« first day (419 days earlier)      last day (4798 days later) » 

19:00
It really is a shame, because America has so many good things.
rolls eyes, snuggles up with blanky, gets back to writing code
Jez
Jez
I wonder what Christopher Hitchens would've made of the latest NDAA and Obama's agreement with it.
Aww.
Jez
Jez
i think i can predict.
@Kitḫ Hey my country sucks too!
In different ways.
19:01
It's not that bad.
Jez
Jez
@Cerberus yeah. stop getting more conservative!! :-(
@Jez Yeah does anyone know why on earth big O. didn't veto it?
Jez
Jez
@Cerberus sure. he supports it.
@Jez Yeah we're trying!
@Cerberus Because despite what everyone seems to think, Obama's a centrist.
19:02
But Wilder will never get close to a majority, luckily.
Jez
Jez
@Kit ahem. bullshit.
@Kitḫ Oh, I know. But is this new law centrist?
Jez
Jez
@Kit well, unless we're just randomly defining 'centrist'
It seemed extremist to me, but perhaps that is an outsider's perspective.
My eyes don't need this kind of exercise.
Jez
Jez
19:02
in which case, yeah, he's a centrist, hitler was a centrist, Mao was a centrist, etc.
Oh please.
@Jez Nonsense.
That's just stupid.
Jez, you are the extremist here.
Jez
Jez
well you've got to admit that word has very little meaning.
19:03
Taking extreme view points.
Obama is more moderate than Dubya.
It means in the centre of the current political spectrum in one's country.
Jez
Jez
'centrist' just means that you're in the centre of the political mainstream around you. if that mainstream is insane, you're insane.
Obama is that, more or less, though he is probably a bit to the left of the centre.
Jez
Jez
@Kit and yet dubya didn't sign the latest NDAA, or agree to SOPA.
19:04
@Jez Sure. But neither Hitler nor Mao were that.
Gosh, of course not. He's not in power anymore.
@Jez I really wonder why Obama won't veto either.
I would not have been surprised if Bush had let those bills pass.
@Cerberus It's a concession to the Rs.
@Kitḫ But why make such huge concessions?
because Obama is not actually notably more leftist than Dubya on security issues
19:05
@JSBᾶngs Apparently not; and that is what surprises me.
Tru dat, @JSB.
the expectations of the left that Obama was the second coming of Ghandi were completely unrealistic from the start
@JSBᾶngs Sure; but is vetoing these bills so much to expect?
Both would be extreme, extreme right here.
i don't even think that the Rs are making Obama do this stuff. have they even made any major noise about it?
all of the GOP energy is spent protecting tax cuts these days
Not that I know.
Jez
Jez
19:07
watch the latest The Young Turks reports.
they tell it as it is
Hey I keep wondering what their background is.
They usually seem reasonable people.
Jez
Jez
Obama is, at heart, rather tyrannical. he wants the power to just detain citizens on a whim and has carried out a propoganda campaign to make it look like he is 'reluctantly' agreeing to it
Well, I don't disagree with NDAA.
Huh?
It is presented as an extremist military law here.
@Cerberus don't believe anything you hear on TV/radio/whatever
19:10
The army can detain and try people without an official civilian prsecution.
Well, given that it has been enacted for the last 49 years, I think it's probably not that evil.
@JSBᾶngs We have some good reporters here, and the text of the bill is public.
Jez
Jez
@Kit you do know it changes from year to year
@Kit you might as well say that they enact laws every year so no laws are that evil
@Jez Yes, I am well aware.
@Kitḫ Public opinion here is that America tortures prisoners, and criminals will not be extradited to America in many cases, because Dutch judges consider the American justice system unfair for certain crimes.
Notably drugs and terrorism, and anything that one could get sentenced to death for.
19:12
> Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States.
Jez
Jez
in the United States
We may torture detainees, but not prisoners.
Jez
Jez
not outside.
So what do I care about outside?
Jez
Jez
so, don't go on holiday outside the US.
