« first day (2159 days earlier)      last day (2757 days later) » 

12:04 AM
@tchrist In saying that I think you should note that if your prior example were made to be a democrat instead of a republican, it probably make a difference to the democrats either, especially in this election. Many voters cite a "lesser of two evils" argument to explain why they vote for a majoritarian candidate over any of the dozens of third party candidates.
I believe one of our own members even voted for Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders, mostly for the fact that she's more likely to beat Trump.
I wonder how these elections would play out if everybody actually voted for who they thought was the best candidate on the ballot, rather than the best compromise....
 
@Tonepoet "even"?
 
@tchrist To clarify, if I am not just imagining things, the person preferred Bernie, which I think should be clear by the nature of the statement. It would not very noteworthy to suggest that somebody made a choice between what they consider to be two otherwise equal candidates on the basis that one is even just superficially better.
I think it was this discussion I'm recollecting. My memory's a little bad, as there was no actual vote. Just a statement of who they would have voted for if they did. Bernie allegedly did better in the debate, but Hillary would have gotten the vote regardless.
 
12:24 AM
@tchrist Ah, OK.
@Tonepoet The winner-take-all system...
 
@Cerberus I'm not sure if winner take all can be avoided, given the primary role of the president is meant to be making immediate decisions upon how to best execute federal laws. However, elections would maybe work better if every eligible voter got three votes for separate candidates?
 
That would be a start.
 
@tchrist that's oompa-loompist
 
But I think a core problem is that 1 person wins 100% of the power.
So the majority of the population are not represented at all by this one person; their votes as "thrown away", as it were.
 
Proportional works ok for a bunch of people, but by definition aa single person is monolithic.
So are you suggestion not to have a single leader at all?
 
user227867
12:32 AM
I just watched Robert de Niro talking about Donald Trump on YouTube, ROFLMAO.
 
Yes, or one who doesn't wield so much power.
 
user227867
All power is imaginary. It ends in the grave.
 
@Tonepoet there are amelioruzations, as you suggest but the only mitigate the problem, and don't remove it.
The voting paradox (also known as Condorcet's paradox or the paradox of voting) is a situation noted by the Marquis de Condorcet in the late 18th century, in which collective preferences can be cyclic (i.e., not transitive), even if the preferences of individual voters are not cyclic. This is paradoxical, because it means that majority wishes can be in conflict with each other. When this occurs, it is because the conflicting majorities are each made up of different groups of individuals. Thus an expectation that transitivity on the part of all individuals' preferences should result in transitivity...
Also Arrows theorem
@Cerberus I'm starting to think that the US president isn't really that powerful
 
Not that powerful, but still powerful.
Or how powerful did you (not) mean?
 
@Mitch They aren't meant to be. Antifederalists didn't want an analogue to the authority of a king , so compromises had to be made.
 
user227867
12:39 AM
I however am powderful. I have lots of coffee powder!
 
@Cerberus vaguely noncommittal powerful. Less than however powerful I thought before
 
@WillHunting Not if you're the Dalai Lama, or the Karmapa.
 
@WillHunting Nescafé!!
 
user227867
@Tonepoet OK. But I don't subscribe to the Tibetans!
 
I canceled my subscription long ago
After the monk-monkey incident
 
user227867
12:41 AM
@Mitch You may wish to subscribe to my channel youtube.com/channel/UC2-RQJJVtIR59D3gegF89tg if you are bored. Thank you.
 
@WillHunting Regardless, I would suppose you still believe in reincarnation and if we posit that the reincarnations have been accurately tracked, then those people inherit at least some amount of power from their prior lives.
 
user227867
One reason why I deleted all my videos in the past was because nobody was watching them except myself. But I decided to give it another shot...
 
user227867
@Tonepoet I do believe in rebirth but not in the Tibetan tracking system or TTS, an abbreviation I just invented, LOL.
 
