand aside and do nothing. So the East India Company won.
That's the well known traditions of British fair play right there.
@CowperKettle Having said that, I think the British were really good at killing, with all the local practice they got.
@Robusto India under the British was mostly run by Indians. The British were too few in number to keep control by themselves. And the 1857 revolt failed in part because the British kept control of some of their Indian troops. Though I don't know (or forget) the details.
> In the Punjab, the Sikh princes crucially helped the British by providing both soldiers and support.[k][8][11] The large princely states, Hyderabad, Mysore, Travancore, and Kashmir, as well as the smaller ones of Rajputana, did not join the rebellion, serving the British, in the Governor-General Lord Canning's words, as "breakwaters in a storm."
@ConGovDeIn I do sometimes but most of them are not pleasing. Rarely I have really exquisite dreams. Like dream about past friends, childhood and nature. And I keep thinking about them whole day.
I don't remember my dreams in most cases. If I take vitamin B6 + Zinc + Mg, then I do recall dreams, and they are vivid. I don't know whether they become vivid on this combination, or whether this is simply from remembering them.
Last time I had a really good dream was like - I was at my old village where I spent childhood. Away from city. I also like to take photos sometimes. So then I noticed a very beautiful flower and I got mesmerized by it. I kept planning to take a photo of it. I was confused whether to take photo or keep staring. The dream ended without taking photo but it was worth it. I kept thinking about it next 2-3 days. There was something great about the flower and that location and maybe sunlight.
I wish I should have written that dream that day. I remember only 30-40% of that dream now. If I had written, I would have saved most of the things about it.
Actually I don't get dreams about politics and current war at all. I don't know why even though I often read about them.
But on the other hand, I very often do get dreams about an imaginary war because I play war games XD. Every time dream ends just before someone tries to shoot me.
@CowperKettle You mean these vitamins help to recall past dreams?
@FaheemMitha Yes. The Indians have never really been one people. And the interesting thing is that in the 18th century, the British and their Indians fought the French and their Indians for control of the subcontinent.
That's one of the contributing factors to the 1857 debacle.
@Robusto I didn't know that, but it doesn't surprise me. Similar things happened in North America. Apparently it's really hard to figure out who your enemy is. Hint: for the last few hundred years, it's been Northern Europeans.
Tangentially, it's worth noting that Indians, by and large, don't like each other very much, and don't want to talk to other strange Indians. For reasons that aren't entirely clear to me. But if you start trashing the British in public, at least in India, everyone will happily join in.
@Robusto Well, we're still worried about being blown up, and being drowned by rising seas. Just to take two examples.
I'm actually a few hundred meters away from the Indian Ocean, and I'm wondering how long it will stay where it is.
@Robusto The nuclear weapons thing is. It was created by Europeans and their technology. And the CO2 in the air is mostly an offshoot of modern industrial capitalism, which is also a European thing.
Oh, by the way, this whole thing in Japan reminds me of a great quote from Will Durant: "Civilization exists by geological consent, subject to change without notice."
@FaheemMitha Actually, it was created by the United States and their technology (including input from some Europeans). But you and Pakistan have your own bombs now. You can't blame the Chinese for all wars just because they invented gunpowder.
@FaheemMitha Yet Asians are one of the fastest-growing minorities here. I, for one, am of European descent, but I married an Asian and so did my son. What does that make us?
@Robusto By "you" I suppose you mean the Indian state, which I don't personally identify with. I don't have any nuclear bombs stacked away, personally.
@Robusto I think people have an unfortunate tendency to identify with the State they live in. It's unfortunate because they then feel the need to support the crimes of that State. Or if not support, at least tacitly "buy into".
@Robusto Yes, but it's often true. For example, to be a good Indian, you're supposed to vilify and hate Pakistan. Call them terrorists and so on. This has been true for many years. It's not a recent phenomenon.
Similarly, as a "good" American, you are supposed to vilify and hate the State's enemies. Whether they are Russia or Iraq or Iran or Cuba. Even if you know nothing about those places or those cultures.
What preposition would you most normally use to rewrite a sentence beginning with “My understanding is that....” so that it begins with “<PREPOSITION> my understanding,...” instead?
- By - In - To - For - Per - From - With - As per - Within - Following - Vis-à-vis - Pursuant to - According to - To the best of - In keeping with - With respect to
Correct me if wrong, I think both of the words are adjectives describing having two opposite characteristics at the same time.
To my understanding, while ambivalent is more of a psychological term or status, both contradictory and ambivalent can describe one's emotion, but only contradictory can ...
There is this request for information in a form, given as a (negative) statement rather than a question, but requiring a response of 'Yes' or 'No':
I don't have a criminal background (Y / N)
To my understanding, if someone does not have a criminal background, they should pick YES. Yes, I don't ...
I was looking into the usage of 'to catch one's breath'. To my understanding, it's used to denote a pause between an intake of breath and the release. However, I was told that the idiom is more commonly rendered as 'one's breath caught in one's throat' and this got me thinking about who's doing t...
Here are the examples:
He repeated the experiment in exactly the same way yet expect different results.
He repeated the experiment in exactly the same way then somehow expect different results.
These can be combined for effect:
He repeated the experiment in exactly the same way yet then some...
@Robusto Yes, it feels quite old and formal to me.
> According to the rules of commas, to my understanding, both "then" and "somehow" are interruptions and can safely be omitted, but It seems to me that they are separate interruptions.
I did find some instances of its use in old Congressional records.
But Sven also used it, and he's in his 70s IIRC.
No, he cites it.
