« first day (3084 days earlier)      last day (1835 days later) » 

1:41 AM
@Mitch Injecting a little liquid just under the skin makes a wheal, like a dime-sized blister, flat as one too. My PCM gave me a test for something using that method a few years ago, so maybe they still do that. I dunno.
 
 
6 hours later…
8:10 AM
@KannE What is PCM?
 
8:38 AM
What is the correct word order:

"it supposedly makes disputes over [...]" or
"it makes supposedly disputes over [...]"

Thank you :)
 
9:02 AM
Could anyone answer me please?
 
Afternoon
@MartinVseticka If your "supposedly" modified "disputes", it should have been an adjective instead
@Curio Maybe
Are you a telemarketer?
 
I have to record my voice so everything must be ok
 
@Curio Wha?
 
I'm making a video
So is it correct?
 
@Curio Oh, you mean whether the sentence "I have to record my voice so everything must be ok" is correct?
 
9:14 AM
No
<<You are now in the Middle Ages, that era where magic was considered real>>
 
Is what correct, then . . . Oh
 
??
I'm confused
 
It's correct, but I'd use "the" instead of "that"
 
Ok many thanks!
 
@Curio Also "where" is a bit shaky, you can just say " . . . Middle Ages, when magic was considered real"
 
9:19 AM
So <<You are now in the Middle Ages, when magic was considered real>>
 
9:44 AM
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ what about "I only want to travel for fun"?
 
 
2 hours later…
11:27 AM
@Mitch Why is there a hole in her head?
 
 
1 hour later…
12:46 PM
@Curio Works for me
 
1:00 PM
Hii! Anybody there?...I want to ask something!
 
@user8718165 Ask away! Anyone that comes around can answer
This chat's transcript is preserved.
 
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Oh looks nice:-)
 
I'm a non-native speaker though, so take my advice with two grains of salt. One for the idiom and one for good measure.
 
Does a proper noun followed by a common noun always take the as a definite article?
12
Q: Definite article with proper nouns, titles followed by a common noun

TomOver time I developed this rule where if a title or a proper name is followed by a common noun that represents the class of the entity I am referring to, then I use the definite article. In Example 1, the title of a publication in the first sentence is followed by the noun "whitepaper", thus the ...

 
Something like "The Notre-dame fire"?
 
1:06 PM
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ yes:-)
 
Considering the guidelines of when to use "the" as opposed to indefinite articles, I guess so. No counterexamples come to my mind now
Omission of the article and the common noun is itself common enough though
 
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ thanks
 
> I love reading Hemingway.
That usually doesn't mean the notes on his tombstone
 
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ I was confused by that Microsoft example. I thought I could say My brother works at the Microsoft Corporation
 
Yep, you can
But people usually drop the "the" because . . . dunno . . . rolls off the tongue better?
 
1:11 PM
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ yeah, I also think the same
 
To be clear, by "counterexample" I meant "the" vs. "a", not "the" vs. zero/no article
 
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ One last thing... Can I say stuff like The ABC Welfare Organization
 
@user8718165 I think in that particular example, people treat "Microsoft Corp" as a proper noun, and a single unit, rather that a noun phrase with a common noun as head.
The full name is Microsoft Corporation anyway
@user8718165 Sure.
 
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ these articles can get pretty confusing at times for a non- native speaker:-(
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Well thanks! you found time to help!!:-)
 
@user8718165 IME articles are one of those things you should just get a hang of by using
@user8718165 Sure
 
 
2 hours later…
3:13 PM
@Jasper The link associated with the picture explains. They inject saline just under the skin in the forehead which forms a large weal (basically a huge blister). But while they're slowly injecting, they press with their finger at the center to give it that shape. It goes away after a few hours (I think and hope). I guess it's not as bad as a face tatto because it goes away. But still, eww.
 
3:24 PM
@RegDwigнt Not only do I now know, I don't even understand.
 
3:45 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive answer detected, toxic answer detected (160): Can the verb "wonder" simply take an object? by humphrey on english.SE
 
4:16 PM
@Jasper PCM: primary care manager; usually a physician assistant (PA) except there is no actual physician to assist; most likely someone who became a 'PA' because his practice sheep or goat didn't die (locally, that is).
 
@KannE They turned the physician into the goat
 
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ That explains everything. Now I see.
 
I have a lot of table cells in my clinical trial report table in which there is only one record: NCS abnormality - I wonder if I translated it well. NCS means "Not Clinically Significant". I thought of phrasing it as "Abnormality (NCS)" but that would require two additional characters, bloating the table.
"Not Clinically Significant abnormality" is a bit un-English.
But however much I scratched my dimples of Venus, I could not come up with a better concise wording.
Maybe .. "NCS findings"
Non-clinically-significant findings.
 
 
2 hours later…
6:23 PM
:5001367 There should be a word for that...
For example, take chromosome abnormalities. Down syndrome is considered "common" ("by far the most common chromosomal abnormality") when compared with Edwards syndrome (rare, more so in live births).
We had a little girl on our ward with the latter. I remembered her name, so I was able to find it on a lifespan report. She lived 9.3 years. It's very rare.
Quote source: Scitable by NatureEducation.
So, is NCS and extremely rare basically the same thing in this case? I don't know. It's a toughie, I think.
 
7:16 PM
@CowperKettle I can't think of anything that wouldn't bloat the table more
 
 
1 hour later…
8:50 PM
@Færd sounds like I need a VPN for that
@Færd Hmm, seems this guy and a Slovenian Stanley Kubrick had something called a debate
And they're both wackos, balloons filled with hyperbole and fueled by the greatest achievement of the 21st century: Social media
At least a shallow search about the debate revealed that much
I apologize in advance to intellectual people who find potential strength in some of their valid arguments, if they make any.
End of story, I guess. To me, these people seem like they always have ways of intricately explaining what's wrong with the society or capitalism or Marxism or whatever-the-hellism but no one has the solutions.
"It's easier to be critical than correct."
Although ironically that's what I'm doing right now.
But I don't have a PhD in psychology so it's not like it's MY job to be correct.
 
> Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679
Jesus, just how big is this place now?
@Mitch I thought you held a record for sitting on the raft back in the day.
I know many people sat on the raft. JSBangs, Cerberus. All the big names.
I thought you were a big name?
Feb 19 '13 at 19:48, by MετάEd
It means you might be on a raft with a chicken until 25 or 6 to 4.
Dec 12 '12 at 18:57, by Mr. Shiny and New 安宇
> You have been on a raft with a chicken for 2 hours 50 minutes 58 seconds.
Apr 5 '12 at 18:53, by Mahnax
> You have been on a chicken with a raft for 67789 hours 988 minutes and -234^5 seconds.
Apr 5 '12 at 18:54, by JSBᾶngs
> You have been on a raft with a chicken for longer than ANYBODY, EVER. YOU WIN. Now please leave the chicken alone.
Feb 20 '13 at 13:46, by Matt Эллен
Hayo, chicken on a raft
 
9:09 PM
@RegDwigнt you have mistaken me for someone who has ever heard of this chicken-raft thing ever.
You had to be there to get it. And I wasn't there.
That was six years ago. I wasn't even conscious then.
 
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Hmm. Yeap. And quite unfairly, since you sound like you can't quote these two guys on anything specific.
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ It's often good to be correct. You could say it's sometimes a responsibility to try to be correct, regardless of your job and education.
 
 
2 hours later…
10:55 PM
@RegDwigнt They don't recycle from the deadpool.
 

« first day (3084 days earlier)      last day (1835 days later) »