@WillHunting It might take years before people notice your videos and you gather a following. Try to leave them up. Also, try commenting on other people's videos.
 
user227867
@Tonepoet I made my own subscriptions public. I am currently subscribing to Jacob Sartorius, LOL.
 
12:45 AM
@WillHunting The reason I suggest commenting on videos is that if somebody is interested by your comment, it doubles as a link to your channel to draw in others.
 
user227867
@Tonepoet Yes, I certainly thought of that before.
 
@Mitch That definition is no doubt true.
 
user227867
@Tonepoet I emailed two sellers because the system did not allow them to ship to my place. Hope they respond soon. On two different sites. I am keeping the location a secret!
 
@WillHunting I wonder why.
 
user227867
@Tonepoet Either they keyed in their preferences wrongly disallowing overseas shipping or they really don't like shipping to aliens.
 
user227867
12:51 AM
I suspect it is the former, because who doesn't want to make money?
 
user227867
And I am not even ordering drugs or guns, just a dictionary, lol.
 
Dictionaries are big and heavy compared to other sorts of books. Maybe they just don't think it's profitable.
 
user227867
At the price they are selling, even free shipping gives them a huge profit already.
 
user227867
Oh I have not watched Batman @tone.
 
user227867
And I wanted to watch Mirrors 2 but is was too scary so I turned it off lol.
 
12:54 AM
@WillHunting You don't have to watch it you know. I just answered because you asked.
 
@WillHunting if the pen is mightier than the sword, then a dictionary is a blue print for unimaginably terrible weapons
 
user227867
@Tonepoet Yes I know =)
 
user227867
@Mitch This one is 2800 pages.
 
user227867
@Tonepoet I think Chambers was very nice to reply to me in 1 day. Oxford and Collins no reply for 1 week =)
 
user227867
So guys, I suggest you buy from Chambers since they are sooooooo nice =)
 
1:06 AM
Or you can drop the big book on someone's head
Leaves no bruises
@WillHunting their words are the best
 
1:28 AM
@WillHunting I saw your previous clips. This one is new
 
So I just received Oxford Additions Series No. 1 in the mail today. Apparently a pistol is "Someone blustering, eccentric in appearance, or otherwise peculiar." And here I thought it was a hot pastrami sandwich!
 
That's awfully specific.
 
Well the additions series just adds stuff to the second edition. The second edition was published in 1987. The first two volumes of the additions series were published in '93 and the third was published in 1997 before they stopped updating it.
 
That explains so much
 
1:44 AM
Beefalo is a word according to Oxford.
 
1:55 AM
"A cross-bred livestock animal that is three-eighths bison and five-eighths domestic cow." They cite the National Observer, Daily Colonist, Scientific American, Animal Production XXX and New Yorker as using it, with citations ranging from '74 to '86. There are so many things about this entry that earn my consternation, but most of all, I think it's the fact that it isn't the meat of said animal that really grabs me.
 
Zombie cows
 
2:15 AM
@tchrist Zombeefalo: A delicious but deadly hybrid of rotting burger flesh that wants to eat your brain with an identity crisis.
 
BSE
Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), commonly known as mad cow disease, is a fatal neurodegenerative disease (encephalopathy) in cattle that causes a spongy degeneration of the brain and spinal cord. BSE has a long incubation period, of 2.5 to 5 years, usually affecting adult cattle at a peak age onset of four to five years, all breeds being equally susceptible. BSE is caused by a misfolded protein—a prion. In the United Kingdom, the country worst affected by an epidemic in 1986–1998, more than 180,000 cattle were infected and 4.4 million slaughtered during the eradication program. The disease...
 
