« first day (526 days earlier)      last day (4413 days later) » 

4:00 PM
@RegDwightѬſ道 From what to what?
 
Hah.
Next question.
Anyway, if you ask me, one answer should be enough for everyone.
I mean, ideally, every question should have exactly one answer anyway.
They are trying to catch up, but it's too little to late. I have started an active war and have to run in a minute.
I'll try to find the Joel makes a 180 thingy later tonight.
Au wiedervederci!
 
Later.
 
CU.
 
What led to you doing this thing?
 
@Vitaly What qualifications or restrictions does Daedalus have on Jam?
 
4:12 PM
@Robusto Huh?
 
Must be raspberry.
 
Jam all, jam 1, jam Imperial ...
 
Just Jam.
 
So it can jam any single card?
 
Yeah. A 50% chance of jamming a random enemy assault that is active or is about to activate.
 
4:13 PM
@aedia Where have you been? I missed you! Are you all moved?
 
Hiya!
@KitFox I'm set up in my new (temporary) digs at my parents' house, yep.
 
Nice!
Does it have rainbows and soft, fluffy clouds?
 
Sky is blue and the birds are chirping, so that's all I can ask for :)
Also, giant new monitor when my work laptop is in its docking station, so that's exciting.
 
@Vitaly I guess "Jam All" would be imba.
 
@KitFox How's things up even more northeasterer? Y'all got beautiful weather there too?
 
4:20 PM
Birds are chirping. Naked people rode past my window at lunchtime. Can't complain, really.
 
giggles
 
Are you celebrating today?
The enemy of my enemy is mine frenemy.
 
Today is actually the birthday of two people close to me, so that's what we'll be celebrating.
 
Hooray!
 
Going out to dinner like responsible grownups and all.
Heh.
 
4:28 PM
Oh! My brain just had a thought.
Come back here, you slippery thing.
 
Lunch. Laterz.
 
Catch ya later! Mmm, food. That sounds like a good idea.
 
4:56 PM
Yay! Building indexes.
 
Jez
5:17 PM
frenemy
great word, it should exist
Logically, one could have two enemies who were also frenemies
 
0
Q: Loaf of French bread

Anglo SaxonWhat is the English word describing a long thin loaf of French bread, which crust is appetisingly golden and crunchy, and the bread inside is light and fluffy?

 
Eeek!
 
Pain de penis
hi @aedia :D
i do not recommend Googling pain de penis without quotes
not a good set of images
 
Shouldn't it be pan? Wow. My brain is hurting.
 
5:27 PM
It's shouting no!yes!no!yes! right now.
 
sooth your brain with some nice
something
 
@KitFox That's Spanish.
 
Shut UP, brain! It's yes!
 
music?
 
I mean no.
 
5:28 PM
lol
 
@aediaλ Oh thank god.
I had a hell of a time when I was a junior in high school. Spanish and French back-to-back.
 
That's why Panera's name makes sense... it's a place to stick your bread
 
It wasn't too bad, but I distinctly remember what must have been four minutes of half my brain saying tiendatiendatiendatienda and the other half saying notspanishnotspanishnotspanish
 
I mean, um.
 
aye, me too
 
5:30 PM
I also like "tienda" better than "magasin" so that didn't help.
 
Nunca he hablado bien el francés
 
It came out as "Je vais aller au uuuuuuuhhhhhhhhuuuuuuuummmmmmuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhttttttttttuuuuuuummmmmttttummmmma‌​gasin."
 
but it paid off in the end, since you can now speak fluent Russian
 
Or something. It would have been fourth-level French, so I was probably cheeky enough to ask "Como se dice tienda en frances?"
 
5:35 PM
When I was in college we had to go to language table once a week. This was at lunchtime where we would eat and learn table manners and such for our respective languages.
We were not allowed to speak English, so my friend and I would often cheat by speaking French at Chinese table.
 
Ooh language table sounds fun.
 
It's funny because people would notice right away if you started speaking English, but any other foreign language didn't set off alarms.
@aediaλ It was interesting.
Especially in first-year Chinese class.
They taught us how to order food and whatnot, but then the rest of the time, we'd make up the weirdest conversations based on our limited vocabulary.
 
about monkeys in trees?
 