19:13
Well, I can judge this bill myself; I'd need to read it all and know more about the system.
I don't care if the US detains you indefinitely.
But the papers here say that even the American army was against it, or at least many senior people in it.
well, i care that the US not detain Jez indefinitely
Jez
Jez
troll Kit is trolly
@JSBᾶngs Aww.
19:14
but i still doubt that this is actually the end of the world
@Jez Outside the US is arguably outside our jurisdiction, nitwit.
It probably won't be.
Jez
Jez
@Kit this act says they can get you arrested, bring you home, and that section applies to you because you were not arrested in the US
But what the CIA and the army are allowed to do in secret prisons in Europe and Cuba is, I think, close to the end of the world.
Well, I'm glad I live in Europe and close to Germany.
Jez
Jez
@Cerberus im kind of glad i live in Europe and not the US too, now.
19:17
Though of course the practical consequences for most ordinary people will be slight, for now.
Jez
Jez
i wonder how much Canada will be dragged into this kind of shit.
@Jez shrugs only if Obama says so, otherwise not.
@Jez Yeah, but I'd rather live on this side of the Channel!
Jez
Jez
@Kit or maybe Santorum, if he's next.
lol. Santorum has no chance at all.
19:18
Lol.
Jez
Jez
not that Obama is particularly sensible. he thinks locking people up for possessing weed is just fine
You said santorum.
i'm calling it now: 2012 will be Obama v. Romney, and Obama will win by 6 points
@Jez I think Canada's PM is quite a right-winger, isn't he?
Jez
Jez
then i returned to Obama
@Cerberus at the moment, alas, yes
19:18
@JSBᾶngs I agree.
What's the spread on the election @JSB?
Jez
Jez
@Cerberus canada could be effectively annexed as part of the US, in law
@Kitḫ what do you mean?
should we start a pool?
Yeah, let's.
@Jez Ehh...
19:19
Anyway, I think there's no reason to get panties knotted over it.
Jez
Jez
well, if they're ok with breaking the constitution and putting military to work on the government's whim INSIDE the US, why not in canada?
canada doesnt really have the force to resist them
Canada is useless.
Why would we want Canada?
Canada is adorable and full of moose!
don't they have polar bear mounted cavalry robots 10000 strong?
that's reason enough to annex it
19:20
By the way, the first thing that should change is that candidates should not be allowed to take any money from third parties in their campaigns over a certain (low) limit, say € 1 million.
Jez
Jez
@JSBngs and mousse
They are adorable, but I don't want to support them!
@Cerberus we already have a law to that effect. what happens is that third parties run ads and events for a particular candidate without ever giving them money
@Cerberus THat's a nice thought, but there are so many ways around it.
Jez
Jez
@Cerberus 1 million? are you kidding? in the UK they're suggesting £10k, and I think that's too high.
19:21
Like JSB said.
Jez
Jez
@JSBngs that's the ruling where the supreme court said that money was speech?
@Jez that's only part of it
@JSBᾶngs Well, there is no stopping that. But then how come it works here?
I don't know the details.
Jez
Jez
@JSBngs and im not sure what you mean there anyway. companies give politicians ENORMOUS donations.
@Cerberus Why do you think it doesn't work here?
19:22
Oops doorbell, bye!
@Cerberus what works there?
Jez
Jez
@JSBngs presumably campaign finance limits
@Kitḫ why do we think campaign finance limits don't work in a country where the president is looking to raise $1bn in private donations next election cycle?
@Jez Yeah, sure.
What's wrong with that?
Jez
Jez
people donating large amounts of money will infuence/corrupt politicians.
i don't want a system with financially influenced/corrupted politicians.
So how else should the campaigns be financed?
And does that mean you are OK with $1bn from 300 million donors?
Jez
Jez
19:27
yes. but it won't be that.
Because the total amount raised really doesn't mean anything. The limits are on the individual donations.
Jez
Jez
there should be a low limit on individual donations, companies should not be allowed to donate, and most funding should come from taxation.
So who cares about the total, unless you think he's going to have one person donate that much?