@tchrist That's actually quite interesting to know that Mad Cow Disease has a more formal name and a little more about it than the media sensationalism. Regardless, I must ask, does it cause an identity crisis? =P
 
Chronic wasting disease (CWD) is a transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) of mule deer, white-tailed deer, elk (or "wapiti"), and moose ("elk" in Europe). To date, CWD has only been found in members of the deer family. First recognized as a clinical "wasting" syndrome in 1967 in mule deer in a wildlife research facility in northern Colorado, USA, it was identified as a TSE in 1978 and has spread to free-ranging and captive populations in 23 US states and two Canadian provinces. CWD is typified by chronic weight loss leading to death. No relationship is known between CWD and any other TSE...
 
2:44 AM
@tchrist It seems like eating nervous tissue is never a good idea.
 
I always recommend against consuming uneasy kleenex.
 
@tchrist So if it's unbranded tissues, or easy kleenex, it's fine then right? >_>
 
And while I did live in England during a time when the cow supply was unsafe, I lucked out by being chaste as a Brahman carnally.
 
@tchrist That's a strange collocation of chaste and carnal.
 
@Tonepoet Two words: monkey brains.
 
2:52 AM
@tchrist Hmm, I concede I should've gotten that one to be honest. I'm not sure if my response would've been much different though.
 
@Tonepoet Carne by default means carne de vaca in Spanish.
 
@tchrist A default implies alternative contextual interpretations.
 
Unqualified.
 
@tchrist After being given the tour, I must admit that I am a trespasser here. =P
 
We are all of us but passersby, feeble flames flickering in the darkness of eternity.
 
3:03 AM
@tchrist I thought that was just those of us who were eaten by otherworldly demons. =P
 
Out out brief candle.
It's late Saturday night.
Time to say goodnight to my family and go to bed.
 
user227867
@tchrist Good night. See you in your dreams.
 
@tchrist G'night.
 
user227867
Too late, I said it first so I win. =)
 
@WillHunting What's the booby prize?
 
user227867
3:15 AM
I think I am very childish. Don't you think so?
 
user227867
@Tonepoet Hmm, booby sounds like...
 
A booby prize is a joke prize usually given in recognition of a terrible performance or last-place finish. A person who finishes last, for example, may receive a booby prize such as a worthless coin. Booby prizes are sometimes jokingly coveted as an object of pride. Booby prizes may also be given as consolation prizes to all non-placing participants of a competition. == Origin == The word "boob" stems from the Spanish bobo meaning stupid, which in turn came from the Latin balbus meaning stammering; the word booby to mean dunce appeared in 1599. Booby prize literally means "idiot's prize". The OED...
 
user227867
A wooden spoon is a spoon made from wood, usually given to an individual or team which has come last in a competition, but sometimes also to runners-up. Examples range from the academic to sporting and more frivolous events. The term is of British origin and has spread to other Commonwealth countries. == Wooden spoon at the University of Cambridge == The wooden spoon was presented originally at the University of Cambridge as a kind of booby prize awarded by the students to the man who achieved the lowest exam marks but still earned a third-class degree (a junior optime) in the Mathematical Tripos...
 
user227867
Maybe Oxford and Collins will both reply next week, and give me a free set of all their language dictionaries for my constructive feedback.
 
user227867
@Cerberus Perfection is an asymptote. We approach it but never reach it. Like terminal velocity of a falling body.
 
user227867
3:21 AM
I think the Macquarie Dictionary really is the authority on Australian English. I have seen it mentioned in several places now.
 
user227867
It's not sold anywhere except in Australia and Australian online stores, it seems.
 
user227867
I think the two sellers will get back to me on Monday when they go back to work.
 
@WillHunting That brings new meaning to the words spoony bard. Here's a printed article on the subject
 
user227867
The three year course in Cambridge for math majors is the most rigorous course in the world I have come across, though not necessarily the hardest.
 
user227867
In three years, you essentially get exposed to almost every branch of math, twice or thrice as much as the average American university.
 
user227867
3:30 AM
If you want to go to college to study math, perhaps you can talk to me. =)
 
user227867
Of course, until now, I don't know anything about you, not even a name. =)
 
user227867
Goodnight @tone see you in your dreams.
 