Eddie Izzard!
And no.
"Whose milk glass is fuller, mine or yours?"
"Compared to yours, mine is fuller."
 
5:38 PM
"Oh, I respectfully disagree. My fish is quite big compared to our esteemed teacher's."
"Do you walk often in the rain?"
"I walk in the rain when the sun only shines."
"Where is Mao Zedong?"
"Old Mao is next to the river, north of the lake, on top of the tree, near my house."
OK, I suppose I've made my point. It was really fun.
 
:D
sounds it
 
We also had some of the funniest year-end sketches ever.
My good friend played one of our teachers, and another male student actually crossed-dressed to play the part of the other teacher.
 
I, uh, didn't take language classes in college. Nor a single traditional English class (usability and software focused classes filled the requirement). And now my job title has "writer" in it... go figure.
 
They played that they had a party and my friend brought his friend—his best friend—the fish to it. Then he got drunk and jumped up on the desk and started telling people about how his fish was bigger than anybody's.
 
giggles
 
5:43 PM
Still makes me chuckle, to this day.
@aediaλ Wow. I feel like making rude comments, but just to be silly.
 
@KitFox Hehe, I know what you mean. I can still think of lines from practicing those kind of class skits with friends, now that I think about it. "Yes, of course, I'm going to Spain to buy ham!"
 
Hahaha. Right. Because where else would you go to buy ham?
Damn it, Linq! Behave!
contemplates changing stuff again
 
Sooooorrrreeee princess!
 
I really would have continued Spanish classes if I'd had a crystal ball... god knows I've forgotten my entire chem minor (which at the time was maybe going to be a dual major, so it ate like all my elective slots).
 
Tocino langosta.
 
5:48 PM
@aediaλ I know what you mean. If I knew then what I know now, I would have worked harder to keep my Chinese double major, and added more programming classes.
 
Bacon... shrimp?
 
Lobster.
 
NOT LOBSTER!!!!
 
Why?
 
> In March 2006, Long John Silver's garnered controversy by offering buttered lobster bites advertising that they include "langostino lobster". A Los Angeles Superior Court judge made no decisions in April 2006 on the matter when a class-action lawsuit was brought against Rubio's Restaurants, Inc., for selling "lobster burrito" and "lobster taco" that were in fact made with squat lobster.
 
5:51 PM
What, nobody likes the lobsters who couldn't afford their own homesteads?
 
It's not a lobster.
But sorry, I'm overly-sensitive. You said "langosta" not "langostino." My apologies.
It's a huge controversy in my home state, where lobster is one of our major exports.
 
Oh, according to Google Translate, langosta also means locust.
 
Eww nobody wants locust bacon!
 
Then again, they think "ajellut" means shaving, not driving.
 
Cheap knockoffs have really hurt our fishing economy.
 
5:53 PM
Hmm I can imagine.
 
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
 
From a paper in Malaysia
 
NICE
 
5:54 PM
That is great.
 
Silly people.
 
So pro tip: anyone doing Android development should consider getting the x86 Android images from Intel. Those, combined with a special hypervisor you can download, let you run the emulator at near native speeds. Instead of the crappy arm emulation which is sllllllllllllllllllooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwww
 
sketches diagram You mean you can use eye movements for your interface?
 
hypervisor -> over seer -> officer -> cop! watchout, it's the feds
 
@KitFox Um, it'd be awesome of a hypervisor had to do with eyes, but instead it has to do with virtualization, which is still cool, but not as sexy.
 
6:00 PM
@MattЭллен ducks
 
That reminds me of something I can't quite remember that I wanted to ask you. It was maybe about phones, but probably not, more like... webby things, or Java. Hmm. tries to scratch brain
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 The virtualization I worked on had a visor. sniffs haughtily
LMGTFY. pokes @aedia's hippocampus
 
@KitFox you misspelled unicorncampus
 
Have you ever seen a flagged message of mine? Go star that nonsense. Silly people.
 
There's a thing with icons and stuff. Icons that are loaded once on the page like CSS sprites? Does that sound like something we talked about here?
 
6:02 PM
@aediaλ we talked about css sprites
are you asking about jquery-ui?
 
@aediaλ Oh! I remember that!
 
Yeah!
 
all the cool kids are using jquery-mobile now.
 