Jez
Jez
if they can't spend shitloads on TV ads, that's a feature, not a bug.
i think he's going to have a few people and companies donate most of it.
I don't want to finance political campaigns.
Jez
Jez
19:28
well, i disagree with you. the alternative sucks far more.
Disagree all you like. You can't do anything about it anyway.
Jez
Jez
nor can you, or anyone without vast amounts of money.
I can, and have done, far more to affect American legislation that you ever have or ever will.
And I am poor as dirt.
So that is why I feel that you, and people like you who just want to sit on their porch and throw stones, are full of shit.
Jez
Jez
what have you done? heh.
Well, we blocked a bill that would tax child care providers.
And several others that would have impinged on workers' rights to organize.
I am pretty sleepy right now, but I can look up the details for you later.
What have you done?
Oh right, also passed legislation to provide tax credits to citizens who are paying student loans from state universities and trade schools.
Jez
Jez
19:36
who is 'we'?
My husband and I and others.
Some unions, some other grassroots organizations.
None of us is anywhere close to the 1%.
But you still haven't told me what you've done.
Jez
Jez
why do you care about stuff outside the US?
I don't.
But all I've heard you do is bitch.
Jez
Jez
you sure it isn't just that all you've heard is "bitch"?
I'm sorry. Did I misread somewhere? All I see are questions that deflect the one I asked.
Jez
Jez
19:42
i don't need to deflect an imbecilic, rhetorical question
i just watch it squelch on the floor
It's not rhetorical. It's a simple question. Why can't you answer it?
Jez
Jez
read above.
Pansy.
@Jez You asked it of her in the first place.
Anybody here?
19:51
Hi @Sonic!
@SonicTheHedgehog Oh hello!
EL&U is out right now, please come back later. this is an automated message
@MattЭллен Thanks Matt.
@Mahnax Yo.
19:52
@SonicTheHedgehog When do you go back to school?
Whats wrong with ELU lately?
@Mah Already did.
not enough chocolate sprinkles?
Kit's grumpy?
@MAtt I thought it WAS automated message?!
@SonicTheHedgehog Oh, then you're at it right now?
19:53
@Kit why?
@Mah just came back.
@SonicTheHedgehog Stuff and/or things. Remains to evaluated.
@Kit Boss mean to you?
@SonicTheHedgehog now is later :D
@SonicTheHedgehog No.
@Kit I'll be sure to send him ghost or two...
19:54
@SonicTheHedgehog Aw, thanks.
@Matt splutters
So, any interesting stories lately?
@SonicTheHedgehog Well, if you scroll up a little...
I'm no gossiper, but I'm bored...
Let's play a game!
19:56
ahh, just saw the news about Obama
What shall we play?
what game?
He broke his promise I think?
Let me get a link...
No, not another minute mysteries.
What? Politicians breaking promises? That never happens.
Looks like four for Russian roulette
19:56
I had nightmares last night.
alas I only have one bullet
@MattЭллен It's better with six.
Oh, I'm in for a game.
Robusto just HAD to bring up pictures of Twin headed Taiwanese.
Yeah, that was creepy.
19:57
I had a nightmare, it was invasion of Siamses twins.
@Kitḫ Because I'm in it!
Couldn't go to sleep until 4:00 AM.
I blame him for me sleeping in at Science class.
@Mahnax Well, Canada is nice, but I don't feel the need to possess it.
:(
Russian Roulette?
I really like what they've done with their gays.
19:58
Just read about it yesterday...
@Kitḫ We do have adorable moose though.
where the board spins you!
So, what do you do, spin clips around, chuck it into pistol, and shoot?
Nice.
@Mahnax And let's not forget the noble beaver.
@SonicTheHedgehog No, no. You need a revolver.
In Soviet Russia, Russian Roulette Spins YOU.
19:59
rolls eyes
@SonicTheHedgehog normally you use a six shooter revolver, put one bullet in it and spin the chamber

« first day (419 days earlier)      last day (4798 days later) »