3:51 AM
TIL: Music Fans.SE allows lyric interpretation! Now we can easily suggest another site for anyone asking for music interpretation here.
 
@curiousdannii I'm not sure how to feel about it. That sounds like a good thing on first impression but if those questions are too subjective for us, what makes their stack exchange much better for it? Maybe it's the fact that you can probably reference a song writer's personal interpretation?
 
@Tonepoet I'm sure it's a terrible thing for them to allow. Maybe if we migrate questions there we can help them realise that? ;)
Or maybe they do just want their site to be more subjective than most.
 
@curiousdannii Hmm, well the subjectivity policies are network-wide policies, but hey, that's not our problem, so sure!
 
They do have guidelines on how those questions should be answered: meta.musicfans.stackexchange.com/q/63/3040
 
 
1 hour later…
5:07 AM
Somebody call an 🚑 because I think I'm going to faint: Unicode has become ridiculous. What 🃏 decided to put playing cards in it?
 
 
1 hour later…
6:27 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive body detected: My baby girl name is hoor but there is a problem by CS Geek on english.stackexchange.com
 
 
1 hour later…
user227867
7:47 AM
@Tonepoet People can just reference anyone else and then it would be 'objective' even though the referred may be completely wrong. Maybe that is how Wiki or Stack works, I dunno.
 
user227867
:32808727 I have done some 'research' and found that indeed the New Revised Standard Version is the best version for biblical scholars who want an accurate translation. And the best version to get that comes with study notes is the New Oxford Annotated Bible.
 
user227867
Note that the New Revised Standard Version is NOT the Revised Standard Version. 'New' is particularly important in bible versions.
 
user227867
Of course, Oxford loves the word 'new' in all its glory.
 
Maybe that's what they meant when they said they wouldn't print the O.E.D. 3. Maybe it's going to come out and be called the N.O.E.D!
 
user227867
^-^
 
7:59 AM
It's a shame that The Oxford English Dictionary and Encyclopædia Britannica aren't going to be printed in book form anymore.
 
user227867
If I am rich, I will buy you the 20 volume OED as a Christmas present.
 
Oh please no. I have no room for that.
 
user227867
Don't worry. I am poor.
 
Hehe, phew...
 
user227867
Alternatively, you can take part in Countdown UK and win the first prize which is the 20 volume OED =P
 
8:04 AM
A leatherbound copy of the full O.E.D. sounds special.
 
user227867
I think it is excessive. Hardback will do. I don't like leather anyway, and it kills the animals for a poor reason.
 
user227867
If you are rich you could buy me the Oxford Paravia Italian Dictionary. =P
 
I wonder if that's the only reason those animals get killed.
 
user227867
The OUP website is very badly done.
 
user227867
Books are not classified properly and titles are not entered properly.
 
user227867
8:09 AM
Lazy bums.
 
user227867
This of course has nothing to do with the lexicographers or authors.
 
user227867
But I expect more from a world renowned name.
 
user227867
Now the CUP website is very well done.
 
user227867
Cambridge beats Oxford in everything, except dictionaries, largely because they don't publish many dictionaries in the first place.
 
They decided to tackle the grammar instead, but I think the Farlex Grammar Book series might be an interesting thing to buy also. Farlex is owned by Princeton, if I recall correctly.
 
user227867
8:14 AM
You really need to see the Book Depository website. The new design I mentioned that day is so beautiful, just like Laura Ramsey.
 
Did they darken the purple?
 
user227867
I wonder who they got to design it. That person has a bright future. They removed the purple and made it light blue and pink.
 
user227867
Purple is my anti-favourite colour.
 
user227867
And the new fonts are delicious, long in shape and short in duration.
 