When I was asking about my up-down arrows, I think.
 
jquery-ui is so Feb 2012
 
6:03 PM
0
A: Origin of the phrase, "There's more than one way to skin a cat."

MitchYes, it has always been a bit rough, but not in the way you expect. Even though it sounds somewhat derogatory towards cats, the phrase originated -within- the cat subculture. Even more interesting, it is not a metaphor for questionable behavior but is literally about skinning. It is not very we...

 
Thank you!
 
0
Q: Loaf of French bread

Anglo SaxonWhat is the English word describing a long thin loaf of French bread, which crust is appetisingly golden and crunchy, and the bread inside is light and fluffy?

You people are killing me.
 
I tried to think of a reason to close it, but I couldn't
same with the paprika question
 
Q: What is the English word for "loaf of French bread"? A: "Loaf of French bread!" Bam! Accepted within an hour, reps all around.
@MattЭллен I suppose if the OP gets three answers (stick, baguette, baton) but ignores them all, that's reason enough to call it a NARQ.
 
6:08 PM
Funny, since the answer is baguette.
 
@KitFox yes, and that's the highest voted, but not the accepted answer.
so 'stick' is upper or lower class? — Mitch 2 mins ago
Hahahaha you're so mean.
 
A ficelle is type of bread that is similar to a baguette but much thinner. The word ficelle literally means "string" in French. Like the baguette, this type of bread has a hard, brown crust and many air pockets. A typical ficelle weighs 140 g (4.9 oz), but this varies from shop to shop. External links *[http://www.recipetips.com/glossary-term/t--38436/ficelle-bread.asp Recipe Tips] *[http://www.baking911.com/bread/french.htm Baking 911] *[http://www.bagatelle.co.uk/wholesale/bakery/bread-baguette-sandwich.php Bagatelle]
Could also be this. ^
 
@Robusto go post it just to mess with him.
 
A'ight.
 
@Robusto Could be, but I think most people would still call that baguette.
 
6:22 PM
@KitFox Obviously you don't have a French bakery near you.
 
Obviously.
We don't even have a Panera near us.
Much less a boulangerie.
 
You give up a lot for the chance to run into a moose on the highway.
 
@RegDwight: Why is it "die Geschichte meines Todes "?
 
I have a friend who survived a moose collision.
 
@Gigili The stories of my death.
 
6:24 PM
@Robusto Right, but why meinES todES?
 
@Gigili How else you gonna show genitive case? Case markers: they can save your life.
@KitFox But I bet you don't know anybody who survived a collision with a ficelle.
 
Tru dat.
 
@Robusto Um, so that's the genitive case? I always had problem recognizing them.
 
@Gigili Well, then, the answer is simple. Whenever it's a case you don't recognize, consider that it might be genitive.
 
Wenn ist das Nunstück git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
 
6:27 PM
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Das ist Unsinn.
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Wes Geistes Kind hat dies verbrochen?
 
sigh
I guess it doesn't work
 
Oh it does.
 
"The Funniest Joke in the World" is the title most frequently used for written references to a Monty Python's Flying Circus comedy sketch, which is also known by two other phrases that appear within it, "Joke Warfare" and "Killer Joke", the latter being the most commonly spoken title used to refer to it. The premise of the sketch is that the joke is so funny that anyone who reads or hears it promptly dies from laughter. Broadcast The sketch appeared in the first episode of the television show Monty Python's Flying Circus ("Whither Canada"), first shown on October 5, 1969. The sketch was ...
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Wait ... did you generate that heuristically?
 
6:28 PM
That meme is old as all eternity.
@MrShinyandNew安宇 who is Monty Python?
 
@RegDwightѬſ道 Now you're just trolling me
 
@RegDwightѬſ道 A.k.a. The Fool Monty.
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 oh, now?
Apr 1 '11 at 12:23, by RegDwight
Sie müssen nur den Nippel durch die Lasche ziehn, und mit der kleinen Kurbel ganz nach oben drehn. Da erscheint sofort ein Pfeil, und da drücken Sie dann drauf.
 
Jez
@RegDwight hey
@RegDwight time to do any translation?
 
Actually, time to cook!
OMFG don't click on that link to Apr 1st. Three messages down Robusto wins.
 