> This to my understanding implies, that the robbery or sacriledge committed by our first Parents for which the Sonne of God did humble and ingage himselfe to make satisfaction, was their proud or haughty attempt to be equal with God, at lest in knowledge of good and evill. And yet, as was said before, the collapsed Angels had doubtlesse sinned more presumptuously, before they tempted our first Parents to the like sinne.
@Robusto India isn't really a country. It's basically a small continent. Somewhat comparable to Western Europe. Which was smooshed together by force, and with little thought of the conseqences.
Incidentally, I only recently discovered that the (newish) Indian state invaded, occupied and annexed Hyderabad by force. Which was, probably not coincidentally, ruled by a Muslim. The Nizam. A nasty business, by all accounts.
(The "by force" bit is probably redundant, above.)
Zealandia (pronounced ), also known as Te Riu-a-Māui (Māori) or Tasmantis, is an almost entirely submerged mass of continental crust that subsided after breaking away from Gondwanaland 83–79 million years ago. It has been described variously as a submerged continent, a continental fragment (or microcontinent), and a continent. The name and concept for Zealandia was proposed by Bruce Luyendyk in 1995, and satellite imagery shows it to be almost the size of Australia. A 2021 study suggests Zealandia is 1 billion years old, about twice as old as geologists previously thought.By approximately 23 million...
> ’Did not the Italian Musico Cazzani Sing at my heart six months at least in vain? Did not his countryman, Count Corniani, Call me the only virtuous wife in Spain?
> Were there not also Russians, English, many? The Count Strongstroganoff I put in pain, And Lord Mount Coffeehouse, the Irish peer, Who kill’d himself for love (with wine) last year.
@Vikas Probably several things: facilities to collect and remove waste were probably not growing along with the population fast enough; more people per square metre means more squalor per square metre; rapid growth might mean the government's organisation could not keep up? Etc.
> The USA in general is dirtier and junkier than many G7 countries. You see the difference the minute you cross the border from Canada. The cleanest country I’ve ever seen is actually Turkey!
@Vikas In my experience, that's not true. They are usually reasonably clean. Though I've not travelled extensively. Of course, it depends on how high your standards are.
@Vikas Quora isn't reliable at all. There is no reputation system, no moderation, or even a real community. Just a bunch of random people milling around.
@Vikas It's not just that. Like their forebears, the British, bathrooms are important there.
@Vikas And this would depend on where you cross the border from Canada! If you're near Detroit, possibly you'll find some dirt. But the border is thousands of kilometers long. Do you look at a Frenchman who has a mole on his face and decide that all Frenchmen have moles?
Wuḍūʾ (Arabic: الوضوء al-wuḍūʼ [wʊˈdˤuːʔ]) is the Islamic procedure for cleansing parts of the body, a type of ritual purification, or ablution. The 4 Fardh (Mandatory) acts of Wudu consists of washing the face, arms, then wiping the head and the feet with water.
Wudu is an important part of ritual purity in Islam. It is governed by fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence), which specifies rules concerning hygiene and defines the rituals that constitute it.
It is typically performed before prayers (salah or salat). Activities that invalidate wudu include urination, defecation, flatulence, deep sleep, light...
I think Turkey is a bit special, because it's one of the few places that far West that is still (mostly) Islamic. It's partly in Asia and partly in Europe, isn't it?
@Vikas It doesn't say, so probably after any visit.
By automatically, they mean, always, without thinking.
> There are some indications that the Muslim presence within present day Argentinian territory dates back to the time of the Spanish exploration and conquest. The first mentioned Muslim settlers were the 15th century's Moorish-Morisco (Muslims of the Iberian peninsula of North African and Spanish descent) who explored the Americas with Spanish explorers, many of them settling in Argentina who were fleeing from persecution in Spain such as the Spanish Inquisition.[4]
However, in the 19th century Argentina saw the first real wave of Arabs to settle within its territory, mostly from Syria and…
I don't know if a Turkish soap opera is reliable, but it shows Turkey as surprisingly clean and modern looking. Though I wouldn't mistake it for Western Europe or North America, probably.
@Cerberus It's possible, yes. Family influences are hard to gauge.
@FaheemMitha I don't think either travelling or Google Street View sightseeing would allow for fair comparisons, but no, I'm unfortunately not a travelled person
> Turkey will now be known as Türkiye at the United Nations, after the intergovernmental body agreed to a formal request for the name change from Ankara.
@Cerberus Well, they didn't create the roads and buildings for the soap opera. And they look reasonably good. Of course, it's possible to film selectively.
> The inflation rate for consumer prices in Iran moved over the past 59 years between -0.4% and 49.7%. For 2019, an inflation rate of 39.9% was calculated.
@Mitch They wear lots of white shirts and blouses, high heels, not-quite-U suits, glittering watches, lots of make-up. And their houses have black or white modernist furniture. And lots of glass and steel.
And they always drink white wine, often with bubbles.
The thing with the nouveau-rich aesthetic is that they are still afraid of their background, so they wish to avoid the taste of their poorer grandparents at all cost, so old things = bad.
The Indian subcontinent, or simply the subcontinent, is a physiographical region in Southern Asia. It is situated on the Indian Plate, projecting southwards into the Indian Ocean from the Himalayas. Geopolitically, it includes the countries of Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. The terms Indian subcontinent and South Asia are often used interchangeably to denote the region, although the geopolitical term of South Asia frequently includes Afghanistan, which may otherwise be classified as Central Asian. Sometimes, the British Indian Ocean Territory is also included...
So that says it's made up of Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka.
Naming the whole continent India was probably as clever as naming the one containing Argentina and Alaska and everything in between America. :)
@tchrist Oh, I see what you mean. No, I meant the country India is probably better thought of as a collection of smaller countries, in some, but not all cases, corresponding to the states.