« first day (526 days earlier)      last day (4693 days later) » 

21:22
@KitFox That actually doesn't matter. If your kids are boys and you have guns in the house, unless you take extreme precautions — way beyond storing the ammo in a separate place — your boys will find the guns and the ammo and use the guns however they can. That's what me and my brother did. My dad had handguns stored in a locked container in his room and his ammo was in a locked container in the attic. Didn't matter. We found his keys for the guns and his combination for the ammo.
We were in middle school at the time, or thereabouts.
@Robusto Good point.
Is that when you shot part of your brain to pulp?
@Cerberus No. I was too good a marksman for that.
Oh, so it is genetic.
I dunno.
It's OK.
21:35
I've just always been a good shot. Pistols, rifles, bows, slingshots — not sure why.
How about throwing and hitting balls?
Darts?
Good hitter, good thrower, but not a pitcher.
Remind me, what does a pitcher do again?
Good jumpshot in basketball.
Throws the ball? Hits it?
I am terrible at most sports.
21:39
He throws the baseball to the catcher. The batter tries to hit it before it gets to the catcher's mitt.
Ah OK.
I have played softball, but rarely and long ago.
I only know a bit about the sports that I used to play.
greetings, chatters
Greetings, edible stranger!
Or are you stale?
That depends on who you ask
21:41
I see.
I'm no fruitcake
My dad had 31 guns in the house at one count
almost all were rifles and shotguns
most older
damn this dc plug
Hmm.
which part?
All.
I'm sorry.
._.
21:45
No need.
I just hmm a lot.
things that make ya go 'hmm'
I think I was a bee in a past life.
she looks so confrontational
sorry, I'm sort of constantly distracted by music
Haha.
I mean, hmm.
21:52
@Robusto when I saw the pitcher video, I thought it was going to be this one: youtube.com/watch?v=KxEUW3pQX6A
also, how did you get the video preview all fancy?
I think yours didn't because it lacks the http://
weird.
all I did was 'copy link location' on yours and paste it
22:05
huh
maybe it just needs to be its own post...
(removed)
yup, that seems to do it
Hey, @RegDwight, you can complain about the quality of the questions on ELU; but have a look at this.
-9
Q: Mocking lots of objects - its boring and it smells bad

NimChimpskyI am doing this in an abstract base class but it smells : protected Person mockPerson1 = mock(Person.class); protected Person mockPerson2 = mock(Person.class); protected Person mockPerson3 = mock(Person.class); protected Person mockPerson4 = mock(Person.class); protected Person m...

Hello.
howdy
Hola.
How's everyone today?
22:14
صبح به خیر
Oh, you're Arabic today?
Or maybe some similar language.
NO! This language is not even related to Arabic.
I'm not very familiar with them.
@DavidWallace Sorry…
@DavidWallace It's midnight David!
Oh, Google Translate is saying Persian.
22:15
Not where I am!
Sorry for the rash generalisation.
Are you sure it's not quarter to three in the morning?
Oh, it is. I didn't notice.
user19161
@mahnax I just returned from a night's walk again!
@JasperLoy Nice.
22:18
Hey, I have to go and referee a kids' soccer game. See you all later.
user19161
@DavidWallace Have fun.
@DavidWallace Bye!
user19161
@Cerberus Don't run, just walk. Otherwise you may trip and fall with all the fruits.
user19161
@KitFox Nice kitty there!
Is the word 'erudite' only ever used sarcastically? OED says it (primarily) is, but MW doesn't say anything like that. Maybe its a British/American thing?
user19161
22:34
@Cameron Really? I sort of doubt it says the primary use is sarcastic, but I don't have access to it. I never thought it was sarcastic in itself.
copy/pasting: Learned, scholarly. (Now somewhat rare exc. in sarcastic use.)
user19161
@Cameron Hmm OK. Well who cares about OED? :-)
user19161
However it does define the word as what it means, no more no less, and that suffices.
Well, I'm American, so if I can't shoot it, eat it, or convert it to my religion, I certainly don't care.
I'm writing a letter of recommendation
user19161
So I say it does not have to be thought of as sarcastic. It just means "learned and scholarly". QED.
22:38
@Cameron Let me guess, the OED doesn't list any 20th-century quotations for erudite?
but I don't want to use it if people will think that I am being sarcastic
@Vitaly lemme check...
user19161
@Cameron Oh man, I don't know anyone I would call erudite today.
@Vitaly None.
@Vitaly nope, 1875 is the latest
user19161
There are just so many things to be learnt in any subject that it is quite impossible to be "erudite"!
22:39
@Cameron Well, there.
Feb 20 at 19:35, by Vitaly
> In using the Oxford English Dictionary you do need to be aware of the age of large parts of the text; much of it dates back to the first edition which was originally published in parts between 1884 and 1928.
user19161
@Cameron I don't think people will regard it as sarcastic in such a letter, but do not overuse the word. It is very powerful.
user19161
If I see a letter calling someone "erudite" I would probably dismiss it myself, but that's just me!
I think you are just being influenced by the OED's dated claim.
@JasperLoy the person I'm describing was useful in a project we worked on specifically because he knew so much about various fields (physics and economics) that weren't necessarily his specialty (computer science). I feel like erudite is appropriate here
This page quotes the 4th edition of the AHD:
user19161
22:43
@Vitaly I think maybe I have overestimated the meaning of the word. QED.
> The English word erudite is first recorded in a work possibly written before 1425 with the senses "instructed, learned." Erudite meaning "learned" is supposed to have become rare except in sarcastic use during the latter part of the 19th century, but the word now seems to have been restored to favor.
user19161
@Cameron Ah then I would actually just write more specifically about his contributions than apply a vague adjective, but that's just me!
@Vitaly that's likely. I guess what's making me nervous is the use of the word now in the note about sarcastic usage. I hadn't considered that now still refers to the time when it was written
@JasperLoy I am, I am, its just for the concluding sentence
I just saw that on FB.
I don't even…
@Mahnax I bet Hamilton wishes he could change his mind now!
user19161
22:46
@Mahnax Not a real question.
@JasperLoy Sometimes I wonder why I'm friends with the lady who posts this stuff.
user19161
@Mahnax Is it Maria?
@JasperLoy Heck no.
user19161
@Mahnax Well, at least Washington gave us some apples.
@JasperLoy @Vitaly thanks for your help
user19161
22:48
@Cameron No help at all!
user19161
@mahnax You going for the party later?
@JasperLoy Ayup.
My mom left to visit some friends for the weekend so my dad's taking all of us out for dinner tonight.
Then I'm going to the party.
user19161
@Mahnax No alcohol for you!
@JasperLoy But Jasper…
I'm kidding, I don't drink.
user19161
@Mahnax OK at least no drugs...
22:52
@JasperLoy Certainly not.
Although it is that day… jokes
user19161
@Mahnax Oh Robusto taught me about it.
@JasperLoy Did he? Good on him.
You shouldn't be so sheltered.
user19161
@Mahnax Wow, now you sound like Yoda.
@JasperLoy Learn you must, padawan.
Bye!
23:12
@Cameron I would certainly use it in a serious sense, about a third person.
"The erudite Burchfield claims..." or something.
That is, there may be a hint of irony, but no more than with "learned" or "scholarly".
Less than with "wise".
And even if there is some irony it can still be sincere for the most part.

« first day (526 days earlier)      last day (4693 days later) »