6:32 PM
Apr 1 '11 at 12:24, by Robusto
user image
@RegDwightѬſ道 Too late.
 
See? Behind every Hello Kitty drawing there's a genuine asshole.
Apr 1 '11 at 12:33, by Robusto
You are trying too hard. Look, you got sweat all over your last attempt.
 
Hi.
 
Ohai!
 
Cerb! Have you heard? Microsoft has announced the end of the end of Windows XP support
 
6:42 PM
Oh, really?
Well, I have never needed support...
 
Hiya!
 
Hi girlz!
I hope you don't mind my greeting you in pairs.
 
no, that means "no more fixes of any kind, no more third-party software supported"
 
But you're both cute animals.
 
@Robusto Thank you for the tip!
 
6:43 PM
@MrShinyandNew安宇 And do I need any of that?
 
@Cerberus well, you should install security fixes
And it also means that other software you might want to use won't necessarily be available for XP because it will get harder and harder to develop software for XP
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Link?
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 You know I disagree with you there...
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 gotcha! I was feeling loopy this morning. about to delete....
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 We'll see. When the time comes that I need anything that won't work on XP, then's the time to switch. Any time sooner I know not why.
 
6:46 PM
and done.
 
@Gigili Hey what's with your avatar?
 
6:59 PM
coughs
 
Heimlich manoeuvre
 
Hello Kitty.
@Cerberus Hum? Isn't it clear enough?
 
Not exactly?
 
Umm, "sorry, we're closed".
 
Is it supposed to be a funny picture, or are you contemplating leaving the site again?
 
7:03 PM
She is disappointed in love.
 
> It is wrong to use some constitutional provisions as springboards for major social change while treating others like senile relatives to be cooped up in a nursing home until they quit annoying us. (re the right to bear arms) — judge Alex Kozinski
 
Therefore, closed for business.
 
Oh, I see.
I wish all government officials could write as well as this judge!
 
Too bad I disagree.
 
@Cerberus why is it wrong?
 
7:05 PM
@KitFox With what exactly?
He seems to be arguing for the right to bear arms, you mean?
 
@Cerberus I don't think it is wrong.
 
Ah OK.
 
Too many people treat the Constitution like the Bible.
It should be a living document.
Therefore, it is right to use some constitutional provisions as springboards for major social change while treating others like senile relatives to be cooped up in a nursing home until they quit annoying us.
 
Well, it is living. Just that changing it is hard.
And not everyone agrees about the senility of the various clauses.
 
@Cerberus All of the above.
 
7:07 PM
Well, I have only read this little quotation, so I have no idea what it is about; but his point is probably that there should be due democratic process involved in changing long-standing practice, rather than a new or alternative interpretation of an old document.
 
It's like caring for Gramma D. "Here's your breakfast." "What?" "Here's your breakfast." "What?" point "What's that?" "Your breakfast." "What?" "YOUR BREAKFAST!" indignant look
 
@KitFox But wouldn't it be better to have a major social discussion and voting and whatnot instead? Because otherwise who is to decide which clause to discard and which to revive?
 
@Cerberus You say that like I'm disagreeing with you.
 
@Cerberus opinions tend to be so thoroughly divided about the relevant clauses that there is nothing to be gained from voting at this point.
 
@KitFox You appeared to be, but perhaps you interpret the judge differently?
@MrShinyandNew安宇 So then any random judge should cherry pick the clauses from the Constitution that he personally likes?
Why not just have a referendum?
Do your respective countries use referenda much? We don't, not really.
But sometimes we do.
Then again, those invite populism and ignorance.
 
7:11 PM
Changing the Constitution doesn't happen lightly.
 
0
A: Use of "completely rubbish"

Andy PostemaThis website is complete rubbish.

Funneh.
 
@KitFox The people could be asked to vote on an interpretation of the Constitution?
 
@Cerberus What?
 
In case opinions are divided, or in case standing practice deviates from the C.
@KitFox As with the right to bear arms.
 
No, that's a terrible idea.
Really just awful.
 
7:13 PM
Perhaps so.
 
That's like asking retarded people, grocery clerks, your mechanic, and the clergy to decide what type of medical treatment you should receive.
 
But to give a judge so much power? Isn't that a violation of the separation of powers, and anti-democratic?
 
bangs head on desk
I think I'll make some coffee.
 