THe header still looks purple to me.
 
user227867
8:17 AM
Maybe I did not notice that part.
 
user227867
No, it does not look purple at all.
 
user227867
Maybe you need to refresh your browser, or the internet has not propagated to your abode yet.
 
user227867
The changes have arrived at my domicile already.
 
I cleared my cache.
 
user227867
Since you like Tibetan Buddhism, I have a present for you, hang on...
 
user227867
8:22 AM
 
user227867
Today's featured pic on Wiki =P
 
Hmm, interesting. I think my mother might like that.
 
user227867
Say hi to her for me, lol.
 
user227867
12:41 PM
Just had a huge dinner, lol.
 
2:32 PM
@WillHunting How huge?
Also dinner? I'm guessing you're Australian, or similar.
 
 
2 hours later…
4:25 PM
We should make primpeach a word.
 
It sounds a bit . . . hmm, can't explain why I don't like it
 
4:50 PM
:32813960 Huh, why deleted?
@TCh you deleted that semi-rant?
 
Yes.
Thrice.
 
O.O Oh.
 
Anonymous
5:50 PM
OxfordDictionaries.com now says "Oxford Living Dictionaries" on the top of the page.
 
Anonymous
I wish they'd just stick with one name which is clearly distinct from the OED.
 
@snailplane Aside from possibly being an acronym pronounced and spelled exactly like Old, don't they already use those initials for some other dictionary?
 
@Rubisco Old Smokey doesn't like some particular words which are perfectly OK in a context where they are the subject of discussion.
 
Anonymous
I'll just keep referring to the site by its domain name, I suppose. I rather liked the "Oxford Dictionaries Online" name. If we could all call the site "ODO" without confusing anyone, it'd be nice.
 
Anonymous
@Tonepoet Well, there's the OALD.
 
5:54 PM
@snailplane I use ODO in links. I don't intend to stop.
 
@snailplane Oh right! That's it.
 
Anonymous
@AndrewLeach That's fine, although it's probably opaque to outsiders, given that that's not its actual name.
 
@AndrewLeach I knowz
 
> Not that I even care.
> How did you know I was even here?
This non-comparative use of even sounds a bit curious to me.
 
Anonymous
@Færd Yeah, sometimes I totally can't even.
 
Anonymous
5:56 PM
Sorry, I misspoke. Sometimes I literally can't even.
 
But I here it occasionally.
 
Anonymous
@Færd It sounds perfectly normal to me. I think the use of even is expanding a bit, though.
 
Anonymous
It's taken me a while to get used to expressions like "What even is that?"
 
Yeah it seems so.
 
Anonymous
Your examples are part of my natively acquired English, but I think there are some newer uses that are just now catching on.
 
Anonymous
6:01 PM
Even is often described as a scalar additive particle, a kind of focus particle.
 
@snailplane Like "What even is that?"?
How is it differently used from those in my examples?
 
Anonymous
@Færd Yes, I think that is newer. It's not part of the English I acquired as a child, and it sounded wrong to me when I first heard it.
 
Anonymous
But it's common enough now that it's stopped sounding wrong to me.
 
Anonymous
@Færd Good question! :-)
 
:)
 
Anonymous
6:04 PM
What sort of usage is that, even?
 
I would suggest checking to see if the definition is in the Oxford Dictionary of English, and at least use the O.D.E. initials so that if the definition ever goes offline, somebody has a some chance of verifying the definition at the library.

I've been actually hoping to make similar edits (fully spelled out, with the edition number) once I get the privilege to do unsupervised edits when I see answers in the future, although I'm not the boss of anybody and I'll try to avoid doing that for your own answers if you're so dead set against it... (or at all if you say within your authority as a
 
Anonymous
@Tonepoet That is exactly what I do, except that if I write ODE, I try to always spell it out as well.
 
Anonymous
I would personally prefer to have references to sources be as transparent as possible. ODO seems somewhat opaque to me without further explanation.
 
What's the "Oxford Dictionary of English"?
 
