@Cerberus It comes up in my flagging history as declined. It says: "not an answer – Chappo 2 days ago declined - a moderator reviewed your flag, but found no evidence to support it"
@Cerberus I don't doubt that deletion was appropriate, and I suspect I might have flagged it as NAA first and subsequently found it in the LQP queue where I then voted to delete (but without giving a comment, as I'd already added a personal one). So the question is, why's it showing up as "declined"?
Similarly, this one, which has since been closed as POB. My flagging history says "off-topic – Chappo Sep 3 at 2:02 declined." My recollection is that I thought it was seeking literary analysis, which is off-topic.
@Cerberus Well, the declined ones are a tiny fraction of my total (7 out of 435 post flags) so I'm not going to lose any sleep over it. But I was concerned that maybe when I flag a question as off-topic for not showing enough research, it's being rejected for the other half of the flag (i.e. consider ELL instead).
@RegDwigнt I just saw your latest video. It is very strange that every time you upload a new video, within an hour there is already one like. I wonder if that is from Robusto or someone else... It must be a very big fan of yours. I have a big fan too, in the living room.
@Cerberus It could be a human error too. Sometimes, people just click on the wrong button, especially when they are using a touchpad and not a mouse, or worse, when they are using a mobile phone.
I remember there was once I edited a post on SE. After it was done, some tags were changed, but I did not change them, and the edit history didn't show anyone else doing edits, so I had no idea how it happened.
That edit removed a relevant tag and added an irrelevant tag, and I had to explain that I had no idea what happened, especially when I was using a mouse on a big computer.
@Mitch The lyrics of that song A Flower's All You Need made me cry. Some of it means a lot to me.
@Chappo I just saw it. I have never worn a hat myself.
@Chappo Oh, I would like to ask you since you seem to be Australian. Is the Macquarie Dictionary the most popular dictionary there? Also it seems that there is no way to buy the dictionary except from Australian stores and websites. For example, Amazon doesn't even carry it!
@JasperLoy Sadly most people (probably globally) consult an online dictionary nowadays, and the Macquarie is paywalled. So my answer would be no, very few Australians would own one. Most homes probably have a dusty old Pocket Collins, or Concise Oxford.
I've been thinking of buying one though, both for professional purposes and for fun.
@Chappo I see. Well, Oxford does publish a two-volume Australian National Dictionary, but it is a rather old edition. I have the 2007 two-volume Shorter Oxford English Dictionary and also the 2010 Oxford Dictionary of English.
The great value of the Macquarie is in all the uniquely Australian (or Aust/NZ) words and expressions. When I get the time, I'm planning on asking a well-researched question here about the etymology of "blowing a foofoo valve" ;-)
I have the Australian Concise Oxford but it's a 1989 edition :(
Some history about the Concise Oxford English Dictionary.
At first it was based on the Oxford English Dictionary, but the last few editions have been based on the Oxford Dictionary of English, which represents current English only and not historical English.
So OED is a different dictionary from ODE.
And the website oxforddictionaries.com where you can check words for free is actually the ODE, while oed.com is actually the OED of course.
I am very interested in all kinds of dictionaries, which is why I read up on them.
In Asian countries, such as China and Korea, populace's aesthetic is quite different from the US.
We prefer a girl who is more sweet, pure, and inoffensive, (my translation is not authentic in English, since sweet can be used to describe any kind of attractive females). And in Asian countries, i...
For example, newspapers habitually (and by convention) correct spelling and grammar errors when quoting people, unless there is some special reason to keep errors intact in that particular situation.
@JBis You mean the square brackets for comments? Yes, but that is something else entirely.
Normally, when you quote someone's text that contains an error, fix it to save him from embarrassment, rather than emphasising the error by sicking it.
It is a bit like [w]hile: only used in contexts where you really need to be 100% exact, to indicate that something odd in the text is not your error/addition, but the original author's.
What is it called, the gesture whereby a team stack their hands on top of each other's with their palms face-down, then swing their arms quickly backwards, and go "Yeah!" or something, before they enthusiastically engage in some sort of teamwork activity?
@RegDwigнt Although I subscribe to channels, for some idiosyncratic reasons I usually don't like videos, so the like is not mine. Not that I don't like them. I am guessing it's Robusto then.
He's trying to find out what videos on YouTube you upvote. And I'm laughing in his face, because he's not a fucking secret agent. And because I fucking am.
How long do you plan on keeping that nonsense up, anyway? I thought you've won Iraq and also Afghanistan. And hey Osama is dead.
So I'm not like even trying to be funny, this is a genuine question. Is anyone thinking about stopping this shit that started for a specific reason that's been dealt with?
Like, even half the Patriot Act has expired by now. Something we used to think it never would.
@Robusto I was always thinking that that would make rep a reasonable real-life target if it were convertible to something, and frequent flyer miles is about as intangible, but then I searched for my previous mentions and yours showed up years earlier. Which proves that you're a time-traveler stealing my ideas from the future.
@Robusto well yes, but this time it's every single American's ass on the other side of the seesaw. Like, literally every single American's ass could get searched, and not a single American's ass is liking that.
It's not like some minor thing about milk package sizes that you just give up complaining about because you only get to deal with it like once. This is something that affects everyone all the time.
"I don't have an identifiable accent. In any language. I have an accent in every language, however slight, but you can't pin it down. I've been deemed a French, a Lithuanian, you name it."
@Robusto last time we discussed this, we discussed this the two of us. There was nobody else there. We had to talk to each other because we had nothing else.
You get to insult the French once you become as fucking epic as a French.
That said, my German is better than that of most Germans.