I mean, one judge may say guns are OK, and the next will say the opposite.
 
Judges set precedent, but they can't just make stuff up.
It's not a violation of the separation of powers, it is the basis of the separation of powers.
 
7:15 PM
Well, if they choose some controversial interpretation of the Constitution and ignore other clauses...
 
And normal people won't do that?
 
@Cerberus Well, not "cherry pick clauses". But it's naive to think that interpretation of clauses can't be revised.
 
@RegDwightѬſ道 Sure, but then at least there will be debate and voting and accountability.
 
@Cerberus Accountability?? How??
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 That's how I interpret the quotation.
 
7:17 PM
If it's one judge, you know who is accountable. If it's three hundred million people, nobody is responsible.
 
You pick one clause and disregard another at will—that's what Alex was arguing against.
 
Well, no. Judges are not allowed to completely disregard clauses in any laws, unless there are higher laws that invalidate them.
 
@RegDwightѬſ道 Lawmakers can be voted into oblivion, and there will be major debates and candidates taking positions and such.
 
Anyway, amending the constitution requires congress passing a bill, and then 3/4ths of all states ratifying it by passing a bill.
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Alex suggests that that is more or less what some judges are doing.
You don't need to change the Constitution, just reinterpret it.
In any case, it was his style that I praised: in order to judge the content I would have to fully understand what he meant.
Most officials write badly.
 
7:22 PM
Ahh, coffee.
 
coffee sounds like a really good idea
 
By the way, I am not in favour of guns, so I think the Constitution should be changed.
 
I am in favor of guns.
So I guess we are at a standoff.
looks archly @Cerb
It's hard to look arch with this cat face on.
 
FINALLY Kit fulfills an American Stereotype!
I've been waiting so long
 
@KitFox Are you really? Hmm.
 
7:26 PM
I thought slutty and boob-showing were both American stereotypes.
 
Are many of your friends in favour of guns?
 
We are unanimously in favor of guns.
Also sometimes roses.
 
Oh, interpreting. I thought most liberals were against guns.
I think the real effect of guns on killings should be more thoroughly investigated.
Because I think there was some Scandinavian country with very lax gun laws where relatively few murders took place.
 
I'm a liberal gun-lover. I think guns should require a license, and handguns and automatic weapons should require special endorsement.
 
So it's not a 1:1 effect for certain.
 
7:29 PM
Like driving.
 
Hmm.
I guess hand guns are important.
The kind you need for hunting usually aren't much of a problem, I think.
 
Also, like New Hampshire, I think the state should provide a rifle free of charge to every citizen who reaches the age of majority.
 
Why?
Now you're trying to fool me.
I can smell it.
 
Because the point of the second amendment was to ensure an adequately armed standing militia.
Therefore, we should do that.
 
Well, I think the point behind that was that people have to be able to defend themselves in the wilderness where the law can't reach.
In the pioneering age.
 
7:31 PM
@Cerberus You should understand that I live in a rural state. The majority of gun deaths here occur because of inadequately secured firearms being handled by people who have not taken gun safety courses.
 
Like children?
 
@Cerberus No. The point of the amendment was to allow the people to effectively rebel and overthrow the government, should it grow despotic.
 
@Cerberus I'm pretty sure the intent was that the people, being sufficiently well-armed, could always keep the government in fear of an uprising
 
Many children shooting themselves in the head because their parents didn't store ammunition separately from the weapon.
 
@MrShinyandNew beat me to it..
 
7:32 PM
Hmm is that so? What do you two base that on?
 
@Cerberus the text
 
American history class?
 
Every US civics class ever?
Jinx!
 
@KitFox Ugh that is ugly. But how can people be made to store their guns more securely?
No, I mean, what historical text is that based on?
I am admittedly not very knowledgeable in US civics.
 
@Cerberus If you have to have a license to own a firearm, then you can be required to fulfill certain obligations as a condition of licensure, such as taking safety classes and demonstrating an awareness of the dangers of owning firearms, etc.
@Cerberus A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
 
7:35 PM
@KitFox OK, and are such instructions nowhere compulsory now?
 
@Cerberus Nope.
 
"The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." -- (Thomas Jefferson)
 
@KitFox Yeah but I mean, what texts are used to interpret the reason behind that clause in the way you mentioned?
 