Anonymous
That's the main dictionary you can access via OxfordDictionaries.com.
 
Anonymous
6:06 PM
It has an American English version called the NOAD (New Oxford American Dictionary), and that is accessible through the same site.
 
@snailplane I called it non-comparative, because I used to think that even has a hidden comparison inside of it. Both my examples and yours are non-comparative.
 
Anonymous
But although there are some not insignificant differences between the two, the ODE and NOAD are substantially the same dictionary.
 
@AndrewLeach It's this.
 
Too similar to "Oxford English Dictionary".
 
Anonymous
Nonetheless, that is the actual name of the dictionary.
 
6:06 PM
@AndrewLeach Yeah, Oxford University Press is just horrible at naming books.
 
Anonymous
@Tonepoet It's true.
 
Anonymous
Not that that failing is exclusive to Oxford.
 
You say terrible, I say horrible.
Cambridge sucks too.
 
Anonymous
How many people do you suppose know the difference between the Cambridge Grammar of the English Language and the Cambridge Grammar of English?
 
Anonymous
@Cerberus Yes!
 
Anonymous
6:07 PM
They sure do.
 
@Cerberus Fix'd.
 
@snailplane Exactly.
 
Anonymous
Worse: if someone refers to one of those two books as The Cambridge Grammar, which one do you suppose they mean?
 
@Tonepoet Haha no, both adjectives are appropriate.
 
Anonymous
(Not a hypothetical question, since they really do.)
 
6:08 PM
Yeah.
It's commercialese.
 
> Please note that not all features available on the former site are included as part of this update
The screwed it up a bit. I'm not sure why.
 
Anonymous
@Færd Have you read Conventional Implicature (Karttunen and Peters 1979)?
 
No.
 
Anonymous
It'll give a starting point for talking about even.
 
6:12 PM
And its newer uses?
I suppose not. The book is not that recent itself.
 
Anonymous
No, that's why I called it a starting point :-)
 
I'm not sure I can read it all right now, but thanks.
 
Anonymous
But I think it might get you a bit closer than the 'comparative' idea.
 
@Færd I can't be sure but I suspect they had some free content, other than dictionary content, that they may want to remove because of money.
 
@snailplane Comparative was a bad word. I don't know how to name it.
Now you would say: that's why I suggested the book!
@Tonepoet Yeah, probably.
 
6:22 PM
@Færd Snail doesn't do that. She just stays silent until we realize she's right
 
I bet she thought of it at least. I just wanted to lift the burden and say it myself.
 
user227867
6:57 PM
@snailplane Maybe it is still called Oxford Dictionaries online by them. Maybe the new words don't mean the official title has changed.
 
user227867
@snailplane I hope they drop the New in the next edition. They should drop New in all their book titles once it appears in one edition to tell readers that it is quite different from the previous one.
 
user227867
@Rubisco I need to keep my location a secret for reasons I need to keep secret. For all chat purposes I live in Antarctica.
 
user227867
@Rubisco Huge like two people's servings.
 
Oh man, I can't wait for Dunkirk to be out
 
user227867
It's so silly they ban Da Vinci Code, and Angels and Demons in some countries. Maybe they will do that for Inferno too, to be released late this month.
 
user227867
7:03 PM
It is clear that Da Vinci Code et al is a work of fiction. It never claims otherwise. Why ban religious fiction? Maybe the religion itself is a fiction too? I can't stand these authoritarian governing bodies. They are making the world a stupid place.
 
I wish they were the only people making this world a stupid place.
 
user227867
That's why I always say there will be shit in this world until I take over, but they, the ones who are addicted to power, will never let that happen, so this world is finished, in some sense.
 
user227867
Now now, those people will ask me if I have thought of the consequences of not banning it in those countries. And the answer is yes, I have, and I also have ways to deal with any possible bad situation that might arise. I have thought through it from A to Z for many years. They have only thought about it during lunchtime.
 