Kind of like my English is better than whatever most people from England speak. That's because I actually learned English. And they never did. They only speak some local bullshit dialect that only twenty people understand.
I had that discussion on Xbox Live once. But then again, that's another thing I've told you before.
X(1)
The number enclosed in parenthesis in the superscript signifies the first slice of the tensor X
This is my sentence. I want to replace the italicized phrase with a single word that demonstrates that the number is inside the parenthesis. I'd write the sentence as it is but for some ...
My point is, like when Putin threatens you, like even when you think haha dude's insane and talking bullshit, but even then you're thinking if push comes to shove and he's lost everything and has nobody left in the world entire, he still might just snap and just walk up to you and kill you with his bare hands if nothing else. But when Trump threatens you, you know that the worst thing that ever happens is that you walk up to him and he shits his pants.
Being threatened by Trump is like being threatened by Teresa May, except in a much worse accent.
And now I shall threaten commute upon you.
And no puns with communism, I'll threaten that one on a separate occasion.
@JonathanMerritt Google Books is a fiasco.
How many papers have been written using Google Books as some true representation of culture?
How many offhand observations have been made?
@Mitch I don't see the problem to be honest. Google Books has a such a large collection of texts that it is comparable to a literal library, and nobody would be complaining if somebody used a library as a representation of culture.
Perhaps a museum would be a better representation of culture than a library, but libraries are not very far behind museums in that regard, if at all.
I'm just curious --
In a business setting with native English and non-native English speakers. Most revenue is software based, but there is a significant category that includes physical CDs, DVDs, and USB drives (containing software).
Currently it's called "physical devices" -- however in a fin...
@MetaEd no no not monocotyledon, you're thinking about all those papers that @CowperKettle is translating (in between writing poetry) that discuss the magical new medication to combat disease by actual creating elements of our immune system directly against the offending problem.
@MetaEd well I was actually truly thinking of another word (monoclonal antibodies) but let's go with immunotherapy, which for the sake of the game I expect you were not really thinking of but rather those flowers that the coral are named after. Wait, it was catastrophe that you were not thinking of?
Well then, no, not catastrophe. You were probably thinking of another word for the same thing having to do with stars.
@MetaEd It's like every conversation I've ever had with my uncle. He's smart too; I can't keep up. It's like playing Monopoly for six hours and ending up in the poor house.
I mean that that's 'Life'. The game of 'Life'. There's a spot on the board in 'Life' that is called 'The Poor House'. In real life, you're lucky if there's such a house at the end to go to.
In Monopoly however at the end of the game, every body is just angry. Maybe not the winner. But even then everybody is so made at the winner that the winner can't enjoy themselves. Do you remember ever winning at monopoly? Nobody has. Because everybody hates that person because they cheated so horribly (it was so obvious), and the winner is ashamed to admit it later (both the winning and the cheating).
@Cerberus Wait...what was the name of that book? All language learning books should be like that. I now know where the Rhine is. It is definitely not in Africa.
@MetaEd I'm sort of torn. I grew up with English and use it every day, but French was my first foreign language. Latin however just covers so much (but frankly the children's stories are kind of bland). What did they say about Aeneas? Something like 'Aeneas is the most boring hero in all of literature'
Anyway, It's hard to choose my favorite. I'm kinda liking Spanish right now.
I am looking for equivalent of Indian saying "Makdach ghar" which is "Monkey's house" the meaning is a monkey always starts to built his house only after it starts to rain. It has the analogy of "Ants and the grasshopper" where the monkey = the grasshopper
I am not looking for the saying like "S...
@Cerberus It's great if you become a doctor or lawyer in English. It also helps with a lot of academic words. But for newspapers and news? I think that's its own slog in any language. What's the difference between the national security advisor and the secretary adjutant for national security? danged if I know.
Also Latin won't teach you what 'danged if I know' means.
@Cerberus I kinda know where the Rhine is already. So that part was easy. (also I had year of Latin in high school which covers 'Ave atque vale' and how to conjugate the pluperfect but stops before the ablative absolute.
@Cerberus I quit Latin well before we were supposed to start reading the Aeneid. I've only just read that Aeneas the character was boring. They didn't say that the Aeneid itself was entirely boring. (but I did infer that)
@Cerberus Isn't she the girl that sings with Eminem?
@MetaEd Oh. I see. That's why you were asking.
I think I've said too much already
But no, not an edifice, but rather that fancy word for toothpaste, the one where I can never remember where to put the 'r'.
@Cerberus I think that is bit strong. Kind of limiting. Who's to say who can or cannot learn what from a text. Im learning two things from what you wrote: 1) You can't learn two languages from one text ... not intended for that use. and 2) You aren't being imaginative enough.
@Mitch No: many of the words you mention learners would not know. But they will know if they know Latin.
That is the point.
Difference, national, security, advisor, secretary, adjudant: a learner might be able to guess those words knowing Latin.
In addition, more difficult words in English, ones that most native speakers don't know, are easier to guess for those native speakers of English that do know Latin.
@Mitch Aren't heroes always boring?
They are vessels through which the story is told and the virtues are exemplified.
I just used the phrase "narrow wall", and it occurred to me that, even though my meaning was clear, the word "narrow" usually refers to width and not to depth. Are there words like "tall" and "short" for height and "wide" and "narrow" for width that describe the extent of depth specifically? I'm ...
Heard an old joke about someone trying to namedrop. The person they were talking to didn't know who they were talking about, so they said, "Well, they really are very famous, even though most people don't know who they are."
But there's a kernel of truth in that old joke, namely that someone no...