The other day I read that the scientists of the world were working on creating yet another pointless millenium bug hysteria, because the last pointless millenium bug hysteria is a while ago.
And the Unamerican scientists of the world counter, "um, if you can't remember now all the things that you must keep an eye on and update because of a leap second, then how does it help to try and remember them all in a hundred years?"
It's a funny little argument those funnly little scientists are having. Unfunny big tax money at work.
@RegDwigнt I was very impressed with the kid when I watched that movie so I'd been keeping an eye out for him. It's nice to get leading actors who can actually act for a change (I'm looking at you Keanu)
@Robusto No! He did not act in the matrix. He was just about acceptable because he didn't need to show any emotion. He just stood around throwing religious propaganda and sappy cliches through all the gaping plot holes.
I've seen people who looked exactly the same in Film 1 and Film 2, and completely failed to connect them because they were playing completely different personalities.
I've seen him in three different places, and didn't connect them at all. And he wasn't wearing a disguise in any of them. You probably wouldn't have that problem with Keanu.
@FaheemMitha No, 'cause he doesn't act, you know, that thing where you change the way your face looks and body moves and try to impersonate a character?
But if you want this discussion to get all serious, then I will point out that Bryan Cranston does play a wide range of roles, not just dentists all over and over and over again.
@RegDwigнt Yes, I saw that. I remember a review which pointed out that having Barry Watson and Helen Mirren in the same film was cruel and unusual punishment towards Barry.
Not to mention the other young things acting alongside.
And Leger is an actor from another movie altogether, California Dream.
@Robusto I myself like to put my mind at ease with that thought, and yet somewhere deep down it knows that that isn't true. If you look at Nolan's last three movies, he's simply caught the same virus Peter Jackson got from George Lucas.
"Keep making all things ever grander, with no understanding whatsoever of why the little things we did worked".
The buck stops here: No letter s on this acronym....EVER! It's probably ok to "s" it on some occasions - particularly possessive ones; "His RBIs have come in bunches". For sanity's sake though, lets drop the s forever because no thing sounds goofier than to hear a broadcaster say, "Batting 270 wi...
@Robusto It sucked because it relied on momentum from the dark knight and reintroduced a villain we previously saw chauffeuring Poison Ivy in that batman movie with Arnold The Terminator
For example, if I wanted to write the equivalent of
There are many automated teller machines in this city.
Would it be
There are many ATMs in this city.
or
There are many ATM's in this city.
(could get confused with possessive form or contraction).
or just
There are many...
@Nick right, now can you count all the ways in which saying that is radically different from saying "The Chicago Manual of Style omits the apostrophe, unless there are periods in the abbreviation"?
@Robusto Mayakovsky was so disappointed with not getting enough attention, he held an exhibition titled "20 years of work", at the age of 30, then killed himself. I say bravo. Not everyone can pull off that kind of stunt.
@Nick then you haven't read the answer to the canonical question, or what I was saying, or what you were saying. :))
@Nick this room didn't fail the quick question test. This room answers quick questions all day long, every day, for five years. So obviously it must be you who have failed. This will be in future used to generate a rank list of you.
But only in the future for I have to mute commies now.