No they haven't
They're too apathetic for that
 
user227867
If you are bored, you may listen to my latest masterpiece which I made today youtube.com/watch?v=I1d7ddj8XjU
 
7:12 PM
Oh, I'd love to, but I'm supposed to be studying so I have speakers off.
Whispering Don't tell anyone
 
user227867
OK. If you are studying you should go offline.
 
I'm not studying studying. I know this stuff I'm supposed to be studying.
So I chat instead.
 
user227867
I apologise for shamelessly promoting my 'masterpieces'. I just thought it's silly if I were the only one in the world to view them over and over again.
 
I know I can find it and listen to it if I search for 'masterpiece' later. :)
 
user227867
They are not meant to be of professional standard, but more of a personal hobby and distraction.
 
user227867
7:17 PM
@snailplane I know you are an expert in buying dictionaries. If you know where I can buy a brand new copy of the Oxford Paravia Italian Dictionary, Third Edition, 2010 at a reasonable price, like below 100 USD excluding shipping, please let me know. It is now selling for thousands of dollars in several places.
 
Anonymous
7:32 PM
@WillHunting Well, if they consider Oxford Dictionaries Online to be the official title of their website, they're doing a really good job of keeping it a secret.
 
8:12 PM
@WillHunting I can't find reference to the ODO abbreviation on their website anymore. They used to have it on their differences between the OED and Oxford Dictionaries Online webpage, if I recall correctly, but I can't find that webpage anymore and webpages I see on the matter now do not use the ODO abbreviation.
Do you have a U.R.L. for that webpage I can plug into the wayback machine? I want to update our abbreviations list.
 
 
2 hours later…
9:52 PM
@Cerberus Nice verbs.
Although I don't know how stridet starts with a C.
 
I guess they couldn't find a suitable verb. Rather like having to choose between xylophone and x-ray these days.
 
@AndrewLeach xenon
 
An odourless colourless gas is a bit difficult on an alphabet chart!
 
Oh. Yes. I'm sure there's some obscure bird that starts with 'x'
 
Possibly. H could be illustrated with a hummingbird but labelled Huitzilopochtli.
 
user227867
10:40 PM
Don't all birds hum?
 
user227867
This room is one with a very high proportion of users present who are also moderators.
 
user227867
There are currently 6 mods in this room on a boring Sunday.
 
user227867
By the way, are the autogenerated gravatars still randomly changing?
 
user227867
Hey @Tonepoet do you have any recommendation for me for a dictionary of English usage?
 
user227867
@Tonepoet I see you are approaching 2000. =)
 
user227867
11:01 PM
-4
Q: Why are people at stackoverflow rude

stack overflowEven most of the moderators are rude, nearly all the users except of a few noble people (like a fish surrounded by sharks) think they know everything and what the heck do you mean by please give us high level questions. Your site says that meaningful questions contribute to the society not tough ...

 
11:24 PM
@tchrist Why should it start with a c?
But very nice! Where did you find that? Is there more?
I've found it.
 
11:52 PM
@Cerberus The letters on the right hand column.
But it's for Cicada, not for stridet.
 
No, it is for the sound, not the verb or the name.
 
The hoopoe /ˈhuːpuː/ (Upupa epops) is a colourful bird found across Afro-Eurasia, notable for its distinctive "crown" of feathers. It is the only extant species in the family Upupidae. One insular species, the Saint Helena hoopoe, is extinct, and the Madagascar subspecies of the hoopoe is sometimes elevated to a full species. Upupa and epops are respectively the Latin and Ancient Greek names for the hoopoe; both, like the English name, are onomatopoeic forms which imitate the cry of the bird. == Taxonomy and systematics == The hoopoe was classified in the clade Coraciiformes, which also includes...
Not one of ours
 
It's either Latin or Czech, or both.
 

« first day (2159 days earlier)      last day (2757 days later) »