Cerb, remember: the US had just formed itself by a rebellion consisting of regular people arming themselves and fighting the government
 
@KitFox Hmm it would be interesting to find out how well that would work.
 
7:36 PM
There is tons of historical documentation for this
 
@Cerberus What part of "well-regulated militia" needs interpretation?
 
The Second Amendment (Amendment II) to the United States Constitution is the part of the United States Bill of Rights that protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, along with the rest of the Bill of Rights. In 2008 and 2010, the Supreme Court issued two Second Amendment decisions. In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm, unconnected to service in a militia and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within t...
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 All right, if you say so.
 
@Cerberus don't take my word for it. Wikipedia is full of details
 
@KitFox Not the clause itself, but the reason why it would be needed.
@MrShinyandNew安宇 OK I'll read that later.
 
7:38 PM
Anyway, in principle I agree that people sometimes need to rebel against the government. However, it also seems that A) this is never needed in countries that have things like bills of rights, and B) gun proliferation in the US has caused a lot of problems.
and C) An armed uprising in the US now would be put down so fast by the vastly superior forces of the US army or the national guard.
 
I'm sure Canada would help us out though, eh?
 
with what guns?
 
You've got four submarines. You could use those.
 
We could help by stopping shipments of oil, thus paralyzing ... someone.
 
@MrShinyandNew your point C is a good one, but it presupposes that the US military and national guard would not fragment in the event of an actual uprising
 
7:40 PM
hahaha
@Cameron true. But the military fragmenting in the case of an uprising can't be used as an argument in favour of a right to bear arms.
 
I wasn't intending it to be, I was just pointing out that if an uprising took place, you couldn't count on unilateral military support for ending it
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Hmm I think I have to agree on all those points, dammit.
@Cameron ...but the civilians who were swaying their little guns probably wouldn't make much of a difference anyway.
 
I think regulating firearms would be a good thing.
 
Or would they?
 
@Cerberus ever met someone in the Michigan Militia?
 
7:43 PM
Daily.
I mean, no.
 
@Cerberus just for context, where are you from?
Nevermind, I see Amsterdam in your profile
 
@Cameron The problem would be if the uprising started small enough that the military could stop it before it got out of hand, and soldiers started defecting (and taking weapons with them).
Anyway, Cerb, the constitution grants broad freedoms so as to avoid a slippery slope of regulation-creep.
 
@MrShinyandNew Before the internet, I would have agreed with you, it would have been logistically impossible. But, keep in mind that most of the crazies who are the closest to starting an armed revolution are A) ex military (i.e. trained and organized), B) well-connected, and C) well-armed. That's enough to make me board up my windows if something started even in the same state
let alone in my neighborhood
 
@Cameron But are "armed crazies" likely to gain enough support to become a national revolution, with the military fragmenting?
Currently, most people's lives are so good (in absolute terms) that armed rebellion against the government would be a huge waste of effort. Changes in the government can be achieved in non-violent means. It's not perfect, but it's way better than it was in the 18th century.
Instead people who want change do things like Occupy Wall Street.
Or go into politics.
or lobbying.
Or opining on Internet chat forums.
 
Hey! I do that!
Anyway, I'm off. Have a lovely evening. Maybe I will chat with you later, if not, enjoy your weekend.
Actually, either way, I hope you enjoy your weekend.
 
8:01 PM
same to you! bye
I'm off too.
 
@MrShinyandNew sorry for the delay, work calls. Anyway, I think it's unlikely, but possible. I'm talking about a hypothetical future in which something has happened to instigate the people who espouse the use of violence to bring social and gov't change, I should have made that clear, sorry
@MrShinyandNew bye
 
0
A: What would be a formal reply to "I need your help"?

steve richieMy question...I need help - what is the appropriate reply to these words? "Age is an issue of Mind over Matter, if you don't mind it doesn't matter." I know that it does matter though and especially 30 years. How can I explain that to her? Anxiously awaiting your reply to my inbox...thank you....

That's an answer.
One of those cases where commenting that he should use the Ask Question link instead would do no good...
Oh well I've done it anyway.
 
Sorry, I had to run for groceries.
 

« first day (526 days earlier)      last day (4413 days later) »